Slashing Grace not working on natural slashing attacks from a medium or lager creature? Malarky I say!


Pathfinder First Edition General Discussion

1 to 50 of 53 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>

How on earth haha, what a silly rule. I love Paizo but Paizo doesn't love dexterity users. Sad birds everywhere - tengu claws are the size of short swords. Lol'able indeed.

Shadow Lodge

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens Subscriber

Such mad. Many upset.

Wow.

Shadow Lodge

For what its worth, Short Swords are not a choice for Slashing Grace either.

Grand Lodge

Dylos wrote:
For what its worth, Short Swords are not a choice for Slashing Grace either.

Just curious, what is your reasoning behind the statement. Please don't say that a light weapon is not a one handed weapon. That argument is just idiotic imho, as it implies that light weapons require NO hands. When it just denotes weapons you may use Dex with (via Weapon Finesse) and weapons you may use in a grapple.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

9 people marked this as a favorite.
Dafydd wrote:
Please don't say that a light weapon is not a one handed weapon. That argument is just idiotic imho, as it implies that light weapons require NO hands.

No, it implies you've read the Core Rulebook at some point:

Core Rulebook, Equipment chapter wrote:
Light, One-Handed, and Two-Handed Melee Weapons: This designation is a measure of how much effort it takes to wield a weapon in combat. It indicates whether a melee weapon, when wielded by a character of the weapon's size category, is considered a light weapon, a one-handed weapon, or a two-handed weapon.

Please don't call people idiots, especially the people who actually did the homework.

Grand Lodge

How does it work for small creatures? As written, it doesn't work for natural weapons at all..

Grand Lodge

Dafydd wrote:
Dylos wrote:
For what its worth, Short Swords are not a choice for Slashing Grace either.
Just curious, what is your reasoning behind the statement. Please don't say that a light weapon is not a one handed weapon. That argument is just idiotic imho, as it implies that light weapons require NO hands. When it just denotes weapons you may use Dex with (via Weapon Finesse) and weapons you may use in a grapple.

Light Weapons and One-Handed Weapons are specifically defined weapon groups in Pathfinder. Thus, while all one-handed weapons can be wielded in one hand, not all weapons you can wielded in one hand are one-handed weapons. It's the difference between a specific defined term and generally defined term.

Sovereign Court

2 people marked this as a favorite.

To be honest, I'm confused how lager creatures can have any kind of natural attacks. Except possibly for being delicious.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Dafydd wrote:
Dylos wrote:
For what its worth, Short Swords are not a choice for Slashing Grace either.
Just curious, what is your reasoning behind the statement. Please don't say that a light weapon is not a one handed weapon. That argument is just idiotic imho, as it implies that light weapons require NO hands. When it just denotes weapons you may use Dex with (via Weapon Finesse) and weapons you may use in a grapple.

The reason is short swords are piercing not slashing so it doesn't matter if it's light or one handed.

Grand Lodge

Dread Knight wrote:
The reason is short swords are piercing not slashing so it doesn't matter if it's light or one handed.

Thank you, I just double checked my books and it seems my newer CRB does list it as a P only weapon while my older CRB lists it as a P or S. Had not noticed the change. That is what I get for assuming basic things didn't change over the years.

Jiggy wrote:
Dafydd wrote:
Please don't say that a light weapon is not a one handed weapon. That argument is just idiotic imho, as it implies that light weapons require NO hands.

No, it implies you've read the Core Rulebook at some point:

Core Rulebook, Equipment chapter wrote:
Light, One-Handed, and Two-Handed Melee Weapons: This designation is a measure of how much effort it takes to wield a weapon in combat. It indicates whether a melee weapon, when wielded by a character of the weapon's size category, is considered a light weapon, a one-handed weapon, or a two-handed weapon.
Please don't call people idiots, especially the people who actually did the homework.

Actually, if you read my statement, I call the argument idiotic. If you want to stand by the argument, that is your choice. I have made my view on the argument clear, I am not interested in people who take offense because I view a line of reasoning a way that differs from theirs.

Shadow Lodge

Dafydd wrote:
Dylos wrote:
For what its worth, Short Swords are not a choice for Slashing Grace either.
Just curious, what is your reasoning behind the statement. Please don't say that a light weapon is not a one handed weapon. That argument is just idiotic imho, as it implies that light weapons require NO hands. When it just denotes weapons you may use Dex with (via Weapon Finesse) and weapons you may use in a grapple.

