Confessions That Will Get You Shunned By The Members Of The Paizo Community


Gamer Life General Discussion

1,351 to 1,400 of 4,499 << first < prev | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | next > last >>

Rynjin wrote:
Scythia wrote:
Rynjin wrote:
Scythia wrote:

I think point buy is a bad idea.

Why?

I'm hoping this means you like Stat Arrays rather than *shudders* rolling.

Allow me to dash your hope.

Although it's also probably not what you think. I don't use straight 3d6, or anything like that. I have experimented with and refined over the years a method of rolling to generate high stats while still retaining a degree of randomness. My method gives scores between 10 and 18, averaging 15. I want every player to have at least one 18.

I prefer a high adventure heroic feel. Also I don't like homogeneity of point buy.

So it's like a 1d8+10 system or some such? I've considered trying something like that out myself. Details?

It's 2d5+8. I got a set of d5 (d10 numbered 1-5 twice) specially for it. If I really want high rolls, I'll do 3d5, drop lowest,+8.

I did a series of 30 full set rolls as a test, when I first got the dice, and wasn't disappointed with any set.

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Pathfinder Accessories, Rulebook, Starfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Gark the Goblin wrote:
Paizo is heavily moderated, though, yes.

Paizo is about the least moderated forum I know, save one other.


TriOmegaZero wrote:
Gark the Goblin wrote:
Paizo is heavily moderated, though, yes.
Paizo is about the least moderated forum I know, save one other.

My other major forum experience is SPUF (the Steampowered User Forums).

It's a madhouse.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

wraithstrike wrote:
Cyrad wrote:

I ban using Hero Lab for character sheets (too many problems with players using it as a clutch for understanding how the game works).

How would you know if they use Herolab and then copy it over to another character sheet?

PS: I do agree that players should know how to do it on their own.

I can usually tell when they do that. In most cases, they're too lazy to do that anyway.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
TriOmegaZero wrote:
Gark the Goblin wrote:
Paizo is heavily moderated, though, yes.
Paizo is about the least moderated forum I know, save one other.

I see this claim thrown out a lot when this sort of thing comes up, and it provokes a O_o out of me every time.

What other forums do you guys who claim this spend your time on or have been on in the past to make this sort of comparison?

Because Paizo is the only board I've ever visited where post-deletions happen on a near-daily basis and at least one thread is locked every other week. Reasons why and the justifications for and against are irrelevant at this point and let's not re-open that discussion as Chris has asked; this is simply an observation of fact. This sort of thing hasn't and doesn't happen on any other forum I've visited, past or present, for any extensive amount of time (longer than 6 months or so).

Granted, every other forum I visit avoids this by simply completely prohibiting the topics that tend to generate half of those locks (politics and religion), so I might be able to see how someone can construe that as "strongly moderated".

But the other half get locked over gaming arguments and general forum disagreements that simply don't happen (or at least don't get to "this thread needs to be locked" severity on a regular basis) on any other forum I've ever been on.

In comparison, it's been over six months since we had a thread locked (that wasn't an announcement or other sort of thread where replies weren't desired in the first place) on the NWN community forum I admin for, and I can't think of a single time we've deleted a post that wasn't spam. Despite much desire to do so, thanks to a few passive-aggressive responses from some unhappy players after a certain in-game incident, it's always been our policy to leave posts as they stand to avoid the appearance of censorship or suggestion that posts that disagree with the admins will simply be removed.

Is it just because the only forums I've ever spent time on were video game fanforums, one webcomic fanforum that's now defunct (and the comic sucked anyway), and Neverwinter Nights communities? Or am I just managing to stumble from one relatively-nice corner of the internet to another and somehow magically avoiding every harshly-managed community in existence?


Orthos wrote:
TriOmegaZero wrote:
Gark the Goblin wrote:
Paizo is heavily moderated, though, yes.
Paizo is about the least moderated forum I know, save one other.

I see this claim thrown out a lot when this sort of thing comes up, and it provokes a O_o out of me every time.

What other forums do you guys who claim this spend your time on or have been on in the past to make this sort of comparison?

Because Paizo is the only board I've ever visited where post-deletions happen on a near-daily basis and at least one thread is locked every other week. Reasons why and the justifications for and against are irrelevant at this point and let's not re-open that discussion as Chris has asked; this is simply an observation of fact. This sort of thing hasn't and doesn't happen on any other forum I've visited, past or present, for any extensive amount of time (longer than 6 months or so).

