Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game
Pathfinder Society

Pathfinder Beginner Box

Pathfinder Adventure Card Game

Pathfinder Comics

Pathfinder Legends

The Genius Guide to Martial Archetypes (PFRPG) PDF

***½( ) (based on 3 ratings)

Our Price: $2.99

Add to Cart
Facebook Twitter Email

The “fighting man” is the anchor of a huge collection of myth, legend, and fantasy fiction. While it is wizards and dragons that make fantasy… well… fantastic, most often the heroes of those tales are loyal knights, dashing swashbucklers, royal guards, kung fu masters, grim gladiators, and duelists armed with quick wits and quicker blades. The image of the brave warrior is universal, an icon of fantasy adventure from gritty swords-and-sorcery stories to the highest of high fantasy literature. And often these fighting heroes have techniques, styles, tools and talents that go far beyond what can be reasonably represented by Combat Expertise and Weapon Finesse.

Of course, there is a limit to the number of options that can be presented in a single core rulebook, and players quickly crave more flexibility. Fantasy fiction is filled of daring whip-wielders in search of adventure, sage swordsmen who can run across water, prodigious paragons of physical power, and even wizards who use magic to augment their swords more often than they fling fireballs. Some of these characters can be built using the multiclassing rules and prestige classes, but such efforts often feel awkward and the patchwork of prerequisites and additional abilities may blatantly clash with the character’s intended back-story.

The Genius Guide to Martial Archetypes provides material designed to give fighting classes new techniques for running their foes through, or at least flashier things to do while making the effort. It does this through the use of archetype packages—a way to replace some of a base class’s standard abilities with new powers (in this case, powers tied to martial skill). An archetype package can present new kinds of combat options a character may learn (such as the Youxia), allow him to excel in the mastery of a single weapon (such as the Blacksnake), or just give him an extra edge in any fighting situation (such as the Physical Exemplar).

Product Availability


Fulfilled immediately. Will be added to your My Downloads Page immediately upon purchase of PDF.

Are there errors or omissions in this product information? Got corrections? Let us know at webmaster@paizo.com.

RGSOWC5061E


See Also:

Product Discussion (63)
1 to 50 of 63 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Paizo Employee Modules Overlord

The Genius Guide to Martial Archetypes is now available!

Super Genius Games presents the next entry in its popular "Archetype" line of products, presenting alternate sets of class abilities. The Genius Guide to Martial Archetypes presents five new archetypes packages (the whip-wielding Blacksnake, hit-and-run Harrier, amazingly able Physical Exemplar, mystic smiting Spellhammer, and ki-focused Youxia) with new combat-oriented abilities.

It also presents the base archetype packages for every class in the Pathfinder Roleplaying Core Rulebook, every class from each Genius Guide published to date (including the popular time thief and vanguard) and (for the first time) the classes from the Advanced Player's Guide.

Taldor

Pathfinder Comics Subscriber; Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Tales Subscriber

Oooh!

Mr. Genius wrote:
It also presents the base archetype packages for every class in the Pathfinder Roleplaying Core Rulebook, every class from each Genius Guide published to date (including the popular time thief and vanguard) and (for the first time) the classes from the Advanced Player's Guide.

I'm a bit confused by this bit. Are we getting archetypes for every class?


The Genius archtype guides work a little differently than archetypes from the APG.

Essentially the system assumes that every class has a set of powers you can remove without preventing the class from being useful. So you can remove domains from clerics, or some sneak attack and talents from rogues, and the class can still work in a group. They call those sets of powers achetype packages.

Once you remove the built-in archetype package of a class, you can repalce it with the new packages they present, gaining a bunch of new powers that are different, but just as useful as what you lost. So using Archer Archetyps as an example, you could play a sorcerer who didnt get a bloodline, but *did* get the Spellbow achetype which lets you use magic to fire arrows without a bow.

