RSS RSS Facebook Twitter Email
Pathfinder / Rulebooks / First Edition

Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Core Rulebook (OGL)

4.60/5 (based on 130 ratings)
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Core Rulebook (OGL)

Hardcover Unavailable

Add PDF $19.99

Facebook Twitter Email

Enter a fantastic world of adventure!

The Pathfinder Roleplaying Game puts you in the role of a brave adventurer fighting to survive in a world beset by magic and evil. Will you cut your way through monster-filled ruins and cities rife with political intrigue to emerge as a famous hero laden with fabulous treasure, or will you fall victim to treacherous traps and fiendish monsters in a forgotten dungeon? Your fate is yours to decide with this giant Core Rulebook that provides everything a player needs to set out on a life of adventure and excitement!

This imaginative tabletop game builds upon more than 10 years of system development and an open playtest involving more than 50,000 gamers to create a cutting-edge RPG experience that brings the all-time best-selling set of fantasy rules into the new millennium.

The Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Core Rulebook includes:

  • All player and Game Master rules in a single volume
  • Complete rules for fantastic player races like elves, dwarves, gnomes, halflings, and half-orcs
  • Exciting new options for character classes like fighters, wizards, rogues, clerics, and more
  • Streamlined and updated rules for feats and skills that increase options for your hero
  • A simple combat system with easy rules for grapples, bull rushes, and other special attacks
  • Spellcaster options for magic domains, familiars, bonded items, specialty schools, and more
  • Hundreds of revised, new, and updated spells and magical treasures
  • Quick-generation guidelines for nonplayer characters
  • Expanded rules for curses, diseases, and poisons
  • A completely overhauled experience system with options for slow, medium, and fast advancement
  • ... and much, much more!

Available Formats

The Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Core Rulebook is also available as:

Hardcover ISBN: 978-1-60125-150-3

Downloads

Looking for more? Check out the Resources and Free Downloads available for the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game.

Errata
Last Updated - 5/30/2013

Other Resources: This product is also available on the following platforms:

Hero Lab Online
Fantasy Grounds Virtual Tabletop
Archives of Nethys

Note: This product is part of the Pathfinder Rulebook Subscription.

Additional Product Images

(click to enlarge)
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Core Rulebook (OGL) Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Core Rulebook (OGL) Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Core Rulebook (OGL) Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Core Rulebook (OGL)

Product Availability

Hardcover:

Unavailable

PDF:

Fulfilled immediately.

Are there errors or omissions in this product information? Got corrections? Let us know at store@paizo.com.

PZO1110

See Also:

1 to 5 of 136 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

Average product rating:

4.60/5 (based on 130 ratings)

Sign in to create or edit a product review.


What a Pathfinder truly needs...

5/5 —

If there is any one book to have, it is this one. It is the only Pathfinder book you will ever need to start playing, but if you're like me you'll eventually want more.

When I first learned of tabletop RPGs my attention turned to D&D even though I knew next to nothing about it, nor did I know of anyone who played it. I only knew it because it was the name everyone knew when someone said "tabletop RPG" and the answer wasn't "what is that?" I wanted to play it but I didn't know where to start. I was lost, forlorn, and alone.

Then, one fateful day, I met someone online who told me about Pathfinder. I took one look at the Core Rulebook and I never looked back, and to this day I don't regret the decision one bit. The Core Rulebook is a solid start to any aspiring tabletop gamer's adventure and is a must own not only for the abundance of useful information it provides but also for the clean presentation and the magnificent art provided by Wayne Reynolds.

In short, if you want to play Pathfinder and haven't already, pick this book up immediately. It is well worth it.

Legendary

5/5 —

Legendary. It’s hard to know where to begin to review this book, but that one word encapsulates it well. There’s a reason Pathfinder is thriving a decade into its existence, and it all starts here. If you don’t know anything about Pathfinder, you can think of it as a revised and improved version of a specific edition of D&D (the “3.5” edition). Its strength is the nearly infinite capacity for customization, and its weakness is that enormous customization introduces complexity. In other words, this is a “crunch heavy” instead of a “rules light” game. Trust me, it’s worth it though. This is going to be a long review because I’ve got fifteen chapters to cover in this massive, 575-page book! If you don’t have the patience to read through the whole review, the conclusion makes it clear: buy this book. With this and the Bestiary, you have years of adventure at your fingertips.

Chapter 1 is “Getting Started” (12 pages). This chapter contains a brief introduction to the game, an overview of each chapter, a glossary of common terms, an example of play (very useful if this is your first RPG ever), and the rules for generating ability scores for a character (how physically and mentally capable they are).

Chapter 2 is “Races” (11 pages). The “Core” races presented here are: Dwarves, Elves, Gnomes, Half-Elves, Half-Orcs, Halflings, and Humans. As you would imagine, there are advantages and disadvantages to each race. The chapter spends a page on each race, and beyond the rules ramifications it takes care to talk about what members of that race typically look like, what their culture is like, why they often become adventurers, and how they relate to other races. It’s not an overwhelming amount of information (which is good for new players). For the most part, these races stick to fairly standard fantasy expectations.

Chapter 3 is “Classes” (57 pages). There are eleven “core classes” presented in this book: Barbarian, Bard, Cleric, Druid, Fighter, Monk, Paladin, Ranger, Rogue, Sorcerer, and Wizard. The spread of classes does an excellent job covering different play-styles and roles within a group. The power level of these classes has been significantly bumped up from D&D 3.5, and there are a lot more choices to be made within each class. This makes the classes more complex, but also more satisfying to see advance up through each level. If you’re brand-new to Pathfinder, it might be good to stay away from spell-casters like the Druid, Cleric, Sorcerer, and Wizard until you get more experience, as the sheer number of choices to be made can be overwhelming at first.

