|Vic Wertz Chief Technical Officer|
Just for the record: its 1 inch longer than the map in the original (3.5) campaign guide, but otherwise similar in size. (Got my new campaign guide today)
The colour contrast has been improved, and the wording is a lot bigger and clearer. The borders are also clearer. (One early PC was from Ostenso, in Andoran... in the campaign I was playing in)
It's certainly a better map, but if you have the original map, I am not convinced its worth the extra money to buy it seperatly.
If you want a nice big map, and don't want the campaign guide, or the even bigger map, its a good product.
So much for "The Fabled City of Xin-Shalast"
I'm really dumbfounded by the decision to print the location of Xin-Shalast on all of these maps. It's such a spoiler.
My party is in the process of searching for Xin-Shalast in the last of the ROTRL series. Having it printed on the map kills some of the suspense.
I've asked my players not to look but that's kinda silly.
So much for there being any suspense to that module. Or the Lost Cities supplement for that matter. Not very lost any more.
Well I am two minds about the lost cities on the map. As a GM I like it for reference. But I get Osopolare's point. I don't recall off the top of my head if the latest gaz map had them listed or not. If not then it is a good player map and this a good GM map.