Videos of how Men and Women are Treated Walking in NYC


Off-Topic Discussions


The following are video documentation of:

10 Hours of Walking in NYC as a Man

10 Hours of Walking in NYC as a Woman

Spoiler:

conclusion: don't go to NYC


Yeah that is high on my list of places im glad i have no reason to even go near

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

And in New Zealand as a woman.

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I want to see 10 hours walking around nyc as a zombie.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
ShadowcatX wrote:
I want to see 10 hours walking around nyc as a zombie.

They already sound like a shambling horde without human emotion so not a stretch


I could have used that planquin.


Avatar-1 wrote:
And in New Zealand as a woman.

I wonder if that difference has anything to do with NYC having nearly twice the population of New Zealand. Not twice the population of the Auckland, the city they tried it in, but of the whole country.

I'd actually like to think it's a matter of culture and deliberate lack of tolerance for the nastier behavior, but I'm not so sure.


thejeff wrote:
Avatar-1 wrote:
And in New Zealand as a woman.

I wonder if that difference has anything to do with NYC having nearly twice the population of New Zealand. Not twice the population of the Auckland, the city they tried it in, but of the whole country.

I'd actually like to think it's a matter of culture and deliberate lack of tolerance for the nastier behavior, but I'm not so sure.

.

It is 100% a matter of culture -- that's the point. In Tokyo, whose
population is 13 million compared to NYC's 8.5 million, we would see
similar results like Auckland. Culture.


Grand Magus wrote:
thejeff wrote:
Avatar-1 wrote:
And in New Zealand as a woman.

I wonder if that difference has anything to do with NYC having nearly twice the population of New Zealand. Not twice the population of the Auckland, the city they tried it in, but of the whole country.

I'd actually like to think it's a matter of culture and deliberate lack of tolerance for the nastier behavior, but I'm not so sure.

.

It is 100% a matter of culture -- that's the point. In Tokyo, whose
population is 13 million compared to NYC's 8.5 million, we would see
similar results like Auckland. Culture.

Plus they have vending machines everywhere not getting vandalized.


Apparently there are a LOT of people in NYC that have nothing to do but stand on the sidewalk. Can you imagine what that video would be like if those people actually had something to do?


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Grand Magus wrote:
thejeff wrote:
Avatar-1 wrote:
And in New Zealand as a woman.

I wonder if that difference has anything to do with NYC having nearly twice the population of New Zealand. Not twice the population of the Auckland, the city they tried it in, but of the whole country.

I'd actually like to think it's a matter of culture and deliberate lack of tolerance for the nastier behavior, but I'm not so sure.

.

It is 100% a matter of culture -- that's the point. In Tokyo, whose
population is 13 million compared to NYC's 8.5 million, we would see
similar results like Auckland. Culture.

Yes, very cultured in Japan.


It was interesting to see that the gentleman that was interested in the woman in New Zealand actually went up and spoke with her rather than screeching something "friendly" from across the way.


Durngrun Stonebreaker wrote:
Grand Magus wrote:
thejeff wrote:
Avatar-1 wrote:
And in New Zealand as a woman.

I wonder if that difference has anything to do with NYC having nearly twice the population of New Zealand. Not twice the population of the Auckland, the city they tried it in, but of the whole country.

I'd actually like to think it's a matter of culture and deliberate lack of tolerance for the nastier behavior, but I'm not so sure.

.

It is 100% a matter of culture -- that's the point. In Tokyo, whose
population is 13 million compared to NYC's 8.5 million, we would see
similar results like Auckland. Culture.

Yes, very cultured in Japan.

Yes, very cultural in NYC


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Grand Magus wrote:
Durngrun Stonebreaker wrote:
Grand Magus wrote:
thejeff wrote:
Avatar-1 wrote:
And in New Zealand as a woman.

I wonder if that difference has anything to do with NYC having nearly twice the population of New Zealand. Not twice the population of the Auckland, the city they tried it in, but of the whole country.

I'd actually like to think it's a matter of culture and deliberate lack of tolerance for the nastier behavior, but I'm not so sure.

.

It is 100% a matter of culture -- that's the point. In Tokyo, whose
population is 13 million compared to NYC's 8.5 million, we would see
similar results like Auckland. Culture.

Yes, very cultured in Japan.

Yes, very cultural in NYC

And your point is? We all agree that New York has some problems.

You made the claim that Tokyo's culture would prevent street harassment. That's not really a big deal if it just moves onto the subway and gets nastier.