As pointed out by Dread Knight, a Short Sword is a piercing weapon, not slashing, and thus is not eligible for slashing grace.

Additionally, as pointed out by Jiggy, One-Handed Weapon is a specifically defined term in the core rule book. If Slashing Grace was referring to a weapon that can be used in one hand it would say such, and most importantly it wouldn't include the line "The weapon must be one appropriate for your size."

Grand Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder PF Special Edition, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Illeist wrote:
To be honest, I'm confused how lager creatures can have any kind of natural attacks. Except possibly for being delicious.

I can see the controversy fermenting already.

Grand Lodge

Dafydd wrote:
Actually, if you read my statement, I call the argument idiotic. If you want to stand by the argument, that is your choice. I have made my view on the argument clear, I am not interested in people who take offense because I view a line of reasoning a way that differs from theirs.

I find it rather odd that you would find following RAW to be idiotic. One-Handed Weapons have a specific definition by RAW. The fact you have chosen to use a non-RAW definition for a RAW argument says more about your argument then it does theirs. As does the fact that you choose to dismiss all counter arguments by labeling them as idiotic rather than supporting your own arguments with logic and reason.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

Dafydd wrote:
Jiggy wrote:
Dafydd wrote:
Please don't say that a light weapon is not a one handed weapon. That argument is just idiotic imho, as it implies that light weapons require NO hands.

No, it implies you've read the Core Rulebook at some point:

Core Rulebook, Equipment chapter wrote:
Light, One-Handed, and Two-Handed Melee Weapons: This designation is a measure of how much effort it takes to wield a weapon in combat. It indicates whether a melee weapon, when wielded by a character of the weapon's size category, is considered a light weapon, a one-handed weapon, or a two-handed weapon.
Please don't call people idiots, especially the people who actually did the homework.
Actually, if you read my statement, I call the argument idiotic. If you want to stand by the argument, that is your choice. I have made my view on the argument clear, I am not interested in people who take offense because I view a line of reasoning a way that differs from theirs.

Okay, so it's not that you're calling people who read the Core Rulebook idiots, it's that you call the act of reading the Core Rulebook idiotic. I agree with the general mantra of "attack the issue, not the person", but I'm skeptical of the implication that that's what you were doing with your comment.

In any case, you're welcome to continue believing that understanding Core rules is idiotic if you like, as that is—as you put it—your choice.


Illeist wrote:
To be honest, I'm confused how lager creatures can have any kind of natural attacks. Except possibly for being delicious.

"Suicide Poisoning" (Ex)- The lager creature targets a conscious living creature within 30' and encourages them to come and drink it. The target must pass a Will save to resist the urge to drink the lager creature. If they fail they drink one pint of the creature and may take no other actions this round. They take a Fort save for every pint consumed, with DC of 12+pints consumed so far today. Target takes 1 dex, int, wis, and cha damage on a failed save.

A creature who is already drinking may make a new will save to stop each round. If they fail they have another drink, and will continue drinking as long as they continue failing. After the initial attack, the lager creature may act normally, including targetting this attack at another creature. A single lager creature can be drunk by as many foes as can get within their own natural reach.
A drinker who takes HP damage gets a +4 bonus on their next Will save.

A nights rest removes the ability damage, but if the target took more than (con mod) points of it, they're fatigued the whole day after.

CR varies, dependant on the DC of the will save and the size of the creature.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I have an easy solution.

http://www.d20pfsrd.com/path-of-war/feats#TOC-Deadly-Agility-Combat-


2 people marked this as a favorite.
LazarX wrote:
Illeist wrote:
To be honest, I'm confused how lager creatures can have any kind of natural attacks. Except possibly for being delicious.
I can see the controversy fermenting already.

I can barley wait.


Dafydd wrote:
Dylos wrote:
For what its worth, Short Swords are not a choice for Slashing Grace either.
Just curious, what is your reasoning behind the statement. Please don't say that a light weapon is not a one handed weapon.

A Light weapon is not a one-handed weapon. See the equipment charts? Separate categories. Using two hands on a one-handed weapon does not change it into a two-handed weapon, either.

