Tabletop Giant |
Things like this get confusing because I believe somethings do actually combine. If you have levels in two classes, and both of those classes provide a familiar, then isn't your familiar's level based on the sum of the two?
That may be an exception based upon the fact you may only have a single familiar no matter what.
BigNorseWolf |
Things like this get confusing because I believe somethings do actually combine. If you have levels in two classes, and both of those classes provide a familiar, then isn't your familiar's level based on the sum of the two?That may be an exception based upon the fact you may only have a single familiar no matter what.
It only stacks when it says it stacks (and you expressly can't stack stats)
Tabletop Giant |
Two things...
This should be on the rules forum.
And
This is like a fighter & barbarian both having martial weapon proficiency.... But a fighter/barbarian doesn't get Exotic because he has it twice.
I think another good example is a positive channeling cleric and a life oracle with the channel revelation; they do not merge, and instead turn into two separate channel pools with (potentially) two different # of dice involved.
At least, I think it does.
Finlanderboy |
nosig wrote:Two things...
This should be on the rules forum.
And
This is like a fighter & barbarian both having martial weapon proficiency.... But a fighter/barbarian doesn't get Exotic because he has it twice.I think another good example is a positive channeling cleric and a life oracle with the channel revelation; they do not merge, and instead turn into two separate channel pools with (potentially) two different # of dice involved.
At least, I think it does.
You are correct. Same with a paladin and those as well.