It's a neat system. Since every class has an archetype package, and they are all balanced against each other, any class can take any archetype (with a few limitations, kinda like feat prerequisites, but most archetype packages are open to any class). So a fighter, rogue, or
even a cleric could all take Hedge wizard (from Arcane Archetpes) and gain a little arcane spellpower in place of some of their normal class powers. (You can also swap the class' original packages, so you can play a cleric with a sorcerous bloodline, though that comes with some warnings).

The only drawback is you have to know the built-in archetype packages for any class you want to use the system with. Since Archer and Arcane Archetypes came out before the APG, you couldnt use the system with any of those classes unless they made "baseline" archetypes for them, so you knew what powers to *remove* when adding spellbow or hedge wizard or whatever archetype you wanted.

So I presume since this is the first archetype book since the APG came out, it includes the "original" archetype packages for all the APG classes. And then you can use any of the new archetypes for any (or nearly any) class. They *also* give archetypes for all the classes from their own line of books, so this works with every genius Guide out there.

Cheliax

Pathfinder Comics Subscriber; Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

If it is like their archer archtypes then any class can take these options.

Edit: Beat by DG. Yeah what she said.

Paizo Employee Modules Overlord

Thank you ladies, it's always nice to be so well represented!

As DM said, DG's description is pretty accurate. Of the new archetypes only one (Spellhammer) has any restrictions on what classes can use it, and it simply requires the class you add it to be able to cast spells.

That doesn't always mean every archetype is an ideal choice for every class. These are martial archetypes, and as you might expect most of them work best with classes designed to get into weapon-based combat. In fact, given that we already did a lot of ranged archetypes (in the Archer Archetypes book), I'd say these lean towards melee combatants. But my playtest has a sorcerer who took the Blacksnake archetype package, and made it work really well, so we leave it up to the players to decide what matches their character concepts.

As DG mentioned you CAN use the base archetype packages from each class as a new set of powers for OTHER classes, and it's an option we talked about at length in our first product in the line (Archer Archetypes). But that takes a GM comfortable with blurring the lines between classes. On the other hand, one of my games currently has a bard who replaced bardic performances with witch hexes and presents himself as a cult hunter, so it can lead to cool characters.

I made a point of talking about including the base packages for APG classes because it was mentioned as a request when Arcane Archetypes came out.


I am considering purchasing both the Archer and Martial Archetypes PDF's but before I do, I'd like to get an opinion on this in relationship to my current character.

Currently I have a Ranger, 4th level, that has the Archery Combat style, but is taking his main feats in martial activities, power attack, cleave etc. Would the archetypes described in these two books be a good fit for this character concept? He hasn't spent much time with the martial activities to this point as he has been leveraging true strike for ranged attacks and whittling away the enemy at range, and by the time they get close enough in, the rest of the party is working through decimating the
enemy and the ranger gets little cleanup for up close and personal.

Opinions, thoughts?

Thanks.


Sethvir wrote:
I am considering purchasing both the Archer and Martial Archetypes PDF's but before I do, I'd like to get an opinion on this in relationship to my current character.

I can only speak to archer Archtypes right now_ I havent picked up Martial yet.

First, the bad news. You'll need to give up with all your spellcasting and a couple of skill points per level *or* your favored terrain, enemy, and combat style. that's what you lose so you stay balanced when you gain the awesome new powers of an achrtype.

I recommend giving up spellcasting and the spell points. We have a ranger who gave those up to take the alchemical archer archetype, and the character is amazing!

Now, the good news. If what you want is to be great wiht a bow at range, archer archetypes is your book. If you dont want to fire cool achemical trick arrows (which are neat as heck but not for everyone), then you'll want either the Sharpshooter or tempest archetypes. sharpshooter lets you make really accurate attacks (though you get your biggest bonuses if you just make one attack a round, but it seems to stack with vital strike). tempest lets you pretend you are crow from hawk the Slayer, and become the gattling-gun of archers. You can not only fire your full round's worth of arrows as a standard action (very cool with Shot on the Run), you can eventually pincushion a foe so it counts as being flanked for a round, or do an area of covering fire that gives you ranged attacks of opportunity.

Either of these works rocking with a ranged-weapon ranger. They are balanced so you dont become the guy who overshadows everyone, but they also let you do interesting things no one else can.

