Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
Pathfinder Adventure Card Game Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Pathfinder Adventures Pathfinder Campaign Setting Pathfinder Player Companion Pathfinder Accessories Pathfinder Miniatures Pathfinder Fiction Pathfinder® Society™ Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Compatible Products Pathfinder Apparel & Gifts Pathfinder Licensed Products
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game
Pathfinder Society

Pathfinder Beginner Box

Pathfinder Adventure Card Game

Pathfinder Comics

Pathfinder Legends

Pathfinder Society Scenario #24: Decline of Glory (OGL) PDF

****( ) (based on 15 ratings)

Our Price: $3.99

Add to Cart
Facebook Twitter Email

A Pathfinder Society Scenario designed for 1st to 7th level characters (Tiers: 1–2, 3–4, and 6–7).

When the son of a famous Pathfinder gains control of his father's holdings in Taldor, the Pathfinder Society decides to build a new lodge there as a base to explore the many ruins of that crumbling empire. Unfortunately, the Taldan Phalanx has its eye on the holdings and an ancient curse has turned many of the residents into the walking dead. Can you survive the tangled web of Taldor's politics and fight off the echoes of the past or will you, too, see your glory decline?

Written by Tim Hitchcock

This scenario is designed for play in Pathfinder Society Organized Play, but can easily be adapted for use with any world. This scenario is compliant with the Open Game License (OGL) and is suitable for use with the 3.5 edition of the world’s most popular fantasy roleplaying game.

Product Availability

Fulfilled immediately. Will be added to your My Downloads Page immediately upon purchase of PDF.

Are there errors or omissions in this product information? Got corrections? Let us know at


See Also:

Product Reviews (15)
1 to 5 of 15 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>

Average product rating:

****( ) (based on 15 ratings)

Sign in to create or edit a product review.

where did that come from?


This was a fun adventure, some political intrigue, a short dungeon crawl, then wtf out of left field end fight that was surprisingly entertaining.

decent adventure with aome scaling flaws.

***( )( )

from gm side: had a fun time running the adventure but a lot of underpowed encounters on the 3-4 side... several one hit kills and the threat of most monsters diesease or ability damage just didnt add up... as well as a 13 ac bbeg..... just a pitful creature.

Operates better than it reads.

***( )( )

Upon my first read-through of 'Decline of Glory' I wasn't really enthused about running it. It seems Season 0's first choice of monster anywhere is always ghouls and zombies and I was aching for some variety in monsters. I couldn't see any real variation in the story and aside from an awesome finale, the rest of the adventure seemed pretty dry (despite the constant rain modifiers).

Boy, was I wrong! At subtier 1-2. this is a solid 3.5 star scenario and a great 'character test' of what sort of Pathfinders your players actually are. There are tonnes of moral decisions embedded in the deceptively short word count and during running, all of these 'big decisions' came out swinging.


-There are loads of decisisons here. Do we use the last Scroll of Remove Disease on the son of a Pathfinder - or do we use it on a team mate? Do we remain to protect the village or do we venture off into the woods? Do we steal the locked box or do we ask for it politely? They are pretty tough as well... Kudos to Hitchcock.

-The finale is awesome. I love any 'defend the base' situation, and with a potential seven ghouls vs a team of newbie Pathfinders, I am delighted with this one >:)

-A novel and believable realistic situation is the source of conflict, and a lot flows from this into guiding the PCs hands. You almost forget that there actually is a macguffin!

-Amazing gold for a Subtier 1-2 scenario. Yummy :)


-Season 0 suffered from undead overload.

-There is very little explanation about why the nearby woods are infested with ghouls. Let us use Knowledge History to know that it's always been like this, or say that some necromancers have moved in recently. Run as written, the undead element may actually detract from the real meat of the scenario, unless properly explained by GM fiat.

-The flooded cavern combat makes it very easy for a party with any kind of ranged capability to deal with 75% of the encounter without taking any damage whatsoever. Bit of a slaughter, really.

Acceptable, nothing to write home about

***( )( )

I ran this for a crew of four PCs at the middle tier. Frankly, they trounced it. It was extremely easy - so easy, in fact, that the boss was dropped in a single hit. The storyline is acceptable, but it does require some GM massaging to make it all come together. There are a lot of fights, especially the first few, which are throwaways and seem only included to take up time. It wasn't terrible, but it wasn't really memorable either.

Not too much stands out.

***( )( )

Investigation and tactics rein supreme in this one.

1 to 5 of 15 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>

©2002–2014 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.