Chapter 4 is “Skills” (27 pages). Skills are something that every character has and they determine the likelihood of success in doing certain things. Want to leap from one rooftop to another? Roll an Acrobatics check. Want to figure out what spell that evil wizard just cast at you? Roll a Spellcraft check. Different classes get bonuses to using particular skills, but every character, regardless of class, can become good at something if they invest their “skill points” in a particular skill. Pathfinder has condensed the number of skills slightly from D&D 3.5, though it still has more than newer RPGs tend to have. I like the diversity and ability to specialize in discrete areas, but some think there should have been further consolidation. Each skill is described with great detail on specifically what it allows you to do and not do, which is quite helpful in avoiding rules arguments.

Chapter 5 is “Feats” (29 pages). Feats are special abilities. Every character gets to choose one feat at every odd level, and some classes and races get “bonus” feats. A feat might be something that lets you fight better in darkness (“Blindfighting”) or it might be something that makes certain spells you cast more effective (“Spell Focus”). There are several dozen feats to choose from, so this can be one of the parts of character creation that takes the longest to do. Their value, again, is that they allow for enormous customization of a character. Just because there are two Fighters in the party doesn’t mean they’ll be identical, because feats allow them to operate in very different ways!

Chapter 6 is “Equipment” (16 pages). Your character will need a weapon, maybe some armor, and some other gear like a backpack or a coil of rope. But in addition, you might wonder how expensive a night’s stay at an inn is, or how much it’ll cost to persuade a local wizard to cast a spell for you. All of the answers are in this chapter. I really appreciate that every item and service isn’t just listed on a table with a price, but in addition most receive a description, a picture, and (sometimes) additional rules to explain how it works in actual gameplay.

Chapter 7 is “Additional Rules” (13 pages). The title of this chapter isn’t particularly helpful, as the entire book consists of rules. Really, it’s a miscellany of various things about your character. First up is Alignment, which is whether your character is good, evil, or somewhere in between. A lot of other RPGs dispense with such questions, but it is “hard-coded” into Pathfinder in the sense that it’s not just a role-playing choice: many spells, magic items, and other effects change depending on a character’s alignment. Next, there’s a few pages on “Vital Statistics” like determining a character’s age, height and weight, and (most importantly) carrying capacity (also known as “encumbrance”). If your character has a low Strength score, don’t expect him or her to be able to carry a lot of gear. Then, there’s a discussion of movement speeds in various contexts (in the course of a combat encounter, for example, or for travelling great distances overland). Last, a bunch of little things are covered under the title “Exploration”: how far characters can see in different levels of light, how to determine if an object can be intentionally broken, etc. It’s a chapter that’s easy to overlook but provides answers to a lot of “little things” that might come up during a session.

Chapter 8 is “Combat” (29 pages). Combat is a major part of Pathfinder, and there’s admittedly a lot to digest in a short number of pages here. The way the chapter is laid out isn’t necessarily intuitive, and later Paizo products (like the Strategy Guide) do a much better job making combat clearer. You’ll find everything you need in this chapter, but you’ll be flipping back and forth for a while. I’ve been playing for years and I still refer to it occasionally.

Chapter 9 is “Magic” (19 pages). This chapter discusses different categories of spells, how characters learn them, and how to read a spell entry in the next chapter. It’s a chapter that’s easy to skip over at first, but is actually pretty important once a campaign gets serious.

Chapter 10 is “Spells” (156 pages). You read that right: about a quarter of the book consists of an alphabetical list and description of several hundred different spells! The spells have been cleaned up and improved from D&D 3.5 for better gameplay, but what hasn’t changed is that magic still rules. If pure power is what you want, play a true spell-caster and you’ll find it.

Chapter 11 is “Prestige Classes” (23 pages). Prestige Classes are special classes that characters can eventually take, well into their adventuring careers, if they meet certain prerequisites. This book has ten of them: Arcane Archer, Arcane Trickster, Assassin, Dragon Disciple, Duelist, Eldritch Knight, Loremaster, Mystic Theurge, Pathfinder Chronicler, and Shadowdancer. For the most part, and until very recent, Pathfinder hasn’t been a game where prestige classes thrive. Apart from some specific flavour reasons, a character would usually be better off simply continuing in their base class rather than taking levels in a prestige class.

Chapter 12 is “Gamemastering” (15 pages). As its title indicates, this chapter helps the person running a game (the “Gamemaster” or “GM”) prepare an adventure, referee the rules, deal with common problems at the table, etc. It’s okay for what it is, but I’ve seen better resources to help new GMs figure out what they’re doing.

Chapter 13 is “Environment” (39 pages). This chapter contains a lot of little things to help make the setting interesting. It contains rules on weather, travelling through the wilderness, dealing with traps, and so forth. It’s primarily for the GM too and shouldn’t be a priority to master until more fundamental rules are digested.

Chapter 14 is “Creating NPCs” (11 pages). This chapter gives rules for creating background (non-player) characters by using “NPC classes” like a Commoner. I have to admit I never use this chapter, as I just rely on NPC stat blocks already generated in other Pathfinder products.

Chapter 15 is “Magic Items” (101 pages). Your adventurer is going to want some cool magic gear, and this chapter explains what it does, how much it costs, and how it’s made. It’s pretty extensive and detailed.

