Iron Gods Sanctioning?


Pathfinder Society

51 to 100 of 232 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>
3/5 5/5

Matthew Pittard wrote:
I do kinda feel like my choice of Technologist was a bit of a waste of time. Albeit is an out of left field choice for a Bones Oracle to take, but then again the character was frankly designed to be a bit of a strange one.

If you play through the scenarios that involve tech, and then don't plan to use the items gained from those chronicle sheets that might need that feat, you could always use the retraining rules to replace it with a different feat.

Silver Crusade 2/5

How much work needs to go into sanctioning APs for PFS? Is it pretty standard now that many others have been?

Liberty's Edge 3/5

Campaign leadership still needs to read the AP, develop chronicle sheets/boons, and in Iron Gods' case, figure out how much technology they want to allow to leak into the regular PFS campaign.

They've been pretty good thus far at getting adventures sanctioned, but consider that they've only fully sanctioned 7 APs in the past ~2 years - it clearly takes a significant amount of spare time. Regular PFS scenario development certainly takes priority, and modules compete with APs for sanctioning.

That said, I'm looking forward to Iron Gods getting sanctioned, and I wouldn't be terribly surprised to see it in the next month or two.

Silver Crusade 2/5

Well Hopefully it doesn't take more than a couple months. Looking to start it in late April.

Liberty's Edge 4/5

Is Daughters of Fury on the schedule after Iron Gods?

Mike

Liberty's Edge 2/5 *

JakBlitz: I think April 2016 might be a safer bet.. or at least Nov 2015.

Scarab Sages 4/5

Either way, playing the AP gets me out of the house with people one day a week for months. That makes it worth playing. PFS credit is always icing on the cake for me. Personally I am running a group of brand new players through the Emerald Spire before introducing tech though...

Silver Crusade 2/5

Matthew Pittard wrote:
JakBlitz: I think April 2016 might be a safer bet.. or at least Nov 2015.

Really? It takes that long on average?

Shadow Lodge 5/5

no they are just behind on sanctioning things

we have the following were waiting on

Carrion Crown
Kingmaker
council of thieves (See Below)

Daughters of Fury
Giantslayer

ok so were really not waiting for the last 2

I know there was a cut off I just cant remember if it was kingmaker or council due to edition things

Mummys Mask was the last AP they sanctioned and it was several months ago that it was 4-5 months ago IIRC

Tears at Bitter manor was the last module that was sanctioned and it was very recent

+ you have the ramp up for Con season happening now ... (PaizoCon in July and GenCon in August) - youve seen the call for volunteers go out for both of these recently

Silver Crusade Venture-Agent, Florida–Altamonte Springs

Uh Carrion Crown was sanctioned January 2014.

Typically what I've seen is the latest AP gets sanctioned and then if the Campaign Leadership has time they finalize sanctioning of an older AP.

Shadow Lodge 5/5

Tamec wrote:

Uh Carrion Crown was sanctioned January 2014.

Typically what I've seen is the latest AP gets sanctioned and then if the Campaign Leadership has time they finalize sanctioning of an older AP.

yup your right my brain was reading 1 and thinking another

I meant Serpent Skull

Sovereign Court 5/5

as i understand it wotr wont get sanctioned and iron gods will take alot more effort to sanction due to the tech lvl in it. council of thieves was supposed to be the next 1 sanctioned if i remember right but we will see.

personally im ok waiting on iron gods id rather see the oldr stuff get in.

Silver Crusade 2/5

Hmm I have a couple of people wanting to make tech heros. Was hoping that sanctioning of the Iron gods would help them out.

Liberty's Edge 4/5

I can see why Kingmaker wasn't done. What about Council of Thieves?

Mike

Silver Crusade 2/5

Kingmaker and Wrath of the Righteous make sense not getting sanctions. Maybe I will be lucky and see iron gods done after Paizo con.

Silver Crusade Venture-Agent, Florida–Altamonte Springs

Qstor wrote:

I can see why Kingmaker wasn't done. What about Council of Thieves?

Mike

They haven't gotten to either kingmaker or Council of Thieves yet. The next oldest AP in the line Serpent's Skull. Council of Thieves is the last in line for old AP sanctioning, as that is the first non-3.5 AP.

Silver Crusade 2/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Hmm might prefer that Council of Thieves is sanctioned before Serpent's Skull.

Grand Lodge 4/5

As a Iron Gods GM, I have been chronicling all the loot (tech and otherwise) on an excel spreadsheet for this entire AP. If this would be helpful for the chronicles, let me know and I can email it through.

Scarab Sages 3/5

I don't suppose there's been any news on Iron Gods getting sanctioned? My group finished the AP last week and it'd be nice to give them sheets to apply to their PFS characters at this point, and getting the tables of GM credit to boot.

