'At This Location' Powers


Rules Questions and Gameplay Discussion


Pathfinder Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber

I always figured I had a good grasp on these powers. But, I remember reading something, I forget where, but now I'm starting to question them.

I have set aside 5 locations from Wrath.
1) Abattoir
2) Cell
3) Cemetery
4) Eagle Rock
5) Mongrel Village

Because of the wording on these locations, am I correct or incorrect in thinking that when someone is at one of the above locations, the 'At This Location' power will affect everything game wide?

If one person is at the Abattoir, will EVERY check in the game against a bane be +X harder? Will you have to succeed at a STR or Disable check to move if one person is at the Cell? Will all monsters gain additional
traits if one person is at either Eagle Rock or the Cemetery?

I included Cell in this group as the word 'you' is not used in the power block.

I believe these 5 locations are all that could apply here. Every other location uses either 'you' or 'your' in referencing something.


i think not and we've been playing it as it would only affect characters at that specific location. You are correct that it doesn't explicitly say "you" or "your". But I think the general rule is that "At This Location" only affects characters at that location.

Thus if you encounter a barrier that forces everyone to encounter a card, only the characters at the Abattoir get the +X to banes.


I believe most of these instances are considered exactly as worded. If they do not say "at this location" then they will affect everyone. I believe the cell has a closing power that causes everyone to take 1 mental damage. On the other hand, the Abattoir says "at this location."


Characters at that location only my good sir... :D


I'd agree, all those locations' "at this location" powers only apply to the characters at those locations.

Some points of reference:
Vic talks about "At this location."

You might be recalling this thread about Tempest Cay which does sort of have a power that effects anything that happens anywhere. But only because some one is at that location and because the ship in S&S is your ship even when you aren't on it. (i.e. That location basically says "If you are at this location, when your ship is dealt damage, add 1 to it.")


rules wrote:

At This Location: These are special powers that are in effect while the location is open. Some of these remain in effect when the

location is permanently closed; in that case, they also appear on the
back of the location card.

At this Location power can apply globally, and the rules don't explicitly limit them to such. Consider the recent case of the FAQ to Chasm of Shadow:

FAQ wrote:

Is the restriction on searching and examining Chasm of Shadows limited to characters at that location?

No—nobody gets to search or examine that deck.

Resolution: On the location Chasm of Shadows, change the At This Location power to "This location deck cannot be searched or examined."

That resolution wouldn't work unless At this Location power's could reach out and effect character anywhere. S&S Fog Bank's would be another one that wouldn't work if At this Location powers couldn't reach out. Of course, I might just be making a devil's argument around how things are assumed to work versus what the rules and cards say.


Yeah. I guess in general, they tell how how things work at that location. And the way it is worded will tell you whether it applies only to characters at that location, the deck of that location, or what else.

But in general, I think the typically apply only to the characters at that location. For example "At this location: Add 5 to checks to defeat." That would apply to checks at that location, or more specifically checks made by characters at that location. "At this location: When you play a blessing, discard a card." That would apply to playing blessings at that location, or more specifically to characters at that location that play blessings.


Pathfinder Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber

And as far as I could tell these 5 locations were the only ones in Wrath that did not include the words 'you' or 'your' in the powers block. As of adv deck 3.

As is usually the case with me, I'm probably reading something that isn't or not intended to be there.


Skull & Shackles had similar unclarity. For example Alahazra examining the Fog Bank from afar. Or the location that made all monsters undead and some "summon and encounter" effects.

I still think that it would be most consistent if the At this location effects would only affect actions and effects that actually happen at those locations unless the At this location effect explicity says otherwise (like Temple etc.)

Let us compare the Woods from Rise Of The Runelords and the infamous Abbattoir from Wrath of the Righteous.

Woods wrote:
AT THIS LOCATION: Undefeated monsters other than villain or henchmen are banished.
Abbattoir wrote:
AT THIS LOCATION: The difficulty of any check to defeat a bane is increased by the number of characters.

So the rule to go by is "cards do what they say" and "cards don't do what they don't say"

The effect of the Woods was limited (by intent) to its own location deck but the sentence itself does not say that. Only the congruent semantic of the At this location power "Undefeated monsters AT THIS LOCATION other than villain or henchmen are banished." delivers this intent. Therefore all locations need to be read in this congruent semantic and not like some people think as stand alone sentences that ignore the At this location restriction.

So the logical interpretation of the Abbattoir would be "The difficulty of any check to defeat a bane AT THIS LOCATION is increased by the number of characters." and not "The difficulty of any check to defeat a bane AT any LOCATION is increased by the number of characters."

In the When permanently closed power we already have lots of cards that effect other locations by adding "at any location". See for example the Mongrel Village. The Temple from Rise Of The Runelord explicity states "Any character at another location..."

Let us take another look at Tempest Cay.

Tempest Cay wrote:
AT THIS LOCATION: If your ship is dealt structural damage, increase the damage by 1.

Well here applying logic would rephrase the effect as "If your ship is dealt structural damage AT THIS LOCATION, increase the damage by 1." For reasons beyond my understanding this is not the designers intent and it is the official breaking point where a location's power is applied to all locations just because a character is at that location.

But the rules do not state that a location's effect should always be in effect when a player is at that location. The rules just say

WOTR rules p.21 wrote:
At This Location: These are special powers that are in effect while the location is open. Some of these remain in effect when the location is permanently closed; in that case, they also appear on the back of the location card.

This wording let some people to believe that these effects stretch over all loacations but the paragraph does not say that.