Last up, there are appendices summarizing “Special Abilities”, “Conditions” (status effects a character might be under), “Inspiring Reading”, and “Game Aids” (other products you can purchase).
The Core Rulebook is a hefty tome for an RPG book. For players coming from D&D 3.5, it’s basically a combination of the Player’s Handbook and the Dungeon Master’s Guide in a single volume, but refined and improved. The book is, with the single exception of the deities, completely “setting neutral” (that is, it’s suitable for play in any campaign world or a homemade setting). There’s some excellent artwork taken from other Paizo products mixed in with some artwork that’s more pedestrian. Still, the production quality overall is fantastic. I would normally go into more detail, but there are hard word counts on these reviews. So I’ll sum up by saying: this is the one book you won’t leave home without, and it’s worth every penny.

Special Note: The Core Rulebook was recently released in a smaller softcover. The interior is exactly the same as the sixth printing of the hardcover, but it’s lighter and easier to carry. I’ve been using it for a few months now, and I’m quite happy with the font size, reduced price, durability, and ease of use.

Pathfinder's Heart

5/5 —

This book is at the heart of all Pathfinder games. It is great and can be picked up regularly cheap with sales all over. (Humble Bundle 1$) I myself have a PDF but plan to pickup a hardcopy one day. Either one will do the trick and is always good to keep handy. I like the PDF because you can do keyword searches. Even if you don't ever use it. The cover art is pretty awesome.

A Fresh Start

5/5 —

After years of seeing the Pathfinder rule books on the shelves of my FLGS, I took the plunge in December of 2012. I bought the Core Rulebook and began skimming it immediately. My first discovery was the character creation rules. They were fun! Characters were cool in a way that I hadn't seen in previous editions of the world's oldest role-playing game. Within three months, I was up and running my first Pathfinder adventure. That was three years ago and I have no regrets getting involved with the Pathfinder system.

1 to 5 of 136 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>
Search Thread

Search this Thread:

1,251 to 1,300 of 1,495 << first < prev | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | next > last >>

Well we aren't a single entity Gorbacz, so don't be so insulting. So reductive, two have become one for you now. You do realise we are separate people? Someone who really doesn't like a product and writes a negative review isn't immediately a troll for saying they didn't like it. To say so repeatedly is not exactly being welcoming.

To discuss the product, on tripping and other combat feats, I think core really made huge mistakes. Taking the attack of opportunity off the trip, the very useful feat in 3.5 is now weakened.

Greater trip is what improved trip used to be. And an extra feat to get there too. Somewhere a Fighter cries.

Power attack has also been changed, from -1 to hit, +1 damage (or 2 if two handed, to, in core what starts at -1, +2 (or +3 if two-handed). While there was choice and excitement behind the old power attack choice of penalty and damage to be inflicted, now the penalty is fixed, as you go up in level, the penalty slowly increases and the damage surges ahead. I do not like this at all, it is too much.

So, I throw a few more criticisms into the mix.
Silver Crusade
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
3.5 Loyalist wrote:
Well we aren't a single entity Gorbacz, so don't be so insulting. So reductive, two have become one for you now. You do realise we are separate people?

Nope, your posts are so similar that they blend together in my brain. Sorry about that.

3.5 Loyalist wrote:

To discuss the product, on tripping and other combat feats, I think core really made huge mistakes. Taking the attack of opportunity off the trip, when you have the feat says to me, the very useful feat in 3.5 is now weakened.

Greater trip is what improved trip used to be. And an extra feat to get there too.

Power attack has also been changed, from -1 to hit, +1 damage (or 2 if two handed, to a what starts at -1, +2 (or +3 if two-handed). While there was choice and excitement behind the old power attack choice of penalty and damage to be inflicted, now the penalty is fixed, as you go up in level, the penalty slowly increases and the damage surges ahead.

So, I throw a few more criticisms into the mix. And someone who really doesn't like a product and writes a negative review isn't immediately a troll for saying they didn't like it. To say so repeatedly is not exactly being welcoming.

That's a nice attempt at changing the topic, but I won't let you float with that. The reviewer we are talking about raised exactly two points, of which one was positive and the other one false. If somebody gives the book worst possible rating just for that, well, there's not much to discuss about.

And you're still showing that you don't exactly understand what the real problems with 3.5 rules were :)

No, he made more than two points.

1) I really enjoy the class/cross class skill system (you have 3 ranks in all class skills, and after that its 1 point regardless of class or cross class)
2) They took Search and rolled it with spot/listen for perception nerfing one of the only nice utility skills for wizards though.
3) Also lets talk about grappling, as far as the rules go I can grapple THROUGH A WALL
4) or i can TRIP A GHOST. This was something that wasn't even broke in 3.5 and they took it and made it completely retarded. Did this even get playtested by competent players?

You seemed to miss that. Also not everyone writes long reviews, I would like him to add more, so he can discuss why it was a 1 for him and contribute to the discussion. Changing the topic? The topic is core.

Enlighten me on the real problems of the 3.5 rules?
Liberty's Edge
Pathfinder Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber
3.5 Loyalist wrote:

No, he made more than two points.

1) I really enjoy the class/cross class skill system (you have 3 ranks in all class skills, and after that its 1 point regardless of class or cross class)
2) They took Search and rolled it with spot/listen for perception nerfing one of the only nice utility skills for wizards though.
3) Also lets talk about grappling, as far as the rules go I can grapple THROUGH A WALL
4) or i can TRIP A GHOST. This was something that wasn't even broke in 3.5 and they took it and made it completely retarded. Did this even get playtested by competent players?

You seemed to miss that. Also not everyone writes long reviews, I would like him to add more, so he can discuss why it was a 1 for him and contribute to the discussion. Changing the topic? The topic is core.

Enlighten me on the real problems of the 3.5 rules?

Except points 3 and 4, as have been noted, are factually wrong. You cannot, by RAW, grapple through a wall, nor, by RAW, can you trip a ghost. It might make the case that the rules aren't well-layed out that he got that impression, but they are nonetheless not valid points because they are wrong.

