Fighting the ugly face of racism


Off-Topic Discussions

51 to 100 of 165 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | next > last >>

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Leonid Brezhnev III?
Jimmy-Bob Ritchie?
Isaac Goldman?
Pinko Luxemberg?
The Goblin Once Again Known As Chemnitz? (look up a map of East Germany from before 1989 if you don't get that one)
George W. Bush?


Wait. David Duke = Jesse Jackson, and Cornel West is crazy?

What did I miss?

I think many people hear 'white privilege' and think of the old Eddie Murphy SNL skit where he gets done up as a white person, and goes around getting free money from banks and stuff. I think it is far more subtle, and varies by situation, location, and many other factors.

I see it most obviously when I get involved with any court setting. There is almost always a disproportionate number of minorities coming up before the judge, and I think that starts with more getting pulled over and ends with more in jail. Having been before judges on several occasions, I'm always glad to be white and well spoken in those situations, although I know it isn't fair.

I don't have time at the moment, but the town I live in is 85+% white, and race is a factor in many aspects of life here.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

From the stories my (Pakistani) workmate told me of visiting his dad in Florida, I get the impression white privilege is not getting pulled over by the police four times in a two-hour drive from the airport.


JurgenV wrote:
As a white person my culture is treated as something to be ashamed of, and minority groups are more As a white. free to express and revel in their unique heritages.

As a white person very interested in my racial heritage, I have never seen this. I have a strong ethnic identity, and I don't get s++$ for it. My Mom's side is German-American, my Dawns is Irish-American, and my Stepdad is so Italian it puts off actual Italians. I've never been told any of this identity is a bad thing.

Quote:
Mix up a puerto rican and a mexican and you will catch hell. Mix up a german and french man, or just say they are both just white, and HE will be in the wrong to argue it.

That really depends on how you correct people.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

. . .Dude, if you mix up a Frenchman and a German, they'll join forces to beat you up for not knowing the difference, and World War Two. In my experience, no one cares if you identify as european-american, french-american or german-american, but it's boorish (not Beor-ish, different thing) to say, "You're african-american, that dude's hispanic-american, and I'm just american."


2 people marked this as a favorite.

I think it's funny that the CEO of the company I work for is from South Africa but can't be called African-American because he's white.


yellowdingo wrote:
Given skin colour isnt race everyone is wrong.

Removed unnecessary insult, but otherwise agree with this statement, if mass effect taught me anything, it's that when we start actual space travel our opinions of our fellow man won't amount to s%@@ in the face of other species that may be out there.


4 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Maps, Rulebook Subscriber; Starfinder Charter Superscriber
Simon Legrande wrote:
Is it too much to ask to just treat people as human beings?

This is probably the best example in this thread of exactly what white privilege is and how it operates. People who identify as "white" (myself included) tend not to be confronted with that identity very often, so we aren't forced to critically examine what it means. It's very easy to feel like we are just "normal", and overlook the fact that "normal" (as in, "aligns with mainstream culture") is not some purely neutral default, but actually is a specific collection of traits and values (including, yes, being white). As a result, we feel like if we treat everyone as though they were "normal", that's the same thing as treating them as if they were "human beings", when it's really not. If we were better able to see the call for "treat everyone the same" as "treat everyone as if they were white males", it might become more obvious why that is an... unworkable suggestion. Treating people like human beings should never mean "treat people the same", and encouraging people to take differences in experiences and opportunities into account should never be seen as "special treatment", it should be the default.

The push back against this seems to be something akin to the tired sophistry about how political correctness stifles thought and communication - that if we spend so much time trying to sort out what the right words are and how our cultural history might be coloring our perspectives, we end up becoming a bunch of navel-gazing solipsists who are too afraid to peer out of our critical examinations of identity for fear of being labelled "racists". At best, the argument goes, forcing all this self examination and reflection on people is an exhausting, tedious punishment for the crime of "being white".

Ironically, this very argument demonstrates exactly how "being white" is privileged. People get upset at the idea of having to confront their "race" and identity before speaking, because it seems exhausting, and demeaning, and a bit like a punishment, all without realizing that often "non-white" or "non-normal" people are forced to do that exact same kind of thinking every day. "Normal" people don't often have to make calculations based on the lives and experiences of other people - they don't have to think, for example, about how they will be treated when the go into a store, or get stopped by the police. They don't have to ask the question "will my <identity> be a problem here?" because they can just assume it won't - after all, that's what being "normal" means, right? Is it possibly exhausting having to think about race/class/gender all the time? Maybe. Probably. I don't really know, because I don't have to do it, because I'm a white male, and that's what white privilege means.

