Gray |
Since I hope to use the PFS open call to help grow new freelancers for Paizo, my responses will be constructive. :-)
If I have time to respond to all of them ... or any of them. We'll see.
This is great to see. I've submitted stories to publishers and any feedback is rather rare. Thanks for the opportunity.
Even if I don't get selected, this has resulted in a scenario that I want to run for my players, and I've created an NPC that I think I can have a lot of fun with. I'm tempted to write it up anyway, just to share.
As others mentioned, I'm also looking forward to the next open call. I think I may have approached it in the wrong way.
Good luck to everyone!
Charles Evans 25 |
I think- according to Terry Pratchett and the troll system of counting- 'lots' is a few more than two.
I do not have the book to hand to be able to quote the troll counting system, but I believe that the system was outlined in either the first or second of the Ankh-Morpork City Watch series, probably in a footnote and with regard to the troll Detritus.
Edit:
Googled up the following Wikipedia link regarding troll counting in Terry Pratchett fiction: *link*
Based on that, I think it safe to say that Josh may have received upwards of sixteen entries.
Darkjoy RPG Superstar 2013 Top 16 |
Sir_Wulf RPG Superstar 2008 Top 16 |
Boerngrim |
I plan to share those in tomorrow's blog. :-)
Hi Joshua,
I just read your post on the blog. I have not submitted an entry, but I wanted to say BRAVO! Those are great words of advice that anyone who wants to break into professional writing needs to hear and heed! It is kind of you to offer that advice rather than simply discarding submissions without a reason.I am not a professional writer, but I am an avid reader and the lack of spell checking and proofreading in many professionally published works in recent years has been excrutiating for me.
I have recently completed two college level writing courses and much of the advice you offered was stressed by my instructors: spelling, grammar, avoid passive voice, and avoid garbage, BS, and crap (or stick to the topic at hand).
Thanks.
Joshua J. Frost |
All of the rejections went out via email for scenario #17. I'll announce the author I selected tomorrow. Rejections for #18 should go out tomorrow with the announced author happening then as well.
Take my feedback to heart, but don't take it personally. You should note I told every single one of you that I'm looking forward to your next submission and I mean that.
Dementrius RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16 |
All of the rejections went out via email for scenario #17. I'll announce the author I selected tomorrow. Rejections for #18 should go out tomorrow with the announced author happening then as well.
Take my feedback to heart, but don't take it personally. You should note I told every single one of you that I'm looking forward to your next submission and I mean that.
Hi Josh - do you have any problems with us posting the "losing" entries on the messageboards? I'd love to see the 101 takes on the scenario.
Sir_Wulf RPG Superstar 2008 Top 16 |
Take my feedback to heart, but don't take it personally. You should note I told every single one of you that I'm looking forward to your next submission and I mean that.
Josh, thank you for your response to my submission. I particularly appreciate the effort that you put into your critique. It's a thankless task (No one enjoys being shot down!), but I'll certainly keep your feedback in mind in the future.
Paris Crenshaw Contributor |
Tarren Dei RPG Superstar 2009 Top 8 |
Joshua J. Frost wrote:Take my feedback to heart, but don't take it personally. You should note I told every single one of you that I'm looking forward to your next submission and I mean that.Josh, thank you for your response to my submission. I particularly appreciate the effort that you put into your critique. It's a thankless task (No one enjoys being shot down!), but I'll certainly keep your feedback in mind in the future.
Of course, what we'd all like to see is what an accepted submission looks like, but we aren't going to see that. In lieu of that, your feedback is much appreciated and valuable. Thanks.
Tarren Dei RPG Superstar 2009 Top 8 |
Josh,
I, too, appreciate the detailed review of the submissions. Rejections aren't easy on either party, but you can bet that I'll be putting your advice to good use!
Cheers!
Paris
I'm not at all upset about having my submission rejected. Paizo has a wonderfully creative community and I can only imagine that some really strong submissions were accepted.
joela |
All of the rejections went out via email for scenario #17. I'll announce the author I selected tomorrow. Rejections for #18 should go out tomorrow with the announced author happening then as well.