Andoran

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game, Tales Subscriber

Thanks for this. The new Archetypes look good.

And really thanks for the APG archetypes. A much faster addition than I'd been expecting for the quality. Although worryingly they're pretty close to what I'd come up with while waiting. I might actually know what I'm doing.

However, between all your archetypes and the Paizo ones in the APG, there are now over 7000 class options available. Yikes!! I've started an Excel spreadsheet just to keep track of them.

Just a question: The Armiger's archetype says what they lose (Bulwark is less effective) but what does someone taking the Archetype gain in terms of Bulwark? I'm assuming they get the same level of benefit, i.e. only granting partial cover to adjacent ally.

Paizo Employee Modules Overlord

Paul Watson wrote:
Thanks for this. The new Archetypes look good.

You are most welcome, and thanks for the kind words!

Paul Watson wrote:
And really thanks for the APG archetypes. A much faster addition than I'd been expecting for the quality. Although worryingly they're pretty close to what I'd come up with while waiting. I might actually know what I'm doing.

Heheh. Most professional game designers start as gamers doing house rules while they wait for the official version of something they need. Goodness knows I did.

Paul Watson wrote:
However, between all your archetypes and the Paizo ones in the APG, there are now over 7000 class options available. Yikes!! I've started an Excel spreadsheet just to keep track of them.

I hadn't counted them up. :D And I still prefer this solution to 7000 unrelated prestige classes.

Paul Watson wrote:
Just a question: The Armiger's archetype says what they lose (Bulwark is less effective) but what does someone taking the Archetype gain in terms of Bulwark? I'm assuming they get the same level of benefit, i.e. only granting partial cover to adjacent ally.

First, let me say that the rules for using a base archetype package from one class to grant powers to another class are essentially still in beta. (I'm beginning to think I'll have a compiled all-archetypes book by the time I'm be done playtesting that idea.) That said, that's definitely how I'm handling it right now.

Taldor

Pathfinder Comics Subscriber; Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Tales Subscriber
Sethvir wrote:

He hasn't spent much time with the martial activities to this point as he has been leveraging true strike for ranged attacks and whittling away the enemy at range, and by the time they get close enough in, the rest of the party is working through decimating the

enemy and the ranger gets little cleanup for up close and personal.

Opinions, thoughts?

How can a 4th level ranger 'leverage' (shudders at the use of leverage as an active verb) true strike?

It has a range of personal, meaning that only sorcerers and wizards can use it.
The cost of a ring would be prohibitive and a wand would suffer from UMD and wand/bow juggling.

More generally I would recommend sharpshooter (losing spells, unless you are the party skill monkey and/or healer) as the partial damage drop on a full action is made up for with the bonus to hit, and there's a neat 'robin hood' vibe to the combat manoeuvre stuff.


GeraintElberion wrote:
Sethvir wrote:

He hasn't spent much time with the martial activities to this point as he has been leveraging true strike for ranged attacks and whittling away the enemy at range, and by the time they get close enough in, the rest of the party is working through decimating the

enemy and the ranger gets little cleanup for up close and personal.

Opinions, thoughts?

How can a 4th level ranger 'leverage' (shudders at the use of leverage as an active verb) true strike?

It has a range of personal, meaning that only sorcerers and wizards can use it.
The cost of a ring would be prohibitive and a wand would suffer from UMD and wand/bow juggling.

More generally I would recommend sharpshooter (losing spells, unless you are the party skill monkey and/or healer) as the partial damage drop on a full action is made up for with the bonus to hit, and there's a neat 'robin hood' vibe to the combat manoeuvre stuff.

Just doing what the DM told me and what he has allowed and that would be a potion of true strike. Also a magic item that allows 5x/Day True strike in possession of said ranger.

Didn't mean to make you shudder. Usually my grammar is much better than that.

Taldor

Pathfinder Comics Subscriber; Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Tales Subscriber
Sethvir wrote:

Just doing what the DM told me and what he has allowed and that would be a potion of true strike. Also a magic item that allows 5x/Day True strike in possession of said ranger.