It's also important to note that being told you are wrong about how you think about race isn't automatically an attempt to "shame" or "punish" people. Nobody likes being wrong, that's true. It can certainly be embarrassing to realize that you've been mistaken about something for a long time, but it's important to realize that being told that you should "check your privilege" is ultimately not about "shaming" any more than telling a child that six times six doesn't equal sixty six is. It's about trying to educate people to see the world differently, and understand that being "normal" is itself a privilege.


Simon Legrande wrote:
I think it's funny that the CEO of the company I work for is from South Africa but can't be called African-American because he's white.

Blame historical context.

This isn't universal, of course, but I know some guys who immigrated frm Ghana who call themselves Ghanan-Americans rather than African-Americans because of the historical context of the second. To them, the descendants of slaves who have been in the US for centuries are distinct from recent African immigrants.


Simon Legrande wrote:
Frankly, as a white male, I find the idea of "white privilege" offensive. Especially the damned if you do, damned if you don't thinking behind it.

Personally, I find white privilege offensive, rather than attempts to acknowledge and combat it. White privilege is very real...even if you don't realize it. Or more accurately, because you don't.


Ok so what if you look white, others assume you are white but you do not self identify as white? Should you "check your privilege" or can you live as what you think of yourself as without the guilt?


bugleyman wrote:
Simon Legrande wrote:
Frankly, as a white male, I find the idea of "white privilege" offensive. Especially the damned if you do, damned if you don't thinking behind it.
Personally, I find white privilege offensive, rather than attempts to acknowledge and combat it. White privilege is very real...even if you don't realize it. Or more accurately, because you don't.

Other than insulting and verbal beatings to whites who get involved in race discussions with out self flagellation HOW do you combat it?


2 people marked this as a favorite.
JurgenV wrote:
Other than insulting and verbal beatings to whites who get involved in race discussions with out self flagellation HOW do you combat it?

In a word? Empathy.

I'm a white male. But I'm a white male who grew up in Hawaii, at a time when racial slurs were openly used against the light-skinned. And I don't just mean some people used them....pretty much everyone did. School employees, civil servants, etc. At the time, of course, I hated it. In hindsight, I think it gave me some perspective. So while I can't begin to imagine how it feels to be black, I do have some experience living with a culture of racism. And it sucks, not matter how "subtle" it happens to be.


Kelsey MacAilbert wrote:
Simon Legrande wrote:
I think it's funny that the CEO of the company I work for is from South Africa but can't be called African-American because he's white.
Blame historical context.

It's funny in a way, but it's mostly just a linguistic quirk. African-American is a euphemism for black American.

Words (even compound ones) have their own meanings. They're not the sum of their parts.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
MrTsFloatinghead wrote:
Simon Legrande wrote:
Is it too much to ask to just treat people as human beings?

This is probably the best example in this thread of exactly what white privilege is and how it operates. People who identify as "white" (myself included) tend not to be confronted with that identity very often, so we aren't forced to critically examine what it means. It's very easy to feel like we are just "normal", and overlook the fact that "normal" (as in, "aligns with mainstream culture") is not some purely neutral default, but actually is a specific collection of traits and values (including, yes, being white). As a result, we feel like if we treat everyone as though they were "normal", that's the same thing as treating them as if they were "human beings", when it's really not. If we were better able to see the call for "treat everyone the same" as "treat everyone as if they were white males", it might become more obvious why that is an... unworkable suggestion. Treating people like human beings should never mean "treat people the same", and encouraging people to take differences in experiences and opportunities into account should never be seen as "special treatment", it should be the default.

The push back against this seems to be something akin to the tired sophistry about how political correctness stifles thought and communication - that if we spend so much time trying to sort out what the right words are and how our cultural history might be coloring our perspectives, we end up becoming a bunch of navel-gazing solipsists who are too afraid to peer out of our critical examinations of identity for fear of being labelled "racists". At best, the argument goes, forcing all this self examination and reflection on people is an exhausting, tedious punishment for the crime of "being white".

Ironically, this very argument demonstrates exactly how "being white" is privileged. People get upset at the idea of having to confront their "race" and identity before speaking, because it seems exhausting, and...

This is why I pointed out that it was a rhetorical question. I knew that it was impossible and someone was likely to come along and explain how I'm wrong for thinking people shouldn't be treated as lesser people for having a different skin color because as a white person I just don't know any better. I'm actually surprised if took this long.


4 people marked this as a favorite.
JurgenV wrote:
Ok so what if you look white, others assume you are white but you do not self identify as white? Should you "check your privilege" or can you live as what you think of yourself as without the guilt?

What if you look black, others assume you are black, but you do not self identify as black? Can you just live as what you think of yourself without the discrimination?

No, obviously not. It's a stupid question.

