Where in the PRD are the rules for non proficiency


Rules Questions

Sovereign Court

That's it, doing some pre-game prep at work and trying to find the rules if someone is using a weapon that they aren't proficient with, can't find them in the PRD was hoping someone could provide me with a link and say where in the wall of text they are. I'm having a hell of a time.

Liberty's Edge

Pathfinder Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber
lastknightleft wrote:
That's it, doing some pre-game prep at work and trying to find the rules if someone is using a weapon that they aren't proficient with, can't find them in the PRD was hoping someone could provide me with a link and say where in the wall of text they are. I'm having a hell of a time.

Check under the weapon proficiency feats themsees. Under normal it gives the penalty. Not sure if it's anywhere else.

Sovereign Court

Paul Watson wrote:
lastknightleft wrote:
That's it, doing some pre-game prep at work and trying to find the rules if someone is using a weapon that they aren't proficient with, can't find them in the PRD was hoping someone could provide me with a link and say where in the wall of text they are. I'm having a hell of a time.
Check under the weapon proficiency feats themsees. Under normal it gives the penalty. Not sure if it's anywhere else.

Thanks, I wouldn't have thought to check feats, I checked the entire equipment and the entire combat sections. That's a pretty buried rule.

Liberty's Edge

Pathfinder Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber
lastknightleft wrote:
Paul Watson wrote:
lastknightleft wrote:
That's it, doing some pre-game prep at work and trying to find the rules if someone is using a weapon that they aren't proficient with, can't find them in the PRD was hoping someone could provide me with a link and say where in the wall of text they are. I'm having a hell of a time.
Check under the weapon proficiency feats themsees. Under normal it gives the penalty. Not sure if it's anywhere else.
Thanks, I wouldn't have thought to check feats, I checked the entire equipment and the entire combat sections. That's a pretty buried rule.

It's also mentioned in passing under Splash weapons that you don't suffer -4 non-proficiency with them, which certainly implies you do with other weaponsbut yeah, it is pretty hidden.


By the way, am i the only one who thinks -4 is way too high as a penalty for non proficiency?
Me thinks -2 would be enough.


Seldriss wrote:

By the way, am i the only one who thinks -4 is way too high as a penalty for non proficiency?

Me thinks -2 would be enough.

Nope.

If the penalty was -2 then I'd just grab a repeating cross-bow and never bother with the feat to use it, same for elven curve blade and orc double axe.

Sovereign Court

mdt wrote:
Seldriss wrote:

By the way, am i the only one who thinks -4 is way too high as a penalty for non proficiency?

Me thinks -2 would be enough.

Nope.

If the penalty was -2 then I'd just grab a repeating cross-bow and never bother with the feat to use it, same for elven curve blade and orc double axe.

+1


The -2 0r -4 confusion is b/c the -2 was the penalty for fighters/barbarians/paladins

and -4 was for magic-users/clerics/rogues.......

This is a holdout from 2.0


Paul Watson wrote:
It's also mentioned in passing under Splash weapons that you don't suffer -4 non-proficiency with them, which certainly implies you do with other weaponsbut yeah, it is pretty hidden.

Huh. It's also mentioned in passing under "Inappropriately Sized Weapons" -- "If the creature isn't proficient with the weapon, a -4 nonproficiency penalty also applies.". That's pretty cryptic.

Sovereign Court

hogarth wrote:
Paul Watson wrote:
It's also mentioned in passing under Splash weapons that you don't suffer -4 non-proficiency with them, which certainly implies you do with other weaponsbut yeah, it is pretty hidden.
Huh. It's also mentioned in passing under "Inappropriately Sized Weapons" -- "If the creature isn't proficient with the weapon, a -4 nonproficiency penalty also applies.". That's pretty cryptic.

yeah I saw that and just wasn't sure if that was the rule, or just a special case for the innapropriately sized weapons. Armor at least has a little spelled out section, but weapons you have to search for the buried rule.

The Exchange

From CRB page 141...
"A character who uses a weapon with which he is not proficient takes a –4 penalty on attack rolls."

Hope this helps.

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder PF Special Edition, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Seldriss wrote:

By the way, am i the only one who thinks -4 is way too high as a penalty for non proficiency?

Me thinks -2 would be enough.

You may not be the only one, but I think you're in the minority. There's a world of difference between being practically untrained with weapons the way the mage is and being a near expert on almost every one the way the martial classes are.

And rememember in first edition the penalty for mages was -6!


mdt wrote:

Nope.

If the penalty was -2 then I'd just grab a repeating cross-bow and never bother with the feat to use it, same for elven curve blade and orc double axe.

I understand that.

But on the other hand, maybe i have really good players, but i don't think any of them would abuse the situation if i was switching the penalty to -2. They might of course sometimes grab a weapon and enjoy the -2 only but they wouldn't do it often, i am sure.
Anyway i am not really asking for myself or my own game, as i use weapon groups, and give already a -2 only if the character is grabbing a weapon close to the ones in his weapon groups.
No, my question was rethoric and general, as -4 is a strong penalty, like the one from being blinded, so it seems high to me...


This comes from 2.0 D&D where the penalties changed for houserule it makes sense that
The fighter would have less of a penalty....

My opinion
Fighters -1
rangers/paladins/barbarians -2
clerics/rogues -3
wizards/sorcerers -4


Seldriss wrote:
mdt wrote:

Nope.

If the penalty was -2 then I'd just grab a repeating cross-bow and never bother with the feat to use it, same for elven curve blade and orc double axe.

I understand that.

But on the other hand, maybe i have really good players, but i don't think any of them would abuse the situation if i was switching the penalty to -2. They might of course sometimes grab a weapon and enjoy the -2 only but they wouldn't do it often, i am sure.
Anyway i am not really asking for myself or my own game, as i use weapon groups, and give already a -2 only if the character is grabbing a weapon close to the ones in his weapon groups.
No, my question was rethoric and general, as -4 is a strong penalty, like the one from being blinded, so it seems high to me...

I prefer weapon groups myself, honestly. One of the best rules in Unearthed Arcana. I hate people paying a feat to use one weapon.

As to the penalty, it's your game, do what you feel is best. Just be prepared to have the players take advantage of it.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Rules Questions / Where in the PRD are the rules for non proficiency All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.