Why isn't spiked chain a reach weapon?


Pathfinder First Edition General Discussion

51 to 74 of 74 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>

There are basically 4 kinds of exotic weapons
-Martial weapon with better stats (fauchard vs bardiche; why?)
-A simple weapon (or worse) that has the Monk property (siangham vs sickle)
-An eastern sounding weapon (kama)
-weapon that does something weird

Spiked chain is in none of these categories ATM. Spiked Chain WAS in the 4th category because of it's threat range.


Just house rule it.

Either give them Reach, or make them martial weapons. Either is a workable fix.


Castilonium wrote:

It's on d20pfsrd.

Elven branched spear, 20 gp, 1d8, ×3, 10 lbs., P, brace, reach

"Behind this long pole weapon's spearhead, several short branches project from the shaft at irregular intervals, each angled forward and tipped with a smaller leaf-like blade. When you make attacks of opportunity provoked by movement, you gain a +2 bonus on attack rolls. You can use the Weapon Finesse feat to apply your Dexterity modifier instead of your Strength modifier on attack rolls with an elven branched spear sized for you, even though it isn't a light weapon. Elves treat elven branched spears as martial weapons."

But remember, guys, spiked chains with reach? Absolutely overpowered! Because———————


I'm necromancing this thread as an alternative to derailing the other thread.

No, "just shut up" isn't an option, and just by asking that you've added yourself to my Enemies List!


Lemmy wrote:

Because Jason didn't like 3.5's trip builds... So he nerfed tripping (and maneuvers in general) as much as he could. Feats, weapons, AoOs, the maneuver themselves... It all got a huge beating from the nerf bat.

It's one of the reasons why some people mock Pathfinder by calling it D&D 3.5 - Caster Edition.

Yep, this is the truth of it. The particular distaste for trips and the spiked whip is on display.


Kobold Cleaver wrote:

I'm necromancing this thread as an alternative to derailing the other thread.

No, "just shut up" isn't an option, and just by asking that you've added yourself to my Enemies List!

It will never change, sorry. The managed to remove divine protection from the game, but I think you are out of luck for spiked chain


Yeah, if the ship has sailed and you want it in your games talk to your dm and persuade them.

Or be the dm and say spiked chains are back, just as per 3.5.


Charon's Little Helper wrote:
The reason it was so very OP in 3.5 (and it was) - was because of how you could abuse the AOOs. Remember - while in Pathfinder - the max AOOs for movement is 1 per opponent - that wasn't a limitation in 3.5.

Yes it was.

d20 SRD wrote:

Combat Reflexes and Additional Attacks of Opportunity

If you have the Combat Reflexes feat you can add your Dexterity modifier to the number of attacks of opportunity you can make in a round. This feat does not let you make more than one attack for a given opportunity, but if the same opponent provokes two attacks of opportunity from you, you could make two separate attacks of opportunity (since each one represents a different opportunity). Moving out of more than one square threatened by the same opponent in the same round doesn’t count as more than one opportunity for that opponent. All these attacks are at your full normal attack bonus.

(Emphasis mine).

Why is this myth so prevalent? At least most of the myths about 4e have people's vested interests keeping them going. But I don't understand why anyone would be that invested in 3e's AoO rules being other than they are.

EDIT: And Owen KC Stevens ninja'd me by several months. How did I not see that post before?

_
glass.


*Insert obligatory martials cant have nice things post*

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
PIXIE DUST wrote:
*Insert obligatory martials cant have nice things post*

With the news that Pummeling Style getting nerfed hardcore, I am really beginning to wish the devs would listen to the large number of people unhappy with martials continuously being depowered while spellcasters go unmolested.

I'd start a new thread about it, but recent history indicates it would be locked the 2nd page in.


CWheezy wrote:
Kobold Cleaver wrote:

I'm necromancing this thread as an alternative to derailing the other thread.

No, "just shut up" isn't an option, and just by asking that you've added yourself to my Enemies List!

