Can a kinetic blast deal nonlethal damage?


Rules Questions


5 people marked this as FAQ candidate.
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

The Merciful Wood utility power of the phytokineticist (Occult Origins) says the following:

You can deal nonlethal damage, without taking a penalty on attack rolls with your wood blasts or composite blasts that include wood.

This seems to heavily imply that any kineticist can deal nonlethal damage with their kinetic blasts, provided they do take the standard -4 penalty to their attacks for dealing nonlethal damage.

Is this true, and if so, is it only limited to physical blasts that have attack rolls, or can energy blasts potentially deal nonlethal damage as well?


I would imagine it is only for the physical blasts. The ones dealing S, P or B damage. As these are effectively "weapon" attack rolls.

Unless spells can also deal non lethal damage. Which... would be kind of awesome!


Combat wrote:

Nonlethal Damage with a Weapon that Deals Lethal Damage

You can use a melee weapon that deals lethal damage to deal nonlethal damage instead, but you take a –4 penalty on your attack roll.

I don't think any kinetic blast is able to do nonlethal damage normally.

As for Kinetic blade/whip, maybe? It says use a melee weapon rather than wield. But I don't know about the energy types though.


Protoman wrote:
Combat wrote:

Nonlethal Damage with a Weapon that Deals Lethal Damage

You can use a melee weapon that deals lethal damage to deal nonlethal damage instead, but you take a –4 penalty on your attack roll.

I don't think any kinetic blast is able to do nonlethal damage normally.

As for Kinetic blade/whip, maybe? It says use a melee weapon rather than wield. But I don't know about the energy types though.

I think that Utility power seems to set a precedent that you could use them to deal Nonlethal damage with the standard -4 to attack; however, I think that it would be limited to only physical blasts. I cannot see doing Nonlethal damage with Fire Blast without a specific Wild Talent.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

We know that nonlethal energy damage is not a new thing at least. Brown mold deals nonlethal cold damage, as does severe cold weather.


Ravingdork wrote:
We know that nonlethal energy damage is not a new thing at least. Brown mold deals nonlethal cold damage, as does severe cold weather.

True, but those are specific exceptions. Most energy spells require a meta magic feat to deal Nonlethal. That's why I would think energy might require something along those lines as well; however, I would be fine with a ruling indicating all Wild Blasts could do Nonlethal. More options are never a bad thing for kineticists!


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Normally the blast can't do non-lethal damage.


Ravingdork wrote:
We know that nonlethal energy damage is not a new thing at least. Brown mold deals nonlethal cold damage, as does severe cold weather.

Think there was a spell or ability that did non-lethal fire, don't recall where.


I don't think this implies anything. It just says that you can deal nonlethal with wood without a penalty.


I believe Mark commented that the blasts couldn't do non-lethal at all as an option. when this was asked in his thread.


Chess Pwn wrote:
I believe Mark commented that the blasts couldn't do non-lethal at all as an option. when this was asked in his thread.

A bit of searching, found it! Thanks for the heads up.


Well, I do believe that answers the question! For homebrew stuff, consult GM. For PFS, then it's a no.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Faelyn wrote:
Ravingdork wrote:
We know that nonlethal energy damage is not a new thing at least. Brown mold deals nonlethal cold damage, as does severe cold weather.
True, but those are specific exceptions. Most energy spells require a meta magic feat to deal Nonlethal.

Exceptions to what? There is no rule saying that energy damage can't deal nonlethal damage, so there is nothing to except it from.

The reason why you need a metamagic feat for most energy spells is because most energy spells aren't considered weapons with attack rolls.

Scarab Sages

Ravingdork wrote:
Faelyn wrote:
Ravingdork wrote:
We know that nonlethal energy damage is not a new thing at least. Brown mold deals nonlethal cold damage, as does severe cold weather.
True, but those are specific exceptions. Most energy spells require a meta magic feat to deal Nonlethal.

Exceptions to what? There is no rule saying that energy damage can't deal nonlethal damage, so there is nothing to except it from.

The reason why you need a metamagic feat for most energy spells is because most energy spells aren't considered weapons with attack rolls.

So can you take a -4 to hit to do nonlethal with a scorching ray?


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Imbicatus wrote:
Ravingdork wrote:
Faelyn wrote:
Ravingdork wrote:
We know that nonlethal energy damage is not a new thing at least. Brown mold deals nonlethal cold damage, as does severe cold weather.
True, but those are specific exceptions. Most energy spells require a meta magic feat to deal Nonlethal.

Exceptions to what? There is no rule saying that energy damage can't deal nonlethal damage, so there is nothing to except it from.

The reason why you need a metamagic feat for most energy spells is because most energy spells aren't considered weapons with attack rolls.

So can you take a -4 to hit to do nonlethal with a scorching ray?

No, the rules for dealing nonlethal damage say it needs to be a melee weapon. Scorching ray is ranged.


FAQd primarily because normally you can't deal non-lethal with lethal ranged attacks.

I can see no real reason to differentiate between energy and physical blasts other than a niggling memory (that I have failed to track down a definitive source for) that says you can't deal non-lethal with for example the fire damage of a flaming weapon.


Ravingdork wrote:
Imbicatus wrote:
Ravingdork wrote:
Faelyn wrote:
Ravingdork wrote:
We know that nonlethal energy damage is not a new thing at least. Brown mold deals nonlethal cold damage, as does severe cold weather.
True, but those are specific exceptions. Most energy spells require a meta magic feat to deal Nonlethal.

Exceptions to what? There is no rule saying that energy damage can't deal nonlethal damage, so there is nothing to except it from.

The reason why you need a metamagic feat for most energy spells is because most energy spells aren't considered weapons with attack rolls.

