Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game
Pathfinder Society

Pathfinder Beginner Box

Pathfinder Adventure Card Game

Pathfinder Comics

PaizoCon 2013!

Search

Links
Shop
Messageboards

Good Magus, Evil Spell. This might be a silly question., by Zhayne

The Catastrophic Problems with Server-Wide Auction Houses, by Ace-of-Spades

PFS Character´s dying., by BigNorseWolf

Whirlwind Attack - worth it ?, by Ravingdork

Is anyone out there just happy with Pathfinder?, by DrDeth

Willing Targets, by Quantum Steve

A face / skill monkey build in need of aid, by blackbloodtroll

Adapting APs for Eberron, by Tangent101

Benedict is Kaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhnn!, by Hama

Pathfinder Flip-Mat: Arcane Dungeons, by gbonehead

Attacking armor with disintigrate, by Ravingdork

The Snows of Summer (GM Reference), by Tangent101

Xbox one is coming, by Hama

Pathfinder Roleplaying Game: Ultimate Campaign (OGL), by Evil Midnight Lurker

Why Pathfinder 2.0 should never happen, by DrDeth

Online Campaigns

An Act of Revenge, by Keston Bane

DM Immortal's Blood Red Roses: A Skull & Shackles Campaign (Gameplay), by DM Immortal

Tales of Agartha: the Avalon Chronicles, by Kiara Flamebreath

Tales of Agartha: The Avalon Chronicles Discussion Thread, by Tybalt Baneko

DM Wellards Hook Mountain Massacre, by Naria Yamyra

GM Tektites PFS First Steps (First Run) Discussion, by Gwion Bach

DM - Tareth's Modified Kingmaker Campaign Gameplay, by Imon Talis

S Founder's "The Darkest Vengeance" Discussion, by Orryn Quattlebaum

Shifty PFS Bravo, by Jivokun Hukaii

Act 1, The Brinewall Legacy, by Treygan Gorski

TEJ's Reign of Winter Campaign OOC Thread, by Sonja half-shield

looking for way of the wicked game, by dunebugg

Into The Stolen Lands - Gameplay, by Timothy of house Churin

DM Fflash's Shackled City Campaign, by Epik

Langsford's Reign of Winter, by Shozole Ribole

Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder RPG / Rules Questions
RSS Facebook Twitter Email

Menacing Weapon Enhancement: Stackability?


Rules Questions

Search Thread
Search this Thread:
Cheliax

1 person marked this as FAQ candidate.

I'm looking at the menacing weapon enhancement in Ultimate Equipment, and I notice there's no set limit on the number of these you can have affecting your party at a time.

Does this mean:

- multiple characters can have one, and it adds +2 to the flanking bonus each time?
- a single character can dual-wield two of them, adding +4 to the flanking bonus total?
- a character with twenty arms and twenty of these can add +40 to the flanking bonus of any of his allies?

Intended or no, what do you guys say? The bonus only applies while someone is flanking of course.


Pathfinder Core Rulebook, page 208 wrote:


Stacking Effects: Spells that provide bonuses or
penalties on attack rolls, damage rolls, saving throws,
and other attributes usually do not stack with themselves.
More generally, two bonuses of the same type don’t stack
even if they come from different spells (or from effects
other than spells; see Bonus Types, above)

Also -- I seem to recall that creatures with different, non-humanoid body types have the same number of magic item slots. A creature with six arms cannot necessarily benefit from six rings, nor would a creature with twenty arms benefit from twenty menacing weapons. To your benefit, however, animal companions may be able to benefit from gloves-style magic items, DM willing.

I'm viewing the Advanced Player's Guide copy of Menacing, and the one thing I can see for your case is that it doesn't explicitly call it out as a bonus ... rather it is an increase to a bonus. Still, an increase to a bonus would be seen by many to be, in of itself, a bonus.

Further, we do have Armor bonuses, Natural Armor bonuses, Armor Enhancement bonuses and Natural Armor Enhancement bonuses. Although they have their own names, Armor Enhancement bonuses and Natural Armor Enhancement bonuses are precisely the same concept as Menacing's increase to flanking bonus. One cannot add two separate Enhancement bonuses together, and consistency would imply that the same Menacing effect wouldn't stack with itself.

Still, if you are not yet convinced, I am then compelled to ask you:

Can a Druid in Wildshape with several natural weapons and a Menacing Amulet of Mighty Fists increase his allies' flanking bonus by an extra +6 or +8, or even +8/+10 if they have Outflank?

Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder RPG / Rules Questions / Menacing Weapon Enhancement: Stackability? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.

Recent threads in Rules Questions

Willing Targets
Attacking armor with disintigrate
Exactly how fast is a floating disk?
Prone while Dying?
Snake Style + Disarm
Is Craft really that slow?
Monk Weapon Proficiency in Ultimate Combat
Large Scorpion Whip
Undead that can take class levels
CR question



©2002–2013 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.