For white privilege, you should "check your privilege", since you're going to get it as an apparently white person, but that doesn't mean you can't live without guilt. Even if you identify as white. "White privilege" isn't about guilt. It's about recognizing the institutional prejudices and not reinforcing them, even if that's just by not denying that they exist and effect others.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Simon Legrande wrote:
This is why I pointed out that it was a rhetorical question. I knew that it was impossible and someone was likely to come along and explain how I'm wrong for thinking people shouldn't be treated as lesser people for having a different skin color because as a white person I just don't know any better. I'm actually surprised if took this long.

Only that isn't what happened. But as you pointed out, you'd already made up your mind what the response was going to be, so what actually happened doesn't really matter.


6 people marked this as a favorite.
thejeff wrote:
"White privilege" isn't about guilt. It's about recognizing the institutional prejudices and not reinforcing them, even if that's just by not denying that they exist and effect others.

Well said.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
bugleyman wrote:
JurgenV wrote:
Other than insulting and verbal beatings to whites who get involved in race discussions with out self flagellation HOW do you combat it?

In a word? Empathy.

I'm a white male. But I'm a white male who grew up in Hawaii, at a time when racial slurs were openly used against the light-skinned. And I don't just mean some people used them....pretty much everyone did. School employees, civil servants, etc. At the time, of course, I hated it. In hindsight, I think it gave me some perspective. So while I can't begin to imagine how it feels to be black, I do have some experience living with a culture of racism. And it sucks, not matter how "subtle" it happens to be.

How about that. I'm a white male and have lived almost my entire life in a city where whites have never been the majority. It’s surprising that you and I, as whites from similar backgrounds, just don't believe the exact same things. It's almost like we're individuals and not part of some monolithic group. Oops, is my racism showing again?


Simon Legrande wrote:
Oops, is my racism showing again?

Nope...just your defensiveness. Acknowledge our differences is not racist...just realistic.

If you really want to be part of the solution, take a step back and try to picture yourself on the wrong side of centuries of ingrained racism. You won't be able to do it -- any more than I can -- but you might get enough of an inkling to help with that chip on your shoulder.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
bugleyman wrote:
JurgenV wrote:
Other than insulting and verbal beatings to whites who get involved in race discussions with out self flagellation HOW do you combat it?

In a word? Empathy.

I'm a white male. But I'm a white male who grew up in Hawaii, at a time when racial slurs were openly used against the light-skinned. And I don't just mean some people used them....pretty much everyone did. School employees, civil servants, etc. At the time, of course, I hated it. In hindsight, I think it gave me some perspective. So while I can't begin to imagine how it feels to be black, I do have some experience living with a culture of racism. And it sucks, not matter how "subtle" it happens to be.

Then these conversations should be about empathy from all people for all people not the usual attacks of white privilege. Just as i cannot know what it is like to be black they cannot know what it is like to live in fear of retaliation for what people of my skin color did to someone of theirs at some time, to be threaten with it regularly, to be told that the school can have a african american, etc club but no such club for any variety of white. We need to get beyond race. and yes that does mean to treat all equal even if some want more/better/different.


JurgenV wrote:
Then these conversations should be about empathy from all people for all people not the usual attacks of white privilege. Just as i cannot know what it is like to be black they cannot know what it is like to live in fear of retaliation for what people of my skin color did to someone of theirs at some time, to be threaten with it regularly, to be told that the school can have a african american, etc club but no such club for any variety of white. We need to get beyond race. and yes that does mean to treat all equal even if some want more/better/different.

I'm sorry you see acknowledging white privilege as an attack. I see it as the starting point for serious discussion.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I read some of these responses and it's like reading the responses from some of the MRA guys vs. feminist arguments against sexism and sexual assault. Not exactly the same, but BOY are the parallels there.


JurgenV wrote:
bugleyman wrote:
JurgenV wrote:
Other than insulting and verbal beatings to whites who get involved in race discussions with out self flagellation HOW do you combat it?

In a word? Empathy.

I'm a white male. But I'm a white male who grew up in Hawaii, at a time when racial slurs were openly used against the light-skinned. And I don't just mean some people used them....pretty much everyone did. School employees, civil servants, etc. At the time, of course, I hated it. In hindsight, I think it gave me some perspective. So while I can't begin to imagine how it feels to be black, I do have some experience living with a culture of racism. And it sucks, not matter how "subtle" it happens to be.

Then these conversations should be about empathy from all people for all people not the usual attacks of white privilege. Just as i cannot know what it is like to be black they cannot know what it is like to live in fear of retaliation for what people of my skin color did to someone of theirs at some time, to be threaten with it regularly, to be told that the school can have a african american, etc club but no such club for any variety of white. We need to get beyond race. and yes that does mean to treat all equal even if some want more/better/different.

