| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I was playing tonight and since I've been working on creating "drop-ins" of the errata for sleeved cards, I've become more intimately acquainted with the errata than I'd ever hoped to be.
So, there were two cards I encountered tonight that I think might need an errata (though maybe really 1 needs un-errata).
Sling: This says "you may instead discard this card to add 1d4". That is the same type of text that was originally on the Throwing Axe. So should this get the same update?
Enfeeble: This says "return it to the top of the deck." Which is vey similar to Sanctuary's original text. While Santuary does say "location" and Enfeeble doesn't, Enfeeble does say "deck" and the card types in the box I don't think are properly "decks." This question was raised over here. And, while I agree with that logic, I think Enfeeble is similar enough that it probably either needs updated, or the update from Sanctuary should be removed.
I would normally not do this, but given the reorganization of the forums, I'm thinking maybe this question go missed or something. So I'm going to bump this thread, just this one time, to see if anyone else has an opinion on this. If no one does, I shall never ask about it again. And I apologize for my behavior in bumping this. I know it is frowned upon. So sorry. And thanks.
Also, how come when I search this forum for the word enfeeble, no posts show in the results? This thread clearly says the word enfeeble. Even errata doesn't give this thread as a result. Does the search function just hate me?
Chief Technical Officer
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Sling should probably have the same update as Throwing Axe.
The Sanctuary fix has actually been superseded by two different developments that cover the situation: the clarification that summoned cards aren't part of any location deck, and the "impossible" addition to the Golden Rule. So yeah, I think I'd rather remove it from Sanctuary than add it to Enfeeble.
As for searching, I see one result when I search the forum, and two when I search this thread. Something is up—possibly as a result of the forum splitting. We'll look into it.
Sounds good. Thanks Vic. (And yeah for removing an errata!!!)