Granted, every other forum I visit avoids this by simply completely prohibiting the topics that tend to generate half of those locks (politics and religion), so I might be able to see how someone can construe that as "strongly moderated".

But the other half get locked over gaming arguments and general forum disagreements that simply don't happen (or at least don't get to "this thread needs to be locked" severity on a regular basis) on any other forum I've ever been on.

In comparison, it's been over six months since we had a thread locked (that wasn't an announcement or other sort of thread where replies weren't desired in the first place) on the NWN community forum I admin for, and I can't think of a single time we've deleted a post that wasn't spam. Despite much desire to do so, thanks to a few passive-aggressive responses from some unhappy players after a certain in-game incident, it's always been our policy to leave posts as they stand to avoid the appearance of censorship or suggestion that posts that disagree with the admins will simply be removed.

Is it just because the only forums I've ever spent...

What kind of traffic do those other forums get? The need for moderation often seems proportional to size.


Turin the Mad wrote:
tsuruki wrote:
put me in the "i like the alignment system" concentration camp
How many of us are in there now? ;)

I have a soft spot in my heart for alignment, even if I don't think it's ever been done quite right.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
thejeff wrote:
What kind of traffic do those other forums get? The need for moderation often seems proportional to size.

That might be a large part of it, admittedly. Paizo is by FAR the largest community I've ever participated in. If this is how communities get when they get large that's probably a good explanation why.

So looks like my aversion to large centralized collections of humans extends online as well.

Sovereign Court

Tequila Sunrise wrote:
Turin the Mad wrote:
tsuruki wrote:
put me in the "i like the alignment system" concentration camp
How many of us are in there now? ;)
I have a soft spot in my heart for alignment, even if I don't think it's ever been done quite right.

The alignment system is nice, but players can't get it right

Just because your chaotic evil doesn't mean you have to be a cannibal who flayes people alive in the middle of a bar in front of the city guard using only your bare hands! That isn't CE(well it really is)! CE likes killing but they aren't that crazy!!!!!


DM waz up? wrote:
Tequila Sunrise wrote:
Turin the Mad wrote:
tsuruki wrote:
put me in the "i like the alignment system" concentration camp
How many of us are in there now? ;)
I have a soft spot in my heart for alignment, even if I don't think it's ever been done quite right.

The alignment system is nice, but players can't get it right

Just because your chaotic evil doesn't mean you have to be a cannibal who flays people alive in the middle of a bar in front of the city guard using only your bare hands! That isn't CE(well it really is)! CE likes killing but they aren't that crazy!!!!!

That kind of CE doesn't get to live for very long ... usually. ;)

President, Jon Brazer Enterprises

Orthos wrote:
So looks like my aversion to large centralized collections of humans extends online as well.

Stick to the Pathfinder Compatible area there. Without the PFS only players, the area is considerably smaller.

Just saying.

President, Jon Brazer Enterprises

6 people marked this as a favorite.

My confession: a few months ago, I played a 1e game (actual 1e, not a retroclone) for the first time in like 25 years.

I hated it and was glad that gaming has come such a long way.

Honestly, I think it was more the pregen character that I hated. I was playing a wizard with 1 spell and it wasn't anything like magic missile or shield (I forget what it was). So all I did the whole time was stay in the back and do nothing, waiting for my one opportunity to cast my spell, which I died before I could cast it. I threw out ideas for things to do, no one listened to me since I didn't suggest "kill it with a sword."

But yea, after that, I don't have any interest in playing anything before 3e or a retroclone thereof again. I'm all for playing in settings like Greyhawk updated to modern games, but not the old systems themselves.

Sovereign Court

Turin the Mad wrote:
DM waz up? wrote:
Tequila Sunrise wrote:
Turin the Mad wrote:
tsuruki wrote:
put me in the "i like the alignment system" concentration camp
How many of us are in there now? ;)
I have a soft spot in my heart for alignment, even if I don't think it's ever been done quite right.

The alignment system is nice, but players can't get it right

Just because your chaotic evil doesn't mean you have to be a cannibal who flays people alive in the middle of a bar in front of the city guard using only your bare hands! That isn't CE(well it really is)! CE likes killing but they aren't that crazy!!!!!

That kind of CE doesn't get to live for very long ... usually. ;)

Got that right!, my group found him revolting and decided to kill him off.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
LordSynos wrote:


Despite owning all the Discworld books, I've never read one.

