I have been waiting for an Alraune for a long time.
So if the creature is in the beastairy of an AP it will be found somewhere on Golarian but if it is only in one the hard cover Beastaries, it might exist on Golarion?
There were actually THREE Lovecraftian critters cut from #46, though. The nightgaunt, the flying polyp, and the bhole. All three will make their appearance eventually, bu the Lovecraftian critters in Bestiary 3 are others who were always intended to be in Bestiary 3 and not an AP.
I want to see Paizo's take on the Nightgaunt and Flying Polyp so badly! Fit them in wherever you can, don't worry if it makes sense, it's supposed to be insane!
On an unrelated note, the nine-headed norse-style troll wins. It just wins.
I like all four monsters my self but if I have to pic a favorite it would be the Alraune.
I can't wait for this book.
New Linnorms(Cairn, Fyord, Tiaga, Tor)
Imperial Dragons(Forest, Sky, Sea, Soveriegn, Underworld)
New Drakes(River, ?)
Faerie Dragon
Nixie
Atomie
Catfolk
Alraune
Ratfolk
Allip
Giant Antlion
Ascomoid
Annis Hag
Caryatid Column
Shadow Mastif
Water Naga
Dragonne
Axebeak
Lammasu
Huecuva
Bigfoot
Boogyman
New Oni(?)
Valkyrie
Norns
Rusalka
Behemoth(Tempest, Thalassic, Thunder)
Kami(Jinushigami, Kodama, Shikigami, Toshigami, Zuishin)
Adlet
Vanara
Vishkanya
Phantom Fungus
Yuki-onna
Tunaki
Bandersnatch
Kappa
Dybback
Suli
Demilich
Garuda
Cacaelia
Graveknight
Clockwork Horrors(?)
Savage Cyclops
Daemons(Vulnadaemon, Crucidaemon)
New Shinxes(?)
Sleipnir
Demodunds(?)
Hungry fog
Jotund Troll
Yithian
Nephilim
Goblin Snake
Unfedered Eidolon
Looks like the release date got pushed back again.
You know, this whole time I thought that giant on the cover of Bestiary 3 was a cyclops but they're actually in the first Bestiary.
What's the one-eyed giant pictured there?
You know, this whole time I thought that giant on the cover of Bestiary 3 was a cyclops but they're actually in the first Bestiary.
What's the one-eyed giant pictured there?
Great Cyclops
Looks like the release date got pushed back again.
Now, that's a nice birthday present.
It was called "Great Cyclops" in the Kingmaker AP but here they refure to it as "Savage Cyclops".
Hopefully Tuesdays Beastairy 3 preview will be for something I didn't know was there but really interested in.
It was called "Great Cyclops" in the Kingmaker AP but here they refure to it as "Savage Cyclops".
Hopefully Tuesdays Beastairy 3 preview will be for something I didn't know was there but really interested in.
I'm still hoping for a boogeyman preview to help out one of the projects over at Open Design.
The Boogeyman would be cool along with Bigfoot, the Bandersnatch, if they have the Cheshire cat, one of the Behemoths, and many more.
But as long as they are monsters not from past Paizo products.
So...no new previews or anything this week?
So...no new previews or anything this week?Thanksgiving...
I know but they mentioned adding some new monsters this week.
Yeah they did mention that they would but they didn't. I am not surprised once friday came and I had to go to work, I had a feeling all I would see(if anything) on the blog would be another minis preview.
So...no new previews or anything this week?
Their normal preview day is Tuesday. They announced Goblinworks and the Pathfinder RPG instead of a monster preview this week.
Yeah I wasn't very happy about that one for tuesday and would have been too hard to not have the short story blog on wednesday, the mini blog on friday, or just had it on Thursday instead a blog about ...well nothing really. Ofcourse it didn't help is was the holidays and seeing that it didn't get a tuesday preview was no surprise that there was going to be nothing.
Tunaki
Sure that it isn't actually Tanuki?
Though I would really wonder how they would try to do that in a way that is acceptable to western audiences.
I can't think of any creature from myth that is more akward than Tanuki. ^^
Oops I mean Tanuki, and Yori, they have said the picture will not have "them" but it does get a slam attack so you can use your immagination.
Am I overlooking something?
