Pathfinder Battles: Heroes & Monsters (based on
46
ratings)
WizKids/NECA
Add
Brick:
$74.99
Add
Standard Booster:
$3.99
Case:
Unavailable
Large Booster:
Unavailable
Pathfinder RPG combat comes to life on your tabletop with Heroes & Monsters, the debut release in the new Pathfinder Battles prepainted miniatures line! Produced in cooperation with Paizo Publishing, Heroes & Monsters presents a fascinating array of 40 beautifully painted miniatures perfect for use with the Pathfinder RPG or any fantasy miniatures game! From the brave Gnome Fighter to the mighty evil lich, Heroes & Monsters offers a wide range of player characters and dungeon denizens that make a perfect start to your Pathfinder Battles collection!
Heroes & Monsters Standard Boosters contain 1 Medium or 2 Small miniatures.
Heroes & Monsters Large Boosters contain 1 Large miniature.
Heroes & Monsters Bricks contain 16 Standard Boosters and 3 Large Boosters.
Heroes & Monsters Cases contain 4 Bricks (64 Standard Boosters and 12 Large Boosters).
Purchasers should get no to very few duplicate figures in a brick. Buyers who purchase factory-sealed cases should get a nearly complete set of figures. (As with any randomized product, collation is not guaranteed.)
Begin your Pathfinder Battles collection today! The Heroes & Monsters of the Pathfinder world await!
See the press release for questions and answers about this exciting new product line.
Actually further up Erik Mona actually confirmed there will be 2 goblin minis and a skeleton.
I'm waiting until we actually get some kind of picture before putting something on the list. Though I'll try to remember to put the skeleton on the list of other possible miniatures.
So maybe Kae Yoss you can help me with which one of the following statements holds true to the Queen's English:
Kae Yoss, your a rotting haggis,
Or
Kae Yoss you're a rotting haggis.
Neither is correct:
You misspelled my name. It's KaeYoss (or Kae'Yoss, but not Kae Yoss).
In the first, you used "your" instead of "you're" again.
In the second, you forgot the comma.
"KaeYoss, your a rotting haggis," Is a legitimate phrase that requires an archaic and seldom seen usage of 'a'.
So, what does it mean?
And what are you doing with the haggis? We need a verb!
It means that Kae'Yoss is meat that has been left sitting far to long in a wrapping of sheep's stomach.
So maybe Kae Yoss you can help me with which one of the following statements holds true to the Queen's English:
Kae Yoss, your a rotting haggis,
Or
Kae Yoss you're a rotting haggis.
Neither is correct:
You misspelled my name. It's KaeYoss (or Kae'Yoss, but not Kae Yoss).
In the first, you used "your" instead of "you're" again.
In the second, you forgot the comma.
"KaeYoss, your a rotting haggis," Is a legitimate phrase that requires an archaic and seldom seen usage of 'a'.
So, what does it mean?
And what are you doing with the haggis? We need a verb!
It means that Kae'Yoss is meat that has been left sitting far to long in a wrapping of sheep's stomach.
The nips and tatties still might be good though.
Nope, the 'your' is still posessive.
Think of Byron: "So we'll go no more a roving..."
KaeYoss has a haggis which he has chosen to let rot.
Okay, I've given you that bit. Now, what shall we have KaeYoss do with it?
Just to change the direction of the thread a bit. I really like both Seelah and the Half-Orc Barbarian. I have become quite fond of Seelah, and her back story, so this will be a special miniature to me. I will be introducing her as an NPC later in the campaign I am running, so this is quite timely. Erik Mona said the Half-Orc Barbarian will have a bit more green in the skin tone than what is evident in the digital sculpt. That will be good. I am really liking this set.
Later,
Mazra
Speaking of Seelah and the angry mutt, they should be added to the product page.
Absolutely nothing. I'm not even touching that stuff. I mean haggis? If I hadn't heard about that fish stew they bury in the ground to let it rot for a year, I'd say that it is the most disgusting thing people eat out of their own free will.
Can anyone direct me to this supposed Chimera? I've seen it referenced a few times as confirmed (and it seems, with a picture), but I must have missed this.