So can you take a -4 to hit to do nonlethal with a scorching ray?
No, the rules for dealing nonlethal damage say it needs to be a melee weapon. Scorching ray is ranged.

True, there are no specific rules stating that energy attacks cannot deal nonlethal damage, I concede that much. You also make a good point about spells and the metamagic feat. The issue I'm seeing is that you also state that nonlethal requires a melee weapon, and Kinetic/Composite Blasts are not melee weapons. Therefore, without the special exception for Merciful Wood, you cannot deal nonlethal with a kinetic/composite blast. Even with using Kinetic Blade/Whip, because those still are not melee weapons, they are still Kinetic Blasts jsut shaped differently.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Protoman wrote:
Chess Pwn wrote:
I believe Mark commented that the blasts couldn't do non-lethal at all as an option. when this was asked in his thread.
A bit of searching, found it! Thanks for the heads up.

Thanks for the link! The fact that I'm not the only one asking this kind of question only reinforces the notion that it should probably be FAQ'd.

Faelyn wrote:
Even with using Kinetic Blade/Whip, because those still are not melee weapons, they are still Kinetic Blasts jsut shaped differently.

Has this been specifically clarified in an official capacity already? The kinetic blade is specifically referred to as a weapon several times in that ability's entry.

You form a weapon using your kinetic abilities. You create a non-reach, light or one-handed weapon in your hand formed of pure energy or elemental matter. (If you’re a telekineticist, you instead transfer the power of your kinetic blast to any object held in one hand.) The kinetic blade’s shape is purely cosmetic and doesn’t affect the damage dice, critical threat range, or critical multiplier of the kinetic blade, nor does it grant the kinetic blade any weapon special features. The object held by a telekineticist for this form infusion doesn’t prevent her from using gather power.

...

The blade disappears at the end of your turn. The weapon deals the same damage type that your kinetic blast deals...

I assume the second to last bit is referring to crit range, weapon properties (like disarm or trip), etc. It seems absolutely clear to me that a kinetic blade is considered a weapon.

Whether or not it is considered a MELEE weapon, is up in the air though I think.


That's what I was referring to, RD. Just not very eloquently... The Infusions refer to the blast as a "weapon", but not specifically a "melee weapon". Unfortunately with the emphasis you placed on the nonlethal rules requiring a "melee weapon", then one could potentially argue that kinetic blade/whip would not be a feasible choice for nonlethal rules.

I'm in your court on this, RD, I would love for the kineticists to have more options available to them; however, I am playing Devil's Advocate and pointing out the flaws that I see when they surface. (Probably should have pointed that out sooner...)

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

I'm surprised that the option to use Merciful isn't covered by Metakinecis...


Kinetic Blast

Quote:
Kinetic blasts count as a type of weapon for the purpose of feats such as Weapon Focus. The kineticist is never considered to be wielding or gripping the kinetic blast (regardless of effects from form infusions; see Infusion), and she can't use Vital Strike feats with kinetic blasts. Even the weakest kinetic blast involves a sizable mass of elemental matter or energy, so kinetic blasts always deal full damage to swarms of any size (though only area blasts deal extra damage to swarms).

Bolded the important part. It is the kinetic blast that is the weapon. It is a ranged weapon, thus the point-blank shot and precise shot feats.

Unless word of god says otherwise, I would think kinetic blade would be a melee range ranged attack.

Scarab Sages

Faelyn wrote:
Ravingdork wrote:
Imbicatus wrote:
Ravingdork wrote:
Faelyn wrote:
Ravingdork wrote:
We know that nonlethal energy damage is not a new thing at least. Brown mold deals nonlethal cold damage, as does severe cold weather.
True, but those are specific exceptions. Most energy spells require a meta magic feat to deal Nonlethal.

Exceptions to what? There is no rule saying that energy damage can't deal nonlethal damage, so there is nothing to except it from.

The reason why you need a metamagic feat for most energy spells is because most energy spells aren't considered weapons with attack rolls.

So can you take a -4 to hit to do nonlethal with a scorching ray?
No, the rules for dealing nonlethal damage say it needs to be a melee weapon. Scorching ray is ranged.
True, there are no specific rules stating that energy attacks cannot deal nonlethal damage, I concede that much. You also make a good point about spells and the metamagic feat. The issue I'm seeing is that you also state that nonlethal requires a melee weapon, and Kinetic/Composite Blasts are not melee weapons. Therefore, without the special exception for Merciful Wood, you cannot deal nonlethal with a kinetic/composite blast. Even with using Kinetic Blade/Whip, because those still are not melee weapons, they are still Kinetic Blasts jsut shaped differently.

Ok, then can you take a -4 to do nonlethal damage with shocking grasp or chill touch?


Texas Snyper wrote:

Kinetic Blast

Quote:
Kinetic blasts count as a type of weapon for the purpose of feats such as Weapon Focus. The kineticist is never considered to be wielding or gripping the kinetic blast (regardless of effects from form infusions; see Infusion), and she can't use Vital Strike feats with kinetic blasts. Even the weakest kinetic blast involves a sizable mass of elemental matter or energy, so kinetic blasts always deal full damage to swarms of any size (though only area blasts deal extra damage to swarms).

Bolded the important part. It is the kinetic blast that is the weapon. It is a ranged weapon, thus the point-blank shot and precise shot feats.

Unless word of god says otherwise, I would think kinetic blade would be a melee range ranged attack.

"Melee range ranged attack" would imply you'd be provoking if you use it in melee range.

Kinetic Blade and Whip are melee attacks.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Rules Questions / Can a kinetic blast deal nonlethal damage? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.