Asmodean advocate stipulates that I can only have 1 domain, and it must be trickery. Evangelist simply says that I can only have 1 domain.
They both alter the Domains class feature, and so cannot be combined. How they change their Domains is irrelevant, only that they do so matters.
Contributor
|
Asmodean advocate stipulates that I can only have 1 domain, and it must be trickery. Evangelist simply says that I can only have 1 domain.They both alter the Domains class feature, and so cannot be combined. How they change their Domains is irrelevant, only that they do so matters.
This is correct, as clarified by a semi-recent FAQ.
That said, you could always check with your GM and explain the situation. Your GM may be willing to house-rule it, since (as you pointed out) you can meet the requirements of both. In fact, the FAQ even recommends that GMs remain open to house-ruling this way.
It's worth a shot. ^_^
However, in this case, each Archetype gives up a Domain. This seems to be a clear case of "no." Or the end result is zero domains.
|
However, in this case, each Archetype gives up a Domain. This seems to be a clear case of "no." Or the end result is zero domains.
It wouldn't be zero domains. Neither says you get one less domain, they both say you only get one, a very noticeable difference. This would easily be a GM handwave since neither actually affects the other.
However, in this case, each Archetype gives up a Domain. This seems to be a clear case of "no." Or the end result is zero domains.It wouldn't be zero domains. Neither says you get one less domain, they both say you only get one, a very noticeable difference. This would easily be a GM handwave since neither actually affects the other.
Of course they are not supposed to be combined the intention was presumably to balance them with other class features the archetypes gain.
Usually the granted powers of a domain would be sacrificed and flexibility in preparing your domain spells. Stripping the granted power of both domains would be obvious, but stripping both domains completely would result in a complete loss of bonus spells.
I would either strip both domains or strip one domain and spontaneous inflict / cure feature (if the archetypes don't already take that (I don't know from the top of my head)
However, in this case, each Archetype gives up a Domain. This seems to be a clear case of "no." Or the end result is zero domains.It wouldn't be zero domains. Neither says you get one less domain, they both say you only get one, a very noticeable difference. This would easily be a GM handwave since neither actually affects the other.
The baseline state is two domains. The effect is each archetype has one less domain. Evangelist gives up one for bardic performances. Asmodeus Advocate gives up one for more skill points, a familiar that later becomes an improved familiar, and a cool versatile performance-like ability. If you were to overlap them, you would only "pay" the price once for two sets of class features.