The summary says the playtest ends on Thursday, July 20th but July 20th is a Monday. Is the playtest going to end that Thursday, or on the 20th?
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
20th July 3015 is a Thursday. I believe we still have another 1,000 and a bit years on this playtest.
inb4 someone jokes that not even in a thousand years could Paizo make this class palatable
Yeah, this playtest rather desperately needs a second phase, at least.
I don't know. I think I was able to form an opinion about this class using only one round of playtest...
It has amused me thus far that when I armchair'd out this class was bad, to see it frequently repeated to actually playtest it first before offering criticism, which, I'm glad I did, since it's even worse in practice.
I don't know. I think I was able to form an opinion about this class using only one round of playtest...It has amused me thus far that when I armchair'd out this class was bad, to see it frequently repeated to actually playtest it first before offering criticism, which, I'm glad I did, since it's even worse in practice.
maximum keks achieved
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
It's not all bad. I actually really like the stalker after getting into it when at first look it seemed the weakest. My unchained rogue is so jealous of Up Close and Personal, Leave an Opening, Mockingbird, Perfect Vulnerability, and Sniper.
The other three specializations need serious work though.
|
I don't know. I think I was able to form an opinion about this class using only one round of playtest...That is sort of hte point of a second round. They issue alterations they want to test out and gather data. It can be little changes, or massive other way changes.
Depends on the data they want.It's not like the 2nd go through is the same exact stuff just repeated. Or they'd just extend the time period.
That could happen. Look, I'm not going to point fingers here, but even if some genius ideas would come out of the playtest, there's a strong possibility that the inertia of the whole publishing process could be too great to change the course. Or the great ideas do make it, but not entirely... sigh.
That could happen. Look, I'm not going to point fingers here, but even if some genius ideas would come out of the playtest, there's a strong possibility that the inertia of the whole publishing process could be too great to change the course. Or the great ideas do make it, but not entirely... sigh.I don't know. I think I was able to form an opinion about this class using only one round of playtest...That is sort of hte point of a second round. They issue alterations they want to test out and gather data. It can be little changes, or massive other way changes.
Depends on the data they want.It's not like the 2nd go through is the same exact stuff just repeated. Or they'd just extend the time period.
Luckily, they have a millennium to get it right.
