Backmasking Is Overpowered! but Slayer isn't - possible APG errata?


Pathfinder First Edition General Discussion

RPG Superstar 2010 Top 32

1 person marked this as FAQ candidate.
Ah Peh Gay, Inquisitor section wrote:
Slayer (Ex): At 17th level, an inquisitor learns to act quickly in combat. Whenever an inquisitor uses her judgment ability, she can select one of her judgments— that judgment grants the maximum bonus from the first round of combat onward. If that judgment is changed during combat, it resets as normal.

This doesn't do anything at all, now that Judgement bonuses don't change on a round-to-round basis. Should this just be ignored, or was this going to be replaced?

ANGRY RANT WITH LOTS OF INFLAMMATORY LANGUAGE GOES HERE

Liberty's Edge

A Man In Black wrote:
Ah Peh Gay, Inquisitor section wrote:
Slayer (Ex): At 17th level, an inquisitor learns to act quickly in combat. Whenever an inquisitor uses her judgment ability, she can select one of her judgments— that judgment grants the maximum bonus from the first round of combat onward. If that judgment is changed during combat, it resets as normal.

This doesn't do anything at all, now that Judgement bonuses don't change on a round-to-round basis. Should this just be ignored, or was this going to be replaced?

ANGRY RANT WITH LOTS OF INFLAMMATORY LANGUAGE GOES HERE

Ok here is a time machine, you only get one use now here are your instructions.

First delete this pointless thread, go back and check the search function for the relevant info. Read the 10+ threads about this including the official responses by the Paizo staff and pretend like this never happened.

Shame you wasted your one use on this... tsk tsk


The first result of a search for "Inquisitor Slayer" (I would have tried just "Slayer" but I figured that was too generic a term) yields this thread, which contains two different links in three total posts to Jason's errata for the ability.

It sucks that it made it through editing like that, but it's already been addressed. The rage isn't really warranted.

RPG Superstar 2010 Top 32

Zurai wrote:
It sucks that it made it through editing like that, but it's already been addressed. The rage isn't really warranted.

I'm not sure who's angry? Anyhoo, I searched for Slayer and didn't get anything relevant. Ah well.


Ya used all caps, which normally means the person using them is pissed or in full on rant mode

So yeah it comes off as your very upset and angry


Sorry, I'm never sure which ALLCAPS POSTERS are actually angry and which are just parodying the angry people :)

RPG Superstar 2010 Top 32

seekerofshadowlight wrote:

Ya used all caps, which normally means the person using them is pissed or in full on rant mode

So yeah it comes off as your very upset and angry

Well, I feel strongly about 25-year-old Satanic metal.

(And I'm sad nobody got the joke.)

Liberty's Edge

A Man In Black wrote:
seekerofshadowlight wrote:

Ya used all caps, which normally means the person using them is pissed or in full on rant mode

So yeah it comes off as your very upset and angry

Well, I feel strongly about 25-year-old Satanic metal.

(And I'm sad nobody got the joke.)

Play that sh-t backwards foo!

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / General Discussion / Backmasking Is Overpowered! but Slayer isn't - possible APG errata? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in General Discussion