The Swashbuckler and the Aldori Dueling Sword - Suggestion


Class Discussion

Grand Lodge

The swashbuckler as a class can't benefit from its full range of abilities with the Aldori dueling sword... which is a pity because it does fit in well with the concept.

Perhaps a ruling that allows the class to also use that weapon (paying the exotic weapon feat as normal would still apply) wouldn't be a horrible addition. In terms of crit range and replenishment of Panache its a sub-optimal choice and it does cost a feat to be able to use the weapon.


Flagged for movement to the Advanced Class Guide playtest forum.

Sovereign Court RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8

1 person marked this as a favorite.

(waits for it to be moved)
Thought about this very thing in the morning (shower logic). The issue seems to be that you need Aldori dueling style for the swashbuckler's abilites to apply. Now you could get that, but you've roughly 4 'dead levels' where it would be very suboptimal (spending a feat on EWP then another on Weapon focus, then finally being able to use it when you take Aldori dueling style. Short of retraining once you've enough feats, it's not practical.

And that's not including you're either a) spending gold on a rapier you're trading out eventually, or b) using a sword that won't regenerate your panache.

I think an archtype would be the answer.


One other thing is that Paizo has historically diverted from including any Golarion-specific items to their hardcover lines. Aldori Dueling Sword come from the Inner Sea books on purpose.


Is the Aldori dueling sword in UE or another core product? If not, slim chance of this working out.


Rather than something weapon-specific, it really just needs to be changed to "light or one-handed weapons" or "light or one-handed swords" or the like.

That way the oddness of picks working but some swords not working goes away, and archetypes can tailor the class features and deeds to different weapon classes (like, say, a "viking raider" archetype with axes and spears).

Paizo Employee Creative Director

6 people marked this as a favorite.

Actually... this is the type of comment and observation I hope we see more of.

While the hardcover line is world neutral... in theory, it DOES directly support Golarion, and allowing the swashbuckler to use something like an Aldori dueling sword makes a lot of sense. I would love to see this type of thing work better between the hardcovers and Golarion content...

...so keep comments like this coming!!


I concur with Roadie. Allowing only piercing weapons limits the amount of different swashbucklers. Why not allow for light or one-handed piercing or slashing weapons? This opens up swashbucklers wielding dueling blades or scimitars.


Someone was pointing out all the weird weapons that are one handed piercing weapons, like the Spear, Trident, Morning Star and picks. So I'm hoping they open up the weapon restrictions since you already have weird options that make less sense than a Longsword or Scimitar.

Shadow Lodge

Also whips.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

yes, whip support PLEASE. you have no IDEA how hard it is to play a vampire slayer from a prestigious vampire slaying family when your heirloom weapon isnt useful until like 9th level!

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
James Jacobs wrote:

Actually... this is the type of comment and observation I hope we see more of.

While the hardcover line is world neutral... in theory, it DOES directly support Golarion, and allowing the swashbuckler to use something like an Aldori dueling sword makes a lot of sense. I would love to see this type of thing work better between the hardcovers and Golarion content...

...so keep comments like this coming!!

Yay! JJ liked my comment :)

Sovereign Court

Hah, Not gonna lie, my friend and I were just talking about this exact thing on the way to get food. We came up with pretty much what you guys did; i.e. that since Aldori Dueling Master (And my extension Dervish Dance) allow their respective weapons to count as piercing weapons for the purpose of qualifying for the Duelist's Precise Strike ability, it made sense for them to also allow a character to Qualify for the Swash-Buckler's Precise Strike ability.


Well, the way this could be solved without messing with the Core vs. Golarion content divide is by adding it to the weapon instead of the class.


the swashbuckler's finesse ability bugs me in general. He's THE finesse class, so why does he have a limited version of the feat that doesn't meet prerequisites for improved versions? It's not just the duelling sword, it's everything that needs the feat. Look at Mythic Weapon Finesse, for example. Mythic swashbucklers can't have the first thing they'll want.

Sovereign Court RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8

ALso let's not forget the Falcata. My inner Taldan is sad that all the Taldan Magi are using scimitars. Last thing we need is the Swashbucklers doing the same.

hmm, maybe a strength archtype?

Grand Lodge

Could just add dervish dance and aldori dueling mastery to the book and add text that lets them count as piercing weapons for both duelist and swashbuckler. Or text that any weapon that counts as a piercing weapon for the duelist PrC counts for the Swashbuckler.


I agree completely with the fact that this needs to be fixed.

Designer, RPG Superstar Judge

Thread closed. Please continue this discussion in the stickied thread for this class, otherwise we'll end up with a hundred parallel discussion threads. Thanks!

Community / Forums / Archive / Pathfinder / Playtests & Prerelease Discussions / Advanced Class Guide Playtest / Class Discussion / The Swashbuckler and the Aldori Dueling Sword - Suggestion All Messageboards
Recent threads in Class Discussion