Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
Pathfinder Adventure Card Game Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Pathfinder Adventures Pathfinder Campaign Setting Pathfinder Player Companion Pathfinder Accessories Pathfinder Miniatures Pathfinder Fiction Pathfinder Society Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Compatible Products Pathfinder Apparel & Gifts Pathfinder Licensed Products
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game

Starfinder


Pathfinder Society


Pathfinder Adventure Card Game

Pathfinder Roleplaying Game: Bestiary 6 (PFRPG)

****½ (based on 16 ratings)
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game: Bestiary 6 (PFRPG)

Add Hardcover $44.99

Add PDF $9.99

Facebook Twitter Email

Bow Down in Fear!

Monsters have long stalked us in the darkness. Within this book, you’ll find a host of these creatures for use in the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game. Face off against archdevils and the Horsemen of the Apocalypse, planar dragons and the legendary wild hunt, proteans and psychopomps, and hundreds more! Some creatures, such as the capricious taniwha, the mysterious green man, or the powerful empyreal lords, might even be willing to provide your heroes aid—if they deserve it!

Pathfinder RPG Bestiary 6 is the sixth must-have volume of monsters for use with the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game and serves as a companion to the Pathfinder RPG Core Rulebook and Pathfinder RPG Bestiary. This imaginative tabletop game builds upon more than 10 years of system development and an open playtest featuring more than 50,000 gamers to create a cutting-edge RPG experience that brings the all-time best-selling set of fantasy rules into a new era.

Pathfinder RPG Bestiary 6 includes:

  • More than 200 different monsters.
  • New player-friendly races, like the crazed monkey goblins, the telepathic albino munavris, the river-dwelling fey naiads, the wolflike rougarou, and the yaddithians of the Elder Mythos.
  • Numerous powerful demigods, from archdevils and Great Old Ones to empyreal lords and qlippoth lords.
  • New animal companions and other allies, such as fierce devil monkeys and loyal clockwork hounds.
  • New templates, including the entothrope and the mongrel giant, to help you get more life out of classic monsters.
  • Appendices to help you find the right monster, including lists by Challenge Rating, monster type, and habitat.
  • Expanded universal monster rules to simplify combat.
  • Challenges for every adventure and every level of play.
  • AND MUCH, MUCH MORE!

ISBN-13: 978-1-60125-931-8

Note: This product is part of the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscription.

Product Availability

Hardcover: Ships from our warehouse in 1 to 7 business days.

PDF: Will be added to your My Downloads Page immediately upon purchase of PDF.

Are there errors or omissions in this product information? Got corrections? Let us know at store@paizo.com.

PZO1137


See Also:

Product Discussion (3,686)
3,651 to 3,686 of 3,686 << first < prev | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | next > last >>

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber, Companion Subscriber

Yeah I remember the Mezlan, wish they got new art, but happy they made it in.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber, Campaign Setting, Companion, Maps, Pawns, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Alexandre Gayk-Lemay wrote:

I quite like the product over all, but does anyone else have a wierdly low-rez image by Tyler Walpole for the Vavakia Demon on p.89?

I've looked closely at every other image in my copy and I've found every other image to be very high resolution and generally beautiful - the contrast is jarring to the point where I can't help but think it might not be intentional...

My friend tells me that there are several such low resolution graphics in the Bestiaries going as far back as #3. He thinks it most commonly occurs on reprinted monsters, where the original image was small, but then got improperly blown up to fill the larger page space of the Bestiaries during reprint.

I haven't confirmed anything of the sort, but I have seen several such images in the Bestiary 6, and speaking as a professional graphic designer, it's damned sloppy! I sure hope whoever is responsible gets a stern talking to, and that it gets fixed before reprint.

Paizo Employee Creative Director

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Milo v3 wrote:
edit: also, why can't Herecites be oracles/druids/antipaladins/hunters/onimuji/etc. who don't rely on faith?

All divine spellcasters rely on faith. That's part of what makes faith what it is in the game, a belief in something larger than yourself. Typically that's a deity or demigod or the like, but can also be a philosophy or a pantheon or anything else a divine spellcaster must believe in so as to gain their powers. Including oracles, druids, antipaladins, etc.


Finally got my hard copy in the mail.

Were there issues with the print run? My copy has 30 pages out of order and duplicated with missing entries. It's horrible.


Feros wrote:
Luthorne wrote:
Would someone be willing to say how long a rougarou can remain in wolf form? Is it 1 minute/HD, indefinitely, something else?
1 minute/HD, as it works like beast shape I.

no it's indefinitely as the change shape monster ability which it is

Paizo Employee Creative Director

Brother Fen wrote:

Finally got my hard copy in the mail.

Were there issues with the print run? My copy has 30 pages out of order and duplicated with missing entries. It's horrible.

No issues I know of, but weird printing errors like this happen with every print run for every book in every publishing company. Let customer service know and they'll help you with a solution.


