Vic or whoever it may concern...

[thenorthman]

Vic,

You normally answer OGL questions so it is the reason I directed it at you.

The picture of goblins attacking a computer I am hoping to use as a Zagg Skin photo and hope it is ok. Want to use it for the back of my iPhone.

[The Shining Fool]

thenorthman wrote:

Vic,

You normally answer OGL questions so it is the reason I directed it at you.

The picture of goblins attacking a computer I am hoping to use as a Zagg Skin photo and hope it is ok. Want to use it for the back of my iPhone.

I know that this isn't ya'll's normal area, but I would buy Paizo goblin computer and phone covers. =)

[Sara Marie]

This is definitely Vic's purview. Unfortunately he's not in the office at the moment. I'll let him know about this thread so he can address it when he returns.

[Lisa Stevens]

Sara Marie wrote:

This is definitely Vic's purview. Unfortunately he's not in the office at the moment. I'll let him know about this thread so he can address it when he returns.

As long as it's for personal use only, we don't have any issues with things like that.

[Wolf Munroe]

Zagg skin (www.zagg.com) is a service that charges to make custom device covers though, so since they're profiting from the provided picture (by selling the item to the user providing the image), how does that come into play?

I mean, someone is making a profit from it. But then again if Kinko's or a similar copy center prints a PDF for someone, it's a similar issue. Then again the license for the Paizo PDF might actually allow for that while the "personal-use" of a copied image might not.

Anyway, Zagg's making money on the deal, so how does that affect the use of the image?

[thenorthman]

Wolf Munroe wrote:

Zagg skin (www.zagg.com) is a service that charges to make custom device covers though, so since they're profiting from the provided picture (by selling the item to the user providing the image), how does that come into play?

I mean, someone is making a profit from it. But then again if Kinko's or a similar copy center prints a PDF for someone, it's a similar issue. Then again the license for the Paizo PDF might actually allow for that while the "personal-use" of a copied image might not.

Anyway, Zagg's making money on the deal, so how does that affect the use of the image?

Plus as you pointed out Kinkos also is making money to print an item out. But they were ok with that as long as it's personal use.

It's going to be a back cover for my iPhone is all.

Thanks Lisa for the reply.

Order sent. ;-).

[Gorbacz]

What do the terms of use of Zagg say about the ownership of a picture used to make a skin?

For example, if there's a clause that says that rights to the image are transferred to Zagg, this won't be kosher.

[thenorthman]

Gorbacz wrote:

What do the terms of use of Zagg say about the ownership of a picture used to make a skin?

For example, if there's a clause that says that rights to the image are transferred to Zagg, this won't be kosher.

No it doesn't. It has a warning about copy right stuff before you submit. Which the photo didn't have on it but I recognize it does/is covered.