Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game

Starfinder


Pathfinder Society


Pathfinder Adventure Card Game

You should not rule this city!


Forum Games

1 to 50 of 1,075 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

Simple,
post the reason why the previous poster should not get to rule a city.
Scams, behavior..whatever goes.

Dark Archive

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules Subscriber

The fiend Fantastic should not rule this city because of lactose intolerance.


Gruumash should not rule this city because he attracts pet imps. Which we could all do without.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Sissyl has no business ruling this city...

...pointy things on hats...that's all I'm saying...


Randarak should not rule this city because a mayor with such a haircut is not believable.


The Fiend Fantastic should not rule this city as he laughs during inappropriate moments. Tragic moments.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Randarak should not rule this city because of alignment infractions.


Why should Lucky 7 rue this city? It’s a great city. I mean why would anyone have a problem with a city as great as this one. I mean you got your coffee shops, vinyl record stores, and they aren’t run by arrogant hipsters either. No, they are sweet and helpful, that one girl at the record shop, I really think I got a shot with her, but anyway. Where was I? Oh, yeah so I think it’s rude for Lucky 7 to rue the city and that just…what?

Oh, rule? Yeah, okay, no, that makes a lot more sense.

No, lucky 7 should not rule this city.

Scarab Sages

Waglinde is too good to rule this backwater cesspit of a city!


ihiyc should not rule this city, he would only be clowning around.

Scarab Sages

The Fiend Fantastic would rather rule in Hell than serve in Heaven...and this city falls under the jurisdiction of neither. You Should Not Rule This City!

Silver Crusade

IHIYC should not rule this city. It's not you, it's the city!


IHIYC has better things to do.

Shadow Lodge

Randarak can't keep up.


Conman informed the populace of his real intentions.


Randarak should not rule this city because he's too idealistic.


The Fiend Fantastic should not rule this city because he's actually mediocre.

Scarab Sages

Randarak should not rule this city because a face like that is just asking to be knifed by a close friend.

The Exchange

IHIYC should not rule this city because my closet is in another city.. and has bad reception.


Countchocula shouldn't rule this city... It would just make the city a target.

Scarab Sages

Sissyl, You Should Not Rule This City - at least, not until you've finished eating. Stop playing with your food and swallow, dammit!


IHIYC should not rule this city, he'd likely turn it into a giant circus.

Silver Crusade

The Fiend Fantastic should not rule this city. I'm too drunk to remember why.

Scarab Sages

1 person marked this as a favorite.

YOU? Rule This City? Go home, lucky7, you're drunk!


1 person marked this as a favorite.

IHIYC should not rule this city, he's too judgmental.

Dark Archive

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules Subscriber

Randarak should not rule this city he spends too much time looking over his shoulder and not focused on the task at hand.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Gruumash should not rule this city because pirates rule the seas, not cities.


The Fiend Fantastic should not rule this city because he already rules the kitchen.

Dark Archive

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Randarak should not rule because I'm better.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Cr500cricket should not rule because no who wants to should be allowed to.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Randarak should not rule because we built this city. We built this city on rock an roll.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Tiny coffee Golem, CAN'T rule this city, I think Starbucks has got a lock on that market.


Tessrimea can't rule this city. Her name's too weird.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

SPanky the Lepperchaun should not rule this city, spanking is inappropraite to do in public.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

TFF should not rule this city because of THAC0


1 person marked this as a favorite.

lucky7 should not rule this city because he use THAC0 as a legal brief.


Jack B. Kwikk, Esq. Should not rule this city because he's far too paranoid. Just watch how he reacts to me pointing this out...


Count FuelDrop, Vampire Lord should not rule this city, vampires rule the night, no cities.


TFF will not rule this city while I am on fire.


Burning Straw Man should not rule this city. He's a fire hazard.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Paizo Charter Superscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Deluxe Comics Subscriber; Pathfinder Legends Subscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Accessories, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Maps, Starfinder Society Roleplaying Guild Subscriber

Randarak should not rule this city. His name is too similar to Ragnarok.

Dark Archive

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Uncle teddy should not rule, to far from the immediate family


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Paizo Charter Superscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Deluxe Comics Subscriber; Pathfinder Legends Subscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Accessories, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Maps, Starfinder Society Roleplaying Guild Subscriber

Cr500cricket should not rule because Weird Al Yankovic said so.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Uncle Teddy should not rule because Aunt Dolly says he has too much to do at home.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Randarak should not rule this city because he can't see anything to his left.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Sissyl should not rule this city because she appears to have a picket fence stuck on her helmet. Also, she's a huge hypocrite.

And if you're a guy: Sorry, put that in your profile next time. Kobolds can't be expected to remember these things. ;D


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Cards, Companion Subscriber

Kobold Cleaver should not rule this city because of all the drop bears and fiendish dire weasels he has turned loose on the world. (ALso because he ninja'ed me.)

Scarab Sages

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Geistlinger should not rule this city until she talks to someone about her self-laceration "thing".


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I'm Hiding in your Closet shouldn't rule this city until he comes out of the closet.

Scarab Sages

1 person marked this as a favorite.

The FuelDrop Collective Should Not Rule This City! CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PEOPLE!

1 to 50 of 1,075 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>
Paizo / Messageboards / Community / Forum Games / You should not rule this city! All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.

©2002-2017 Paizo Inc.® | Privacy Policy | Contact Us
Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours, Monday through Friday, 10:00 AM to 5:00 PM Pacific time.

Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, Starfinder, the Starfinder logo, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc. The Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Legends, Pathfinder Online, Starfinder Adventure Path, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.