Dark Archive Bella Sara Charter Superscriber

Okay, how exactly do the rules allow someone to grapple THROUGH A WALL or TRIP A GHOST?

Yeah, that review was pretty worthless. Saying "I found a loophole that doesn't exist and doesn't matter, yet is so important that I gave the product a 1 star review and didn't mention anything relevant to people who actually want to play the game and don't have the same ridiculous obsessions over minutiae as me" isn't really helpful. It just shows that you (a) didn't read the rules carefully enough and (b) are obssessed over ridiculous minutiae (i.e., OMG ELVES ARE ARROGANT).

Can you actually post a decent argument? Hiding behind condescension and sarcasm is getting really repetitive. At least you've added a new touch of being mysterious. "And you're still showing that you don't exactly understand what the real problems with 3.5 rules were."

Well, why don't you elaborate then. Unless you'd rather maintain a position of dismissal, thus ensuring that you've won the discussion which hasn't even started, thereby reinforcing my earlier argument.
Silver Crusade
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
3.5 Loyalist wrote:

No, he made more than two points.

1) I really enjoy the class/cross class skill system (you have 3 ranks in all class skills, and after that its 1 point regardless of class or cross class)
2) They took Search and rolled it with spot/listen for perception nerfing one of the only nice utility skills for wizards though.
3) Also lets talk about grappling, as far as the rules go I can grapple THROUGH A WALL
4) or i can TRIP A GHOST. This was something that wasn't even broke in 3.5 and they took it and made it completely retarded. Did this even get playtested by competent players?

You seemed to miss that. Also not everyone writes long reviews, I would like him to add more, so he can discuss why it was a 1 for him and contribute to the discussion. Changing the topic? The topic is core.

Enlighten me on the real problems of the 3.5 rules?

Thanks for making my point with the whole single entity issue.

I can't even comprehend point 2 - the whole utility skill for Wizards part is lost on me. Again, might be my brain deterioration showing.

Real problems of 3.5 rules, who boy. Hope TOZ will be around for backup.
Here's a few:

1. The disparity between casters (in particular, full casters) and martial classes.
2. Christmas Tree Syndrome.
3. Monks and Paladins are so crap that it hurts.
4. SoD/SoS/SoL spells dominate the game. Evocation spells are subpar.
5. CoDzillas > any martial class. At fighting. The thing martial classes were supposed to be good at.
6. Skill system blows (amount of skills + cross-class skill rules)
7. Classes are bland (as in "you get nothing at this level apart from +1 Ref, move along), zillion PrCs in attempt to remedy that leading to PrC bloat.
8. Trap Options (feats in particular. Deflect Arrows? Dilligent?)
Sovereign Court
The equalizer wrote:
Can you actually post a decent argument?

^^ My thoughts when reading the review, thanks for posting them :).

P.S... get out of my mind...
Gorbacz wrote:
I can't even comprehend point 2 - the whole utility skill for Wizards part is lost on me. Again, might be my brain deterioration showing.

Search used to be Int-based, as opposed to Wis-based Spot. Wizards have Int as their primary stat; ergo, your basic wizard is now worse at searching than he used to be in 3.5.

Silver Crusade
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Joana wrote:
Gorbacz wrote:
I can't even comprehend point 2 - the whole utility skill for Wizards part is lost on me. Again, might be my brain deterioration showing.
Search used to be Int-based, as opposed to Wis-based Spot. Wizards have Int as their primary stat; ergo, your basic wizard is now worse at searching than he used to be in 3.5.

That's an earth-shattering nerf for a class that can fix anything using spells, I admit. I think I'll go and drop my Core Rulebook review a star for this...

Grand Lodge
Pathfinder Adventure, Rulebook Subscriber
Gorbacz wrote:


Real problems of 3.5 rules, who boy. Hope TOZ will be around for backup.

Sorry, not this time. He feels that 3.5 monks and fighters are excellent standards of balance. It's like he sees the sky as green. There is nothing I can say to it.

Gorbacz wrote:
3.5 Loyalist wrote:

No, he made more than two points.

1) I really enjoy the class/cross class skill system (you have 3 ranks in all class skills, and after that its 1 point regardless of class or cross class)
2) They took Search and rolled it with spot/listen for perception nerfing one of the only nice utility skills for wizards though.
3) Also lets talk about grappling, as far as the rules go I can grapple THROUGH A WALL
4) or i can TRIP A GHOST. This was something that wasn't even broke in 3.5 and they took it and made it completely retarded. Did this even get playtested by competent players?

You seemed to miss that. Also not everyone writes long reviews, I would like him to add more, so he can discuss why it was a 1 for him and contribute to the discussion. Changing the topic? The topic is core.

Enlighten me on the real problems of the 3.5 rules?

Thanks for making my point with the whole single entity issue.

I can't even comprehend point 2 - the whole utility skill for Wizards part is lost on me. Again, might be my brain deterioration showing.

Real problems of 3.5 rules, who boy. Hope TOZ will be around for backup.
Here's a few:

1. The disparity between casters (in particular, full casters) and martial classes.
2. Christmas Tree Syndrome.
3. Monks and Paladins are so crap that it hurts.
4. SoD/SoS/SoL spells dominate the game. Evocation spells are subpar.
5. CoDzillas > any martial class. At fighting. The thing martial classes were supposed to be good at.
6. Skill system blows (amount of skills + cross-class skill rules)
7. Classes are bland (as in "you get nothing at this level apart from +1 Ref, move along), zillion PrCs in attempt to remedy that leading to PrC bloat.
8. Trap Options (feats in particular. Deflect Arrows? Dilligent?)