Now this is very well said.


Kajehase wrote:
From the stories my (Pakistani) workmate told me of visiting his dad in Florida, I get the impression white privilege is not getting pulled over by the police four times in a two-hour drive from the airport.

If I drove like my (Pakistani) former next-door neighbor, I'd never get there from the airport, because they'd have taken my license away by the sixth or eighth time I was pulled over for doing things like "driving on the sidewalk" and "failure to acknowledge laws of physics" and "refusal to accept that other cars, barriers, pits, etc. are real objects."

So I'm going to presume that your workmate's driving was vastly better than my neighbor's. (Toonces the Cat's driving was also vastly better than my neighbor's.)


MrTsFloatinghead wrote:
The push back against this seems to be something akin to the tired sophistry about how political correctness stifles thought and communication - that if we spend so much time trying to sort out what the right words are and how our cultural history might be coloring our perspectives, we end up becoming a bunch of navel-gazing solipsists who are too afraid to peer out of our critical examinations of identity for fear of being labelled "racists". At best, the argument goes, forcing all this self examination and reflection on people is an exhausting, tedious punishment for the crime of "being white".

Accusing others of sophistry while using it to try and discredit opposing viewpoints.


Simon Legrande wrote:
bugleyman wrote:
JurgenV wrote:
Other than insulting and verbal beatings to whites who get involved in race discussions with out self flagellation HOW do you combat it?

In a word? Empathy.

I'm a white male. But I'm a white male who grew up in Hawaii, at a time when racial slurs were openly used against the light-skinned. And I don't just mean some people used them....pretty much everyone did. School employees, civil servants, etc. At the time, of course, I hated it. In hindsight, I think it gave me some perspective. So while I can't begin to imagine how it feels to be black, I do have some experience living with a culture of racism. And it sucks, not matter how "subtle" it happens to be.

How about that. I'm a white male and have lived almost my entire life in a city where whites have never been the majority. It’s surprising that you and I, as whites from similar backgrounds, just don't believe the exact same things. It's almost like we're individuals and not part of some monolithic group. Oops, is my racism showing again?

I don't know what city you've lived in, but if it's an mainland American city, regardless of the actual number of people of various descents, it's quite possible to live the mainstream white culture experience. Even in majority-minority urban areas, whites often control the major businesses and wield disproportiate influence. It's also common for the residential sections to be somewhat segregated - often reflecting differences in wealth along with race.

In short, living in a city where the underclass is the majority by numbers may not actually be a similar experience to bugleyman's Hawaiian experience. Or to the experiences discussed in the CNN article of actually being one of the few whites in a black school or other setting.

Note: I'm not calling you a racist and have not intentionally done so. I am suggesting, that as a white person it is possible for you to miss things that minorities cannot afford to ignore.


ShinHakkaider wrote:
I read some of these responses and it's like reading the responses from some of the MRA guys vs. feminist arguments against sexism and sexual assault. Not exactly the same, but BOY are the parallels there.

Yeah. It's the same thing.

Or the War on Christians people.

It's all the same instincts kicking in.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

And now, a Musical Interlude.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
bugleyman wrote:
Simon Legrande wrote:
Oops, is my racism showing again?

Nope...just your defensiveness. Acknowledge our differences is not racist...just realistic.

If you really want to be part of the solution, take a step back and try to picture yourself on the wrong side of centuries of ingrained racism. You won't be able to do it -- any more than I can -- but you might get enough of an inkling to help with that chip on your shoulder.

That chip up there is called collectivism. I keep it there as a reminder that even though I wish to be treated as an individual and strive to treat others the same, that will usually be considered bad because many other people would rather identify themselves by the group they belong to. Every now and then someone comes along and tries to load some guilt up there too. Because for some reason I should be held accountable for the actions of people I've never met just because we have the same skin color. Well there's no room for the guilt so don't expect me to feel any.


Simon Legrande wrote:
Because for some reason I should be held accountable for the actions of people I've never met just because we have the same skin color.

I CANT EVEN...I'm laughing so hard at the irony here that I'm on the verge of CRYING.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Simon Legrande wrote:
That chip up there is called collectivism. I keep it there as a reminder that even though I wish to be treated as an individual and strive to treat others the same, that will usually be considered bad because many other people would rather identify themselves by the group they belong to. Every now and then someone comes along and tries to load some guilt up there too. Because for some reason I should be held accountable for the actions of people I've never met just because we have the same skin color. Well there's no room for the guilt so don't expect me to feel any.

Nor should you.

But refusing to acknowledge racism doesn't eliminate it, just as the act of acknowledging racism is not itself racist.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Simon Legrande wrote:
bugleyman wrote:
Simon Legrande wrote:
Oops, is my racism showing again?