It looks like the Hungry Fog can be killed with normal weapons, just swing a sword at it and shoot a few arrows and its gone O_o
That seems really weird for a a gaseous opponent but there is nothing I can find that would state that this is not allowed.
The Alraune's description reminds me of a scene with Poison Ivy from Batman & Robin.
And isn't Alraune the German word for Mandrake?
I never liked that a creature made of gas, fog, mist, etc. can be hurt by weapons(even magical) but a bunch bugs(swarms) don't even take 1 point of damage.
The Alraune's description reminds me of a scene with Poison Ivy from Batman & Robin.
And isn't Alraune the German word for Mandrake?
Yes. Yes it is. Here's the lowdown on alraunes-as-monsters...
There was a German novel titled "Alraune", in which a mad scientist uses a mandrake as the animus to create a human being, due to the legend that mandrakes grow from the ejaculate of a hanged man. The mandrake-child rapidly grows up into a young woman who uses charm and seduction to wreak havoc. Sort of a fable about the perceived dangers of female sexuality with a botanical twist.
In the late eighties/early nineties, Japanese video game developers looking to populate their dungeons with weird monsters discover this novel (which has several film adaptations, all of which somewhat obscure). Rather than making the alraune a woman born of a plant, they make her a giant plant with a woman growing out of it. I think the first alraune-as-monster was in a Castlevania game, but I'm not sure; they've cropped up in a ton of franchises, including Breath of Fire, Tales Of and even Final Fantasy.
And now you know.
Oops I mean Tanuki, and Yori, they have said the picture will not have "them" but it does get a slam attack so you can use your immagination.
I'm pretty pumped about that. I wanted to make stats for tanukis back in Oriental Adventures, but I wasn't sure whether or not I should give it a scrotal attack. I'm glad Paizo went with it.
The Alraune is also in the Disgaea games(well 2nd one and on).
The Alraune's description reminds me of a scene with Poison Ivy from Batman & Robin.
And isn't Alraune the German word for Mandrake?Yes. Yes it is. Here's the lowdown on alraunes-as-monsters...
There was a German novel titled "Alraune", in which a mad scientist uses a mandrake as the animus to create a human being, due to the legend that mandrakes grow from the ejaculate of a hanged man. The mandrake-child rapidly grows up into a young woman who uses charm and seduction to wreak havoc. Sort of a fable about the perceived dangers of female sexuality with a botanical twist.
In the late eighties/early nineties, Japanese video game developers looking to populate their dungeons with weird monsters discover this novel (which has several film adaptations, all of which somewhat obscure). Rather than making the alraune a woman born of a plant, they make her a giant plant with a woman growing out of it. I think the first alraune-as-monster was in a Castlevania game, but I'm not sure; they've cropped up in a ton of franchises, including Breath of Fire, Tales Of and even Final Fantasy.
And now you know.
I thought I'd heard the word "Alraune" before. And now I wonder if that's an Alraune that Kyra is facing in the art included with Kingmaker #6 with the article about the First World.
*cough*
*cough*
I was just going to post that here! For those of you who are wondering, Gorbacz is linking to a PDF preview we did through Game Trade Magazine. I think there are six new monsters in that preview PDF (actually, turned out to be four, thanks for checking on me guys!). Enjoy!
-Lisa
That's one impressively ugly troll there. He's so very Norse!
And yay for non-insanely evil (but still dangerous) aberrations/Lovecraftian horrors in the Race of Yith. This is going to be a GREAT book!
|
Remember how when Bestiary 2 came out there were a few abilities in the glossary that got reworded and changed from the Bestiary 1 descriptions (I think grab or constrict was one of those)? These newly written versions of these abilities were described as replacing the older versions from Bestiary 1. Anyway, can I suggest maybe rewording the Rock Throwing ability that many giants have? I say this because both Bestiary 1 and 2 have the same description for it, but it seems no creature in either of those books follows it (they either don't have the +1 to rock throwing, don't have 1-1/2 times their strength bonus to damage, some combination of both, or some other oddity).
Thank you so much and I can't wait to pick up this book!
Remember how when Bestiary 2 came out there were a few abilities in the glossary that got reworded and changed from the Bestiary 1 descriptions (I think grab or constrict was one of those)? These newly written versions of these abilities were described as replacing the older versions from Bestiary 1. Anyway, can I suggest maybe rewording the Rock Throwing ability that many giants have? I say this because both Bestiary 1 and 2 have the same description for it, but it seems no creature in either of those books follows it (they either don't have the +1 to rock throwing, don't have 1-1/2 times their strength bonus to damage, some combination of both, or some other oddity).
