Greenrager / primalist / spell eater / untouchable rager work as a combo?

[Lastoutkast]

???

[Java Man]

Looks like it to me.

[Lastoutkast]

Using it for a Druid gesalt build.

[Ravingdork]

More people might answer your question if you didn't make them hunt down all those disparate rules. Quoting or linking to the relevant rules goes a long way towards getting the answers you seek, it's also considerate.

With some digging I managed to hunt them down:
Greenrager
Primalist
Spelleater
Untouchable Rager

I didn't even know you were talking about a bloodrager until I bothered to do all the leg work for you.

Now, as to your question: If there is no overlap between class abilities being modified/replaced (this appears to be the case at a glance), then the different archetypes can work together.

You can find the rules and limitations for archetypes here, under "Selecting Archetypes."

I hope that helps! :)

[Calth]

Based off the latest FAQ Primalist and Untouchable are incompatible. Untouchable alters bloodline spells, which is a subfeature of bloodline, which primalist alters. Similarly Greenrager and Primalist are incompatible because bloodline feats are a subfeature of bloodlines. (It is important to note that Primalist says it alters the bloodline feature and not the bloodline power features, as the previous makes it incompatible, the latter would not.) Primalist also conflicts with Untouchable for this reason. I would also say Untouchable and Spell Eater are incompatible. Spell Eater (Spell Eating feature) alters spellcasting even if it doesn't explicitly say it in those words, but that's more RAI than RAW.

[Lastoutkast]

Well...crap, guess I'll stick with Druid(feral shifter)/barbarian(invulnerable rager) for the win.

[Lastoutkast]

So the primalist wouldn't combine with any of them?

[Calth]

Lastoutkast wrote:

So the primalist wouldn't combine with any of them?

Correct, Primalist cannot be combined with anything that alters bloodline powers, bloodline feats, or bloodline spells. At least for now, the ACG is well known to have been poorly edited and a massive errata for it is due to be released fairly soon. It should probably be listed to alter only bloodline powers, or should have been worded like Quigong Monk, which has its own FAQ, but that's not what it currently says. Since this is a home game, you can always talk to your GM. I would still nix Spell Eater with untouchable, since the second spell eater feature requires spellcasting, but again that's me leaning more towards RAI.

[Lastoutkast]

OK thanks. But I do think primalist/untouchable rage would work and also makes role play sense. I'm actually asking for one of my players, I value rp over rules but I try to make an effort to stay within them.