Take my feedback to heart, but don't take it personally. You should note I told every single one of you that I'm looking forward to your next submission and I mean that.
I received rejection for scenario #17. My first rejection letter. More importantly, Josh provided a critique!
Yeah! My first step to publishing in the rpg industry has been taken! Thanks, Paizo! :)
Dementrius RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16 |
James Jacobs Creative Director |
Joshua J. Frost wrote:Feel free to start a thread and share the entries that weren't accepted--though keep in mind Paizo's policy regarding subject matter posted on the boards when doing so.Could you quickly clarify what you mean?
I suspect that what he means is to not post stuff that's inappropriately violent, sexy, profane, or otherwise naughty. I haven't read many of the submissions (only a handful of the final contenders for each), but having seen plenty of other submissions over my years here at Paizo, every now and then we get some in that are too over the top to accept.
Of course, I'm just guessing here. Maybe he means something else!
Joshua J. Frost |
Oh sorry, I should have been much more clear than I was!
I could have sworn we had some policy up somewhere about anything you post on the boards is ours blah blah to protect ourselves in case we had ideas similar to ones on the boards ... but I can find it, so never mind.
So, yeah, that's what I was talking about.
James Jacobs Creative Director |
Oh sorry, I should have been much more clear than I was!
I could have sworn we had some policy up somewhere about anything you post on the boards is ours blah blah to protect ourselves in case we had ideas similar to ones on the boards ... but I can find it, so never mind.
So, yeah, that's what I was talking about.
Are you SURE there weren't any X-rated proposals that you rejected, though?
Charles Evans 25 |
Joshua J. Frost wrote:Are you SURE there weren't any X-rated proposals that you rejected, though?Oh sorry, I should have been much more clear than I was!
I could have sworn we had some policy up somewhere about anything you post on the boards is ours blah blah to protect ourselves in case we had ideas similar to ones on the boards ... but I can find it, so never mind.
So, yeah, that's what I was talking about.
Nooo! I knew I should have left the succubus in. <bashes head against the keyboard>
Edit (clarity):
Wait. No mail. Module #18 stil 24 hours left to wait.
The slow drip torture treatment continues... :D
Sir_Wulf RPG Superstar 2008 Top 16 |
joela |
Looking at some of those scenario #17 entries and Josh's comments, I'm thinking I should have done better for my #18 submission. Ah well; all part of the learning experience.
Thank you (in advance) for the feedback you're going to send out for #18, Josh. :)
I feel the same about my scenario #18 submission as well, Charles Evans 25. Can't wait for the next submission call! :)
Darkjoy RPG Superstar 2013 Top 16 |
All of the rejections went out via email for scenario #17. I'll announce the author I selected tomorrow. Rejections for #18 should go out tomorrow with the announced author happening then as well.
Take my feedback to heart, but don't take it personally. You should note I told every single one of you that I'm looking forward to your next submission and I mean that.
Thank you for the (extensive) feedback, it is much more helpful than the one sentence 'thanks but no thanks' I sometimes get, if I get anything at all.
Charles Evans 25 |
(edited)
So, oh evilly tantalising Events Manager (by the way, unless it's covered by the 'improved flip you for real', I think you need something along the lines of 'mercilessly tantalise the board regulars' recorded as an at will power in your profile): when can we have the details for the next open call?
Mark Moreland Director of Brand Strategy |
So, oh evily tantalising director of Marketing & Organised Play (by te way, you need something along the lines of 'mercilessly tantalise the board regulars' recorded as an at will power in your profile, I think); when can we have the details for the next open call?
Charles, let him give us the promised results of this open call first, ok?
Small Attention Span |
Charles Evans 25 wrote:Charles, let him give us the promised results of this open call first, ok?So, oh evily tantalising director of Marketing & Organised Play (by te way, you need something along the lines of 'mercilessly tantalise the board regulars' recorded as an at will power in your profile, I think); when can we have the details for the next open call?