Thank you so much and I can't wait to pick up this book!
You're really going to love how they determine which giants have martial weapon proficiency and which have to take a feat for it...
|
I wonder if the Selkie is in this book. Ive been looking for one.
Already in Pathfinder #50, Night of Frozen Shadows. Not going to be in Bestiary 3, or likely even 4, if they make one, just due to trying to not reprint things that have been published in Pathfinder AP volumes recently.
Maybe in Bestiary 5, if such a thing ever sees print.
I hope for a Beastairy 5 one day, maybe in a better world, or if this one is still around, wich ever works.
Well I hope for more then 5 Beastaies myself but that depends if they keep selling.
I'm all up for new monster based on the works of Lovecraft. I, too am disappointed that mind flayers cannot be made pathfinder but there is a monster in here that thematically is its misbegotten with beholders, a monster I still consider goofy looking, along with at least the monsters I care about from Misfit Monsters redeemed including what I have always thought of as the lovable loser of traditional D&D monsters: Flumphs! Daigle did a great job sprucing them up.
I always have liked the Flumph both in form and name.
|
The thing about monsters from the APs is that in the beginning I printed them out and put them in a book. Then do I put them together as they came out in the APs? Do I put them alphabetically? And if you put the monster in a future AP or module you have to reprint the entire state block instead of referring to the AP page because many people will not have that old AP.
Even though I love the new monsters in the APs and I really do, I want them to continue making their way into the bestiaries. It is a place where I can find them easily. I have 50 AP issues now and finding that monster that I remember that time a year or two ago makes it almost impossible to find something like that unless I spend a lot of time working at it. At least with bestiaries I only have a few books to look in and even if 10 of them came out, by that time I would have 150 AP issues and I would never find it.
I have already had this problem with adventures referring me to an old AP. Keep them Bestiaries coming.
|
|
While I am looking forward to this book, I am concerned about one thing.
A glut of reprints.
While I understand not everyone subscribes to the APs, having a glut of monsters from the AP books is what I think may turn off some people considering purchasing this. I know my GM has voiced concern about it, and he also pointed out that he thinks it's silly that people are paying for some monsters that were given for free on the Bonus Bestiary. That could've been more new monsters instead, according to his view. (I personally think because it's only a handful in a 300+ monster book that it shouldn't be that big a deal)
From what I see, a lot on the current list a previous poster put together appears to be quite a number of AP reprints, too. What, may I ask, is the estimated ratio of reprint and new monsters in this book? Maybe I can convince my GM to use it depending on the answer, hopefully.
Just a thought. Here's to something different with Bestiary 4! :D
It's a lot easier to lug around one hardback/access one PDF than it is to look between 50+ volumes/PDFs. I'm 100% ok with reprints, as long as they're the ones worth reprinting.
Can we expect any new dinosaurs?
I'm really hoping that Paizo can release this before X-mas. I never understood why you would want to release something after X-mas. For the mos part people are usualy broke from buying gifts. Plus with the X_mas hoildays something to read.
People have to have something to do with their gift certificates and cards :)
Well originally it was going to come out before christmas but it didn't work out that way.
Yes there will be dinosaurs in the beastairy 3.
Is there any chance we could get a preview of the Vanara? The illustration that we have seen of them already has really made me curious about how Pathfinder will depict their behavior, culture, and stats.
The Vanara's stats were already revealed in the Advanced races playtest.
Vanara
-Type: Humaniod(vanara)
-Size: Medium
-Stats: +2dex +2wis -2cha
-Speed: 30ft climb 20ft
-low-light vision
-Prehensile tail
The Vanara's stats were already revealed in the Advanced races playtest.
Vanara
-Type: Humaniod(vanara)
-Size: Medium
-Stats: +2dex +2wis -2cha
-Speed: 30ft climb 20ft
-low-light vision
-Prehensile tail
Thanks! I didn't know that.
However, the stats weren't all I was looking for. I was hoping to learn about how Pathfinder is depicting their culture. I want to know how they fit into the world and interact with others. Basically, I want to see their write up.
