Barbarain or Bloodrager


Advice

51 to 57 of 57 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>

Weirdo wrote:

There's some debate over that.

Fruian Thistlefoot wrote:


And you can't use these spells on anyone else. And if you're using spider climb out of combat you have to burn bloodrage rounds to do it.

If you are talking about Bloodragers having to be in a rage to cast spells, that would be incorrect.

Shadow Lodge

No, I'm talking about Fruian's point that arcane bloodline bloodragers can use some spells including spider climb on themselves as part of a rage at the same level that sorcerers gain access to these spells (4) as opposed to waiting until level 7 like most bloodragers.


I'm kinda partial to the Abyssal bloodline myself. On a race with a bite attack you can claw/claw/bite from level 1. Everyone loves enlarge effects, and this one is a free action that you get at 4th. Kind drops off after that, but in a low level game they can outpace a barbarian.


most silly bloodrager I can think of is primalist abyssal rageborn. Being able to get gore, bite, hoof, hoof, claw, claw, and the enlarge from the blood line seems tricky to pull off but the amount of attacks is again silly.


Dip in ape shaman and you can get bite/claw/claw/gore/hoof/hoof/slam/slam from level 3. (assuming slams don't necessarily use your arms, which they might)


Slams are basically an "untyped" natural attack, which is why it's the one that oozes get.

Shadow Lodge

Debate on that point.

There's a strong case for slams being associated with arms in humanoid creatures (and thus not able to be combined with claws).

51 to 57 of 57 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Advice / Barbarain or Bloodrager All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.