It will never change, sorry. The managed to remove divine protection from the game, but I think you are out of luck for spiked chain

*Cries*


EntrerisShadow wrote:
PIXIE DUST wrote:
*Insert obligatory martials cant have nice things post*

With the news that Pummeling Style getting nerfed hardcore, I am really beginning to wish the devs would listen to the large number of people unhappy with martials continuously being depowered while spellcasters go unmolested.

I'd start a new thread about it, but recent history indicates it would be locked the 2nd page in.

Consider heading over here. I think it's about due a necromance, in light of the reactions to the ACG errata.

Grand Lodge

Kobold Cleaver wrote:
EntrerisShadow wrote:
PIXIE DUST wrote:
*Insert obligatory martials cant have nice things post*

With the news that Pummeling Style getting nerfed hardcore, I am really beginning to wish the devs would listen to the large number of people unhappy with martials continuously being depowered while spellcasters go unmolested.

I'd start a new thread about it, but recent history indicates it would be locked the 2nd page in.

Consider heading over here. I think it's about due a necromance, in light of the reactions to the ACG errata.

Me. Through the entire thread.


EntrerisShadow wrote:
PIXIE DUST wrote:
*Insert obligatory martials cant have nice things post*

With the news that Pummeling Style getting nerfed hardcore, I am really beginning to wish the devs would listen to the large number of people unhappy with martials continuously being depowered while spellcasters go unmolested.

I'd start a new thread about it, but recent history indicates it would be locked the 2nd page in.

It would be locked. They are very sensitive to criticisms.


DM Under The Bridge wrote:
EntrerisShadow wrote:
PIXIE DUST wrote:
*Insert obligatory martials cant have nice things post*

With the news that Pummeling Style getting nerfed hardcore, I am really beginning to wish the devs would listen to the large number of people unhappy with martials continuously being depowered while spellcasters go unmolested.

I'd start a new thread about it, but recent history indicates it would be locked the 2nd page in.

It would be locked. They are very sensitive to criticisms.

Well, that and repeated criticism on the same topic. They don't seem to agree with the large number of people -- however large that might be -- that aren't happy with their choices. It doesn't pay to continue the conversation.


Some are not happy with accepting poor decisions, so the criticisms will, I suspect, continue. :)


Yeah. That puzzles me, though. House rule it and save the energy for something more useful, like mowing the lawn or washing dishes. If they are not interested in changing their minds, slamming your head into a wall doesn't impress the wall and leaves you with a soft head. :)


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Kobold Cleaver wrote:

There's a little thing called "overkill". "Hey, this weapon is currently insanely good—better make it suck now to make up for lost time" is a good example.

The nerfbat don't now middle grounds.

Liberty's Edge

Nicos wrote:


The nerfbat don't now middle grounds.

No it really does not IMO.


knightnday wrote:
Yeah. That puzzles me, though. House rule it and save the energy for something more useful, like mowing the lawn or washing dishes. If they are not interested in changing their minds, slamming your head into a wall doesn't impress the wall and leaves you with a soft head. :)

Which would work better if there was not a distinct, statistically observed tendency for people who don't believe the house ruling is needed to derail the house rule threads. :P


Kobold Cleaver wrote:
knightnday wrote:
Yeah. That puzzles me, though. House rule it and save the energy for something more useful, like mowing the lawn or washing dishes. If they are not interested in changing their minds, slamming your head into a wall doesn't impress the wall and leaves you with a soft head. :)
Which would work better if there was not a distinct, statistically observed tendency for people who don't believe the house ruling is needed to derail the house rule threads. :P

Yes, people are often problematic. There is not much we can do about invading other threads, anymore than we can limit issue threads to less than a handful.


And the Kuthites continue to cry over their "favored" weapon.

How do battle-focused priests of Zon even still exist?

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.
bigrig107 wrote:

And the Kuthites continue to cry over their "favored" weapon.

How do battle-focused priests of Zon even still exist?

Well they are masochists.

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder Adventure, Rulebook Subscriber

My first character was a core Monk who worshipped Illmater. He carried a spiked chain wrapped around his arms as part of his worship, and twisted it around his body as he fought.

51 to 74 of 74 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / General Discussion / Why isn't spiked chain a reach weapon? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.