On that note, when will the evily Event's Manager give us the results we so desperately seek?
Charles Evans 25 |
Charles Evans 25 wrote:Charles, let him give us the promised results of this open call first, ok?So, oh evily tantalising director of Marketing & Organised Play (by te way, you need something along the lines of 'mercilessly tantalise the board regulars' recorded as an at will power in your profile, I think); when can we have the details for the next open call?
I'm hoping if we show enough enthusiasm he might show mercy and move his schedule up.
It is a very long-shot though, I admit. :DWiglaf |
Thank you for the feedback Mr. Frost. I have taken it to heart and shall pay closer attention in the future. Considering that this was my first experience with submitting material for publication I'm satisfied with the outcome. I'll probably clean up my submission a bit and then share it with the hopes of getting some feedback from the community.
Charles Evans 25 |
Your first paragraph is your only opportunity to make the editor read more. It needs to sell to the editor the fact that you're a clear, concise author and that you have a good grasp of storytelling. Sorry to say, these first two paragraphs did not accomplish this. In the paragraph above, I've highlighted, in order: passive voice, passive voice, vampiress should just be "vampire", can reveal is an odd tense choice ("reveals" is the better choice here), passive voice.
For your next submission focus on these things:
1. clear, concise plot outline with well-defined goals and events
2. crisp, well-written first paragraph
3. Re-read your entire submission out loud. Chances are if it sounds bad as you read it out loud it'll sound bad when I read it.
1) I should have pestered you much more on the threads for an example layout, or simply not entered.
2) I should have made more of an effort to find out what the 'passive voice' is which you keep mentioning; although perhaps 'passive voice' is a European writing accent?3) I re-read it several times. Clearly this didn't help.
A barely successful (I think?) Wisdom check is keeping me from adding much, much, more.
Edit:
For what it's worth, a 'vampiress' is 'a female vampire'. I've checked it, and indeed the word seems to see regular use, if my Google results for the word are anything to go by. *Wiktionary link*
Tarren Dei RPG Superstar 2009 Top 8 |
Charles Evans 25 wrote:Ummm. Now I'm not sure I want to check my email....Oh, stop being a woose. The agony will stop in a few months....
Agony? I pay people to tear into my writing much, much worse. Then, I smile and thank them afterwards. Josh gave some honest and clear feedback. The writing was a pleasure. Next time, I'll do one proposal only and try to keep the writing crisp.
Callum Finlayson |
2) I should have made more of an effort to find out what the 'passive voice' is which you keep mentioning; although perhaps 'passive voice' is a European writing accent?
I think it's more commonly used over here than in the US; certainly I was taught that using the passive voice wasn't wrong per se, rather it's easy to misuse/overuse.
Joshua J. Frost |
While passive voice certainly has a place in writing, in most adventure writing it comes across as ... well ... passive ... when there's a much stronger way to say the thing you're trying to say. Repeated use of passive voice in an opening paragraph, say, just feels lazy. An awesome website to help you recognize and destroy overuse of it can be found here. Over the past few years that website alone did wonders to help me clean passive voice out of my writing.
My feedback is the same style of feedback I gave and received for years in creative writing workshops. Any time I was in a workshop where everyone hinted and was overly nice about their response, none of the writers progressed. In those workshops, though, where the authors were brutal and openly honest, everyone progressed.
Now, I wasn't brutal. Just honest. If your opening paragraph didn't grab me, if your story idea didn't speak to me, if your writing style didn't fit my expectation of what we need in our authors, I told you. I then, in nearly every case, told you what exactly I wanted to see the next time.
And I want to see every single one of you submit next time.
Tarren Dei RPG Superstar 2009 Top 8 |
Heathansson |
2) I should have made more of an effort to find out what the 'passive voice' is which you keep mentioning; although perhaps 'passive voice' is a European writing accent?
I think it's the difference between:
The vampire bit Seoni in the neck. (active)
vs
Seoni was bitten in the neck by the vampire. (passive)
Adam Daigle Director of Game Development |