Just upvoted an item that could kill the whole party. But the other had an apology...
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
Look Edison entered the contest, I can tell because clearly this was written by Tesla!
What's a For save? Are decimals as commas a European thing?
A For save is... a For save? And what about decimals? (Oh how I fear you just read my item!)
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
dice dice baby
We're going to beat FAWTL, aren't we?Fawtl's nearly to 2000 pages. Good luck.
We already have beaten them - in posts per second :D
Look Edison entered the contest, I can tell because clearly this was written by Tesla!Fairly certain I've seen this item.
More than once.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Look Edison entered the contest, I can tell because clearly this was written by Tesla!Fairly certain I've seen this item.
As have I....
Next year, I'm totally submitting a deck of torcs.
Or a torquing deck of the tor king.
Look Edison entered the contest, I can tell because clearly this was written by Tesla!Fairly certain I've seen this item.
I thought it belongs to Megavolt from Darkwing Duck? Pretty sure it does.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I just saw a phrase...I can't repeat it, but it was sort of like, "This item is powered by hair that must be obtained from beings that have hair."
Contributor, RPG Superstar 2012
,
Star Voter Season 6, Marathon Voter Season 7, Star Voter Season 9
|
| 3 people marked this as a favorite. |
I've seen Cloak a couple of times. Now I'm hoping to see Dagger at least once.
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
Next year, I'm totally submitting a deck of torcs.Or a torquing deck of the tor king.
Miley Cyrus' twerking deck of the tor king?
I just saw a phrase...I can't repeat it, but it was sort of like, "This item is powered by hair that must be obtained from beings that have hair."
Should go great with the one that grows hair.
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
I've noticed this year in particular, there've been a lot of really complicated construction requirements in many many entries.
You look at most actual magic items, construction requirements seldom exceed three of any combination of spells and a feat/skill/class ability requirement. Most items require, beyond the crafting feat, just one, maybe two spells. The only ones that exceed this are items like the golem manual in the PRD where you need to know all of the spells required to make the golem, which makes sense.
Perhaps amongst advice for next year, we could discuss guidelines for the requirements. My sense is you do not need a spell for everything the item can do, just one or two that cover the bulk of it--and if you feel like it does four to six things that are so specific you need to back it up with as many spells, your item probably tries to do too much.
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
If you have to tell me it's not cursed I'm not going to believe you
OK, I'm making a Will save. But what's the DC?
I've seen the Tesla item as well. It was better than the 299 words beside it.
Nice item but doesn't require Craft Wondrous Item
|
Contributor, RPG Superstar 2012
,
Star Voter Season 6, Marathon Voter Season 7, Star Voter Season 9
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
OK, I'm making a Will save. But what's the DC?
I always assume elebenty in these cases.
I've noticed this year in particular, there've been a lot of really complicated construction requirements in many many entries.
You look at most actual magic items, construction requirements seldom exceed three of any combination of spells and a feat/skill/class ability requirement. Most items require, beyond the crafting feat, just one, maybe two spells. The only ones that exceed this are items like the golem manual in the PRD where you need to know all of the spells required to make the golem, which makes sense.
Perhaps amongst advice for next year, we could discuss guidelines for the requirements. My sense is you do not need a spell for everything the item can do, just one or two that cover the bulk of it--and if you feel like it does four to six things that are so specific you need to back it up with as many spells, your item probably tries to do too much.
Guidelines? You know it's not superstar when the requirements have been overdone => too many spells not tight enough a theme = fail
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I haven't seen any yet, but because it was big on the internet this year I'm expecting a few items based on this.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Is it time for the first culling yet? Rent a rogue in on my screen for at the least the fifth time.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Miley Cyrus' twerking deck of the tor king?Next year, I'm totally submitting a deck of torcs.Or a torquing deck of the tor king.
Bleach please, for the minds eye, quickly now.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
OK, I'm making a Will save. But what's the DC?I always assume elebenty in these cases.
Or Bleventeen.
500 individual items! And counting...
Is it time for the first culling yet. Rent a rogue in on my screen for at the least the fifth time.
Lucky you, only five...I believe I have seen several at least 8+ time today.
Or Bleventeen.OK, I'm making a Will save. But what's the DC?I always assume elebenty in these cases.
I've seen that many fun items!
100+ words about your PC does not make a cool backstory.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I have yet to see an item using a female name or title that is not semi-cursed, evil, of questionable ethics, or outright "argh!".
Item must be paired with a better item to function.
2 items missing 0's in their pricing one is at least slighly less complex
EMS = fail
Ok, Scott, it's true. We Europeans use dots for thousands and millions, not commas. AND I think I know what the other thing was about too. My bad, I forgot to put that in. Probably I won't be in Round 2. :P
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
At first I thought the price was written in eldritch symbols, which Man Was Not Meant To Know. Then I saw they were footnotes. For crying out loud, you only have 300 words; you shouldn't need footnotes!
I have yet to see an item using a female name or title that is not semi-cursed, evil, of questionable ethics, or outright "argh!".
It's a backlash, yeah, that must be it ;>
and a description that wouldn't need much alteration to be pronographic fan fic
At first I thought the price was written in eldritch symbols, which Man Was Not Meant To Know. Then I saw they were footnotes. For crying out loud, you only have 300 words; you shouldn't need footnotes!
and one is see text.
I haz seen dat 50 word item. Having a sad right now.
SIAC vs SIAC
My item against a bad item... what does that mean?
At first I thought the price was written in eldritch symbols, which Man Was Not Meant To Know. Then I saw they were footnotes. For crying out loud, you only have 300 words; you shouldn't need footnotes!
I downvoted it, twice.
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
Okay, it's bad when I see an item's title and think to myself "Oh, great, another person that can't effectively put words together in English," only to discover that this one did it on purpose because it's "goblinspeak."