Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game

Pathfinder Society

Pathfinder Roleplaying Game: Beginner Box

PaizoCon 2012!
Pathfinder Online Technology Demo by Goblinworks Inc. — Kickstarter
2,348
BACKERS
$142,972
PLEDGED
5
DAYS TO GO

Search
Links
Shop
Recent Reviews

Pathfinder Society Scenario #40: Hall of Drunken Heroes (PFRPG) PDF
***** by AxeMurder0

Pathfinder Society Scenario #16: To Scale the Dragon (OGL) PDF
**( )( )( ) by AxeMurder0

Pathfinder Society Scenario #2-14: The Chasm of Screams (PFRPG) PDF
***( )( ) by AxeMurder0

Pathfinder Society Scenario #12: Stay of Execution (OGL) PDF (Retired)
**( )( )( ) by AxeMurder0

Pathfinder Society Scenario #6: Black Waters (OGL) PDF
***( )( ) by AxeMurder0

   RSS Top Sellers    RSS New    RSS Upcoming Facebook Twitter Email
DDO002


5x5
List Price: $12.25
Sale Price: $6.12
Add To Cart
Facebook Twitter Email
5x5 5x5

These rules have been designed to simulate a modern naval action involving surface ships, submarines and aircraft of todays (1980s) navies, using the recently introduced range of 1:3000 scale warships.

The rules were originally designed for a large scale naval campaign in which large numbers of ship8 would be engaged in combat. To achieve this it was necessary to generalize certain areas for the sake of playability this, whilst not giving absolute realism (which can never be achieved in a game), resulted in a very fast and enjoyable game. The rules are not designed for a single ship v. single ship combat, as it was considered "highly unlikely" that in any future Warpac/NATO conflict a solitary NATO ship would come across and fight a solitary WarPac warship. The more likely course of events 1s for the WarPac (Soviet) navies to sail (by devious routes) to prearranged rendezvous points several days before hostilities are due to commence. From there the "Task Forces" prime function would be to disrupt the American reinforcement of Europe; to intercept and destroy the Vital oil cargoes in the Arabian Gulf, off the African coast and in the Indian Ocean; to prevent the transfer of allied warships into and out of the Mediterranean, and to harass the US Pacific Fleet (with the idea of drawing forces from the Atlantic to keep the Pacific Fleet "in being" to counter any threat in the Pacific) A further option open to the Soviets would be to use the obsolete Kynda class cruisers to bombard US coastal cities with their long range missiles, compelling the US to keep back warships to protect their own coasts.

In any of the above scenarios the Soviets would use their ships en masse' to achieve their objectives. It was with those actions in mind that these rules were written, to enable the Wargamer to fight through the Atlantic convoys, to endeavor to keep the oil flowing or to fight for the glory of the revolution and crush the wicked capitalists (even if it costs you your life comrade). It is hoped that the users of these rules do know something of modern warships and win use this set as the basis of a campaign involving a number of wargamers as it is only when there are large numbers of ships involved that the maximum enjoyment can be obtained.

Product Availability
Usually ships from our warehouse in 2 to 6 business days.

Are there errors or omissions in this product information? Got corrections? Let us know at webmaster@paizo.com.


DDO002


See Also:


Product Reviews (0)

Messageboards

BANNED!, by Roac

Safest character to play?, by Umbranus

Pathfinder Player Companion: Varisia, Birthplace of Legends (PFRPG), by Winter_Born

Speak Out: How much does Art REALLY matter to you?, by SuperSlayer

Why Isn't "Animate Objects" on the Sorc / Wiz List?, by blackbloodtroll

spiked gauntlet with reach weapon question, by blackbloodtroll

For $10 a month, how much "content" do you expect to get?, by Donovan Lynch

The Haiku Game, by I'm Hiding In Your Closet

First time Illusionist, by NoneParticular

Belt of Incredible Dexterity +3, by Irontruth

Paizo Blog

Pathfinder Battles Preview: Bone Chiller,

Paizo Publishing's 10th Anniversary Retrospective—Year 4 (2005)—Laying the Foundation,

A Tomb of Winter's Plunder—Chapter One: Taking the Waters,

Pathfinder Society in the Netherlands (or Join the Crew of the Flying Dutchman),

Pathfinder Battles Preview: Big Bads (Volume 2),

Open Game License

Store Blog

The Demon Prince of the Undead Dreams—and Awakens!,

Weekly Adventures?! Brilliant!,

Explore, Investigate, Survive—Just Another Glorious Day in the Society!,

These Bones Don't Rattle Easy!,

Roll Your Dice Like It's 1974!,

Sign up for our weekly store newsletter

News

Jim Zubkavich brings Paizo's "Pathfinder" to Dynamite,

Goblinworks Announces the Pathfinder Online Technology Demo Kickstarter Project,

Giochi Uniti to Publish Pathfinder in Italian,

Mike Welham Named RPG Superstar 2012!,

RPG Superstar Top 4 Pathfinder Module Proposals Now Open for Public Vote,



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online,PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.