Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game
Pathfinder Society

Pathfinder Beginner Box

Pathfinder Adventure Card Game

Pathfinder Comics

PaizoCon 2013!

Search

Links
Shop
Messageboards

Store Blog: Fire in the Sky!, by Troodos

Is torture evil?, by Fromper

Roy Greenhilt's Lament: Serious issue underlying a comical play session, by Ximen Bao

Xbox one is coming, by Irontruth

What ten unique things about the Inner Sea should be I be trying to highlight in my campaign?, by B.A. Ironskull

Party Disagreement and Personal Dilemma, by Metaflux

Closed to go see Star Trek? Great, except..., by DankeSean

The Catastrophic Problems with Server-Wide Auction Houses, by Being

Idle thoughts of the day, by Ciaran Barnes

That's very tempting, Paracountess... but-, by Ryan Blomquist

Why Pathfinder 2.0 should never happen, by thaX

Exactly how fast is a floating disk?, by Aberrant Templar

Your best of the broken, by blackbloodtroll

Gencon - question about joining a PFS game, by Mike McKeown

Monk of the Four Winds Aspects of the Underdark, by blackbloodtroll

Online Campaigns

Post-Apocthulhu Pathfinder RAW, by Merlin the Wild

Conquest of Darkness, by Lot the Kobold

Old Orleans, New Trouble Gameplay, by Vincent "Scab"

CotCT Gameplay Thread!, by Akiki

Tiessa's New Campaign Discussion, by Kelgeah

It began in a town called Solace..., by Elarya Whitescale

Tales of Agartha: the Avalon Chronicles, by narrator

PFS 03.04 The Kortos Envoy Discussion, by Solarious

The Shadows Turn - Chavamana's CoT, by Azhar Mithra Amin

Kingmaker AP - Into the Stolen Lands! Gameplay, by Arianna Silvermane

Children of the Empire Discussion, Alpha Group, by Helrun Thek

Ascension - Thieve's Guild, by Eidolon Krast

The_Ninja_DM's Carrion Crown, by Gkirkhan

Chronicles of Biston Discussion, by garabbott

The Unsettled House, by John Woodford

Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder RPG / Rules Questions
RSS Facebook Twitter Email

Double Barrel Shotgun + Vital Strike


Rules Questions

Search Thread
Search this Thread:

3 people marked this as FAQ candidate.

First, some clarification. In the entry for the double barrel shotgun, it says you can fire both barrels as one attack, then proceeds to say that a double shot with bullets takes a -4 penalty "on both attacks". So is it one attack or two? The rest of the wording seems to imply one attack to me, though it's not really clear. Would it be a single attack roll with 4d8 + modifiers damage, or two seperate attack rolls as one attack action of 2d8 + modifiers damage?

Next, Vital Strike. Vital Strike says when I use the attack action, I double the dice rolled. As I can fire both barrels of a double barrel shotgun as an attack action, and it says it's "one attack" in the wording, for a total dice count of 4d8 according to the book, would Vital Strike double that to 8d8, and so on with the Improved and Greater Vital Strike


It's considered a single attack even though it uses two attack rolls. Vital Strike should work on both damage rolls as written.


So your interpretation is that as an single attack action (Standard Action), the wielder of a double barrel shotgun makes an attack with each barrel using bullets, rolling the attack (at a -4 penalty) and damage (2d8 + modifiers) seperately for each barrel, for which Vital Strike applies to each shot because they are damage dice as part of a single attack action.

Dang...that just seems really powerful.


Since I've yet to have two people with the same interpretation, I'm going to see if I can get a few more thoughts on the matter.

When using the double shot of a double barrel shotgun:

For the purposes of feats and abilities, is it considered one attack or two? Even the descriptions says "one attack" in one sentace, and "both attacks" in the next sentance.

How exactly is damage calculated? Is it calculated like two completely seperate attacks, each with their own damage modifiers, or one attack with modifiers added once, but the damage dice determined by how many barrels hit?


It "should" be that it is 1 d20 roll, 4d8 damage, with all modifiers only added once, but the wording is far too conflicting to be able to say whats right


From one perspective it makes sense to roll 2 times for a double barrel shotgun, & roll the damage as one attack. The bullets could be packed differently enough to cause one to miss so it would cause either 2d8 or 4d8 depending on the number of shots that actually hit.


And from the other perspective?


IMO vital strike would apply to one bullet, not both.

Each barrel fires a bullet, which is its own attack.

Double Crossbow wrote:
Benefit: Make one attack roll. If the attack hits, the target takes damage from both bolts. Critical hits, sneak attack damage, and other precision-based damage only apply to the first bolt.

Let's use the double crossbow as an example here (which is all I'm going on here). it fires both bolts, but the enhancements/modifications/etc only apply to the first bolt.

I could see a case for both bullets/bolts but this is an admittedly grey area and I'm not set on my tentative interpretation.


Stynkk wrote:

IMO vital strike would apply to one bullet, not both.

Each barrel fires a bullet, which is its own attack.

Double Crossbow wrote:
Benefit: Make one attack roll. If the attack hits, the target takes damage from both bolts. Critical hits, sneak attack damage, and other precision-based damage only apply to the first bolt.

Let's use the double crossbow as an example here (which is all I'm going on here). it fires both bolts, but the enhancements/modifications/etc only apply to the first bolt.

I could see a case for both bullets/bolts but this is an admittedly grey area and I'm not set on my tentative interpretation.

Uh...I think you're missing something. Enhancement bonuses, for one, are not precision based damage, and should be added to both bolts in the case of the double crossbow. Only "precision based damage" is limited to the first shot; all other damage is added to both, such as damage from special properties like Flaming, or the Weapon Specialization feat. And while Sneak Attack and Critical Hits are explicitly "precision based damage", various feat bonuses and the like are not nearly as clearly defined. Not to mention with the way Vital Strike details "precision based damage" to me implies that the bonus dice are not "precision based damage" themselves, though are specified to not be multiplied on a critical hit.

The other odd wording here is that it also calls the double shot "one attack", so anything that applies to "one attack" should apply to everyhting involved I believe, based on that wording, as though there are two attacks involved, it still counts as "one attack" by the wording.

Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder RPG / Rules Questions / Double Barrel Shotgun + Vital Strike All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.



©2002–2013 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.