Didn't mean to make you shudder. Usually my grammar is much better than that.

Potions of True Strike are prohibited:

PathfinderSRD wrote:
Spells with a range of personal cannot be made into potions.

Of course, your GM can houserule that away if he wants to.

The item is cool though, potentially lethal but the need to take a standard action to activate (so 1 attack every to rounds when using) and the high-ish cost makes it a fairly balanced item (I'm assuming ring, or perhaps Wondrous Item).

The leverage thing was mostly snark, sorry, it's fairly common usage now but I've never liked it (don't get me started on 'going forward')


DM decision about the True Strike. Don't look a gift horse in the mouth I always say. Maybe he'll change it "going forward". Sorry, couldn't resist. :)

Wonderous Item for the True Strike. We're mostly on a boat, so takes the form of a sextant. And yes you are correct standard action to activate, so every other round. Even with that still manage to be pretty leathal at long ranges.

Taldor

Pathfinder Comics Subscriber; Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Tales Subscriber
Sethvir wrote:

DM decision about the True Strike. Don't look a gift horse in the mouth I always say. Maybe he'll change it "going forward". Sorry, couldn't resist. :)

Wonderous Item for the True Strike. We're mostly on a boat, so takes the form of a sextant. And yes you are correct standard action to activate, so every other round. Even with that still manage to be pretty leathal at long ranges.

Sextant is cool flavour, suits the spell really well.

Cheliax

Pathfinder Comics Subscriber; Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Reviewed and posted it at ENworld.

Paizo Employee Modules Overlord

Dark_Mistress wrote:
Reviewed and posted it at ENworld.

Thanks for the review!

Regarding the raid token system in the harrier. When I wrote it, I knew it wouldn't be for everyone. It's actually one of the most playtested options, and some players love it to death, while others don't want to be bothered with it. It does reward resource management players more than others, and in a way no existing class does, so I decided it was worth it to push the envelope, even if not everyone loves it.

I know at least one group is now using the harrier with a simple "you get one raid token per round" rule, and it seems to work fine for them.

Cheliax

Pathfinder Comics Subscriber; Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Yeah it looked well written and balanced. I just didn't feel it added enough to justify more book keeping is all. I have not play tested it, I rarely can play test stuff I review. So I might change my mind after playing with it.

Cheliax

Pathfinder Comics Subscriber; Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Since you sent me a free copy from Drivethru I posted the review up over there as well now. :)

Paizo Employee Modules Overlord

Dark_Mistress wrote:
Since you sent me a free copy from Drivethru I posted the review up over there as well now. :)

Many thanks.


Reviewed here and sent to GMS magazine. Cheers!

Paizo Employee Modules Overlord

Endzeitgeist wrote:
Reviewed here and sent to GMS magazine. Cheers!

Thanks for the review!

I admit I got my hackles up a bit when you mentioned how you felt the magus helps make the spellhammer superfluous, because I wrote the spellhammer well before the magus was even announced. In retrospect, however, comparing an older product to everything currently available is an entirely fair basis for a review.

The line between iconic and easy to implement and bland is a narrow one. I admit the two things from this that see the most use in my own campaigns are the blacksnake and harrier. (Although I also feel playtesting has long proved the harrier mechanic works great, rewarding the player for a different play style than Pf normally encourages).

So while I clearly find the options easier to implement and more interesting than you seemed to consider them, I think the approach you took is perfectly reasonable.


I absolutely get that. Just as a word of warning: I'll be reviewing the compendium and several older pdfs like the vanguard-class soonish. I'll preface this kind of review with the fact that I am fully aware of them being unfair, something I probably should have done here, too.

I didn't complain about SGG-archetypes (who came first)vs. APG-archetypes, though, because I consider the systems complimentary. At least in my home-game they work that way. Thus I guess it evens out. ;)

Paizo Employee Modules Overlord

Endzeitgeist wrote:
I absolutely get that. Just as a word of warning: I'll be reviewing the compendium and several older pdfs like the vanguard-class soonish. I'll preface this kind of review with the fact that I am fully aware of them being unfair, something I probably should have done here, too.