This makes me very sad for you. Not wanting to start another discussion on whether an author is 'good' or not, I'll just say I find his humorous writing very witty and his satire nearly always spot on. If that's the thing for you, give it a shot when you can.

If not, that's okay too! Maybe someone else who does will see them in your possession and ask to borrow one~

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Fnipernackle wrote:
PS: Not an argument thread. Just a thread where you confess your dirty little gaming opinions that may go against the status quo.

This thread seemed to be doing better in this regard back in '13.


Orthos wrote:
thejeff wrote:
What kind of traffic do those other forums get? The need for moderation often seems proportional to size.

That might be a large part of it, admittedly. Paizo is by FAR the largest community I've ever participated in. If this is how communities get when they get large that's probably a good explanation why.

So looks like my aversion to large centralized collections of humans extends online as well.

Well there's the difference, tiny forum communities traditionally have far less moderation going on. The only small community forums I participate in have a rather respectable membership and moderation isnt necessary, because nobody is making waves in their posts. The only other communities I regularly participate in are places like ENWorld and the Cartographers Guild with 10s of thousands of members and those communities are like the Paizo boards, fairly heavily moderated.

I tend to avoid those communites without moderation, that upon initial reading one might say "somebody should be moderating this board". I don't care for out of control forums. There's a large one, I won't mention (as I'm sure there are many members here that are there to), but I avoid because it rather unmoderated.


gamer-printer wrote:
Orthos wrote:
thejeff wrote:
What kind of traffic do those other forums get? The need for moderation often seems proportional to size.

That might be a large part of it, admittedly. Paizo is by FAR the largest community I've ever participated in. If this is how communities get when they get large that's probably a good explanation why.

So looks like my aversion to large centralized collections of humans extends online as well.

Well there's the difference, tiny forum communities traditionally have far less moderation going on. The only small community forums I participate in have a rather respectable membership and moderation isnt necessary, because nobody is making waves in their posts.

Yeah, that's about what I'd say these places are like. Occasionally a troll player or newcomer intending to make trouble will show up, but otherwise people typically get along and conflicts are minor and don't need staff interference to work out. People disagree on things and arguments occasionally happen, but most of the time things get along even with differences of opinions and playstyles.

Which is probably the core of most of my woes, really. Back when I joined the Paizo forums, 3.5 was in its later years and 4e and PF hadn't come around yet. It was a much, much smaller community then, and a lot of the changes in community and moderation that have occurred since have been the ones I gripe about. It makes sense that the size is the core reason for the changes, now that it's been mentioned.

It's probably as simple as "Paizo's community is getting too big for me".


DM waz up? wrote:
Turin the Mad wrote:
DM waz up? wrote:
Tequila Sunrise wrote:
Turin the Mad wrote:
tsuruki wrote:
put me in the "i like the alignment system" concentration camp
How many of us are in there now? ;)
I have a soft spot in my heart for alignment, even if I don't think it's ever been done quite right.

The alignment system is nice, but players can't get it right

Just because your chaotic evil doesn't mean you have to be a cannibal who flays people alive in the middle of a bar in front of the city guard using only your bare hands! That isn't CE(well it really is)! CE likes killing but they aren't that crazy!!!!!

That kind of CE doesn't get to live for very long ... usually. ;)
Got that right!, my group found him revolting and decided to kill him off.

Oy, yes, I remember the friend who introduced me to tabletop gaming telling me "Chaotic Neutral is basically crazy." Of course, this was back in 2e, when CN really was described as clinically insane.

WotC really improved the definitions, but I've yet to see a happy balance between 'Alignment sticking its nose in all kinds of places it doesn't belong' (2e, 3.x) and 'Alignment is 99% fluff' (4e, 5e). Ah well, c'est la vie.

Sovereign Court

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I like races from 4e, but I hate 4e.

I like the warlock in 4e, but hate 4e.

I think some people are @$$#0\3 yet I act like one myself sometimes

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Pathfinder Accessories, Rulebook, Starfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Orthos wrote:
What other forums do you guys who claim this spend your time on or have been on in the past to make this sort of comparison?

Giant in the Playground.


TriOmegaZero wrote:
Gark the Goblin wrote:
Paizo is heavily moderated, though, yes.
Paizo is about the least moderated forum I know, save one other.

There are days where I long for more moderation, not less. There are participants on the boards that seem to be here to be troublesome or provide what they believe is the dissenting opinion to show why everyone is wrong. It makes for a not so nice place to read about the game.

