The D&D is Porn Discussion


Off-Topic Discussions

51 to 94 of 94 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>

ewan cummins 325 wrote:

Is D&D brimming with pornography? NO, D&D IS NOT PORN.

Unfortunately.


Doodlebug Anklebiter wrote:
ewan cummins 325 wrote:

Is D&D brimming with pornography? NO, D&D IS NOT PORN.

Unfortunately.

There is F.A.T.A.L. for that.

Ewwwwww....


In the end the Supreme Court decides what is and isn't porn.

That's right, eight dudes and a chick, each wearing dresses decide what porn is...


Kirwyn wrote:

In the end the Supreme Court decides what is and isn't porn.

That's right, eight dudes and a chick, each wearing dresses decide what porn is...

Seven dudes and two chicks.

However, that's only within the U.S.

Antarctic porn is where it's at. Puts shame on the Germans.


Antarctic porn? Like, how do you tell which polar explorer is the porn star? It's the one who is wearing garters and such... beneath all the full body -100 Celsius arctic wear.


Actually, one's dressed as a penguin and the other as a walrus. No bears, though.

Check out the tusk on that one guy, though. Crimney.


Urizen wrote:

Actually, one's dressed as a penguin and the other as a walrus. No bears, though.

Check out the tusk on that one guy, though. Crimney.

.....?

Dark Archive

Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber

awww I thought this was going to talk about the Whores of Warcraft, which later had to change the name to Whore Lore. I mean technically that's real DnD porn. :)


I must ... inspect these.


yellowdingo wrote:
Celestial Healer wrote:
Evil Lincoln wrote:
I really don't understand the premise of this thread.
You did notice it was a Yellowdingo thread, right?
Yes...As Patriarch of the Church of Crazy I apparently draw disruptive contempt from the section of the Chapel where are insconched the Royal Fools and Village idiots.

I think you have several people trying to steal your title.


But he'll nevah have mah epic beard! *burp*


Dark_Mistress wrote:
awww I thought this was going to talk about the Whores of Warcraft, which later had to change the name to Whore Lore. I mean technically that's real DnD porn. :)

I WAS WONDERING WHAT HAPPENED TO THAT!!!! Thank you Dark Mistress!!!!!


Smurf


There's plenty of Smvrf porn, I must point out.

The Exchange

Urizen wrote:
There's plenty of Smvrf porn, I must point out.

Deep Smvrf...yes they were rule 34rd early on.

Liberty's Edge

All the Avatar porn counts as Smvrf porn too.


Doodlebug Anklebiter wrote:
ewan cummins 325 wrote:

Is D&D brimming with pornography? NO, D&D IS NOT PORN.

Unfortunately.

+1

Silver Crusade

Where is the musroom love and other decomposers?


Ambrosia Slaad wrote:

{head desk}

{head desk, head desk, head desk}

{wanders off dizzily}

My sentiments exactly.

The way I view Kender is that they are of adult age just like a "little person" in real life. To say that a naked Kender is pedophilic is the same for saying that about real little people. Shall we now have a "no Dwarf Weddings" law now because that suggests a connection to child brides?

The Exchange

Urizen wrote:

Actually, one's dressed as a penguin and the other as a walrus. No bears, though.

Check out the tusk on that one guy, though. Crimney.

Uhm... Uri... those weren't costumes. O.o

The Exchange

DM Aron Marczylo wrote:
Ambrosia Slaad wrote:

{head desk}

{head desk, head desk, head desk}

{wanders off dizzily}

My sentiments exactly.

The way I view Kender is that they are of adult age just like a "little person" in real life. To say that a naked Kender is pedophilic is the same for saying that about real little people. Shall we now have a "no Dwarf Weddings" law now because that suggests a connection to child brides?

I once saw a "primordal dwarf" stripper. She was hot.


Moorluck wrote:
DM Aron Marczylo wrote:
Ambrosia Slaad wrote:

{head desk}

{head desk, head desk, head desk}

{wanders off dizzily}

My sentiments exactly.

