Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game


Pathfinder Society

Pathfinder Adventure Card Game

Pathfinder Adventure Card Game

Would the Pathfinder community support a war game?

Pathfinder RPG General Discussion

I know RPGs and traditional wargames are very different animals, with different audiences.

But I for one would love to have a full-blown tactical-level set of rules for large-unit combat that integrates with Pathfinder.

The current Kingmaker adventure path hints at just how fun a game could be where players can enjoy a really wide ranging game.

To meet my needs, a game would have to contain most of the following:

-A streamlined way that PCs can affect large-scale tactical combat.
-A political component, so that Leadership, Diplomacy and other non-combat elements of Pathfinder can affect outcomes.
-Full integration with the Pathfinder game system, so that races and monsters in the RPG translate smoothly to the WG.
-Clear rules for how monsters and magic-wielders can function as artillery, air support, etc.
-A coherent vision for how war would function in a setting with magic and monsters.

To be clear, I'm not interested in skirmish rules.

I would argue that the standard unit size for the game would be 20 medium-sized creatures per counter or miniature.

Hex scale would be approximately 50'.

That strikes me as an approach that would allow for a wide range of scenarios -- from small border skirmishes (3-4 counters on each side) to fairly epic LOTR-scale battles (20-30 counters on each side).

--Captain Marsh

You mean something like this:

WARPATH—Rules for Mass Combat (PFRPG)

Yes, thanks for the link. I suppose it would be too much to ask that a product like this be created specifically for Golarion.

Meanwhile, anyone played this yet?



Captain Marsh wrote:

Yes, thanks for the link. I suppose it would be too much to ask that a product like this be created specifically for Golarion.

Meanwhile, anyone played this yet?


These two threads explain a lot of what is found in this supplement:

Thread 1

Thread 2

This could be really cool.

I primarily played RuneQuest between around 1982 and the time 3E D&D came out. I ran Glorantha and we played on the 'Dragon Pass' wargame map. It was beautiful and evocative and really, really added a lot to the game.

It would be great if something similar existed for Golarion.



Also, since you're into wargames, you can check out a simple game I created for my gaming group based on the Song of Ice and Fire series by George R. R. Martin, to be used with MapTools, here. The mass battles are meant to be used with Warpath.

Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder RPG / General Discussion / Would the Pathfinder community support a war game? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.

©2002-2017 Paizo Inc.® | Privacy Policy | Contact Us
Need help? Email or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours, Monday through Friday, 10:00 AM to 5:00 PM Pacific time.

Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, Starfinder, the Starfinder logo, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc. The Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Legends, Pathfinder Online, Starfinder Adventure Path, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.