I'm all for a good discussion, don't get me wrong. There are people that aren't interested in that, it feels like. On those days I'd like the mods to dropkick them into the Sun.

This is why I don't admin or mid anywhere anymore. :)


If it's okay to still talk about confessions, I have to share: I hate GMing. I hate it so much, I hate my players and I hate the way they take 20 minutes checking a broom closet for traps but then boldly march between two sword-wielding statues protecting a rune-carved door and get eviscerated and they act like kicked puppies because how could I be so cruel but it's like WHAT DO YOU NEED A POST IT AND A SIGN SAYING "THAR BE TRAPS HERE"??

But mostly I hate how seethe with jealousy from the other side of the GM screen because I will never experience actually getting to play :(

tsuruki wrote:

The more GM-materials paizo releases the more I love paizo. Yet, I hate 90% of paizo softcover books. Gm material or no. They degrade the system with badly balanced options (Pick your ability bonuses Ashimar/Tiefling).

...

I hate how sterilized paizo stuff has become by giving in to parents and people with fear problems, which is why I love the horror themed monsters in bestiary 4 even more.

People with problems need to live with those problems on their own and leave other people out of them.

Also this! 1000 billion %. The seemingly lack of oversight with multiple variations of archetype names, wicked powerful feats and then now redundant feats that are the same as existing ones, and creation of some dull material has really frustrated me recently.

The second part I included because I have noticed examples of (imo of course) really pointless sterilization, such as an amusing and, at most, PG-rated anecdote about a lovey-dovey vampire/succubus couple in the 3rd party material being completely erased and replaced with "the party receives 3000 gp" in Pathfinder material, which just made me sort of sad.


Tels wrote:
Plus, you have the three top tiered gods of Asmodeus, Sarenrae, and especially, Pharasma to deal with in such a case. James Jacobs has stated that, with the exception of Rovagug, Pharasma is the most powerful god (also the oldest) , with Asmodeus and Sarenrae likely being tied for the next strongest.

In reference to the bolded section, I was recently reading the "Pathfinder Chronicles: Book of the Damned—Volume 1: Princes of Darkness (PFRPG)", and in one of the between chapter sections, it describes the two "motes" that came from the sigil initiate life - Asmodeus and Ihys, and that other beings came from somewhere else, later (other gods).

Did I misunderstand something, or did JJ mean to imply that some of the other being were older then Asmodeus and Ihys?


Orthos wrote:


It's probably as simple as "Paizo's community is getting too big for me".

Did you at least ban the person on the forum you admid who called you forum-Hitler?

The moderation here to me seems really inconsistent by subforum. Gamer talk, Pathfinder RPG general discussion/advice/homebrew/rules questions, not much moderation. But the product threads for Paizo products, or the website feedback forum...eek, those are really heavily modded.

So, uh, confessions that will get me shunned? I'm not a fan of Paizo's advanced player's guide. Especially the whole section on traits.

I like the mythic rules. Well, most of them, anyways.

I don't treat Paizo's so-called "FAQs" as RAW. Or RAI. Or even suggestions.

Shadow Lodge

137ben wrote:
Especially the whole section on traits.

*fistbump*

Liberty's Edge

TriOmegaZero wrote:
Gark the Goblin wrote:
Paizo is heavily moderated, though, yes.
Paizo is about the least moderated forum I know, save one other.

My experiences are not dissimilar; I was just comparing Paizo to a totally different kind of website.

I'm still not totally content with the "core" gods and planes being so universal. Not much of a fan of the instanced planes concept either, though admittedly because I formed my own multiversal headcanons years ago.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Confession: I take Pathfinder's claims of Backwards Compatibility very seriously, and will usually refuse campaigns that don't allow access to 3.5 and 3.0 material.


TOZ wrote:
137ben wrote:
Especially the whole section on traits.
*fistbump*

not a huge fan of traits myself. The complaints many have about archetypes I find traits more than a bit guilty of.


6 people marked this as a favorite.
kyrt-ryder wrote:
Confession: I take Pathfinder's claims of Backwards Compatibility very seriously, and will usually refuse campaigns that don't allow access to 3.5 and 3.0 material.

Sounds good to me. I am one of only two people I know who let 3.x into their games. My only stipulation is that players using 3.5 stuff must specifically draw my attention to it, and I reserve the right to disallow 3.0 stuff on a case by case basis.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
BigDTBone wrote:
My only stipulation is that players using 3.5 stuff must specifically draw my attention to it, and I reserve the right to disallow 3.0 stuff on a case by case basis.

