| 7 people marked this as a favorite. |
I think the Rules Questions forum should be split into two separate forums: One where people are really asking for answers to their question, and one where people are only looking for people who agree with them and will totally disregard the opinion, no matter how well sourced or researched, of those who don't agree. Would save some time, I feel like.
threadcount + 1
And another sub-forum called "Snarky Comments/Flame Wars/Alignment Threads".
|
And another sub-forum called "Snarky Comments/Flame Wars/Alignment Threads".
I need at least three subforums to find out if my Paladin fell.
Maybe more.
Because my Paladin code of conduct stats that they need many subforums or else their god will smote them.
Also this thread has no purpose, and I'm a worse person for posting in it.
I'm a worse person.
Get in line.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I think the Rules Questions forum should be split into two separate forums: One where people are really asking for answers to their question, and one where people are only looking for people who agree with them and will totally disregard the opinion, no matter how well sourced or researched, of those who don't agree. Would save some time, I feel like.
There is a sub-forum for your suggestion for more sub-forums.
Personally I see the rules forum as a place to either gets meticulous analyses of the RAW or threads devoted to people trying to figure out how they can justify abilities not doing what they say they do.
...or threads devoted to people trying to figure out how they can justify abilities not doing what they say they do.
Or trying to figure out how they can justify making abilities do things they don't say they can do.
I hope that doesn't start an argument; they'd have to move the thread.
Im with you Aboniks, ppl do seem to have a "lets twist the wording for mechanical proffitz!" disease.