The way I view Kender is that they are of adult age just like a "little person" in real life. To say that a naked Kender is pedophilic is the same for saying that about real little people. Shall we now have a "no Dwarf Weddings" law now because that suggests a connection to child brides?

I once saw a "primordal dwarf" stripper. She was hot.

O.o 'nuff said I think. I'm lost for words...

The Exchange

DM Aron Marczylo wrote:
Moorluck wrote:
DM Aron Marczylo wrote:
Ambrosia Slaad wrote:

{head desk}

{head desk, head desk, head desk}

{wanders off dizzily}

My sentiments exactly.

The way I view Kender is that they are of adult age just like a "little person" in real life. To say that a naked Kender is pedophilic is the same for saying that about real little people. Shall we now have a "no Dwarf Weddings" law now because that suggests a connection to child brides?

I once saw a "primordal dwarf" stripper. She was hot.
O.o 'nuff said I think. I'm lost for words...

A primordal, I think that's the term for it, is a dwarf that is more "normal" in proportion. Basically looking like a miniaturized person of regular hight. She reminded me of a Kender at the time.


Moorluck wrote:
DM Aron Marczylo wrote:
Moorluck wrote:
DM Aron Marczylo wrote:
Ambrosia Slaad wrote:

{head desk}

{head desk, head desk, head desk}

{wanders off dizzily}

My sentiments exactly.

The way I view Kender is that they are of adult age just like a "little person" in real life. To say that a naked Kender is pedophilic is the same for saying that about real little people. Shall we now have a "no Dwarf Weddings" law now because that suggests a connection to child brides?

I once saw a "primordal dwarf" stripper. She was hot.
O.o 'nuff said I think. I'm lost for words...
A primordal, I think that's the term for it, is a dwarf that is more "normal" in proportion. Basically looking like a miniaturized person of regular hight. She reminded me of a Kender at the time.

Oh right, I have heard of that before with watching many different documentries.

Now I'm just thinking back to the old discussion of gnome strippers vs dwarf strippers...


Moorluck wrote:
Urizen wrote:

Actually, one's dressed as a penguin and the other as a walrus. No bears, though.

Check out the tusk on that one guy, though. Crimney.

Uhm... Uri... those weren't costumes. O.o

Antarctica hosts a furry convention?

Do you want me to book a ticket for you too?


DM Aron Marczylo wrote:
Moorluck wrote:
DM Aron Marczylo wrote:
Moorluck wrote:
DM Aron Marczylo wrote:
Ambrosia Slaad wrote:

{head desk}

{head desk, head desk, head desk}

{wanders off dizzily}

My sentiments exactly.

The way I view Kender is that they are of adult age just like a "little person" in real life. To say that a naked Kender is pedophilic is the same for saying that about real little people. Shall we now have a "no Dwarf Weddings" law now because that suggests a connection to child brides?

I once saw a "primordal dwarf" stripper. She was hot.
O.o 'nuff said I think. I'm lost for words...
A primordal, I think that's the term for it, is a dwarf that is more "normal" in proportion. Basically looking like a miniaturized person of regular hight. She reminded me of a Kender at the time.

Oh right, I have heard of that before with watching many different documentries.

Now I'm just thinking back to the old discussion of gnome strippers vs dwarf strippers...

Not quite my debut thread, but one of my all time favorites.

Then again, I -am- an unrepentant smutmonger...

The Exchange

DM Aron Marczylo wrote:
Ambrosia Slaad wrote:

{head desk}

{head desk, head desk, head desk}

{wanders off dizzily}

My sentiments exactly.

The way I view Kender is that they are of adult age just like a "little person" in real life. To say that a naked Kender is pedophilic is the same for saying that about real little people. Shall we now have a "no Dwarf Weddings" law now because that suggests a connection to child brides?