I hope you are not suggesting that PF corrected most of those issues are you? Some of those PF didn't even touch and still has, others they made a half-hearted attempt to fix (e.g. say 6 spells of level are really powerful, and you nerf 2 of those, the other 4 are still really powerful and players will just choose those instead), and still others they just done a shell game (base and PrC combos are bad, but lets create a bunch of archtypes they are basically the same end goal). Not that it is really the designers fault, they were ham-stringed by their own goal of trying to keep some backwards compatibility.

"1. The disparity between casters (in particular, full casters) and martial classes." Inequality in what sense? casters being able to do so much more than martial classes or the other way round. Assuming this is what you are getting at, SR and DR may be the main slowing points for casters and martials. With most spells, SR stops it flat regardless of what the spell can do. With DR, melee attacks do less damage etc. But its not all about damage, something with DR 15 but is grappled then pinned is in a bad way as the rogue sneak attacks away and the spellcaster hits it with ranged touches (no dex to touch AC in this instance). The list goes on with trip/bull rush and about a hundred other things.

"2. Christmas Tree Syndrome." Not sure what you're getting at there. Do elaborate.

"3. Monks and Paladins are so crap that it hurts." Monks are not crap. They are the only base class to start with the best save progression for all three saves. Get a bonus feat at first level and the variant version of two-weapon fighting (flurry). Not to mention evasion/improved evasion/ wholeness of body etc. On top of all that a modest d8 hit die. Nice array of abilities all spread out, not quite like the barbarian and fighter which pushes for specialization. Once again, this falls back to skills and feats picked for the monk. Any player who spreads feats and skills around without really specializing really gets rogered later on so its not just limited to the monk class.

Paladins get their celestial mount, add charisma on attack and level to damage during smite. Also, immunity to fear. Something no other base class has. The smite has the problem of not working on non-evil creatures. Then again, I question a paladin who is smiting neutral and good-aligned creatures instead of evil ones. Their spellcasting is limited since they already have the d10 hit die and good bab progression. Understandable given a class shouldn't get too much too quickly.

"4. SoD/SoS/SoL spells dominate the game. Evocation spells are subpar."
Not sure what SoD/SoS/SoL stands for. Do spell it out.

"5. CoDzillas > any martial class. At fighting. The thing martial classes were supposed to be good at." Again, what are Codzillas?

"6. Skill system blows (amount of skills + cross-class skill rules)."
Agreed. The skill set in 3.5 was really broken down. Pathfinder has made it better by condensing them into fewer skills. I like this change as stated in my review of the core rulebook.

"7. Classes are bland (as in "you get nothing at this level apart from +1 Ref, move along), zillion PrCs in attempt to remedy that leading to PrC bloat." Disagree with you there regarding blandness. Aside from slight boost to a save each level, there is also hit points, skill points and base attack. On top of all this, may gain an additional ability like greater rage. New abilities aren't given every single level but that should be how it is to ensure a class isn't too overpowered. Either that or specific and weaker abilities gained every level makes sense like the warlock. Assuming PrC refers to prestige class, the classes are there as areas of specialization. The fact that there are so many of them just means more options when choosing. That would be more preferable to 6 or 7 prestige classes which pretty much are 2-3 times more powerful than base classes. A base class shouldn't be necessarily weaker than a prestige(just thought I'd point that out). It comes back to classes being strong each in their own way (base or prestige regardless during comparison)and feat selections as they gain levels.
"8. Trap Options (feats in particular. Deflect Arrows? Dilligent?)" What about them? There are those in the players handbook and then there are those in other sources. I recommend getting the tome of feats 1-3. You'll realise there are alot more options than what is in the players and almost anything can be done with them.
Contributor

Please note that there's a whole forum dedicated to Pathfinder RPG rules discussion, where you can discuss each of your points in better detail.
Liberty's Edge

This book is in print and new players dig it. I recommend the Pathfinder Core Rulebook not only for for those who are looking for enjoyable gaming but also for anyone who wants to use it to encourage new players to join the RPG gaming community. Other systems are fine too, but the Pathfinder Core Rulebook in particular really appeals to new gamers. To quote one of these new gamers when he thought about what character to create in this high fantasy RPG, "I can do anything!"

With 3.5, and the great customisation offered by feats, one could already do anything, make any build, focus on any conceivable speciality.

But I can't disagree about the appeal to new gamers, it sure has it. As for doing anything, making any conceivable thing, need to go beyond core to find those rules, feats, prestige or base classes. Also, lol Doppelganger.
Shadow Lodge
Wicht wrote:
As you can't grapple through a wall (unless you just have a poor DM), and you can't trip a ghost (unless your DM doesn't know the rules), his claims that the rules are broken and poorly playtested seem to be the result of a misunderstanding, to say the least. I wouldn't be dismissive of his opinion, but I would not take it as a valid complaint either.

I see it as a symptom of over-codification. When a system becomes as over-codified as 3.X/PFRPG has become, people start to assume that if they can't specifically find a rule saying that something is NOT allowed, they assume that it is allowed. Even if it's moronic, like being able to grapple someone from the other side of a wall.

Well what if there was a window?
Silver Crusade
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
The equalizer wrote:

"1. The disparity between casters (in particular, full casters) and martial classes." Inequality in what sense? casters being able to do so much more than martial classes or the other way round. Assuming this is what you are getting at, SR and DR may be the main slowing points for casters and martials. With most spells, SR stops it flat regardless of what the spell can do. With DR, melee attacks do less damage etc. But its not all about damage, something with DR 15 but is grappled then pinned is in a bad way as the rogue sneak attacks away and the spellcaster hits it with ranged touches (no dex to touch AC in this instance). The list goes on with trip/bull rush and about a hundred other things.

"2. Christmas Tree Syndrome." Not sure what you're getting at there. Do elaborate.