Maybe... but I don't think it's a necessary warning. As I said, your reviews are going out to people buying now, and those people have all the current choices. (Besides, I don't see having archon, magus, and vanguard as options to fill the "warrior/wizard" slot as any more needless than having sorcerer, wizard, and witch to all fill the :arcane spellcaster" slot).

Endzeitgeist wrote:
I didn't complain about SGG-archetypes (who came first)vs. APG-archetypes, though, because I consider the systems complimentary. At least in my home-game they work that way. Thus I guess it evens out. ;)

Thanks! I *did* decide I needed to address it when it became APG archetypes were here to stay, but I do think the two systems play well together. :)


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

So I use this product rather regularly, and despite designing dozens of characters with various archetypes, I just noticed something very interesting. By strict raw, the weapon champion archetype can provide a back door to dervish dance for weapons besides the scimitar.

The language of favored weapon would indicate any weapon specific feats would work with any weapon in the group of favorite weapons. The assumption here is weapon focus or weapon specialization, but Dervish dance and the scimitar would easily fit that language as well. In addition, your favored weapon group need not even be heavy blades (of which only a few are one handed to meet dervish dance's other requirements), since one weapon advantage is to add any one weapon to your favored weapons. So you could for instance take axes and at 2nd level take the weapon advantage to add scimitar to the weapon group, then at 3rd level take the dervish dance feat and it would in theory apply to all one handed axes and the scimitar.

The same could be done with any weapon group, so you could dervish dance with a bastard sword, a katana, a heavy mace, or any other one handed weapon.

I am not sure this is a bad thing, I just dont think such a back door was actually intended. It could easily be read as working with all sorts of normally specific feats, like say the net adept line of feats from ultimate combat, which would get kind of odd I think.


Youxia + Dervish Dance sound pretty wicked :)

Paizo Employee Modules Overlord

Kolokotroni wrote:
I am not sure this is a bad thing, I just dont think such a back door was actually intended. It could easily be read as working with all sorts of normally specific feats, like say the net adept line of feats from ultimate combat, which would get kind of odd I think.

Up to the point someone is entangling people with a quarterstaff, I'm actually okay with all of those. :)


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Owen K. C. Stephens wrote:
Kolokotroni wrote:
I am not sure this is a bad thing, I just dont think such a back door was actually intended. It could easily be read as working with all sorts of normally specific feats, like say the net adept line of feats from ultimate combat, which would get kind of odd I think.
Up to the point someone is entangling people with a quarterstaff, I'm actually okay with all of those. :)

I think I am in most cases as well, but for instance, I dont think i'd be ok with someone using a greatsword as a onehanded weapon along side a trident with 'Net and Trident'. So I think dms will have to take that as they come.

Paizo Employee Modules Overlord

Kolokotroni wrote:
I think I am in most cases as well, but for instance, I dont think i'd be ok with someone using a greatsword as a onehanded weapon along side a trident with 'Net and Trident'. So I think dms will have to take that as they come.

Agreed, although I hope no one would actually try that.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

My players would know better, but I have seen crazier thoughts on these boards. Its just one of the inevitable gaps in a set of rules as complex as the interaction between supplementary material and pfrpg. I honestly dont know how I would write a rule on what is ok and what isnt in these cases, its just a case of 'I know it when I see it.'

Paizo Employee Modules Overlord

Kolokotroni wrote:
My players would know better, but I have seen crazier thoughts on these boards. Its just one of the inevitable gaps in a set of rules as complex as the interaction between supplementary material and pfrpg. I honestly dont know how I would write a rule on what is ok and what isnt in these cases, its just a case of 'I know it when I see it.'

Often that's all you can do. Consider:

Fireball clearly states "The fireball sets fire to combustibles," but there are no official rules for what are "combustibles." Does it set fire to adventurer's clothes? They are certainly in the area. Does it burn up dead bodies and unattended objects on them? Does a fireball destroy all the treasure in an area, since it can melt gold? Realistically, in-play it sets fire to those things the GM decides it should set fire to, largely based on what makes sense, and not much else.

