Are we ever going to get an FAQ on Eidolons being dismissed with gear?

[TurquoiseMouse]

The only rulings I have found are by James Jacobs (http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2l7ns&page=298?Ask-James-Jacobs-ALL-your-Q uestions-Here#14851), which I have recently been told are not the best source...

There is so much back and forth, so many arguments and disagreements, is there a reason we aren't getting an FAQ, especially for PFS where rules like this are so important?

[BigNorseWolf]

This doesn't interact with PFS rules. Unless they want to start using the PFS faq as a back door for a more agile and responsive faq process, they're going to have to wait for the design team to get to it through the regular process.

[TurquoiseMouse]

BigNorseWolf wrote:

This doesn't interact with PFS rules. Unless they want to start using the PFS faq as a back door for a more agile and responsive faq process, they're going to have to wait for the design team to get to it through the regular process.

if i am understanding you right, it will hit the main FAQ long before it would come to the PFS FAQ?

[BigNorseWolf]

TurqoiseMouse wrote:

BigNorseWolf wrote:

This doesn't interact with PFS rules. Unless they want to start using the PFS faq as a back door for a more agile and responsive faq process, they're going to have to wait for the design team to get to it through the regular process.

if i am understanding you right, it will hit the main FAQ long before it would come to the PFS FAQ?

They're different things.

The PFS team is generally faster, but far more limited. And this is really in the regular design teams bailiwick.

PFS faq's are MOSTLY for things that interact with PFS specific rules, or that call for a DM's call that would lead to too much table variation. There's also some realy obvious fixes, as well as fixes to the player companion line, which do not get errata'd.

IE, there's no crafting, so alchemists don't get brew potion, so they get extra bombs.

This is something about the eidolon itself: how the eidolon can be used for baggage storage in the regular rules and in PFS are exactly the same so it should go to the regular rules team.

Probably

I am very tired now...

[TurquoiseMouse]

BigNorseWolf wrote:

TurqoiseMouse wrote:

BigNorseWolf wrote:

This doesn't interact with PFS rules. Unless they want to start using the PFS faq as a back door for a more agile and responsive faq process, they're going to have to wait for the design team to get to it through the regular process.

if i am understanding you right, it will hit the main FAQ long before it would come to the PFS FAQ?

They're different things.

The PFS team is generally faster, but far more limited. And this is really in the regular design teams bailiwick.

PFS faq's are MOSTLY for things that interact with PFS specific rules, or that call for a DM's call that would lead to too much table variation. There's also some realy obvious fixes, as well as fixes to the player companion line, which do not get errata'd.

IE, there's no crafting, so alchemists don't get brew potion, so they get extra bombs.

This is something about the eidolon itself: how the eidolon can be used for baggage storage in the regular rules and in PFS are exactly the same so it should go to the regular rules team.

Probably

I am very tired now...

Okay, I will move this over the the main forum, thanks for telling me ^_^