Nope...just your defensiveness. Acknowledge our differences is not racist...just realistic.

If you really want to be part of the solution, take a step back and try to picture yourself on the wrong side of centuries of ingrained racism. You won't be able to do it -- any more than I can -- but you might get enough of an inkling to help with that chip on your shoulder.

That chip up there is called collectivism. I keep it there as a reminder that even though I wish to be treated as an individual and strive to treat others the same, that will usually be considered bad because many other people would rather identify themselves by the group they belong to. Every now and then someone comes along and tries to load some guilt up there too. Because for some reason I should be held accountable for the actions of people I've never met just because we have the same skin color. Well there's no room for the guilt so don't expect me to feel any.

No one is asking you to.

As I said before, "white privilege" isn't about making whites feel guilty. It's about acknowledging the prejudices still going on and being aware of when you benefit from it, even if you don't actively do anything to do so. (Hiring discrimination, for example, isn't your fault, but you might still benefit. And never actually know it.)

If you really "don't see race", then you also can't see racism in anything but the most blatant form. If you don't pay attention to race, it'll just be a strange anomaly that your co-worker Bob gets stopped for minor traffic violations more than anyone else and usually searched when he does get stopped.

You can't fix racism by ignoring race. It just makes you blind to it.


bugleyman wrote:
Simon Legrande wrote:
That chip up there is called collectivism. I keep it there as a reminder that even though I wish to be treated as an individual and strive to treat others the same, that will usually be considered bad because many other people would rather identify themselves by the group they belong to. Every now and then someone comes along and tries to load some guilt up there too. Because for some reason I should be held accountable for the actions of people I've never met just because we have the same skin color. Well there's no room for the guilt so don't expect me to feel any.

Nor should you.

But refusing to acknowledge racism doesn't eliminate it, just as the act of acknowledging racism is not itself racist.

I'm getting a clinc in proper civil discourse and patience from you here Bugleyman.

In all seriousness though, what you said here is something I think more people need to understand. That and acknowledging white privilege isnt going to make someone burst into flames with guilt and shame. That's not the intent.

It's no different that acknowledging that women in general have to concern themselves with their physical safety in a way that men simply do not. Is it wrong for me to acknowledge that? Does it make me and awful person? No, it quite simply something that IS. And something that I do take into consideration when I'm around women who don't know me well or at all. My physical presence CAN be perceived as a possible threat. That's simply reality.


Hitdice wrote:
. . .Dude, if you mix up a Frenchman and a German, they'll join forces to beat you up for not knowing the difference, and World War Two.

I'm a German-American, and I wouldn't really care if I got mixed up with a French-American (not that this has ever happened).

Then again, my uncle is a Plastic Paddy who gets pissed off gigantically if you ever remind him he has English blood or say anything nice about the English at all.

Quote:
In my experience, no one cares if you identify european-american, french-american or german-american, but it's boorish (not Beor-ish, different thing) to say, "You're african-american, that dude's hispanic-amirican, and I'm just american."

Yea. Referring to yourself as just American while singling out the ethnic identities of others does come across to me as a bit bigoted.


Kelsey MacAilbert wrote:
Hitdice wrote:
. . .Dude, if you mix up a Frenchman and a German, they'll join forces to beat you up for not knowing the difference, and World War Two.

I'm a German-American, and I wouldn't really care if I got mixed up with a French-American (not that this has ever happened).

Then again, my uncle is a Plastic Paddy who gets pissed off gigantically if you ever remind him he has English blood or say anything nice about the English at all.

Quote:
In my experience, no one cares if you identify european-american, french-american or german-american, but it's boorish (not Beor-ish, different thing) to say, "You're african-american, that dude's hispanic-amirican, and I'm just american."
Yea. Referring to yourself as just American while singling out the ethnic identities of others does come across to me as a bit bigoted.

And yet it's just reality.

I don't think of myself as European-American, much less any specific country. There would be at least 4 countries that I know of and they're all at least 4 generations back, some much farther.

Of course it's partly white privilege.

OTOH, I generally think of African-Americans as just Americans too. Unless there's some reason to distinguish, in which case I'd almost certainly use white for me and either African-American or black for them. Mostly because black can cause offense in some cases, while white doesn't.


bugleyman wrote:
Simon Legrande wrote:
That chip up there is called collectivism. I keep it there as a reminder that even though I wish to be treated as an individual and strive to treat others the same, that will usually be considered bad because many other people would rather identify themselves by the group they belong to. Every now and then someone comes along and tries to load some guilt up there too. Because for some reason I should be held accountable for the actions of people I've never met just because we have the same skin color. Well there's no room for the guilt so don't expect me to feel any.