Are they portrayed as small adults or as childlike as possable? Take a dwarf with childlike proportions and dress it like a child, have it act like a child and you know who will want to watch it? pedoes. built like an adult and portrayed as an adult it will be seen as an adult

The Exchange

ewan cummins 325 wrote:

As author of the 'Cheesecake- Too Much?' thread, I feel obligated to weigh in on this one. :)

Is RPG artwork sometimes in poor taste? Yes, sometimes it is.
Is D&D brimming with pornography? NO, D&D IS NOT PORN.

Perhaps Porn was too narrow in definition...try child endangerment.

The legal definition is along the lines of Depicting, or encouraging behaviour of an explicit or dangerous manor. Artwork depicting Children or indescernably child like entities in such violent or sexual, or otherwise illegal behavior...like a naked teenager riding a dragon; or the exposure of children to such art.


Moorluck wrote:
DM Aron Marczylo wrote:
Moorluck wrote:
DM Aron Marczylo wrote:
Ambrosia Slaad wrote:

{head desk}

{head desk, head desk, head desk}

{wanders off dizzily}

My sentiments exactly.

The way I view Kender is that they are of adult age just like a "little person" in real life. To say that a naked Kender is pedophilic is the same for saying that about real little people. Shall we now have a "no Dwarf Weddings" law now because that suggests a connection to child brides?

I once saw a "primordal dwarf" stripper. She was hot.
O.o 'nuff said I think. I'm lost for words...
A primordal, I think that's the term for it, is a dwarf that is more "normal" in proportion. Basically looking like a miniaturized person of regular hight. She reminded me of a Kender at the time.

Hn..Interesting.


yellowdingo wrote:
ewan cummins 325 wrote:

As author of the 'Cheesecake- Too Much?' thread, I feel obligated to weigh in on this one. :)

Is RPG artwork sometimes in poor taste? Yes, sometimes it is.
Is D&D brimming with pornography? NO, D&D IS NOT PORN.

Perhaps Porn was too narrow in definition...try child endangerment.

The legal definition is along the lines of Depicting, or encouraging behaviour of an explicit or dangerous manor. Artwork depicting Children or indescernably child like entities in such violent or sexual, or otherwise illegal behavior...like a naked teenager riding a dragon; or the exposure of children to such art.

Still disagree. Pieces of these art are quite rare and understandably unpopular because they're just so disturbing.


Grand Magus wrote:


Look what the power of sex and DnD made the chinese do:

>Ultra violent NSFW do not watch this!<

Cool


Oddly enough, nude teenagers on dragons does nothing for me.
;)


ewan cummins 325 wrote:

Oddly enough, nude teenagers on dragons does nothing for me.

;)

No, after all they're just riding dragons.

It's not like someone could make it sound wrong by saying "purple dragons" as a expression I heard from Yahtzee talking about Mass Effect.


Freehold DM wrote:
yellowdingo wrote:
ewan cummins 325 wrote:

As author of the 'Cheesecake- Too Much?' thread, I feel obligated to weigh in on this one. :)

Is RPG artwork sometimes in poor taste? Yes, sometimes it is.
Is D&D brimming with pornography? NO, D&D IS NOT PORN.

Perhaps Porn was too narrow in definition...try child endangerment.

The legal definition is along the lines of Depicting, or encouraging behaviour of an explicit or dangerous manor. Artwork depicting Children or indescernably child like entities in such violent or sexual, or otherwise illegal behavior...like a naked teenager riding a dragon; or the exposure of children to such art.

Still disagree. Pieces of these art are quite rare and understandably unpopular because they're just so disturbing.

This prompts an odd question, relevant to my own life/being/happenstances and potentially squicky, so as such..