Can anyone direct me to this supposed Chimera? I've seen it referenced a few times as confirmed (and it seems, with a picture), but I must have missed this.
A wingless chimera was posted here. Paizo was implored to ensure that it had wings. Apparently they worked with WizKids to change it and took down the render.
Can anyone direct me to this supposed Chimera? I've seen it referenced a few times as confirmed (and it seems, with a picture), but I must have missed this.
A wingless chimera was posted here. Paizo was implored to ensure that it had wings. Apparently they worked with WizKids to change it and took down the render.
After several days of reading one fracking thread, I'm finally at the end, whew!
1. Love that Paizo is making it possible to get more PPM minis.
2. Don't really mind the randomness as I can well understand the reasoning behind the decision.
3. Already pre-ordered one case + dragon, and possibly will make it two.
4. Wouldn't mind a minis game to go along with it, especially if it provides additional income for Paizo.
5. Definitely hope to see more large and larger PF specific monsters, as well as tarrasque and other such less used odditys.
I also think there should be a minis game to go with it. I understand that it may make things a bit more difficult, but the DDM minis game was a great added value to the DDM minis themselves. It let me 'use' my minis, especially the more oddball ones more regularly.
Most importantly, it allowed me to come up with neat encounter ideas and see how different creatures would work together and work against each other in a fight.
Can anyone direct me to this supposed Chimera? I've seen it referenced a few times as confirmed (and it seems, with a picture), but I must have missed this.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Deluxe Comics, Battles Case Subscriber
Perram wrote:
I also think there should be a minis game to go with it. I understand that it may make things a bit more difficult, but the DDM minis game was a great added value to the DDM minis themselves. It let me 'use' my minis, especially the more oddball ones more regularly.
Most importantly, it allowed me to come up with neat encounter ideas and see how different creatures would work together and work against each other in a fight.
I believe a game could be designed that could accommodate a miniatures game without IT making, to quote, "things a bit more difficult." In fact the name of this set lends itself to a form of a miniatures game. You have your Heroes and you have your Monsters. Heroes could have a flat point cost, let's say as an example 25 points. You would then have four Heroes in a 100 point game. Monster's points could vary from 5 points for a Goblin to 100 points for a Lich. Then you could have a game where a four piece party of Heroes could have a battle with 20 Goblins or a singular Lich. This too would correspond to the rarity of the minatures.
You could even have differing Hero stats and the points they cost depending on level. You could have a 1st level Hero stat card that cost 10 points. Or the same miniature could have a 5th level Hero card that cost 25 points. Maybe even a 100 point Hero card, etc..
This way the miniatures game would correspond more to the RPG. By doing this the miniatures would have the same utility for both the RPG and the miniatures games. There would no longer be a need to own 5 Militia Archers for your warband.
To take this another step, you could assign Pathfinder factions as an option to the Heroes and possibly Monsters, so that players could have Hero wars, or even Monster Wars, Andoran vs Cheliax or Goblins vs Undead, whatever!
I also think there should be a minis game to go with it. I understand that it may make things a bit more difficult, but the DDM minis game was a great added value to the DDM minis themselves. It let me 'use' my minis, especially the more oddball ones more regularly.
Most importantly, it allowed me to come up with neat encounter ideas and see how different creatures would work together and work against each other in a fight.
I believe a game could be designed that could accommodate a miniatures game without IT making, to quote, "things a bit more difficult." In fact the name of this set lends itself to a form of a miniatures game. You have your Heroes and you have your Monsters. Heroes could have a flat point cost, let's say as an example 25 points. You would then have four Heroes in a 100 point game. Monster's points could vary from 5 points for a Goblin to 100 points for a Lich. Then you could have a game where a four piece party of Heroes could have a battle with 20 Goblins or a singular Lich. This too would correspond to the rarity of the minatures.
You could even have differing Hero stats and the points they cost depending on level. You could have a 1st level Hero stat card that cost 10 points. Or the same miniature could have a 5th level Hero card that cost 25 points. Maybe even a 100 point Hero card, etc..