Nor should you.

But refusing to acknowledge racism doesn't eliminate it, just as the act of acknowledging racism is not itself racist.

I'm not sure that I ever said racism doesn't exist. I'm quite aware of its existence partly in thanks to the term "white privilege". I'm acknowledging that racism exists on all sides and that anyone who says only whites can be racist is flat out wrong. The way I see it, the only way to eliminate racism is for ALL people to stop practicing it.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
ShinHakkaider wrote:
Simon Legrande wrote:
Because for some reason I should be held accountable for the actions of people I've never met just because we have the same skin color.
I CANT EVEN...I'm laughing so hard at the irony here that I'm on the verge of CRYING.

What this means is that you, like many others, don't know what irony actually is.

If I said I hate being grouped with whites while saying all blacks are the same, that would be ironic. Hopefully this explanation will allow you to use the word properly in the future.


thejeff wrote:
OTOH, I generally think of African-Americans as just Americans too. Unless there's some reason to distinguish, in which case I'd almost certainly use white for me and either African-American or black for them. Mostly because black can cause offense in some cases, while white doesn't.

Well, I do think of African-Americans as being every bit as American as I am, and referring to somebody as just American when you apply that term equally to all ethnic groups isn't offensive at all. It's when somebody says "I'm just American, and you are African-American or Mexican-American" that it gets offensive. At that point, you are acting as if your ethnicity as normal for Americans and doesn't need mentioning (and I'll give you just one guess as to which ethnicity that might be), and the other person's ethnicity is not normal and needs to be pointed out.

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder PF Special Edition, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Simon Legrande wrote:
Frankly, as a white male, I find the idea of "white privilege" offensive. Especially the damned if you do, damned if you don't thinking behind it.

In what sense? the claim that it exists? or the fact that it does?

Do you even understand the concept? As a white male, you are largely free from the prejudgements that the society in power makes upon those that are not male or white. It means that when cops see you in the street, they're less likely to consider you "guilty.... of something." It means you're more likely in equal circumstances to have a taxi stop for you if you hail one, be considered for a job or a pay raise. Or be targeted by Klanlike groups because of the color of your skin.

You don't see it as white privilege because it's an expected NORM for you. For others that don't fit your graced demographic, it's a privilege they can only hope that their children or grandchildren might attain some day.

White privilege itself is not the problem. The problem is all the others excluded from those privileges because they aren't white and male.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Maps, Rulebook Subscriber; Starfinder Charter Superscriber
Necromancer wrote:
Accusing others of sophistry while using it to try and discredit opposing viewpoints.

A) Accusations of sophistry work a lot better if you actually attempt to demonstrate (as I did) where the error in logic is, why it's in error, and trace where that error may have stemmed from.

B) Accusations of hypocrisy are not substantive defenses anyway. Even if you feel that my logic is not sound, that doesn't mean that I'm wrong about the other side's logic being equally unsound.

C) I concede that I am attempting to discredit a viewpoint. This is because the viewpoint is wrong. I'm tempted to add a pro forma "in my opinion" there, but I won't, because it really isn't an "opinion" - you don't get to form opinions about "is racism real?" or "does white privilege exist, and is it a problem?", any more than you get to form opinions about "is the Universe expanding?" or "is global warming real, and is it a problem?". Those are certainly issues of PERCEPTION, but that's not the same thing as "opinion". Either racism and white privilege are real, and are a problem, or they are not. Those are factual claims, and can be evaluated as such. At a logical level, at least one of those two viewpoints MUST be wrong - they are mutually exclusive perceptions of the world. I've already explained why, despite the fact that many people "feel" that there is no such thing as white privilege, those perceptions are likely to be incorrect. The opposing side has not advanced anything that resembles an objective argument against this (as in, attempted to show why and how MY perceptions are more likely to be flawed), and has instead relied on "This is how I feel, and I'm entitled to my viewpoint" style arguments. I'm saying that, insofar as the viewpoint espoused is likely to be based on perceptions that are flawed, it's persuasive force can be dismissed.

D) Again, this is NOT a personal attack on you. You are not a bad person for not seeing white privilege. You are not morally culpable for creating the system, nor do you need to feel guilty for benefiting from it. The moral dimension of being "wrong" about how race and privilege works is basically the same as the moral dimension of being wrong about an Algebra question. It might be embarrassing, but it's not "bullying" or attack on your personality to point out the error.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
thejeff wrote:

I don't think of myself as European-American, much less any specific country. There would be at least 4 countries that I know of and they're all at least 4 generations back, some much farther.

Maybe it's a duration thing, then. Mrs. Gersen's relatives up here in Western PA are very aggressively "Croatian-Americans," with emphasis on the Croatian. I personally think of myself as much German as American... and after all my time in the Lone Star State I'm almost inclined to think my American half is more Texan than American!

