investigator vs archaeologist


Advice


Just finished reading up on the investigator, specifically the empiricist. Is it just me or does it seem to be in competition with the bard archaeologist archetype? As well, if you had to chose which is better which one would it be and why?


They are similar but the biggest difference I see the archeologist is actually better at trickery and deceit that the investigator. The bard can affect others with his spells, while an investigator only affects himself, even with spells that normally affect others like haste. The bard has access to illusion and enchantment spells that the investigator simply does not have.

The bard also gets 0 level spells some of which are very useful. Detect magic and mage hand are incredibly useful for a rogue type character.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Advice / investigator vs archaeologist All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Advice
Druid Gear