Same here. It's only come up once or twice and I allowed it, but I had to approve it first.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

I don't care about the precious action economy, my heal is on standby so people don't fall prone when their HP hits -1, especially the barbarian, bloodrager, and triply so on that skald.

I can't stand how the wizard plays. Every plan needs a contigency plan for when things go to shit and that class has almost no ways to pull itself out of a hole. Witches have hexes, sorcerers have powers if they choose wisely and can pull out any spell they want if they have the slots, arcanists defiantly have the ability to grab a get out of hell free card depending on the exploits, and everyone else has the ability to smack things with a stick.

I prefer spontaneous casting so much more than prepared casting it's not even funny. A small toolbox that you can pull whatever you want from it whenever you please will always be better than a large toolbox that you can only take so many tools from at a time and have to magically know which ones are going to work and which ones will flop in my eyes.

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder PF Special Edition, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
kyrt-ryder wrote:
Confession: I take Pathfinder's claims of Backwards Compatibility very seriously, and will usually refuse campaigns that don't allow access to 3.5 and 3.0 material.

Confession: I have a large library of 3.5 material, and unless I get a very very good reason to do otherwise, I don't allow any 3.X material in my Pathfinder games, with the sole exception of setting background.


DungeonmasterCal wrote:
BigDTBone wrote:
My only stipulation is that players using 3.5 stuff must specifically draw my attention to it, and I reserve the right to disallow 3.0 stuff on a case by case basis.
Same here. It's only come up once or twice and I allowed it, but I had to approve it first.

Indeed, I always assume everything is open to GM veto or modification, especially stuff printed by Paizo.

LazarX wrote:
kyrt-ryder wrote:
Confession: I take Pathfinder's claims of Backwards Compatibility very seriously, and will usually refuse campaigns that don't allow access to 3.5 and 3.0 material.
Confession: I have a large library of 3.5 material, and unless I get a very very good reason to do otherwise, I don't allow any 3.X material in my Pathfinder games, with the sole exception of setting background.

Based on my findings on these boards I'm assuming your position fits into the majority LazarX.


kyrt-ryder wrote:
DungeonmasterCal wrote:
BigDTBone wrote:
My only stipulation is that players using 3.5 stuff must specifically draw my attention to it, and I reserve the right to disallow 3.0 stuff on a case by case basis.
Same here. It's only come up once or twice and I allowed it, but I had to approve it first.
Indeed, I always assume everything is open to GM veto or modification, especially stuff printed by Paizo.

I haven't felt it necessary to ban any PF material yet, but my players seem to stick to the CRB,APG,UM,UC and I find most of that to be manageable. But then again, I ban stuff because it takes to bloody long to resolve not because it is OP. I have the feeling that sacred geometry will be my first PF ban for that reason.

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder PF Special Edition, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
kyrt-ryder wrote:
DungeonmasterCal wrote:
BigDTBone wrote:
My only stipulation is that players using 3.5 stuff must specifically draw my attention to it, and I reserve the right to disallow 3.0 stuff on a case by case basis.
Same here. It's only come up once or twice and I allowed it, but I had to approve it first.

Indeed, I always assume everything is open to GM veto or modification, especially stuff printed by Paizo.

LazarX wrote:
kyrt-ryder wrote:
Confession: I take Pathfinder's claims of Backwards Compatibility very seriously, and will usually refuse campaigns that don't allow access to 3.5 and 3.0 material.
Confession: I have a large library of 3.5 material, and unless I get a very very good reason to do otherwise, I don't allow any 3.X material in my Pathfinder games, with the sole exception of setting background.
Based on my findings on these boards I'm assuming your position fits into the majority LazarX.

The title of the thread is "Shunned by Members of the Paizo Community" not Majority of the Paizo Community. I'm sure that for every position or opinion presented in this venue, that there will be at least one person whose gears will grind.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Chris Lambertz wrote:
Orthos wrote:
Rynjin wrote:
Gark the Goblin wrote:
Orthos wrote:
I hate the way Paizo's forums have become so much like Tumblr in the past few years. Especially with the way Certain Subjects are heavily moderated.
Tumblr is not heavily moderated. The staff allow all kinds of active hate groups on that site. Paizo is heavily moderated, though, yes.
It's more accurate to say that Paizo has increasingly become less tolerant of viewpoints that don't perfectly mesh with their own.
This is what I meant, yes. And that viewpoint tends to be very very reminiscent of some of the most outspoken parts of Tumblr.