One of the reasons tabletop RPGs can dare to offer options a computer game can't, is that it depends on the bets judgment of the players and GM. You want to make sure they aren't constantly making up rulings to cover huge gaping holes in the rules (otherwise, why bother to have rules), but it is okay to depend on them to use common sense for corner-cases.


The blacksnakes whip mastery feats. I'm assuming you need to meet the prerequisite feats to take them correct?

Taldor

Pathfinder Comics Subscriber; Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, Tales Subscriber

I'm really wondering, when do we get the genius guide to sneaky archetypes?


GeraintElberion wrote:
I'm really wondering, when do we get the genius guide to sneaky archetypes?

I agree, when is this aforementioned sneaky archetypes stuff coming out?

Paizo Employee Modules Overlord

havoc xiii wrote:
The blacksnakes whip mastery feats. I'm assuming you need to meet the prerequisite feats to take them correct?

Yes, you must meet prerequisites.

I should have explicitly stated that.


The Vanguard archetype package says that it replaces the Vanguard Bonus Feat at level 19. Vanguards don't get a bonus feat at level 19 as far as I know. Should this replace the Bonus Feat gained at 10th level (and thus, all Bonus Feats) or not replace anything other than the other two bonus feats (4th and 16th)?

Also, the Armiger archetype package says it replaces armored DR at 5th level. I'm guessing this is meant to be Armored DR at 4th level as the Armiger does not get Armored DR at 5th level.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

The Vanguard has been updated since then. The three bonus feats and the abilities Spell Block, Spell Grapple, and Spell Sunder were all subsumed under the Spell Maneuvers ability. So the Vanguard archetype should replace all 6 Spell Maneuvers. (This confused me initially, until I noticed all of the above abilities as options under Spell Maneuvers).


ssims2 wrote:
The Vanguard has been updated since then. The three bonus feats and the abilities Spell Block, Spell Grapple, and Spell Sunder were all subsumed under the Spell Maneuvers ability. So the Vanguard archetype should replace all 6 Spell Maneuvers. (This confused me initially, until I noticed all of the above abilities as options under Spell Maneuvers).

Bleh, that's what I get for not checking my pdfs.


So, a question about the Youxia. Does the Hammer Blow talent apply to each strike in a series of iterative attacks, or is the extra d6 of damage only applied once to the entire full-attack (or single attack)?


Also, are there Archetype Packages for the Magus and Gunslinger base classes?

Paizo Employee Modules Overlord

Caedwyr wrote:
So, a question about the Youxia. Does the Hammer Blow talent apply to each strike in a series of iterative attacks, or is the extra d6 of damage only applied once to the entire full-attack (or single attack)?

So the ability ready thusly: Hammer Blow (Ex): As a swift action, after a

successful attack roll with his wushu weapon, the youxia may spend one ki point to increase the damage of his attack by +1d6. The extra damage increases to +2d6 at 6th level, +3d6 at 11th level, and +4d6 at 16th level. The youxia may use this ability only once per round.

That reads as pretty clear to me. After a single attack roll successfully hit, you can spend a swift action to add dice of damage. Since it says you do it as a swift action, it says you do it after an attack hits, and you can only do it once per round, you can only use it for a single attack. the good news is, you don;t have to make that decision until after you hit, so you never "waste" the ki point.

Paizo Employee Modules Overlord

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Caedwyr wrote:
Also, are there Archetype Packages for the Magus and Gunslinger base classes?

Not as yet. These products came out before those classes existed. I have packages in playtesting for an update, but there are some balance issues I'm working to fix before I make them official.

Heck, the first of these products came out before Paizo added archetypes to the official rules! If I had known they were going to use that term, I'd have picked something else for the can-be-applied-to-nearly-any-class power swap packages in these books.

Even now, I may switch to calling them Player Templates, or something similar, in the eventually updates.


Owen K. C. Stephens wrote:
Caedwyr wrote:
Also, are there Archetype Packages for the Magus and Gunslinger base classes?

Not as yet. These products came out before those classes existed. I have packages in playtesting for an update, but there are some balance issues I'm working to fix before I make them official.