This way the miniatures game would correspond more to the RPG. By doing this the miniatures would have the same utility for both the RPG and the miniatures games. There would no longer be a need to own 5 Militia Archers for your warband.
To take this another step, you could assign Pathfinder factions as an option to the Heroes and possibly Monsters, so that players could have Hero wars, or even Monster Wars, Andoran vs Cheliax or Goblins vs Undead, whatever!
Later,
Mazra
I don't mind a game as long as they keep the minis useful for rpg. Wotc released lots of oddities for the DDM scenarios. I really would not like monsters outside the bestiaries. Cthulhu and tarasque not withstanding.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Is tomorrow the preview of the final product state (not just the rendering)? If so, definitely looking forward to it -- basing my decision on whether to subscribe or not on it.
No. Tomorrow will be about non-digital sculpts, and will show off photos of some non-painted minis with some behind-the-scenes info on how these things are put together.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Erik Mona wrote:
No. Tomorrow will be about non-digital sculpts, and will show off photos of some non-painted minis with some behind-the-scenes info on how these things are put together.
Hmmm, still hopefully will be enough for me to drop the hammer on the subscription -- I'm sooo tempted but know the early October deadline is looming. Looking forward to it!
No. Tomorrow will be about non-digital sculpts, and will show off photos of some non-painted minis with some behind-the-scenes info on how these things are put together.
Nice intro box was a great source of some iconic minis, and an interesting new way to use our minis.
The new battlemats for the game could be used as the maps for new PFS scenarios. Some of the existing maps (Keep)? could be used as alternate scenarios for the minis-game.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Deluxe Comics, Battles Case Subscriber
It looks like Paizo will be adding two more to the set list, an Ettin and a Human Ranger. Both are nice sculpts. I hope this set is released in time to be under the Christmas Tres. :)
I'm wondering if they will print any pathfinder exclusive monsters, or some minis that have never been printed. That to me would be much more interesting.
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Deluxe Comics, Battles Case Subscriber
This doesn't really deal directly with Heroes & Monsters persay, but it does have to do with the future of minis in general. This was actually Erik's response in regards to when I thanked him for keeping the minis true to scale (and not make the large ones smaller for convenience sake). Can be found under the Pathfinder Battles Subscription thread:
Erik Mona wrote:
Well, thanks, but to be clear we do not currently have any plans to do _any_ Colossal miniatures at all.
But yeah, when we do Gargantuan minis (and we _do_ have plans for those), they'll be on the right-sized bases.
I will say, this worries me a bit. From how I read that, it sounds like Paizo will never release a Colossal mini. It would be one thing to say "We have no plans right now to make Colossal minis, but there is a good chance you probably will see them in the future." But it sounds like Erik wants to make it clear that this is something we won't ever see.
Which I find a bit odd with RotRL set coming out next year. Aren't there at least 1 or 2 key creatures from the RotRL AP that are Colossal sized?
If we don't ever see Colossal minis, it won't affect my decision to purchase Pathfinder Battles miniatures. But I won't say I wouldn't be disappointed as there are a few Colossal minis that I would really love to see.
I would hate to not see any just because of the large size of the mini and the more expensive price.
I don't know, maybe I misinterpreted Erik's response, and we could see Colossal minis down the road. But it doesn't read that way to me.
I'd say you're misreading the post. I interpret this as no plans for any of the minis they have currently planned. I just skimmed through the last four volumes of Runelords and only see one Colossal (which is not key and probably would not be your first choice as the first Colossal mini).
Spoiler:
The Haunted Chain from Spires of Xin-Shalast
Perhaps I missed some (since I didn't check every MM reference). There are a lot of Gargantuans which have been previously pointed out by Paizo.
Which Colossals would you eventually like to see?
Legacy of Fire Spoiler:
I, for one, would be disappointed if they did a Legacy of Fire set without Xotani, even though the players are supposed to prevent that from happening. The moment of setting that down on the table if they fail or even being able to bring it out after they succeed and show the consequences they avoided would be very sweet.