Yeah...having lived in Japan and New Zealand, those are not very comparable places. I still remember heading to a subway and seeing a guy out in front of it with his hands down his pants and completely going to town on himself in front of the crowd of people entering and leaving. I encountered several similar messed up situations while living there that I won't get into.

Similarly, I have a good friend who was jogging down a rural road in Japan and had a man drive up and drop pants right in front of her (she took off in the opposite direction).

I can't say I had any of those experiences in New Zealand, nor do my American friends have any sort of similar experiences to share from that country.


A lot of people in that women in NYC video just greeted her politely and a few made rather polite compliments. Sure I know they wouldn't do either of those things if she were less attractive or less attractively dressed, or a man, but I can't say I would call that harassment by any stretch.

Of course the "dayum girl"s or the guys just following her around are a different matter. But then she didn't exactly help the situation by completely ignoring them, and not just saying "not interested", or "would you please stop following me". As any normal person would.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
knightnday wrote:
It was interesting to see that the gentleman that was interested in the woman in New Zealand actually went up and spoke with her rather than screeching something "friendly" from across the way.

This too is considered harassment by some.

Liberty's Edge

You know who else considered talking to or looking at women harr...

No, I just don't have the energy.

People, you're holding a serious discussion in an offtopic thread started by EW that uses a Funny or Die gag video as part of its thesis.

I get that you're upset that mods shut down you flailing internet slap fight in the other thread, but for shame. You should all be ashamed.

Now make the requisite eye rolling jokes and go back to your lives.


BigNorseWolf wrote:
knightnday wrote:
It was interesting to see that the gentleman that was interested in the woman in New Zealand actually went up and spoke with her rather than screeching something "friendly" from across the way.
This too is considered harassment by some.

Oh no doubt. But it illustrates how one might go about meeting these untouchable creatures in some other way than shouting greetings in the hopes of being noticed. Give the other thread on this, there seemed to be some concern that some men just couldn't meet women in any other way.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
knightnday wrote:
BigNorseWolf wrote:
knightnday wrote:
It was interesting to see that the gentleman that was interested in the woman in New Zealand actually went up and spoke with her rather than screeching something "friendly" from across the way.
This too is considered harassment by some.
Oh no doubt. But it illustrates how one might go about meeting these untouchable creatures in some other way than shouting greetings in the hopes of being noticed. Give the other thread on this, there seemed to be some concern that some men just couldn't meet women in any other way.

OTOH, imagine that exact same behavior, at least through the beginning of the conversation in the context of someone had been being harassed by other men, from just greetings, to comments on her physical attributes, to demands for smiles and thank yous, to obscene descriptions of what they'd like to do to you - Then this guy comes jogging up from behind and moves in front of you, getting in your way.

In the quieter world of the NZ interaction, not a big deal. In a different environment - panic attack.

Context is still important.


thejeff wrote:
Grand Magus wrote:
Durngrun Stonebreaker wrote:
Grand Magus wrote:
thejeff wrote:
Avatar-1 wrote:
And in New Zealand as a woman.

I wonder if that difference has anything to do with NYC having nearly twice the population of New Zealand. Not twice the population of the Auckland, the city they tried it in, but of the whole country.

I'd actually like to think it's a matter of culture and deliberate lack of tolerance for the nastier behavior, but I'm not so sure.

.

It is 100% a matter of culture -- that's the point. In Tokyo, whose
population is 13 million compared to NYC's 8.5 million, we would see
similar results like Auckland. Culture.

Yes, very cultured in Japan.

Yes, very cultural in NYC

And your point is? We all agree that New York has some problems.

You made the claim that Tokyo's culture would prevent street harassment. That's not really a big deal if it just moves onto the subway and gets nastier.

.

1. This is my point: Cultural differences dominate social
interaction/exchanges between humans; and what we are observing in
these videos is not only a function of the single-variable "population
density". (as you first questioned ...)

Then this guy posted a link, with no explanation, about crime in
Tokyo. Yes, Tokyo has crime. So, I posted a link with no explanation
(because I can do that too -- we all can do it!)

2. My point is: you brought up population size, and questioned
if it is the single most important factor in the behaviors we are
observing in these videos. I said, I think it is 100% cultural.

Then this guy posted a link, with no explanation, about crime in
Tokyo. Yes, Tokyo has crime. So, I posted a link with no explanation
(because I can do that too -- we all can do it!)