Heck, the first of these products came out before Paizo added archetypes to the official rules! If I had known they were going to use that term, I'd have picked something else for the can-be-applied-to-nearly-any-class power swap packages in these books.

Even now, I may switch to calling them Player Templates, or something similar, in the eventually updates.

Man, any chance maybe getting an idea of what your thinking for the Magus archtype(s)? I'm making one for a home campaign more than likely, but I could think of an archtype I wouldn't mind being able to add if I wasn't having to give up a couple specific things.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Krigare wrote:
Owen K. C. Stephens wrote:
Caedwyr wrote:
Also, are there Archetype Packages for the Magus and Gunslinger base classes?

Not as yet. These products came out before those classes existed. I have packages in playtesting for an update, but there are some balance issues I'm working to fix before I make them official.

Heck, the first of these products came out before Paizo added archetypes to the official rules! If I had known they were going to use that term, I'd have picked something else for the can-be-applied-to-nearly-any-class power swap packages in these books.

Even now, I may switch to calling them Player Templates, or something similar, in the eventually updates.

Man, any chance maybe getting an idea of what your thinking for the Magus archtype(s)? I'm making one for a home campaign more than likely, but I could think of an archtype I wouldn't mind being able to add if I wasn't having to give up a couple specific things.

Magus will be touch to create a package for, its abilities REALLY work together. Unlike the other 6level casters you cant take out their spellcasting for instance, because that invalidates their primary class features.

I'd say arcane pool points + arcana would be a good package to remove for an archetype, but I that is just off the top of my head.

Paizo Employee Modules Overlord

Kolokotroni wrote:
Krigare wrote:


Man, any chance maybe getting an idea of what your thinking for the Magus archtype(s)? I'm making one for a home campaign more than likely, but I could think of an archtype I wouldn't mind being able to add if I wasn't having to give up a couple specific things.

Magus will be touch to create a package for, its abilities REALLY work together. Unlike the other 6level casters you cant take out their spellcasting for instance, because that invalidates their primary class features.

I'd say arcane pool points + arcana would be a good package to remove for an archetype, but I that is just off the top of my head.

That's very likely to be one of the options, but wow has the balance been tricky to get right.

Another possibility it that the magus will give up "x" spell slots per level, but no value for "x" has worked perfectly yet.

I suspect it's going to be the very toughest of all Pf classes to implement my universal archetype system with.

Cheliax

Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Comics Subscriber; Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Cards, Companion, Maps, Modules, Pawns, Roleplaying Game, Tales Subscriber
Owen K. C. Stephens wrote:
I suspect it's going to be the very toughest of all Pf classes to implement my universal archetype system with.

I have faith you can figure it out.


Owen K. C. Stephens wrote:


That's very likely to be one of the options, but wow has the balance been tricky to get right.

Another possibility it that the magus will give up "x" spell slots per level, but no value for "x" has worked perfectly yet.

I suspect it's going to be the very toughest of all Pf classes to implement my universal archetype system with.

I've got faith you can figure it out, but I can understand why its so tough. Of all the PF classes its the one that (to me anyway) has the smoothest flow and most inter-connected class abilities of any class.

For homebrew stuff I work on, it has been my defacto benchmark for alot of areas.

Paizo Employee Contributor; Developer, Super Genius Games

Furt wrote:
Really nice work. Love the flexibility these extra options can provide.

Thanks!

Furt wrote:

Two questions though about the Augmenter Summoner package - doesn't taking away the summoners spells make it impossible to heal his/her eidolon?

(Note: I realize that other characters can heal the eidolon, I'm only talking about the summoner's abilities to heal it)

Yes, the summoner ends up being dependent on other classes to heal his eidolon. In playtest that didn't end up being crippling. It is a "major drawback," but a smart summoner chooses an archetype that makes the price worth it.

Also, UMD is a class skill for summoners, and wands of cure light wounds are a cheap and effective way to heal an eidolon between fights.

Furt wrote:
It seems like having an eidolon that's at max 1/2 HP until fast healing is available (LV.11) is a huge disadvantage. Was that intentional?