Just popping in for a moment to touch on this, and I'm going to shamelessly utilize some words from some of our moderators (and the PMG) here:

I understand that our philosophy towards our community might come off as "touchy-feely hippy-dippie" to some people. I understand that there are loud groups on other websites that are very loud and adamant about their points of view and issue ultimatums about how other members of their respective communities should act.

However, our Community Team (Liz and myself) and our group of moderators within the company are maintaining the same inclusive principles that we (Paizo) have held from the get-go. We deal with thousands of posts per day, have a user-base increasing in number as the Pathfinder RPG gains popularity, and also have to mitigate the needs/wants of our existing community (some of whom have been with us for years). This means that how we handle posts has changed, what we permit has been adjusted, and it's going to be an ever evolving process that adjusts as the community does. Additionally, we've never been fond of criticism of other online communities being posted to our own site because it generates unnecessary drama (this includes what may/may not occur on Tumblr).

We're going to make mistakes (such is the nature of being human and having a diverse and passionate group that we have on paizo.com), so...

Bear in mind that Twitter has become a minefield of hate mongering. I like twitter but I block nasty people. Similarly, I hide topics that become offensive here. I haven't had to do that on Pazio as much. Generally, I'm happy with the Mods. Posts that have been removed are rare and I'm usually glad I didn't have to read them.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I've never blamed Cosmo for anything :-)

Shadow Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
LazarX wrote:
The title of the thread is "Shunned by Members of the Paizo Community" not Majority of the Paizo Community. I'm sure that for every position or opinion presented in this venue, that there will be at least one person whose gears will grind.

You could post "The sky is blue" and someone here would get their panties twisted about it.


Kthulhu wrote:
You could post "The sky is blue" and someone here would get their panties twisted about it.

Word.

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Damn, I was hoping the first post after that would argue the point vehemently.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Argh!

WHY DO YOU HATE BLUE SKY SO MUCH!!


Kthulhu wrote:
LazarX wrote:
The title of the thread is "Shunned by Members of the Paizo Community" not Majority of the Paizo Community. I'm sure that for every position or opinion presented in this venue, that there will be at least one person whose gears will grind.
You could post "The sky is blue" and someone here would get their panties twisted about it.

Careful, you'll get banned for telling someone to not get their panties in a twist. Trust me.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
captain yesterday wrote:
I've never blamed Cosmo for anything :-)

*VORP* *VORP* *VORP*

I just came back from last year, reading this post of yours sir.


DungeonmasterCal wrote:
Kthulhu wrote:
You could post "The sky is blue" and someone here would get their panties twisted about it.
Word.

Word? What word?


The Eleventh Doctor wrote:
captain yesterday wrote:
I've never blamed Cosmo for anything :-)

*VORP* *VORP* *VORP*

I just came back from last year, reading this post of yours sir.

Oh no, not another timelord. Hermione was more than enough. (Harry Potter should have beens #3, "Hermione and the Year she was a Timelord.")


GM DarkLightHitomi wrote:
Word.
Word? What word?

Slang from umm..the 90s meaning "that's the truth".


GM DarkLightHitomi wrote:
The Eleventh Doctor wrote:
captain yesterday wrote:
I've never blamed Cosmo for anything :-)

*VORP* *VORP* *VORP*

I just came back from last year, reading this post of yours sir.

Oh no, not another timelord. Hermione was more than enough. (Harry Potter should have beens #3, "Hermione and the Year she was a Timelord.")

Or "Harry Potter and that plot device we'll never mention again".


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I'm totally okay with the idea of GMPCs despite not using them myself.

The majority of named undead NPCs across my games would have been neutral or good if I used alignment.

I like the 40k RPGs more than I like Pathfinder. The name of my account actually comes from my first Dark Heresy character.

I'm still annoyed by the double dipping FAQ and will probably never stop being annoyed by it.

I once faked an illness so I wouldn't have to deal with my friend for a week after he "forgot" that breath weapons have cooldown while running a dragon encounter.

I allow my guests to drink my milk.


Double Dipping FAQ?

1,351 to 1,400 of 4,499 << first < prev | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Gamer Life / General Discussion / Confessions That Will Get You Shunned By The Members Of The Paizo Community All Messageboards