5/5 RPG Superstar 2014 Top 32

Duiker wrote:
I don't suppose there's been any news on Iron Gods getting sanctioned? My group finished the AP last week and it'd be nice to give them sheets to apply to their PFS characters at this point, and getting the tables of GM credit to boot.

Just a heads up, but PFS doesn't grant retroactive credit. In order to gain chronicle sheets you would have to play through the sanctioned material after it was sanctioned.

Scarab Sages 3/5

Brian Lefebvre wrote:
Duiker wrote:
I don't suppose there's been any news on Iron Gods getting sanctioned? My group finished the AP last week and it'd be nice to give them sheets to apply to their PFS characters at this point, and getting the tables of GM credit to boot.
Just a heads up, but PFS doesn't grant retroactive credit. In order to gain chronicle sheets you would have to play through the sanctioned material after it was sanctioned.

*completely bewildered*

So the fact that I'm an AP subscriber and ran an AP as it came out instead of waiting for a year for Paizo to sanction it means that I am actively punished as a PFS GM? Shouldn't the sanctioning process be designed to incentivize exactly what my group just did instead of encouraging us to buy the materials for less money on Amazon in a year?

Grand Lodge 4/5

Pathfinder Adventure, Rulebook Subscriber

Nitpicking, but it's not actively punishing, it's passively. Retroactive credit is just too much of a logistical nightmare to grant.

Scarab Sages 3/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Steven Schopmeyer wrote:
Nitpicking, but it's not actively punishing, it's passively. Retroactive credit is just too much of a logistical nightmare to grant.

How is it a logistical nightmare? Type dates and IDs into the system. Print out chronicle sheets for the people I see every week at the same time. There is no logistical difference for me or for Paizo.

Grand Lodge 4/5

Pathfinder Adventure, Rulebook Subscriber

Logistical is probably the wrong word for it. I'll leave it to those in charge to explain it.

Silver Crusade 5/5 5/55/5 **** Venture-Captain, Germany—Bavaria

Given the nature of campaign mode, there seems to be nothing wrong in just replaying the AP with you players, and as always, in campaign mode you can pretty much change anything (including giving the PCs 245 point by and 10 mythic tiers starting from level 1) .

When the group reches the boss of the first ABP, replace the fight with a trivia quiz about Battlestar galactica. Or maybe competitive drinking, doing a decent McGuiver impression, lock your players in a room with several liters of red bull, a used volkswagen van, a welding torch and a knight rider box set ... you get the gist.

Of maybe just run it as a kind of rematch, and give all the hard enemies a second chance at retribution.

I know that some people might call this cheating, but running the adventure again as written with your usual house rules, is completely legal, but pretty boring when your players metagame to the limit.

---

And for the record I have been an AP subscriber since Jade Regent, and have reported exactly zero AP sessions, and have years of AP sessions left to run. I am not saying that running the APs as soon as they come out was wrong, as I understand this (badly communicated ) rule as been in effect for quite some time.

Shadow Lodge 4/5

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens Subscriber

Still crossing my fingers for Iron Gods to get sanctioned in the near future. I'm a big fan of the technology stuff, and I'm waiting for there to be enough technological options available to make a really solid Technologist character.

Silver Crusade 2/5

Would be interesting to hear an update but, from the sounds of it we could still be waiting a while.

Silver Crusade Venture-Agent, Florida–Altamonte Springs

check back after august....

Con season + Season 7 roll-out = slim to non on sanctioning anything else

If it happens earlier I'll be happily surprised.

Grand Lodge 4/5

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Eh. I don't buy into fans giving the developers/creators a free pass just because they have events on their calendar. PFS sanctioning should be written into the development calendar of every adventure product Paizo releases. Unless, of course, they decide that it's not suitable (eg WOTR).

If they don't have the staff to get the job done, delegate volunteers. There's plenty of open call authors/VOs/Superstar finalists that would happily take on the task.

Liberty's Edge 4/5 *

I found that the chronicle sheet for scenarios like Fires of Karamoss and Return to Sky gaveme a lot of hope for how Iron Gods chronicle sheets could appear. Fires of Karamoss has a LOT of tech on the chronicle sheet, but nearly all of it is timeworn and several are partially charged, keeping the power of the items in check and making them more affordable.

Those could be great examples of how a chronicle sheet for Iron Gods could be written!

The Exchange 3/5

I have similar feelings as Kestler, at this point it is rather worrisome that Hell's Rebels is going to be starting soon and still no real word or update on Iron Gods sanctioning.

I also agree with Kot the Protector that the Scenario chronicles that have had tech on them provide a great example of what I'd hope Iron Gods chronicles could look like one day.