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Deluxe Comics, Battles Case Subscriber
michaelane wrote:
I'd say you're misreading the post. I interpret this as no plans for any of the minis they have currently planned. I just skimmed through the last four volumes of Runelords and only see one Colossal (which is not key and probably would not be your first choice as the first Colossal mini).
** spoiler omitted **
Perhaps I missed some (since I didn't check every MM reference). There are a lot of Gargantuans which have been previously pointed out by Paizo.
Which Colossals would you eventually like to see?
** spoiler omitted **
Really? I thought I had heard there were at least a couple Colossal minis in RotRL AP. Although I've never played it, and don't have it, so I can't confirm.
Yes, there aren't a whole lot of Colossal minis out there, but some I would like to see are the Tarasque, the dragons in their Great Wyrm form, and including the Linorm dragons, as well.
And I am always open to getting other Colossal minis if they are done well (which I would assume they would be) and if our group would use them. Heck, I'd probably still buy them just to have them, even if I knew we wouldn't be using them for a long time. :)
But in the end, I would just hate to see any doors closed on Colossal minis because of the size, rarity (of the creature in the campaign) and the price. I know I would buy them, and I am sure others would as well. I hope you are right and I misinterpreted Erik's response.
To be fair, the much-so-bigger-than-WizKids WotC DDM line had IIRC only one Colossal ever, the Red Dragon, at it was something of a special occurrence limited edition thingawingy.
So I wouldn't hold my breath up - I can imagine a reasonable packaging and size for Gargantuans, but Colossals are just freaking huge and demand special treatment.
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Deluxe Comics, Battles Case Subscriber
Gorbacz wrote:
To be fair, the much-so-bigger-than-WizKids WotC DDM line had IIRC only one Colossal ever, the Red Dragon, at it was something of a special occurrence limited edition thingawingy.
So I wouldn't hold my breath up - I can imagine a reasonable packaging and size for Gargantuans, but Colossals are just freaking huge and demand special treatment.
Yes, I know it has been a unique occurrence, but I was hoping it would be different this time around and see at least a couple of them at various times. I love my Red Dragon, which is why I would love to see that special treatment made for future Colossal minis.
Part of them being that huge is my draw to them, I guess. I mean if the Colossal mini just had a crap sculpt and paint job, I would bypass it, but of course I wouldn't see that happening at all with WizKids/Paizo.
To be fair, the much-so-bigger-than-WizKids WotC DDM line had IIRC only one Colossal ever, the Red Dragon, at it was something of a special occurrence limited edition thingawingy.
So I wouldn't hold my breath up - I can imagine a reasonable packaging and size for Gargantuans, but Colossals are just freaking huge and demand special treatment.
Paizo farmed out their work to Wizkids for the run-o-the-mill minis....Who's to say they don't farm out the Colossal minis to say, oh I don't know...Todd Mcfarlane's dragon division.
I work for a Plastic injection molding shop here in Wisconsin and thats exactly what we do. We take on Plastic Injection Molds from other companies to make their parts for them. Otherwise they'd have to buy the molding presses themselves...hire people to setup and run them...maintain a quality inspection system to retain part quality.
its just easier to send the work to companies who already have the presses, people and established process in place.
So, like I said, I would'nt be surprised if Paizo farmed out the work that Wizkids cannot do to other companies all the while keeping the business that WizKids can do, with Wizkids.
So, like I said, I would'nt be surprised if Paizo farmed out the work that Wizkids cannot do to other companies all the while keeping the business that WizKids can do, with Wizkids.
The only problem with that theory is that Wizkids can handle miniatures on that scale, and have in the past with Heroclix. They've done Fin Fang Foom, Galactus and the Spectre which would all be in the Colossal scale.
So, like I said, I would'nt be surprised if Paizo farmed out the work that Wizkids cannot do to other companies all the while keeping the business that WizKids can do, with Wizkids.
The only problem with that theory is that Wizkids can handle miniatures on that scale, and have in the past with Heroclix. They've done Fin Fang Foom, Galactus and the Spectre which would all be in the Colossal scale.