The sad truth is that, for many African-Americans, their ancestors were forcibly brought over from any number of different cultures, records were not kept, and the only way to narrow down likelihoods is by DNA analysis. So most people can't fall back on the kind of knowledge that, say, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar grew up with:

Kareem Abdul-Jabbar wrote:
My family was brought to America by a French planter named Alcindor, who came here from Trinidad in the 18th century. My people were Yoruba, and their culture survived slavery.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Simon Legrande wrote:
bugleyman wrote:
Simon Legrande wrote:
That chip up there is called collectivism. I keep it there as a reminder that even though I wish to be treated as an individual and strive to treat others the same, that will usually be considered bad because many other people would rather identify themselves by the group they belong to. Every now and then someone comes along and tries to load some guilt up there too. Because for some reason I should be held accountable for the actions of people I've never met just because we have the same skin color. Well there's no room for the guilt so don't expect me to feel any.

Nor should you.

But refusing to acknowledge racism doesn't eliminate it, just as the act of acknowledging racism is not itself racist.

I'm not sure that I ever said racism doesn't exist. I'm quite aware of its existence partly in thanks to the term "white privilege". I'm acknowledging that racism exists on all sides and that anyone who says only whites can be racist is flat out wrong. The way I see it, the only way to eliminate racism is for ALL people to stop practicing it.

That sounds great but so far your only point in this entire thread is to talk about how racism somehow overwhelmingly effects whites.

While I'm sure racism DOES effect whites you come across like the man in a thread discussing sexism and sexual assualt that cries out "but men are victims of rape too!!"

Men ARE victims of rape. Absolutely. But the OVERWHELMING victims of rape and sexual assault are women. And the guy no matter how well meaning who cries out that "men are raped too!!" comes across as trying to deflect from the actual problem. Some people would call that a sense of entitlement from being male. Some would call it a form of silencing. You know "well the people complaining of racism are racists too so they should just shut up." or "if everyone just stopped being racist/talking about racism/acknowledging race" etc...
Me I just call it poor form old chap...

Grand Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Simon Legrande wrote:
bugleyman wrote:
Simon Legrande wrote:
That chip up there is called collectivism. I keep it there as a reminder that even though I wish to be treated as an individual and strive to treat others the same, that will usually be considered bad because many other people would rather identify themselves by the group they belong to. Every now and then someone comes along and tries to load some guilt up there too. Because for some reason I should be held accountable for the actions of people I've never met just because we have the same skin color. Well there's no room for the guilt so don't expect me to feel any.

Nor should you.

But refusing to acknowledge racism doesn't eliminate it, just as the act of acknowledging racism is not itself racist.

I'm not sure that I ever said racism doesn't exist. I'm quite aware of its existence partly in thanks to the term "white privilege". I'm acknowledging that racism exists on all sides and that anyone who says only whites can be racist is flat out wrong. The way I see it, the only way to eliminate racism is for ALL people to stop practicing it.

Unfortunate use of the word irony aside, that's still incredibly ignorant.

Nobody says only whites can be racist.

OK, most people don't say that. A very select few do. Just like a few people will say all heterosexual sex is rape. But their numbers are so negligible that they could hardly be counted at all and are more often used as a strawman to conflate valid arguments with ridiculous ones.

It's not that people of any race cannot be racist. It's just that institutionally whites have power in America. That's such a plain fact to say it isn't a level of denial I can't even begin to debate with. And the problem is not that people are racist - which sucks, but will never be solved - but that this particular racism is widespread and institutionalized.

Taken individually, it doesn't matter if Abdul next door to me thinks all white people are shifty-eyed devils, or if Jim Bob down the street thinks all blacks are intellectually inferior criminals.

What matters is that our entire culture had been built upon the backs of an oppressed people, and in many ways continues to do so while also disenfranchising those who are identified by other socially outlying features. That is what needs to be fixed, and ignoring it is a tacit endorsement of a system that is still heavily weighted against minorities. Deflecting onto those individuals whose attitudes you find distasteful gives you an all-too-convenient excuse not to worry about how those people are treated.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Kirth Gersen wrote:
Kajehase wrote:
From the stories my (Pakistani) workmate told me of visiting his dad in Florida, I get the impression white privilege is not getting pulled over by the police four times in a two-hour drive from the airport.

If I drove like my (Pakistani) former next-door neighbor, I'd never get there from the airport, because they'd have taken my license away by the sixth or eighth time I was pulled over for doing things like "driving on the sidewalk" and "failure to acknowledge laws of physics" and "refusal to accept that other cars, barriers, pits, etc. are real objects."