3. This is my point: I don't think population size is the
dominant ingredient in "culture" as it applies to groups of humans
(like those grouped into modern cities.) So, as you questioned, is it
the relative size of the cities involved that fully explain the
behaviors we see in these videos? I say no, the behaviors are not
dominated by "population density" but by this thing, this concept, we
call "culture".

Then this guy posted a link, with no explanation, about crime in
Tokyo. Yes, Tokyo has crime. So, I posted a link with no explanation
(because I can do that too -- we all can do it!)

This is fun!
.

thejeff wrote:
You made the claim that Tokyo's culture would prevent street harassment. That's not really a big deal if it just moves onto the subway and gets nastier.

1. Are we going to argue the causes of crime?

1a. Are we going to argue what the components are in the model(s) predicting crime rates around the world?

1b. Are we going to do Statistics (and Model prediction) between Crime and Culture?

1c. Are we going to do Regressions on published crime-data and other published city data, to build a link between Crime and Culture?

1d. Can you do Regression Analysis? Or, can you build a statistical model? If so, please build one and post, so we can get the ball rolling.

1e. I'll do a beginning one, if you want me to.

.


knightnday wrote:
BigNorseWolf wrote:
knightnday wrote:
It was interesting to see that the gentleman that was interested in the woman in New Zealand actually went up and spoke with her rather than screeching something "friendly" from across the way.
This too is considered harassment by some.
Oh no doubt. But it illustrates how one might go about meeting these untouchable creatures in some other way than shouting greetings in the hopes of being noticed. Give the other thread on this, there seemed to be some concern that some men just couldn't meet women in any other way.

I don't think that anyone was concerned that meeting them without the catcall couldn't occur. I believe the disagreement was that if you equated the more polite approach with the unacceptable practice of catcalling that there no acceptable approach on the street.


Grand Magus wrote:
thejeff wrote:
Grand Magus wrote:
Durngrun Stonebreaker wrote:
Grand Magus wrote:
thejeff wrote:
Avatar-1 wrote:
And in New Zealand as a woman.

I wonder if that difference has anything to do with NYC having nearly twice the population of New Zealand. Not twice the population of the Auckland, the city they tried it in, but of the whole country.

I'd actually like to think it's a matter of culture and deliberate lack of tolerance for the nastier behavior, but I'm not so sure.

.

It is 100% a matter of culture -- that's the point. In Tokyo, whose
population is 13 million compared to NYC's 8.5 million, we would see
similar results like Auckland. Culture.

Yes, very cultured in Japan.

Yes, very cultural in NYC

And your point is? We all agree that New York has some problems.

You made the claim that Tokyo's culture would prevent street harassment. That's not really a big deal if it just moves onto the subway and gets nastier.

.

1. This is my point: Cultural differences dominate social
interaction/exchanges between humans; and what we are observing in
these videos is not a function of the single-variable "population
density". (as you first questioned ...)

Then this dumb guy posted a link, with no explanation, about crime in
Tokyo. Yes, Tokyo has crime. So, I posted a link with no explanation
(because I can do that too -- we all can do it!)

2. My point is: you brought up population size, and questioned
if it is the single most important factor in the behaviors we are
observing in these videos. I said, I think it is 100% cultural.

Then this dumb guy posted a link,...

I shouldn't waste my time, but there is a correlation with population. I don't know whether it affected this particular example, but it definitely affects how people interact with each other on the street.

It wasn't just a random link about crime in Tokyo. It was a link about sexual harassment on the subways of Tokyo. I understand it's a bit of a stretch to think that women being groped on subways might have some relation to women having obscene things yelled at them on the streets, but I thought I could see the connection.


thejeff wrote:

I shouldn't waste my time, but there is a correlation with population. I don't know whether it affected this particular example, but it definitely affects how people interact with each other on the street.

It wasn't just a random link about crime in Tokyo. It was a link about sexual harassment on the subways of Tokyo. I understand it's a bit of a stretch to think that women being groped on subways might have some relation to women having obscene things yelled at them on the streets, but I thought I could see the connection.

.

That's what made the link so obtuse. It's a demonstration of the concept
called "Confirmation Bias". A random link would have been much more
powerful. And a sample of links would be even better, because then we
can bring the science of Statistics to the scene.

.


Grand Magus wrote:

And a sample of links would be even better, because then we

can bring the science of Statistics to the scene.

Statistics was never one of your strengths, was it?


2 people marked this as a favorite.

The link is not remotely obtuse.

The premise was larger population= a lot of harassment.