Shadow Lodge 4/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I'd have to disagree. Never, that I can remember, did they ever guarantee they would sanction all future APS (or past ones, for that matter). They are doing this as the schedule permits in order to give us more playable content for PFS. They should not be putting them on the schedule at the expense of accrual PFS content and other Paizo events.

As for using volunteers, they've said in the past that even volunteer work has to be edited up to Paizo standards, and that takes in-house talent that they really can't spare right now. You're asking then to devote real money resources to something that flat out won't be profitable.

The Exchange 5/5 RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Mystic Lemur, it's my (anecdotal) experience that people get more fired up to play an AP if there ae Society Chronicles available for it. I'm aware of (a) a home campaign that switched from Wrath of the Righteous to Mummy's Mask, simply because the former didn't offer PFS Chronicles, and (b) a group who were planning to run Emerald Spire, and delayed the start of the campaign until the PFS Chronicles were available, One of the players said tha they "didn't want to waste" the first couple of dungeon levels.

So, in some cases, making Chronicle sheets available does make the corresponding product more profitable.

Silver Crusade 3/5

Mystic Lemur wrote:
I'd have to disagree. Never, that I can remember, did they ever guarantee they would sanction all future APS (or past ones, for that matter).

We aren't talking about all future APs. Nor are we talking about guarantees. We are discussing our hopes. Those hopes are buoyed by this statement:

"John Compton wrote:
I anticipate we will sanction Iron Gods for Pathfinder Society Organized Play.

It is still my hope that this AP will be sanctioned for PFS, though I am, like Codanous, worried that Hell's Rebels will be a higher priority.

Shadow Lodge 4/5

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Then maybe they should add development of PFS chronicles to the regular work of putting out the monthly adventure paths. That way you have APs advertising for Paizo's Organized Play campaign.

5/5 5/55/5

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Mystic Lemur wrote:
Then maybe they should add development of PFS chronicles to the regular work of putting out the monthly adventure paths. That way you have APs advertising for Paizo's Organized Play campaign.

I second this and add that this person should also putsout chronicle sheets for modules. I've been sitting on Daughters of Fury for a long time now wanting to run it but unable to due to no chronicle sheets and the only place I have to run it is with PFS players.

The Exchange 5/5 RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16

I understand, roysier, and I sympathize. You're not the only person with such a story.

Nonetheless, it makes me very sad to hear that some people are electing NOT to play one of the best Pathfinder adventures, simply because the Organized Play campaign isn't rewarding them enough for doing so.

That seems a case of the tail wagging the dog.

Silver Crusade 3/5

Chris Mortika wrote:
...it makes me very sad to hear that some people are electing NOT to play one of the best Pathfinder adventures...

Do you mean Daughters of Fury or do you mean Iron Gods?

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder PF Special Edition, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
The Fox wrote:
Chris Mortika wrote:
...it makes me very sad to hear that some people are electing NOT to play one of the best Pathfinder adventures...
Do you mean Daughters of Fury or do you mean Iron Gods?

Probably Kingmaker. Person can't be talking about Wrath of the Righteous.

Shadow Lodge 4/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Nah, it's prolly Seven Days to the Grave

Liberty's Edge 5/5

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Chris Mortika wrote:

I understand, roysier, and I sympathize. You're not the only person with such a story.

Nonetheless, it makes me very sad to hear that some people are electing NOT to play one of the best Pathfinder adventures, simply because the Organized Play campaign isn't rewarding them enough for doing so.

That seems a case of the tail wagging the dog.

Well, to be fair, if the gaming you do is PFS, I can see why one would wait. And it doesn't surprise me to see that being a prevailing attitude on the PFS boards.

Silver Crusade 2/5

Well I think Origins was this weekend. So hopefully we will see something between now and GenCon.

Grand Lodge 4/5

Yup, my irradiated, mutated Numerian fingers are crossed. All twelve of them!

Liberty's Edge 5/5

Not trying to be a wet blanket here, but the amount if stuff they need to Di between now and Gen Con probably precludes any extra sanctioning.

The final two scenarios are due out this week. Then they have six quests, a 1-11 special, True Dragons of Absalom, and the three Season 7 premiers.

My guess is, 12 hour days for the next month with no extra time to read and sanction Iron Gods. My Guess would be around October at the earliest

Paizo Employee 5/5 Contributor—Canadian Maplecakes

Andrew Christian wrote:

Not trying to be a wet blanket here, but the amount if stuff they need to Di between now and Gen Con probably precludes any extra sanctioning.

The final two scenarios are due out this week. Then they have six quests, a 1-11 special, True Dragons of Absalom, and the three Season 7 premiers.