By the way, if you are looking for stand ins for Rune Giants, the Iron Rain Hill Giant from the Mage Knight line does a pretty good job and they can be gotten pretty cheap at places. The base is a little smaller so you might need to glue them to something as a bigger base, but otherwise they work well.
So, like I said, I would'nt be surprised if Paizo farmed out the work that Wizkids cannot do to other companies all the while keeping the business that WizKids can do, with Wizkids.
The only problem with that theory is that Wizkids can handle miniatures on that scale, and have in the past with Heroclix. They've done Fin Fang Foom, Galactus and the Spectre which would all be in the Colossal scale.
They can.
But it seemed to me like it was difficult for them to do.
Besides that, all three of those figures were super expensive.
Who knows, maybe Wizkids will do the colossal minis and we're just making un-necessary assumptions to the negative in this case.
Whether Paizo gets Wizkids to manufacture the Colossal minis or not, I'm good to go either way.
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Deluxe Comics, Battles Case Subscriber
Cyderak wrote:
They can.
But it seemed to me like it was difficult for them to do.
Why is that? Are the Colossal minis WizKids have made in the past of lesser quality? Has there been an article stating WizKids has difficulty creating Colossal sized figures?
Either way, I know WizKids has changed their procedure and upped the quality of their minis, and I am sure that new procedure would also apply to any Colossal minis they would create.
Cyderak wrote:
Besides that, all three of those figures were super expensive.
Now that, I will give you. Yes, Colossal minis are going to be expensive. However, that is just the fact of the matter with minis at that size, whether WizKids makes them or another company.
Cyderak wrote:
Who knows, maybe Wizkids will do the colossal minis and we're just making un-necessary assumptions to the negative in this case.
Whether Paizo gets Wizkids to manufacture the Colossal minis or not, I'm good to go either way.
I certainly hope you are right in that WizKids do make the Colossal minis. However, I am like yourself, if the Colossal minis are created or not, I am still going to be buying Pathfinder Battles. Although I will admit I would be pretty disappointed if we didn't see Colossal miniatures.
If this is something that has been covered, my apologies. There are a lot of posts, and I admit I haven't been following this thread.
That said, the other day I heard that Wizkids had an exclusive deal with Alliance; as a result, the Paizo pre-painted minis will only be carried through Alliance. Is this true?
Apparently some stores don't like to get their stuff through Alliance. Don't really know why, but the store down the street is apparently one of them. The owner was complaining about it, feeling Paizo was allowing itself to be strong armed by Alliance. He then made a good point: Paizo has what is probably the #1 RPG in the country & should be strong arming Alliance.
If all of this is true, I kind of have to agree. Paizo seems to be the 800 lb gorilla in the room right now, which seems like a good place to be to get others to cooperate.
I'm not in the industry, I don't know what Alliance's deal is or why some stores don't want to deal with them, I'm just curious what the situation is.
Oh, I just noticed Seelah the Paladin and the Half-Orc Barbarian, great jobs on both!
Were those put up on accident instead of the Ettin and the Ranger? :)
Those were last week's previews
wspatterson wrote:
I'm not in the industry, I don't know what Alliance's deal is or why some stores don't want to deal with them, I'm just curious what the situation is.
I know when Alliance was new, they strong-armed/bought out some of their competitors who had lower prices, which burned a lot of bridges to those shops that were supplied by those competitors. At least that's what I have heard
That said, the other day I heard that Wizkids had an exclusive deal with Alliance; as a result, the Paizo pre-painted minis will only be carried through Alliance. Is this true?
No idea. Don't really care, either.
wspatterson wrote:
Apparently some stores don't like to get their stuff through Alliance. Don't really know why, but the store down the street is apparently one of them. The owner was complaining about it, feeling Paizo was allowing itself to be strong armed by Alliance. He then made a good point: Paizo has what is probably the #1 RPG in the country & should be strong arming Alliance.
Why should Paizo strong-arm them?
Wouldn't make any sense, anyway. If it is true, then it's between Alliance and WizKids, with Paizo not directly involved. Paizo has no business meddling in that.