Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game   Pathfinder Adventure Path   Pathfinder Modules   Pathfinder Campaign Setting   Pathfinder Player Companion   Pathfinder Tales  
Search
Links
Shop
Recent Reviews

DHL Classics: Skeletons
***** by Mandreth

GameMastery Plot Twist Cards: Flashbacks
****( ) by madwilly2006

GameMastery Item Cards: Skull & Shackles
****( ) by madwilly2006

Player's Aid II: Monster Summoning Cards (PFRPG) PDF
***** by Entropi

Pathfinder Chronicles: Book of the Damned—Volume 1: Princes of Darkness (PFRPG)
***** by April Bowen

   RSS Recent Posts
Pathfinder Society Scenario #21: The Eternal Obelisk (OGL) PDF (Retired)

Pathfinder Society Scenario #21: The Eternal Obelisk (OGL) PDF (Retired)
**( )( )( ) (based on 5 reviews)

5x5
Our Price: $3.99
Add To Cart
Retired
Facebook Twitter Email
5x5 5x5

A Pathfinder Society Scenario designed for 5th to 9th level characters (Tiers: 5–6 and 8–9).

When the Pathfinder-obsessed daughter of one Qadira's most powerful trade princes goes missing trying to impress the Society, her father angrily demands the Pathfinders track her down or face expulsion from Katheer. Tracking the missing princess leads you to an underground complex filled with traps, tricks, and a creature so powerful, she's lived for a thousand years. Can you save the princess and uncover the power of the Eternal Obelisk?

Written by C. Robert Brown

This scenario is designed for play in Pathfinder Society Organized Play, but can easily be adapted for use with any world. This scenario is compliant with the Open Game License (OGL) and is suitable for use with the 3.5 edition of the world’s most popular fantasy roleplaying game.

This scenario was retired from Pathfinder Society Organized Play on May 24, 2010. After May 24, 2010, it will no longer be legal for Pathfinder Society Organized Play and will no longer be available in the Pathfinder Society Organized Play reporting system.

Product Availability
Will be added to your downloads immediately upon purchase of Retired. This product has been retired.

Are there errors or omissions in this product information? Got corrections? Let us know at webmaster@paizo.com.


PZOPSS0021E


See Also:


Product Reviews (5)

Average product rating: **( )( )( ) (based on 5 reviews)


**( )( )( )

The (almost) eternal boredom


I tend to read the faction missions of a scenario first. The missions sounded nice, but ultimately, after reading the summary, all went down to fetch the gizmo.

And every faction has two generic fetch-the-gizmo-crap/ slay x missions with the associated awards. Great.

The nature of the BBEG is not foreshadowed, but constantly beaten over the heads of the PCs. It took my players not even a minute to accurately guess the nature of the antagonist.

The first encounter proved to be mildly annoying for my PCs.

The subsequent encounters screamed lightning bolt/fireball formation and, quite frankly make this scenario a classic kill everything with fire experience. That might be fun sometimes, but there is NOTHING to intrigue a Player or DM. No puzzle, no RP, this scenario is about mindlessly slaughtering everything.

The adventure does not consist of plot-holes, like "The Trouble with Secrets", but is, quite frankly, monotonous.
The final boss, however, is damn cool, lethal and a fun and challenging fight after all the drudgery and the only saving grace of this adventure.
If your players don't feature enough ranged firepower, your PCs will die here. A lot of them.
I'd give this adventure 1.5 Stars with tendency towards 2.



*( )( )( )( )

Another of Many Scenarios that leads to TPKs


Okay this is another horrible scenario, I mean hell this thing was worse than Asmodeus Mirage in the sense of the encounters...and that means its really, really bad. I personally believe that creatures that cause effects that are pretty much irreversible is too powerful in any game. You going to have to provide some countermeasure, otherwise it will lead to a TPK which our game pretty much lead too. I will never purchase and/or run this scenario...I like to make the player's "sweat" but killing all of them...no I don't want that on my hands.



***( )( )

Decent four-hour dungeon crawl


I enjoyed this scenario as both a player and a GM. It doesn't provide a lot of room for roleplay or problem solving, both of which can add nice variation within a dungeon crawl, but the scenario succeeds at what it sets out to do. I enjoyed some of the tactical situations the scenario presented, including a battle in a maze and one in a forest of statues. The scenario includes one encounter which I believe was incredibly overpowered, a relic of the imbalance in the 3.5 CR system, but my group managed to avoid a certain TPK by roleplaying the encounter, thanks to a generous GM. All in all, this is an average scenario with room for improvement, but it's far from the worst of the scenarios thus far.



*( )( )( )( )

Eternal Boredom


I could just copypaste the review I gave for Trouble With Secrets. This is practically the same; a nonexistant plot, boring combats, and absolutely no roleplaying moments.

If you like mindless dungeon crawls, this is for you.



**( )( )( )

Foreshadow club and the power of box text


My first complaint is the foreshadowing. Holy cow it is beating you over the head by the time you are a quarter of the way through. Second complaint is all encounters start the same way no matter how many precautions are taken. Maybe I'm just sore because we chose not to finish it, but the ending seemed a forgone conclusion. Don't go without a well balance group well inside the level tiers (in fact play DOWN). Some of the faction goals are impossible without very powerful resources.


Messageboards

[Reaper Miniatures] Pathfinder Miniatures: Kirin the Heretic, by Wolf Munroe

Changes for Guide 4.2 discussion, by Mark Moreland

Feyblooded sorceror build advice please, by blackbloodtroll

10 things you love and hate about PF, by Morgan Shay

My feelings about 5E D&D, by Sebastrd

Ganging up on your foes-aren't these guys supposed to be heroes?, by Finn K

Optimized Drow, by blackbloodtroll

Please Do Away With 7-Person Tables, by Mark Moreland

>>Ask *James Jacobs* ALL your Questions Here!<<, by Forbiddenlightbulb

Should the Synthesist be banned?, by Wasum

Paizo Blog

Pathfinder Battles Preview: Familiar Faces,

RPG Superstar: Encounter Challenge Preview,

The Perfumer's Apprentice—Chapter Four: The Scent of Honeysuckle,

RPG Superstar: Round 3!,

Revenge of the FAQ Attack!,

Open Game License

Store Blog

Fifteen Men on a Dead Man's Chest!,

Things That Go Bump in the Night!,

To Sail the Starlit Sea!,

Pulling Down the Walls of Jericho!,

Yo-Ho-Ho, and a Bottle of Rum!,

Sign up for our weekly store newsletter

News

Top 16 Advance to Round 3 of RPG Superstar™,

Paizo Announces RPG Superstar™ 2012 Top 32,

Pathfinder Tales Hits #3 on Barnes & Noble Best Fantasy of 2011 List,

Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Now a Dynamite Comic Book!,

Paizo Launches RPG Superstar 2012,



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure PathPathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Society, Pathfinder Battles, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.