Your counter was that Tokyo has a large population and little harassment.

Their point that Tokyo actually has a lot of harassment, and its even more aggravated than catcalls.

Culture apparently changed the form of harassment, but not its existence


Orfamay Quest wrote:
Grand Magus wrote:

And a sample of links would be even better, because then we

can bring the science of Statistics to the scene.

Statistics was never one of your strengths, was it?

It took me years and years to learn Statistics, so I guess not.

(I even read story books -> story book .)


1 person marked this as a favorite.
BigNorseWolf wrote:

The link is not remotely obtuse.

The premise was larger population= a lot of harassment.

Your counter was that Tokyo has a large population and little harassment.

Their point that Tokyo actually has a lot of harassment, and its even more aggravated than catcalls.

Culture apparently changed the form of harassment, but not its existence

Honestly, I wouldn't even accept the claim that Tokyo has little harassment without some actual evidence.

But you're furthering my mistake, which I alluded to in my last response: You're wasting your time debating with Grand Magus.


BigNorseWolf wrote:

The link is not remotely obtuse.

The premise was larger population= a lot of harassment.

Your counter was that Tokyo has a large population and little harassment.

Their point that Tokyo actually has a lot of harassment, and its even more aggravated than catcalls.

Culture apparently changed the form of harassment, but not its existence

So, you're saying the link is right on target and supports your view.


JurgenV wrote:
ShadowcatX wrote:
I want to see 10 hours walking around nyc as a zombie.
They already sound like a shambling horde without human emotion so not a stretch

Wasn't there already a video of guys dressing as zombies and chasing inner-city folks around, IIRC? I've never seen so many "tough guys" run screaming, it was hilarious. But I do think one of them pulled a gun on one of the "zombies" at one point, so the joke ended. The video was a while ago, but I think it's out there. It got alot of views if I recall.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

The Funny or Die video is annoyingly facetious.

An legitimate video of walking around as a white man would be far more telling... about why it's so scary to be a woman in the same situation.

Strangers are weird in the city, man. It doesn't break down neatly along racial lines, nor does the catcalling.

Anyway, that video's attempt to make light of the situation just annoys me... and I'm (evidently) pretty vocal about street harassment as a problem. The underlying message (that men and women are treated differently) is fine, but the delivery in this case is just crass and stupid. And not particularly funny.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Grand Magus wrote:
It is 100% a matter of culture -- that's the point. In Tokyo, whose population is 13 million compared to NYC's 8.5 million, we would see similar results like Auckland. Culture.

Tokyo, quite famously, has a street harassment culture all its own. I'm talking about groping on public transit, specifically. Not something I'm comfortable getting links for at work.


What it's like walking around as a little person

What it's like walking around as a male actor disguised as woman


1 person marked this as a favorite.

#dudesgreetingdudes

NSFW Language.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Apparently NYC is a great place to run social experiments.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Jezebel remembers intersectionality: A Hollaback Response Video: Women of Color on Street Harassment

Meanwhile over at The Intercept: No, We Don’t Need a Law Against Catcalling

"Feminists of color have long criticized Hollaback’s tactics for having precisely this effect, of casting black and brown men as congenital predators, thus perpetuating their criminalization (in a tradition going back hundreds of years). In New York, where the fight over stop-and-frisk is not over, such activism currently coincides with policing that punishes youth of color for dancing on the subway or uses bullhorns to shoo black students out of affluent Park Slope. Discussing the Hollaback video on his radio show, Geraldo Rivera asked Rudy Giuliani if it was proof of the city’s moral decay, with both men agreeing that street harassment should be seen as analogous to graffiti — a policing priority under New York Police Commander Bill Bratton. In the meantime, not far from where I live, a group of 'concerned residents, business owners, artists and civic croups' called Gowanus United is closing ranks around gentrifying spaces in the name of public safety, raising alarms against a parole complex slated to open next year 'within a half-mile radius' of 'our streets, buses and subways.'"

Obligatory word drop: Liberal, feminist, yuppie, gentrifier.