Thanks for the kind response, James!


1 person marked this as a favorite.
James Jacobs wrote:
All divine spellcasters rely on faith. That's part of what makes faith what it is in the game, a belief in something larger than yourself. Typically that's a deity or demigod or the like, but can also be a philosophy or a pantheon or anything else a divine spellcaster must believe in so as to gain their powers. Including oracles, druids, antipaladins, etc.

Even if you tried to make it so druid and antipaladins did that, that blatantly isn't how oracles and onmyouji work in pathfinder. Oracles don't have a choice in having power, it's just shoved into them faith or not. They don't even know where their powers come from, they don't have anything to believe in and there is a good chance of them disliking what gave them their curse....


oracles believe in a ideal don't they? hence the mystery

Paizo Employee Creative Director

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Milo v3 wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
All divine spellcasters rely on faith. That's part of what makes faith what it is in the game, a belief in something larger than yourself. Typically that's a deity or demigod or the like, but can also be a philosophy or a pantheon or anything else a divine spellcaster must believe in so as to gain their powers. Including oracles, druids, antipaladins, etc.
Even if you tried to make it so druid and antipaladins did that, that blatantly isn't how oracles and onmyouji work in pathfinder. Oracles don't have a choice in having power, it's just shoved into them faith or not. They don't even know where their powers come from, they don't have anything to believe in and there is a good chance of them disliking what gave them their curse....

Actually, it's EXACTLY how oracles work. Feel free to adjust that in your home game, but in Pathfinder, oracles are divine spellcasters and thus their power comes from faith. The oracle may not have a choice to believe since the supernatural elements of her faith are bound to her spirit and soul via her curse, but it's still divine magic and thus still faith based.

And since it says onmyouji spells are divine spells... they rely on faith as well.

That's not really something I want to argue though, so I'll back out of the discussion for now and let folks talk about how it might work differently in home games. I'm only here to confirm how it is assumed to function in the game as we envision it.

Silver Crusade

Pathfinder Companion Subscriber

I am not really aware where I need to put this but
the hybrid weremantis on page on page 117 appears to have a full attack routine of flurry of blows and claws as well.

I thought monks could not use natural weapons alongside their flurry of blows?

Paizo Employee Designer

Richter Harding wrote:

I am not really aware where I need to put this but

the hybrid weremantis on page on page 117 appears to have a full attack routine of flurry of blows and claws as well.

I thought monks could not use natural weapons alongside their flurry of blows?

The best place to post possible mistakes like that one is the possible errata thread.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber Subscriber

I just got my copy of Bestiary 6 in the mail. First I flipped through it, admiring the pictures. One feature of the Pathfinder Bestiary series that I especially like how is how the staff at Paizo credits the individual artist of each illustration in the margin. It makes it appear as if Paizo is not some giant corporate entity (cough, cough, Hasbro) in which recognition of individual effort is beneath their level of interest. I wish the staff at Paizo did this in all their publications, including the Player Companions, Campaign Settings and Adventure Paths. A fair number of these illustrations are familiar to me (especially, if memory serves, from Book of the Damned volumes) but, at least in some cases, the artists were not previously credited (individually).

In any case, it looks great! In the upcoming months, it will be included in the "Survey of Bestiaries" blog. In 2017, the staff at the Poison Pie Publishing House have been adding one bestiary each weekend to the survey. As of today, the survey currently includes 149 bestiaries.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Finally got mine yay!


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Poison Pie wrote:
One feature of the Pathfinder Bestiary series that I especially like how is how the staff at Paizo credits the individual artist of each illustration in the margin.

I didn't know that!

-flips to p.111-

Kim Sokol... I'll have to thank her sometime.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Am I the only one here who is disappointed in the huge number of reprinted monsters in this book? When I got into Pathfinder, i bought up a lot of the books, even picking up used copies on ebay. Now that the new bestiary is out, I'm a little annoyed that so much of it is material I already have.

EDIT: And what really annoys me is that its just reprints of stuff from Pathfinder books. Where are the pathfinder updates for crazy monsters from old 3.5 adventures Paizo wrote, like the Hoary Muntjak?


Mavrickindigo wrote:
Am I the only one here who is disappointed in the huge number of reprinted monsters in this book? When I got into Pathfinder, i bought up a lot of the books, even picking up used copies on ebay. Now that the new bestiary is out, I'm a little annoyed that so much of it is material I already have.

There are supposedly the same percentage of reprints in the bestiary as their normally are in the bestiaries (which I rather appreciate since I don't buy golarion content so all the creatures in this were new to me and I otherwise would never have seen them).


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Mav,

I think it's just you. Also updates from adventures/adventure paths aren't something that occurs regularly. *looks at Cabal Devil longingly*

In ANY case I enjoy this book tremendously.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber, Companion Subscriber

I am fine with reprints from APs and other softcover books. In fact their some creatures I have been waiting for several years to be reprinted into a hardcover bestiary.