Question!:
Supposing I write a story, of undisclosed authenticity, based upon my experiences when a callow youth overseas and abroad, venturing into territory that, while inappropriate for that age bracket, involved activities that would go well above and beyond the NC-17/X/AO rating. We're talking 'That Scene' from Stephen King's 'IT' type scenarios. Is it child porn if the parties involved are no longer children? Is it exploitative if it is biographical? If it is written from the past personal perspective, does it invite condemnation in the same way as a work of pure fiction? Is it exploitative if the halfling or gnome or elf could pass for childlike with effort, but that effort would involve falsetto or breast bindings or face shaving or some other deliberate acts of disguise and subterfuge and otherwise they pass for adults, not unlike stunted actors who for all the world are perpetually trapped in the appearance?

While I can understand the general displeasure with the subject matter, and the accompanying nausea fuel, I feel it's often taken to unreasonable, illogical extremes, because of their take on the 'logical' causality.

This is where I say

Spoiler:
IBTL
,
Spoiler:
IBTheAntiElite Is Pro Child Porn OH NOEZ!!1! (which I'm not, thank you very much)
, and
Spoiler:
Explosive Runes
.


DM Aron Marczylo wrote:
ewan cummins 325 wrote:

Oddly enough, nude teenagers on dragons does nothing for me.

;)

No, after all they're just riding dragons.

It's not like someone could make it sound wrong by saying "purple dragons" as a expression I heard from Yahtzee talking about Mass Effect.

LOL!

Good one, dude.


Ambrosia Slaad wrote:

{head desk}

{head desk, head desk, head desk}

{wanders off dizzily}

Sovereign Court

Porn? In my D&D? Yes please!


The central problem is all these monsters running about in the nude. Dragons, otyughs, bulettes, beholders, not one of them wears more than the occasional piece of jewelry, and some are even very intelligent. It truly is shameless! Even FEMALE beholders are shown in the nude!


Sissyl wrote:
The central problem is all these monsters running about in the nude. Dragons, otyughs, bulettes, beholders, not one of them wears more than the occasional piece of jewelry, and some are even very intelligent. It truly is shameless! Even FEMALE beholders are shown in the nude!

Don't make me go there.

I WILL DO IT.

And no one will be spared.


TheAntiElite wrote:
Sissyl wrote:
The central problem is all these monsters running about in the nude. Dragons, otyughs, bulettes, beholders, not one of them wears more than the occasional piece of jewelry, and some are even very intelligent. It truly is shameless! Even FEMALE beholders are shown in the nude!

Don't make me go there.

I WILL DO IT.

And no one will be spared.

Go where?


Sissyl wrote:
Even FEMALE beholders are shown in the nude!

How can you tell which is which (male/female, I mean)?

Silver Crusade

Gruuuu wrote:
TheAntiElite wrote:
Sissyl wrote:
The central problem is all these monsters running about in the nude. Dragons, otyughs, bulettes, beholders, not one of them wears more than the occasional piece of jewelry, and some are even very intelligent. It truly is shameless! Even FEMALE beholders are shown in the nude!

Don't make me go there.

I WILL DO IT.

And no one will be spared.

Go where?

I don't know, but I hope it involves beholder anatomy.


Readerbreeder wrote:
Sissyl wrote:
Even FEMALE beholders are shown in the nude!
How can you tell which is which (male/female, I mean)?

We have a probe...


Gruuuu wrote:
TheAntiElite wrote:
Sissyl wrote:
The central problem is all these monsters running about in the nude. Dragons, otyughs, bulettes, beholders, not one of them wears more than the occasional piece of jewelry, and some are even very intelligent. It truly is shameless! Even FEMALE beholders are shown in the nude!

Don't make me go there.

I WILL DO IT.

And no one will be spared.

Go where?

Beholder smut. Made of squick, horrible, and 'BRAIN BLEACH WILL NOT SAVE YOU'.

Celestial Healer wrote:
I don't know, but I hope it involves beholder anatomy.

In ways you would never be able to unsee.

ewan cummins 325 wrote:
We have a probe...

Actually, more often than not, it involves eyelash length.

Sometimes, it's choice of hai-...er, eyestalk-decs.

1 to 50 of 94 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Off-Topic Discussions / The D&D is Porn Discussion All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.