"3. Monks and Paladins are so crap that it hurts." Monks are not crap. They are the only base class to start with the best save progression for all three saves. Get a bonus feat at first level and the variant version of two-weapon fighting (flurry). Not to mention evasion/improved evasion/ wholeness of body etc. On top of all that a modest d8 hit die. Nice array of abilities all spread out, not quite like the barbarian and fighter which pushes for specialization. Once again, this falls back to skills and feats picked for the monk. Any player who spreads feats and skills around without really specializing really gets rogered later on so its not just limited to the monk class.

Paladins get their celestial mount, add charisma on attack and level to damage during smite. Also, immunity to fear. Something no other base class has. The smite has the problem of not working on non-evil creatures. Then again, I question a paladin who is smiting neutral and good-aligned creatures instead of evil ones. Their spellcasting is limited since they already have the d10 hit die and good bab progression. Understandable given a class shouldn't get too much too quickly.

"4. SoD/SoS/SoL spells dominate the game. Evocation spells are subpar."
Not sure...

Now, there's an old rule: you don't tear apart a door that's already open.

So, Equalizer/3.5 Loyalist. Take a few moments out of your time and browse WotC forum archives, EnWorld/GiTP/BG and perhaps most of all, the always newbie-friendly The Gaming Den and familiarize yourself with critiques of 3.5 ruleset. Each of my points was elaborated in extensive length over the last 8 years of 3.5ed life, and I really see not much point in discussing game mechanics with somebody who doesn't know what CoDzilla or SoS stands for, since we basically are not going to understand each other. Also, I see no point in copy-pasting several years worth of discussion, so there we go. Thanks! :)
Owner - House of Books and Games LLC
Gorbacz wrote:
... I really see not much point in discussing game mechanics with somebody who doesn't know what CoDzilla or SoS stands for, since we basically are not going to understand each other. Also, I see no point in copy-pasting several years worth of discussion, so there we go. Thanks! :)

A shame. I have no idea what they mean either (though I was able to guess on SoD), but then again I don't really care so I guess that explains it :)

(and now I have to go look. curse you!)
gbonehead wrote:
Gorbacz wrote:
... I really see not much point in discussing game mechanics with somebody who doesn't know what CoDzilla or SoS stands for, since we basically are not going to understand each other. Also, I see no point in copy-pasting several years worth of discussion, so there we go. Thanks! :)

A shame. I have no idea what they mean either (though I was able to guess on SoD), but then again I don't really care so I guess that explains it :)

(and now I have to go look. curse you!)

SOD = save or die

SOS = save or suck
SOL = save or lose(?), S**t out of Luck?

CoDzilla = Cleric or Druid -zilla, the view that clerics and druids in 3.5 were overpowered monsters.
Paizo Employee Chief Technical Officer

I've removed a post.

Knock it off—this discussion is not going anywhere.

To discuss the product again, what do we think of the layout and size?

Putting my own thoughts first, it is a little too big and unwieldy, as a pdf or as a single text. I've seen players have to wait around as one after the other goes through multiple sections, back and forth, to be able to get in the game (and this was with multiple copies).

What I think would have been better would be for the core to be in two texts. Not the old players, dms division, but instead the larger thorough rule book, and a smaller almost pamphlet containing classes, character generation, feats and a small description of skills, with a few examples of genning a character step by step. Make it 40 pages max. Last thursday a new player who was trying to level up his dwarven paladin was confused utterly for many minutes. It was too large and too spread out a text for a beginner.
Grand Lodge
Pathfinder Adventure, Rulebook Subscriber

I think the basic rules for playing should be a small softcover book, while the more indepth rules for running should be a larger hardback. I think the 3.5 PHB from the Player's Kit was the best purchase I ever made, and would be perfect if it were slightly smaller for new players. The PF CRB has never seen use at my table, mostly because of the huge size of it. And the PDFs are horribly slow on my iPad and Macbook.
3.5 Loyalist wrote:

To discuss the product again, what do we think of the layout and size?

Putting my own thoughts first, it is a little too big and unwieldy, as a pdf or as a single text. I've seen players have to wait around as one after the other goes through multiple sections, back and forth, to be able to get in the game (and this was with multiple copies).

What I think would have been better would be for the core to be in two texts. Not the old players, dms division, but instead the larger thorough rule book, and a smaller almost pamphlet containing classes, character generation, feats and a small description of skills, with a few examples of genning a character step by step. Make it 40 pages max. Last thursday a new player who was trying to level up his dwarven paladin was confused utterly for many minutes. It was too large and too spread out a text for a beginner.

As a beginner I had trouble with the 3.5 phb, but with the chapters in roughly the same order and some experience under my belt I don't think the book size is the issue.

That does not mean I would rather not have two smaller size books, but for different reasons. Some rules were snipped(explanations shortened), and if I had played 3.5 I would be using them incorrectly. I would rather pay the extra money for the clarity. I am of course assuming two books would have cost about 30 bucks a piece.
Silver Crusade
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

I think that one of the goals of upcoming Beginner Box is to remedy the Big Book problem.
Owner - House of Books and Games LLC
TriOmegaZero wrote:
I think the basic rules for playing should be a small softcover book, while the more indepth rules for running should be a larger hardback. I think the 3.5 PHB from the Player's Kit was the best purchase I ever made, and would be perfect if it were slightly smaller for new players. The PF CRB has never seen use at my table, mostly because of the huge size of it. And the PDFs are horribly slow on my iPad and Macbook.

I'm with you entirely. But has anyone out there purchased the SORD? That, along with spell cards, goes a long way towards avoiding lugging around that monstrosity.