Grand Lodge

Zhayne wrote:

I have an easy solution.

http://www.d20pfsrd.com/path-of-war/feats#TOC-Deadly-Agility-Combat-

Which would be fine if it were actually published by Paizo and were a PFS legal source.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Why would/should it work on piercing weapons? It's called SLASHING Grace, not PIERCING Grace.


trollbill wrote:
Zhayne wrote:

I have an easy solution.

http://www.d20pfsrd.com/path-of-war/feats#TOC-Deadly-Agility-Combat-

Which would be fine if it were actually published by Paizo and were a PFS legal source.

I see no reference to PFS playing any part in this discussion, and who freaking cares who published it?

Shadow Lodge

Zhayne wrote:
trollbill wrote:
Zhayne wrote:

I have an easy solution.

http://www.d20pfsrd.com/path-of-war/feats#TOC-Deadly-Agility-Combat-

Which would be fine if it were actually published by Paizo and were a PFS legal source.
I see no reference to PFS playing any part in this discussion, and who freaking cares who published it?

This thread was moved from the PFS general discussion.

Grand Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Ser Clay wrote:
I love Paizo but Paizo doesn't love dexterity users.

If you can find me a feat tree or set of magic items that lets you use your Strength for your AC and/or Reflex saves I might buy this argument.


trollbill wrote:
Ser Clay wrote:
I love Paizo but Paizo doesn't love dexterity users.
If you can find me a feat tree or set of magic items that lets you use your Strength for your AC and/or Reflex saves I might buy this argument.

Strong people can wear heavy armor. Feat chain available in PHB 1, first printing through present. Hope that helps.

Sovereign Court

Ser Clay wrote:
A medium creature's natural weapons should be medium.

A medium creature's natural weapons are medium.

That doesn't keep them from being light.

A medium sized dagger is light too.

A small sized longsword isn't light, despite being small.

Small/medium/large & light/one-handed/two-handed are two entirely seperate categories of qualification.


You're stuck in how 3.5 did weapons. Its been tweaked.


trollbill wrote:

If you can find me a feat tree or set of magic items that lets you use your Strength for your AC and/or Reflex saves I might buy this argument.

That is a really bizarre non-sequitur.

Zhayne wrote:

I have an easy solution.

http://www.d20pfsrd.com/path-of-war/feats#TOC-Deadly-Agility-Combat-

Path of War is the solution to most of the problems Paizo causes.

Too bad so many people are afraid of it.


Why should the mere mortals get to use the stat they want?

Meanwhile orc witches can cast with con...


Marroar Gellantara wrote:

Why should the mere mortals get to use the stat they want?

Meanwhile orc witches can cast with con...

Well there's your problem. Stop comparing NPC classes and PC classes.

Grand Lodge

swoosh wrote:
trollbill wrote:

If you can find me a feat tree or set of magic items that lets you use your Strength for your AC and/or Reflex saves I might buy this argument.

That is a really bizarre non-sequitur.

The person I was responding to seemed to understand it just fine.


anlashok wrote:
Marroar Gellantara wrote:

Why should the mere mortals get to use the stat they want?

Meanwhile orc witches can cast with con...

Well there's your problem. Stop comparing NPC classes and PC classes.

You think Witches are a NPC class? Or do you think Scarred-Witch Doctors are a NPC class? Either way you mistaken as both as I assure you, PC classes.

Grand Lodge

Anzyr wrote:
anlashok wrote:
Marroar Gellantara wrote:

Why should the mere mortals get to use the stat they want?

Meanwhile orc witches can cast with con...

Well there's your problem. Stop comparing NPC classes and PC classes.
You think Witches are a NPC class? Or do you think Scarred-Witch Doctors are a NPC class? Either way you mistaken as both as I assure you, PC classes.

I have an Orc Scarred Witch Doctor in a non-PFS campaign. They are quite powerful, but not without their downside as I am now the master of all constitution-based skills.


Fret not! Spells can replace many skills anyway and usually do it better. Why put ranks in Climb, when you can Spider Climb? You are out of luck on Aram Zey's Focus though. Tough break. Maybe get a wand of it?

1 to 50 of 53 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / General Discussion / Slashing Grace not working on natural slashing attacks from a medium or lager creature? Malarky I say! All Messageboards