Maelchar |
Just a heads up. I am posting this in all my games, so you may see it more than once.
I am leaving for a cruise at 2am on March 5th. I'll be on the road all night and arriving at the ship midday. I won't have internet access til sometime the night of the 5th... For the next 2 weeks, I will have spotty internet (wifi at sea isn't the best), and I'll probably only be checking in at night once a day. Please if my character needs to take action between my own posts, GM feel free to bot me as necessary.
Ship returns to port on March 19th, and I will resume normal posting on the 20th.
Thanks, and sorry for any inconvenience my semi-absence may cause.
Nasira Yusra Abujamal |
Like I said in the other thread, I think we can do it by committee.
However, if you want to give it a shot, some people think oracles are easier to run than clerics - you have the divine power, but the options are selected in advance, so you are limited to what Maelchar's player has chosen, just like with a sorcerer vs a wizard. I'm sure you can handle it if you want and the rest of the party will speak up if we think an action is out of character.
We're bashful like that.
Javell DeLeon |
While a part of me wants to, another part of me feels it might be best by committee. I tend to jump into things and then find myself overwhelmed by it. I just hate that. I'd have more confidence if I was more familiar with the class. That in and of itself makes me leery about it.
So, will go down the committee path. It's just safer. :)
Nasira Yusra Abujamal |
RL has me tied up. Please bot me as necessary and I will return in a day or two.
Zeriax |
In a place like this, I'd say Daylight looks good :D
Javell DeLeon |
Apologies if I've misrepresented anyone's pc. I try to keep them as close as to who they are as possible.
And if anyone else has a better idea on what to do with our fellow pc's while they're out, please do not hesitate to throw something out there.
Javell DeLeon |
In the mean time, he casts a regular light spell on the weapon of the nearest ally who doesn't see in the dark.
Funny enough, every one of us can see in the dark. You know this party consist of 5 Aasimars and 2 dwarves? That's pretty wild.
Pakak |
Pakak wrote:In the mean time, he casts a regular light spell on the weapon of the nearest ally who doesn't see in the dark.Funny enough, every one of us can see in the dark. You know this party consist of 5 Aasimars and 2 dwarves? That's pretty wild.
*Facepalm*
I forgot Aasimar can see in the dark. Doh
Zeriax |
Guys, I think this one is for the spellcasters? :P
Javell DeLeon |
Sorry yes you can know 2 things about the greater shadows, three things about the lesser shadows and 2 about the shadow mastiffs.
I'm guessing Pakak's info was on the Greater shadows. If so, then no since it repeating yourself so just disregard.
Greater shadows:
1. Weaknesses
2. Defenses
Lesser shadows:
1. Weaknesses
2. Attacks
3. Defenses
Shadow mastiff:
1. Weaknesses
2. Defenses
Guys, I think this one is for the spellcasters? :P
I think you may be right, Z. As the famous quote goes: "I've got a bad feeling about this."
Edit: @Variel: Just to be clear: Are all of these evil outsiders?
Javell DeLeon |
Has it been longer than 90 minutes(I'd roughly say about no less than 85) since our last battle?
It was the demon squad with the wall of force.
I was curious if the stoneskin spell was still up. I guess it doesn't really matter with these guys but maybe the mastiffs do normal damage? I've no idea.
Javell DeLeon |
@Variel: Can I change what I want to know on the creatures?
Basically, instead of "Defenses" for the Greater Shadows and Mastiffs, I want to know their "Attack" info.
Well, I guess maybe just the Shadow Mastiff seeing how I believe you already gave us the info on the Greater Shadows.
DM Variel |
The information I gave Pakak was for the shadow demon only.
The shadows and greater shadows have touch attacks that do strength drain (d6 and D8 respectively.
The shadow mastiffs deal normal damage but have a trip attempt if their bite hits. They also have a tail attack but I doubt I will hit with that.
Javell DeLeon |
That's cool. I was just making sure.
Besides, blowing something up is always more fun. :)
And hey, at least we all now know everyone can see in the dark. Initially I was thinking So'rien might be an elf until I looked at his sheet more thoroughly.
Pakak |
Nasira Yusra Abujamal |
Bravo, Pakak! Thanks - I'm not sure Nasira was going to survive what the demon had mind next...
Nasira Yusra Abujamal |
Sorry, all. Just when I thought I could afford to be back in the saddle, I realized that I had overlooked a fairly major project for my class and down the rabbit hole I had to go.
Maelchar |
I am back home again after a 2 week cruise, but I am very sick... caught something on the last day of the voyage. I will try to catch up on reading and posting in all my games by tonight but no guarantees... thanks for botting/waiting for me as needed.
Pakak |
"If the crystal is destroyed while the affect is only suppressed, might we accidentally kill Morgrym? I don't know whether it's safe to attack a crystal or not now... Pakak, what's the deal here?"
Good question. DM? Does Pakak already know? I've made a lot of Knowledge rolls so far so I'm not sure if he already knew how it worked or not.
Nasira Yusra Abujamal |
Reading the spell, I would say that destroying the gem would not kill either the demon or his host - it merely ends the spell. Interesting to note that if the spell is ended while the host being possessed is out of range (we don't know the demon's range) of his original body, the possessor dies. Does that still apply when the original body is incorporeal, like this one? I doubt it.
My take on it, subject to squashing by Variel, is that the demon would be forced to reconstruct his body when his lifeforce is forced out of the gem. Note, also, that at this point, Morgrym is in possession of his own body, not the demon, but it's only a matter of time before the demon's spell is ascendant - it lasts hours per level where Morgrym is being protected by a much shorter spell.
As I said, that's just my interpretation.
Javell DeLeon |
If Morgrym makes it to 10th level, I'm sooooooooooo getting Ghost Rager barbarian power.
Man I hate incorporeal. Won't be dealing with that issue any more. Of course, once I do take it, odds are there's probably not another incorporeal creature in the rest of the AP. That's usually how it works.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Quite excited and pumped, "10th level! All right! Taking Ghost rager bay-bee! Look out ghosts!" he exclaims with obvious enthusiasm.
10 levels later...
Nowhere nearly as excited and pumped as he was 10 levels ago, "Still waiting for them ghosts. Yep, Ghost rager gonna get us through. C'mon ghosts," he says with zero emotion as his face falls and clunks on the table. "Is the ghost here yet?"
Zeriax |
Sorry for the lack of posting people - as you may (or not) know, my family has been moving during the last and also this week. I've been crazy busy with all that involves, and really didn't have a single opportunity to post. Again my apologies for that - I expect to be back up and running next weekend.
Maelchar |
Understood, and no problem... I think we've all been there, and there isn't a one of us I'm guessing who doesn't grasp what's involved in a major move. Take your time and we'll see you when you're free to post... take care and don't stress.. - Maelchar, Seijiro and Venja