Again we have to interpret this as "At This Location: These are special powers that are in effect AT THIS LOCATION while the location is open. Some of these remain in effect AT THIS LOCATION when the location is permanently closed; in that case, they also appear on the back of the location card." or otherwise cards like Woods would have never worked the way they were intended.

Well at least if you try to find a coherent ruling.


The only caveat/difference is that the ship, unless it is anchored, is considered to be at all locations. This means that if a character is at Tempest Cay and the ship is not anchored, then whenever the ship takes damage, it is taking damage at Tempest Cay, since, for the purposes of the character at Tempest Cay, the ship is there and is taking damage.

But for every other use of At This Location powers, I would agree with you.


jduteau wrote:
The only caveat/difference is that the ship, unless it is anchored, is considered to be at all locations. This means that if a character is at Tempest Cay and the ship is not anchored, then whenever the ship takes damage, it is taking damage at Tempest Cay, since, for the purposes of the character at Tempest Cay, the ship is there and is taking damage.

I don't think that is accurate. The ship is only with the commander, i.e. the currently active player, unless it is anchored. Otherwise cards that operate differently when you're on the ship would almost always be in effect.

The reason that Tempest Cay is always in effect is because the ship is always "your ship" regardless of whether or not you are the active player or whether or not you are on the ship. So any time "your ship" is dealt structural damage, if a player is at that location it would trigger the power.

It would be similar if there was a location that said, for example, "Any time a character plays a blessing, take 1 Force damage". If you were at that location, it wouldn't matter where the character that played the blessing was located at, since any blessing would act as a trigger that caused the location power to take effect.

Now that leaves the question: Why doesn't the Woods power trigger anytime that any character fails to defeat a monster at any location if a character is in the Woods? It seems like the trigger for that is "Monster is undefeated" which should trigger regardless of who failed to defeat it or where they are. It could have probably been written something like "When you resolve your encounter, undefeated monsters other than villain or henchmen are banished." That makes it clear that it is limited to your encounters only.


Well, Tempest Cay has been updated.

Tempest Cay wrote:
If this location is occupied, Structural damage to your ship at any location is increased by 1.

So, that makes it clear that is is an exception to the "typical" formula, and very different from the Woods.


okay, so then we can go back to Michael's premise that stuff "At This Location" only applies to people at that location. If the developer/designers want an exception, they'll make it (like they do with Tempest Cay).

So we're good? :)


There was a FAQ update for Fog Bank. Strangely, I had always played that as the designers intended while still using Alahazra to scan remote locations (ignoring their negative effects) from ones with positive effects. (Bonuses on checks to acquire or drawing cards whenever I made a check were awesome.)

Then I used Pteranodons to hop around fighting banes to make more remote viewing possible....


jduteau wrote:

okay, so then we can go back to Michael's premise that stuff "At This Location" only applies to people at that location. If the developer/designers want an exception, they'll make it (like they do with Tempest Cay).

So we're good? :)

I think so. I'm not sure that we've hit the technically correct understanding (i.e. the rules don't say it only applies to those at the location by default), but, for all the locations I've seen so far, I think we've hit the practically correct understanding.

Paizo Employee Chief Technical Officer

Hawkmoon269 wrote:
I think so. I'm not sure that we've hit the technically correct understanding (i.e. the rules don't say it only applies to those at the location by default), but, for all the locations I've seen so far, I think we've hit the practically correct understanding.

We can't really say "At This Location powers only apply to characters at that location by default" because many At This Location powers don't apply to characters at all—a lot of them apply to things you encounter at that location. But it is true that when an At This Location power says "you," it's addressing characters at that location.


Pathfinder Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber

OK. As usual I was misinterpreting things. Fortunately all that changed for me with these interpretations was that I ganged up on the locations to knock em out as fast as possible.


Not to revive a dead thread for no reason, I wanted to get a clarification.

Does this mean that banes that affect all characters at all locations would have their difficulty determined by where each character is and not by where the bane came from?

Example 1:

At this location: The difficulty to defeat banes is increased by 3.
All other location have no banes altering powers.

Should a Skeletal Horde come up (where everyone at an open location must summon and encounter the bane) in the location where bane difficulty is +3, would only characters at the +3 location have an increased difficulty?

Example 2:

What about Treasure Hunt in S&S? It says "Each character may attempt at a check to defeat this barrier."

If it was encountered at Fringes of the Eye ("All barriers +3 difficulty" at this location power), would only those actually at the fringes have a +3 difficulty?

Just want to make sure we aren't messing up check calculations.


Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Lost Omens, PF Special Edition, Starfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Example 1: It's based on where the character attempting the check to defeat is. If the character attempting the check is at that location, that check (and ONLY that check) is +3 difficulty. Characters not at that location but attempting checks against the same bane do not have their difficulties impacted by the location power.

Same deal with example 2, it's based on where the character attempting the check is.


I'd say...

Example 1: Only the character(s) at that location would have the difficulty increased by 3.

Example 2: Fringes of the Eye says:

Fringes of the Eye wrote:
The difficulty of checks to defeat barriers is increased by 3.

So, I'd say the character there attempting to defeat Treasure Hunt have a +3 to the difficulty.

As I understand it (and I could be wrong) the location can sort of specify what has to be at the location. In these two examples, the check is the thing being talked about. Checks happen where characters are. So if you are there, the check is harder.

Other locations talk about where the characters are or where the card they are encountering came from. You have to determine what the thing "at the location" is.

Paizo Employee Chief Technical Officer

What Hawk said.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder Adventure Card Game / Rules Questions and Gameplay Discussion / 'At This Location' Powers All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Rules Questions and Gameplay Discussion