Once Ultimate Combat and Ultimate Magic are out, I'm going to work on a project to create single documents for each of the classes - it'd be cool to print-on-demand them, but I'd have to finish them first :)

Always wanted a feat compendium too, but they get out of date very quickly.
Paizo Employee Chief Technical Officer
3.5 Loyalist wrote:

To discuss the product again, what do we think of the layout and size?

Putting my own thoughts first, it is a little too big and unwieldy, as a pdf or as a single text. I've seen players have to wait around as one after the other goes through multiple sections, back and forth, to be able to get in the game (and this was with multiple copies).

What I think would have been better would be for the core to be in two texts. Not the old players, dms division, but instead the larger thorough rule book, and a smaller almost pamphlet containing classes, character generation, feats and a small description of skills, with a few examples of genning a character step by step. Make it 40 pages max. Last thursday a new player who was trying to level up his dwarven paladin was confused utterly for many minutes. It was too large and too spread out a text for a beginner.

I think doing that would have been a horrific mistake. As wraithstrike pointed out, two books would cost much more than one, and increasing the cost of entry would have dramatically slowed the adoption rate of the game.

And we are aware that it's not especially easy to learn from; I think the 3.5 rulebooks had a similar problem, though. And as Gorbacz pointed out, that's a problem that the Beginner's Box is designed to fix.
Silver Crusade
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Vic Wertz wrote:
3.5 Loyalist wrote:

To discuss the product again, what do we think of the layout and size?

Putting my own thoughts first, it is a little too big and unwieldy, as a pdf or as a single text. I've seen players have to wait around as one after the other goes through multiple sections, back and forth, to be able to get in the game (and this was with multiple copies).

What I think would have been better would be for the core to be in two texts. Not the old players, dms division, but instead the larger thorough rule book, and a smaller almost pamphlet containing classes, character generation, feats and a small description of skills, with a few examples of genning a character step by step. Make it 40 pages max. Last thursday a new player who was trying to level up his dwarven paladin was confused utterly for many minutes. It was too large and too spread out a text for a beginner.

I think doing that would have been a horrific mistake. As wraithstrike pointed out, two books would cost much more than one, and increasing the cost of entry would have dramatically slowed the adoption rate of the game.

And we are aware that it's not especially easy to learn from; I think the 3.5 rulebooks had a similar problem, though. And as Gorbacz pointed out, that's a problem that the Beginner's Box is designed to fix.

Yeah, I'd take one book for 50 USD ahead of two books for 60 USD any time.

Gorbacz wrote:
Yeah, I'd take one book for 50 USD ahead of two books for 60 USD any time.

I wouldn't. In fact, I'd pay 40 USD or more for each book if the Core Rulebook had been split into two books instead. I find the book far too unwieldy to actually use at the table (flipping through, passing around, and such), and reading it without resting it on a table is also pretty difficult with its current size.

In fact, if the Core Rulebook was reprinted pretty much as-is, but split into two, I'd buy both of those immediately even though I already have the book. Simply because it would be much more convenient to use.

The layout and contents of the book are awesome though :)
Gorbacz wrote:


Yeah, I'd take one book for 50 USD ahead of two books for 60 USD any time.

Same here.

It's the same reason that I passed on the latest edition of both GURPS and HERO SYSTEM. Both of them used to be just one book with all of the rules you needed to create a character and run a game. Then they split them into two books at $40 a piece? Screw that. I prefer the single Pathfinder book.

These days I'm workin' from my iPad and before that I was working from the PF Resource Document on my iPhone. But my players dont have an issue with finding or using the PF book at our table.
Grand Lodge
Pathfinder Adventure, Rulebook Subscriber
Are wrote:
In fact, if the Core Rulebook was reprinted pretty much as-is, but split into two, I'd buy both of those immediately even though I already have the book. Simply because it would be much more convenient to use.

Agreed.

Paizo Employee Director of Game Development

As a player, GM, and designer, I quite like everything being in the same book.

Sure it took a few adjustments to flip to the right page right off the bat, but I've saved hours of gaming and game design minutes from switching books to flip instead of just flipping in one book over the last couple years.

Now that I think about it you can print the book if you have the pdf as two separate books. The site.

Lulu can combine pdfs into one pdf. Of course the lock on Paizo pdfs may not allow manipulation. If that is the case I am currently out of answers.
Gorbacz wrote:
Vic Wertz wrote:
3.5 Loyalist wrote:

To discuss the product again, what do we think of the layout and size?

Putting my own thoughts first, it is a little too big and unwieldy, as a pdf or as a single text. I've seen players have to wait around as one after the other goes through multiple sections, back and forth, to be able to get in the game (and this was with multiple copies).

What I think would have been better would be for the core to be in two texts. Not the old players, dms division, but instead the larger thorough rule book, and a smaller almost pamphlet containing classes, character generation, feats and a small description of skills, with a few examples of genning a character step by step. Make it 40 pages max. Last thursday a new player who was trying to level up his dwarven paladin was confused utterly for many minutes. It was too large and too spread out a text for a beginner.

I think doing that would have been a horrific mistake. As wraithstrike pointed out, two books would cost much more than one, and increasing the cost of entry would have dramatically slowed the adoption rate of the game.

And we are aware that it's not especially easy to learn from; I think the 3.5 rulebooks had a similar problem, though. And as Gorbacz pointed out, that's a problem that the Beginner's Box is designed to fix.

Yeah, I'd take one book for 50 USD ahead of two books for 60 USD any time.

Yes, but what if 60 USD is actually more useful for players? A small added extra to help the new, and speed up character generation. We'll have to see how this beginner's box goes.

3.5 Loyalist wrote:
Gorbacz wrote:
Vic Wertz wrote:
3.5 Loyalist wrote:

To discuss the product again, what do we think of the layout and size?

