Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game
Pathfinder Society

Pathfinder Beginner Box

Pathfinder Adventure Card Game

Pathfinder Comics

Pathfinder Legends

PaizoCon 2014!

PFS: Modules & Levels


Pathfinder Society GM Discussion

Shadow Lodge **

My group the other night played City of Golden Death, a L5 module, for PFS. After a near-wipe, we retreated and called it game as we didn't think we had the firepower to finish the final series of battles.

The problem we encountered is that the module assumes you will be leveling up as the game progresses and PFS only allows leveling post-scenario.

Page 24 wrote:
Before entering the Third Ring, the PCs should all be at least 6th level. If they are not, use the Xin-Grafar Random Encounters table on page 17 to give them enough experience to reach 6th level. As this is the climax of the Price of Immortality adventure trilogy, the encounters in the Third Ring are quite difficult.

(emphasis mine)

If you don't have a level appropriate character, 4-6 in this case, you would get a PFS pregen at L4. We'll assume any PCs are L5. When you get to the final series of encounters (CR 7 Undead Dragon, CR 8 Dark Naga, then a fully buffed CR 8 caster), you could be in for PC deaths or TPKs, no?

As someone looking to GM, how do you handle modules (based on characters leveling in game) in PFS play knowing that a party of APL (module level+1) would probably walk over the beginning 2/3rds of the adventure but a party of APL (mod level +0/-1) would likely not be able to finish it? What strategies have you discovered or employed?

Qadira *****

Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

Kleenex is helpful, but character sheets are fairly tear-absorbent. I also encourage players to write angry e-mails to Mike Brock before they have a chance to calm down.

Seriously, this danger is present in any Pathfinder module adapted for PFS. For every group you have who gets wiped out or retreats, another group will insist the module was a pushover. I wouldn't expect any action to be taken by the campaign. Just make sure that you stress to your players that the adventure is very tough at the end and they shouldn't hold back if they want to complete it. Encourage them to purchase lots of disposables and use them liberally.

I'm being only slightly preachy when I say that experience will teach you not to make assumptions about your players and their expectations. It seems like every time I tell players that an adventure is very tough and I expect them not to complete it, they plow through everything. When I tell players that the adventure is weak and I doubt they'll feel challenged, it turns into a bloodbath and they're all like 'What the Hell, Doug?!".

Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder Society® / Pathfinder Society GM Discussion / PFS: Modules & Levels All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.

©2002–2014 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.