Dragon,

Like Cabal Devils? ;)


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Companion, Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Mavrickindigo wrote:

Am I the only one here who is disappointed in the huge number of reprinted monsters in this book? When I got into Pathfinder, i bought up a lot of the books, even picking up used copies on ebay. Now that the new bestiary is out, I'm a little annoyed that so much of it is material I already have.

EDIT: And what really annoys me is that its just reprints of stuff from Pathfinder books. Where are the pathfinder updates for crazy monsters from old 3.5 adventures Paizo wrote, like the Hoary Muntjak?

Nope, though I've seen many of them before, I know that in a Bestiary they'll get a lot more coverage and I'm a lot more likely to run into them as a player...not to mention it makes those monsters more available for other adventures, whether they're Pathfinder Society scenarios, modules, Adventure Paths, or third party adventures. Not to mention the convenience of having them all in one book when I'm browsing for monsters in a format that has pictures available.


A question for James Jacobs:

A few reprints in this book were from the Worldwound campaign setting book, but the Gallu demon from that source was not reprinted. Any particular reason?

I think I recall that the new outsiders in the Book of the Damned are all new, so I guess that won't be something the Gallu was saved for.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber Subscriber
Milo v3 wrote:
Mavrickindigo wrote:
Am I the only one here who is disappointed in the huge number of reprinted monsters in this book? When I got into Pathfinder, i bought up a lot of the books, even picking up used copies on ebay. Now that the new bestiary is out, I'm a little annoyed that so much of it is material I already have.
There are supposedly the same percentage of reprints in the bestiary as their normally are in the bestiaries (which I rather appreciate since I don't buy golarion content so all the creatures in this were new to me and I otherwise would never have seen them).

Yep...I believe the ratio of new and old is the same as the last few bestiaries. It might feel a bit obvious with this edition though because the total number of creatures I think is reduced, since there are more two page entries?

Shadow Lodge

Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I'm not bothered too much, it's good to have them all collected in one place.

Liberty's Edge Contributor

5 people marked this as a favorite.

Getting monsters reprinted in a Bestiary also puts them into the PRD, which makes them easier for other publishers to use them in their own material.


Indeed. I for one am looking forward to PRD Obsicisdaemon.

Silver Crusade

5 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber, Campaign Setting, Companion Subscriber
Paris Crenshaw wrote:
Getting monsters reprinted in a Bestiary also puts them into the PRD, which makes them easier for other publishers to use them in their own material.

And for Paizo being able to use them in adventures by simply referencing the name, instead of reprinting the whole statblock, thus saving space for other nice things.


Has anyone tried to make the six Empyreal Lords we have a bit more equal to the CR they represent (this includes Arshea, Black Butterfly, and Ragathiel)? I'm having some difficulty comparing the stats of the three Emypreal Lords we received in this manual to Archdevils, Horsemen of the Apocalypse, Kaiju, and Great Old Ones of similar CR (it keeps coming up unequal in terms of power). Maybe it's just me?


Berselius,

Maybe the reason they're uneven is no one expects normally GOOD PCs to fight such creatures. But I could be wrong.


I wasn't assuming that a party of good-aligned PC's would fight them. I was assuming if an Empyreal Lord (such as Ragathiel or Arshea) fought against a force of equal CR (such as a Demon Lord, Archdevil, or Horseman of Apocalypse). In that case, the Empyreal Lords seem to be at a distinct disadvantage.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber, Campaign Setting, Companion Subscriber

Try running Ragathiel against Barbarossa and see what happens.


Gorbacz,

Why would you want to fight a pirate?

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber, Campaign Setting, Companion Subscriber

I'm not sure, but the autocomplete on my phone's keyboard will likely have the answers when I stop punching the living daylights out of it.


Gorbacz,

Yeah autocomplete/autocorrect are the bane of many people's existence.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber, Campaign Setting, Companion Subscriber

Of course, I meant Ragathiel vs. Barbatos fight. But I wasn't too far off, DAT BEARD YO.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

They both do have very nice beards, no question.

3,651 to 3,686 of 3,686 << first < prev | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | next > last >>
Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo.com / Product Discussion / Pathfinder Roleplaying Game: Bestiary 6 (PFRPG) All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.

Paizo.com Gift Certificates
On Sale and Clearance!

Take the Plunge!,

Pathfinder Adventures—The Tiniest Table,

A Few More Answers,

Of Packages and Poppets,

Gods of Starfinder, Part One,


©2002-2017 Paizo Inc.® | Privacy Policy | Contact Us
Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours, Monday through Friday, 10:00 AM to 5:00 PM Pacific time.

Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, Starfinder, the Starfinder logo, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc. The Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Legends, Pathfinder Online, Starfinder Adventure Path, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.