LazarX |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
Full text here.
It starts like this and only gets better.
This Isn't the Petition Response You're Looking For
By Paul Shawcross
The Administration shares your desire for job creation and a strong national defense, but a Death Star isn't on the horizon. Here are a few reasons:
The construction of the Death Star has been estimated to cost more than $850,000,000,000,000,000. We're working hard to reduce the deficit, not expand it.
The Administration does not support blowing up planets.
Why would we spend countless taxpayer dollars on a Death Star with a fundamental flaw that can be exploited by a one-man starship?
Lord Snow |
Obviously, the Obama administration is against planetary defense.
WHY DO YOU HATE THE EARTH!?!?
Not that it matters anyway. Now that we have a black president who has declared in public that he is in favour of same sex marrige, we can expect the doomsday to come any day now. Might as well not even try to develop a superweapon to save us, given that the wrath of God is by definiton unmatched in this universe.
Amen.
Shadowborn |
What the White House isn't telling us is that NASA's proposed FTL drive is essentially a prototype for a weapon just as dangerous as the Death Star.
yellowdingo |
850 thousand trillion? that's nothing...
one million siemens 6 megawatt wind turbines x 25 million dollars = 25 trillion dollars over ten years. Energy production: 6000kwh x 20 years (188,160 hours) = 1,128,960,000 x 1 million turbines = 1,128,960,000,000,000 x .20 dollars per kwh = 225,792,000,000,000 dollars.
So 200 trillion dollars income from 1 million 6 megawatt wind turbines over 20 years. You could have that Death star in a hundred years.