It was looked at, and we found it to be acceptable. Part of the issue is that summoners and eidolons already sit near the top of the class power curve, so giving a summoner new options gets problematic fast. Take the eidolon away, and its not a summoner anymore. Take the summon monster ability away, and you barely dent the classes' power curve. Taking its spells proved the best solution during playtest.


Hello, I'd like to comment and ask questions about the Blacksnake archetype (as presented on d20pfsrd.com)

Firstly, I think it's a very interesting archetype. It might mesh quite well with Pain Taster prestige class, too. However, I think it strange to use it almost as it is to create the Cloakfighter archetype (besides the fact that a cloak doesn't have weapon statistics in and of itself).

Now, my questions:
1) If my character multiclasses and takes this archetype for several classes, do these levels stack (example, does a Ranger/Blacksnake 1 and Fighter/Blacksnake 1 give access to 1 Lash Talent) ?
2) The Snap talent scales with levels. Are those Blacksnake levels or character levels ?
3) Since the abilities seem the same, would it be possible to indicate that some talents (or the archetype itself) can act as virtual replacement for the Whip Mastery and Improved Whip Mastery feats ?
4) Is this archetype fixed or would you like some input ? I'd like to see more whip-related feats in the Whip Mastery talent list (most notably the Whip Mastery and Serpent's Lash feat trees), and/or some talent to be able to use the whip for other combat maneuvers (like Drag, Reposition, and Grapple).

Thanks

Paizo Employee Contributor; Developer, Super Genius Games

Louis IX wrote:

Hello, I'd like to comment and ask questions about the Blacksnake archetype (as presented on d20pfsrd.com)

Firstly, I think it's a very interesting archetype.

Glad you like it!

Louis IX wrote:
However, I think it strange to use it almost as it is to create the Cloakfighter archetype (besides the fact that a cloak doesn't have weapon statistics in and of itself).

That's covered by the Improved Cloak Proficiency in the actual PDF. I presume that's on d20pfsrd.com somewhere. :)

Louis IX wrote:

Now, my questions:

1) If my character multiclasses and takes this archetype for several classes, do these levels stack (example, does a Ranger/Blacksnake 1 and Fighter/Blacksnake 1 give access to 1 Lash Talent) ?

RAW doesn't cover this. I think it's reasonable, since you give up the innate archetypes built into both the classes you multiclass in, but it would totally be a GM call.

Louis IX wrote:
2) The Snap talent scales with levels. Are those Blacksnake levels or character levels ?

Anytime a class feature scales with level, it's always class level. Since archetypes are alternate class features, this rule applies.

Louis IX wrote:
3) Since the abilities seem the same, would it be possible to indicate that some talents (or the archetype itself) can act as virtual replacement for the Whip Mastery and Improved Whip Mastery feats ?

The Blacksnake predates the book those feats came out in by a considerable amount. We may address that in a revision, but until then it's the land of GM discretion.

Louis IX wrote:
4) Is this archetype fixed or would you like some input ? I'd like to see more whip-related feats in the Whip Mastery talent list (most notably the Whip Mastery and Serpent's Lash feat trees), and/or some talent to be able to use the whip for other combat maneuvers (like Drag, Reposition, and Grapple).

Again, anything that extensive would have to wait for a full revision. Anyone who bought the Martial Archetypes pdf would get the revised version as soon as it came out. I'm not sure how long it would take for someone to decide to put it on d20pfsrd.com, but I know there's always a courtesy delay of at least 30 days.

Thanks


Hello again :-) and thank you for the answers

After juggling with the Godling, I'm back with more questions for the Blacksnake... well, at least one: the Improved Whip Proficiency, does it give proficiency with "the" whip, or all kinds of whips?

I'm thinking of a character concept where one would wield two scorpion whips. Would the archetype be enough to gain proficiency with them?

1 to 50 of 63 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Paizo / Messageboards / paizo.com / Product Discussion / The Genius Guide to Martial Archetypes (PFRPG) PDF All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.

©2002–2014 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.