So I'm going to presume that your workmate's driving was vastly better than my neighbor's. (Toonces the Cat's driving was also vastly better than my neighbor's.)

Well, I've never seen your neighbour drive, but let's just say I've voluntarily asked my workmate for a lift more than once.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
ShinHakkaider wrote:
Simon Legrande wrote:
bugleyman wrote:
Simon Legrande wrote:
That chip up there is called collectivism. I keep it there as a reminder that even though I wish to be treated as an individual and strive to treat others the same, that will usually be considered bad because many other people would rather identify themselves by the group they belong to. Every now and then someone comes along and tries to load some guilt up there too. Because for some reason I should be held accountable for the actions of people I've never met just because we have the same skin color. Well there's no room for the guilt so don't expect me to feel any.

Nor should you.

But refusing to acknowledge racism doesn't eliminate it, just as the act of acknowledging racism is not itself racist.

I'm not sure that I ever said racism doesn't exist. I'm quite aware of its existence partly in thanks to the term "white privilege". I'm acknowledging that racism exists on all sides and that anyone who says only whites can be racist is flat out wrong. The way I see it, the only way to eliminate racism is for ALL people to stop practicing it.

That sounds great but so far your only point in this entire thread is to talk about how racism somehow overwhelmingly effects whites.

While I'm sure racism DOES effect whites you come across like the man in a thread discussing sexism and sexual assualt that cries out "but men are victims of rape too!!"

Men ARE victims of rape. Absolutely. But the OVERWHELMING victims of rape and sexual assault are women. And the guy no matter how well meaning who cries out that "men are raped too!!" comes across as trying to deflect from the actual problem. Some people would call that a sense of entitlement from being male. Some would call it a form of silencing. You know "well the people complaining of racism are racists too so they should just shut up." or "if everyone just stopped being racist/talking about racism/acknowledging race" etc...
Me I just call it poor form old...

Trying to call out everyone who practices racism in a thread about the evils of racism hardly seems like deflection.

Do whites practice racism? Absolutely.
Do blacks practice racism? Absolutely.
Do Hispanics practice racism? Absolutely.
Do I practice racism? Never.

If people truly want racism to end, then everyone needs to stop being racist. I know it's not going to end because thousands of years of evolution have designed humans to group themselves and see different groups as bad. But I'm going to attempt to do my part to try to break out of that.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Simon Legrande wrote:
I'm not sure that I ever said racism doesn't exist. I'm quite aware of its existence partly in thanks to the term "white privilege". I'm acknowledging that racism exists on all sides and that anyone who says only whites can be racist is flat out wrong. The way I see it, the only way to eliminate racism is for ALL people to stop practicing it.

And I don't think I accused you of saying racism doesn't exist.

What I meant was that ignoring race entirely -- assuming such a thing is possible -- actually enables racism unless everyone does it. And since we know that not everyone does...


6 people marked this as a favorite.
Simon Legrande wrote:

Do whites practice racism? Absolutely.

Do blacks practice racism? Absolutely.
Do Hispanics practice racism? Absolutely.
Do I practice racism? Never.

However:

Do whites have an entrenched advantage in the U.S. overall? Absolutely.
Do blacks have an entrenched advantage in the U.S.? Absolutely not.
Do hispanics have an entrenched advantage in the U.S.? Absolutely not.
Do I benefit from this power disparity? Often, even if I don't see it.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Kirth Gersen wrote:

However:

Do whites have an entrenched advantage in the U.S. overall? Absolutely.
Do blacks have an entrenched advantage in the U.S.? Absolutely not.
Do hispanics have an entrenched advantage in the U.S.? Absolutely not.
Do I benefit from this power disparity? Often, even if I don't see it.

I think that's key -- realizing it exists, even if you often don't see it. For me, that took being on the other side of things.


Kirth Gersen wrote:
Simon Legrande wrote:

Do whites practice racism? Absolutely.

Do blacks practice racism? Absolutely.
Do Hispanics practice racism? Absolutely.
Do I practice racism? Never.

However:

Do whites have an entrenched advantage in the U.S. overall? Absolutely.
Do blacks have an entrenched advantage in the U.S.? Absolutely not.
Do hispanics have an entrenched advantage in the U.S.? Absolutely not.
Do I benefit from this power disparity? Often, even if I don't see it.

Sure, I'll agree with that. Am I going to feel guilty about something I have no control over? Absolutely not. I'll continue to treat others as I wish to be treated, as individuals. If guilt isn't the point, as some have said, then what is the point? What is the next step after everyone acknowledges it? What is the ultimate goal behind having all white people agree that white privilege exists?

51 to 100 of 165 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Off-Topic Discussions / Fighting the ugly face of racism All Messageboards