Putting my own thoughts first, it is a little too big and unwieldy, as a pdf or as a single text. I've seen players have to wait around as one after the other goes through multiple sections, back and forth, to be able to get in the game (and this was with multiple copies).

What I think would have been better would be for the core to be in two texts. Not the old players, dms division, but instead the larger thorough rule book, and a smaller almost pamphlet containing classes, character generation, feats and a small description of skills, with a few examples of genning a character step by step. Make it 40 pages max. Last thursday a new player who was trying to level up his dwarven paladin was confused utterly for many minutes. It was too large and too spread out a text for a beginner.

I think doing that would have been a horrific mistake. As wraithstrike pointed out, two books would cost much more than one, and increasing the cost of entry would have dramatically slowed the adoption rate of the game.

And we are aware that it's not especially easy to learn from; I think the 3.5 rulebooks had a similar problem, though. And as Gorbacz pointed out, that's a problem that the Beginner's Box is designed to fix.

Yeah, I'd take one book for 50 USD ahead of two books for 60 USD any time.
Yes, but what if 60 USD is actually more useful for players? A small added extra to help the new, and speed up character generation. We'll have to see how this beginner's box goes.

Why not tell the players to not go past chapter X for the purpose of leveling up? It seems to me that the player section is in the front, while most of the DM related stuff is in the back.

One other consideration is that many groups would only need 1 copy of the DM-section/book, while they would need (or at least want) multiple copies of the PC-section/book. For instance, when we played 3.5, my group maintained 1 PHB for each player, but only 1 DMG in total. The total cost for our group would increase if we were to do the same with the CRB (so the cost for us is actually higher than it was before).

Edit: I hope I don't come off as too negative; I love what Paizo has done with the rules of the game, and I love all the other books they've created so far. The Bestiary is much more useful than the MM was, for instance, and the artwork is far more inspired throughout all of the books.

It's just that this decision to put everything into one big book was a big turn-off point for me when deciding whether to switch to PF. I almost decided to simply stick with 3.5 for that reason, since I had poor experience with huge books from the past (the Ptolus book, for instance). They're just not userfriendly, and I end up almost never actually using the book, purely because of the size. This is also the reason why I will never buy the upcoming complete Tome of Horrors book, even though I would love the updated monsters.
Paizo Employee Chief Technical Officer

I don't think that there really is that much in the Core Rulebook that's really for GameMasters only. The best candidates are chapters 12 through 14, which total about 61 pages (and players might actually occasionally need part of chapter 13).
Kthulhu wrote:
Wicht wrote:
As you can't grapple through a wall (unless you just have a poor DM), and you can't trip a ghost (unless your DM doesn't know the rules), his claims that the rules are broken and poorly playtested seem to be the result of a misunderstanding, to say the least. I wouldn't be dismissive of his opinion, but I would not take it as a valid complaint either.
I see it as a symptom of over-codification. When a system becomes as over-codified as 3.X/PFRPG has become, people start to assume that if they can't specifically find a rule saying that something is NOT allowed, they assume that it is allowed. Even if it's moronic, like being able to grapple someone from the other side of a wall.

This was from the outset, my greatest complaint about 3.x when it came out. It seemed clear that the creators of the game were indulging the worst of the minutia-loving, rules dependent literalists. I knew it would end badly, and it did. And still does. You still see people thinking just what you've said here. If it isn't specifically spelled out and over explained, then the only possible interpretation is the one I came up with to:

1. Break the game.

2. Prove my ridiculous point.

Zombies should be able to grapple through windows/boarding and get a bonus to do so. Would be amusing to put it into a horror game.

Stay away from all openings!
Shadow Lodge
3.5 Loyalist wrote:
Stay away from all openings!

That's what she said!

C'mon guys, it took 4 hours 20 minutes for someone to do that joke? I am disappointed in you all.

Zombies go for all openings.

Yeesh.
Grand Lodge
Pathfinder Adventure, Rulebook Subscriber

"Zombies go for all openings."

Sounds like bad porn.
Dark Archive
TriOmegaZero wrote:

"Zombies go for all openings."

Sounds like bad porn.

Or something AZ starred in in college.

Liberty's Edge
Vic Wertz wrote:

  • In the Appendix, on page 563, in the "Invisible Creature is..." table, the header of the second column has been changed to "Perception DC Modifier." Additionally, the entry for "Not Moving" has been changed from "–40" to "+20."
    [/list]

    • Still missing in the PRD

    I have a question concerning spells:
    Spells seem to do really little damage for their limited cost, and I was wondering if you add anything to spell damage?

    I recall in the beta version of pathfinder that you added charisma to spell damage as a sorcerer? I don't recall, but it'd be nice if that was the case...

    the Vital Strike feat:
    I'm confused as to how often you can use vital strike. is this an every turn thing, or a once per encounter thing? it seems pretty powerful to be able to use it every turn.

    I think I'm correct in my thinking that it replaces any extra attacks you have with extra damage on the one.
    Grand Lodge
    Pathfinder Adventure, Rulebook Subscriber

    Vital Strike is not limited in use, nor is it overpowered. It gives you extra weapon damage when you do not full attack.

    There is also nothing that adds to spell damage out of the box. Certain class abilities and feats do, but the baseline rules do not.
    Dark Archive
    2 people marked this as a favorite.

    I have seen some threads regarding needed errata for the 4th printing of the Core Rulebook. Will this errata be verified, compiled and placed into a pdf soon? or is there a 5th printing on the way?
    1 to 50 of 1,495 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>
    Community / Forums / Paizo / Product Discussion / Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Core Rulebook (OGL) All Messageboards

    Want to post a reply? Sign in.