Don Juan de Doodlebug wrote:

Jezebel remembers intersectionality: A Hollaback Response Video: Women of Color on Street Harassment

Meanwhile over at The Intercept: No, We Don’t Need a Law Against Catcalling

"Feminists of color have long criticized Hollaback’s tactics for having precisely this effect, of casting black and brown men as congenital predators, thus perpetuating their criminalization (in a tradition going back hundreds of years). In New York, where the fight over stop-and-frisk is not over, such activism currently coincides with policing that punishes youth of color for dancing on the subway or uses bullhorns to shoo black students out of affluent Park Slope. Discussing the Hollaback video on his radio show, Geraldo Rivera asked Rudy Giuliani if it was proof of the city’s moral decay, with both men agreeing that street harassment should be seen as analogous to graffiti — a policing priority under New York Police Commander Bill Bratton. In the meantime, not far from where I live, a group of 'concerned residents, business owners, artists and civic croups' called Gowanus United is closing ranks around gentrifying spaces in the name of public safety, raising alarms against a parole complex slated to open next year 'within a half-mile radius' of 'our streets, buses and subways.'"

Obligatory word drop: Liberal, feminist, yuppie, gentrifier.

You forgot the trigger warning, thanks a lot.


I had a nice, long post with my perspective as a new yorker, but my phone ate it. Ah well.


Freehold DM wrote:
I had a nice, long post with my perspective as a new yorker, but my phone ate it. Ah well.

D'oh! Stlarning technology!


What is Catcalling?


Telling a passing woman you like her accouterments, quite loudly.


Freehold DM wrote:
Telling a passing woman you like her accouterments, quite loudly.

That made me think of someone Catcalling "nice accoutrements" to someone. LOL crass and classy at the same time. IT'S A JOKE, NO I AM NOT FOR CATCALLING, hence the crass part.(figured I'd head the loons off at the pass)


2 people marked this as a favorite.

social experiment = Ten Hours of Princess Leia Walking in NYC

nation = zombie


xavier c wrote:
What is Catcalling?

Trigger warning:

Paizo Glitterati Robot

Removed a post. Sorry, but this one treads a bit too much on the circumventing our profanity filter.


Simon Legrande wrote:
Don Juan de Doodlebug wrote:

Jezebel remembers intersectionality: A Hollaback Response Video: Women of Color on Street Harassment

Meanwhile over at The Intercept: No, We Don’t Need a Law Against Catcalling

"Feminists of color have long criticized Hollaback’s tactics for having precisely this effect, of casting black and brown men as congenital predators, thus perpetuating their criminalization (in a tradition going back hundreds of years). In New York, where the fight over stop-and-frisk is not over, such activism currently coincides with policing that punishes youth of color for dancing on the subway or uses bullhorns to shoo black students out of affluent Park Slope. Discussing the Hollaback video on his radio show, Geraldo Rivera asked Rudy Giuliani if it was proof of the city’s moral decay, with both men agreeing that street harassment should be seen as analogous to graffiti — a policing priority under New York Police Commander Bill Bratton. In the meantime, not far from where I live, a group of 'concerned residents, business owners, artists and civic croups' called Gowanus United is closing ranks around gentrifying spaces in the name of public safety, raising alarms against a parole complex slated to open next year 'within a half-mile radius' of 'our streets, buses and subways.'"

Obligatory word drop: Liberal, feminist, yuppie, gentrifier.

You forgot the trigger warning, thanks a lot.

Trigger warning:

NSFW


3 people marked this as a favorite.

Snicker snicker

Now that a lot of that Hip-Hop is over 20 years old, I can't help but think of all the funny situations of parents boring their kids with stories of listing to The Chronic, smoking Blunts, and doing all the other stuff that seemed so "gangsta" way back when...

"In my day, you could buy a 40oz of Olde E for $1.69, and back then, it really was 40oz.!"


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I was riding to work the other day and this jam came on the "Throwback" station. It was awesome and it sounded real familiar but after two verses the dj went into Tribe and then Black Sheep and I couldn't remember who it was. Went to work and looked around to see who might know the song. Asked all the hip hop kids, tried describing it and singing the chorus and they were like "He was rapping about being poor over a Bob Marley sample? Oh, well, that narrows it down..."

Went home and was ashamed and embarrassed to discover it was Naughty by Nature. Was even more upset when I went to work the next day and none of the hip hop kids knew who Naughty by Nature were.

Everything's Gonna Be Alright

On-topic lyric/Trigger warning

Spoiler:
If you ain't never been to the ghetto
Don't ever come to the ghetto
'Cuz you wouldn't understand the ghetto
So stay the f%#+ out of the ghetto!

Down with Hollaback yuppie gentrifiers!

The Exchange

princess leia harassed walking streets of nyc

Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Off-Topic Discussions / Videos of how Men and Women are Treated Walking in NYC All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Off-Topic Discussions