My guess is, 12 hour days for the next month with no extra time to read and sanction Iron Gods. My Guess would be around October at the earliest

HUSH ANDY! People aren't supposed to realize that Paizo developers actually do work... ;)

Liberty's Edge 5/5

Thurston Hillman wrote:
Andrew Christian wrote:

Not trying to be a wet blanket here, but the amount if stuff they need to Di between now and Gen Con probably precludes any extra sanctioning.

The final two scenarios are due out this week. Then they have six quests, a 1-11 special, True Dragons of Absalom, and the three Season 7 premiers.

My guess is, 12 hour days for the next month with no extra time to read and sanction Iron Gods. My Guess would be around October at the earliest

HUSH ANDY! People aren't supposed to realize that Paizo developers actually do work... ;)

chuckle...

2/5

So is there a commitment on sanctioning the Iron Gods AP?

I know it has been talked about for a long, long time. I've been playing and enjoying it, but I also play PFS and having this one sanctioned would be a nice side benefit.

I know GenCon is coming and that Mike Brock is leaving us (we will miss you Mike - you have been great - thank you), but this is dragging on too long.

I have no interest in tech in PFS on a chronicle, just a chronicle full stop.

Grand Lodge 4/5

I wrote a Chronicle for Fires of Creation, following the standard format set by Rise of the Runelords.
I chose to remove much of the 'zap-zap! pew-pew!' technology and retained the more subtle tech that's been featuring on Season 6 chronicles, such as hidden implants, advanced grenades and alien/Technic League drugs.
Be keen to hear some feedback from folks who have played or GM'ed FoC.

Spoilers ensue obviously.

Fires of Creation chronicle sheet:

Fires of Creation
Sanctioned Areas, C1 to D9 (including the warehouse)
Level 3-5
Slow gold: 2,400
Normal gold: 4,800

Select one of the following boons and cross the others off your Chronicle sheet.
League Agents Everywhere: After the betrayal of a trusted town member, you begin to suspect Technic League agents are hiding everywhere. Once per session, you can reroll a Sense Motive check and add 2 to your result. You must accept the second result.

Medbay Cleansing: You discovered a highly advanced medical bay, and after extensive repairs, managed to gain some benefits. Your body has been cleansed by a star-faring disease control system that uses a cocktail of nanites and chemicals. Some of this formula is still present within your body, making it more difficult for foreign bodies to infect you. Once per session, you can reroll a Fortitude save versus disease and add 2 to your result. You must accept the second result.

Petromin Familiar: You discover a cryogenically frozen alien animal. A caster with the familiar class feature may bond with a captured desert dwelling alien Petromin. If you make this bond with the captured alien creature, you must provide a copy of Fires of Creation following the rules for Additional Resources.

Pilo Animal Companion: You discover a cryogenically frozen alien animal. A character with the animal companion class feature may bond with a captured desert dwelling alien Pilo. If you make this bond with the captured alien creature, you must provide a copy of Fires of Creation following the rules for Additional Resources.

Spent Fuel Rod: You survived a battle in the core of a nuclear reactor and you found an unconventional weapon in that hellish place. You hold an irradiated nuclear fuel rod encased in a flimsy lead lining. You can throw this object like a thrown weapon - treat the square it lands in as if a 7th level caster had cast Irradiate (p9 Technology Guide) in that location (Fortitude save DC 17) When you use this item, cross this boon off your chronicle.

Vitality Serum (limit 1 only) (p61 FoC) (500gp)
Universal Serum (limit 1 only) (p61 FoC) (400gp)
Torpinal (limit 1 only) (TG) (300gp)
Bang Grenade (limit 3 only) (TG) (250gp)
Flash Grenade (limit 3 only) (TG) (750gp)
Grade I Hemochem (limit 1 only) (TG) (250gp)
Panic Suit (limit 1 only) (TG) (2,000gp)
Grippers (TG) (100gp)
Skill Slot (Cybertech) (TG) (2,000gp)
Mark I Skillchip (Any Skill) (TG) (400gp)

Silver Crusade 3/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Fires of Creation Spoilers:
I like the boons.

I'd like to see the grenades limited to 1 each.

I think that the inferno pistol (limit 1) should be included.

I also think that a nanite canister (limit 1) should be included.

Grand Lodge 5/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.

At Paizocon, I talked with John about this. The sense I got was that Andrew is right, not likely before October.

I've been running it for a while and we should finish up book 3 mid August, we might be able to get sheets for books 4-6! I hope.

A player I would love to have played with us, refused partially because of the no chronicle sheet issue. This is too bad, since the AP is awesome.

51 to 100 of 232 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Organized Play / Pathfinder Society / Iron Gods Sanctioning? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.