Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Illithid

zylphryx's page

Goblinworks Executive Founder. RPG Superstar 6 Season Dedicated Voter, 7 Season Star Voter. Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber. FullStarFullStarFullStarFullStar RPG Venture-Lieutenant, North Carolina—Asheville. 4,873 posts (5,301 including aliases). 1 review. 1 list. 1 wishlist. 31 Pathfinder Society characters. 53 aliases.


RSS

1 to 50 of 4,873 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>
Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

PM Sent.

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

PM senti

Sovereign Court **** RPG Venture-Lieutenant, North Carolina—Asheville , Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7 aka zylphryx

Yes, yes you may. :)

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Your Grand Magnanimousness, I bring unto thee, warrior.com ... though their garb be strange and their weapons odd, their battles are said to be most entertaining ...

I hereby summon you, next poster, to bring unto me an effervescent beverage. Chilled, but not cold, you dog!

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

thanks for the link Gisher.

That does raise an interesting item as well. The vestigial arm discovery specifically calls out using the hand to wield a weapon as part of TWF ... the tentacle does not contain that language, which would lead one to believe that you cannot wield a weapon in the tentacle.

Sovereign Court **** RPG Venture-Lieutenant, North Carolina—Asheville , Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7 aka zylphryx

sure sure, just post to show off that shiny fifth star ... ;)

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Throw natural attacks in. Say you have a claw, claw, bite set of natural attacks. Would you be able to get a full iterative with armor spikes then get all three natural attacks?

Sovereign Court **** RPG Venture-Lieutenant, North Carolina—Asheville , Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7 aka zylphryx

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Congrats James Becker, VC for Asheville, NC!

Now run those 5 star specials man!!!! ;)

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

anyone? anyone? Bueller?

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

10 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Ha ha! You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is "never get involved in a land war in Tian Xia" - but only slightly less well-known is this: "Never go in against a Varisian when death is on the line"! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha... <thud>

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

OK, so here's the scenario, and I am looking for RAW here.

Assume you have an alchemist with a BAB of +11/+6/+1 who has a natural attack set of claw, claw, bite, gore and fast bombs. That alchemist can use their iterative to throw three bombs and then get a claw, bite, and gore attack in a full round.

Now throw in the tentacle discovery. Does this tentacled alchemist get the three bomb iterative plus claw, claw, bite, and gore (running with the assumption of the tentacle flinging the bombs) or do they get the same attack sequence as the first alchemist?

The reason this comes up is the wording for the tentacle discovery:

PRD wrote:
Tentacle (Ex): The alchemist gains a prehensile, arm-length tentacle on his body. The tentacle is fully under his control and cannot be concealed except with magic or bulky clothing. The tentacle does not give the alchemist any extra attacks or actions per round, though he can use it to make a tentacle attack (1d4 damage for a Medium alchemist, 1d3 damage for a Small one) with the grab ability. The tentacle can manipulate or hold items as well as the alchemist's original arms can (for example, allowing the alchemist to use one hand to wield a weapon, the tentacle to hold a potion, and the third hand to throw a bomb). Unlike an arm, the tentacle has no magic item slots.

Since the tentacle discovery specifies the following limitations:

  • it does not grant any extra attacks or actions per round
  • states a single specific attack that the tentacle can make
does this mean the alchemist with a tentacle is limited to the same attack iteration as the alchemist without a tentacle? Or is the additional claw attack not considered an extra attack since the alchemist is using a free appendage to make the iterative attack?

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I have thankfully not had a migraine in almost a year. Not sure exactly what the trigger is for them (though I do know stress was a big factor from my old job ~8 years ago when I would get them on a regular basis).

The last migraine I had came with a new onset symptom. I actually saw a scintillating scotoma ... freaked the hell out of me at first (thought my toying around with various substances back in the day was making a comeback). It lasted about 15 minutes, saw the most vivid colors in a 3/4 arc running along the border of my vision (focused on the left eye, as when I closed that eye the effect lessened). Once it ended, the migraine kicked in, though was somewhat muted from what I had normally experienced (but it still sucked ... had to turn off the lights from the light sensitivity, the mini psychopath with that freaking icepick was poking the backside of my eyes, and the nausea was still present, though not as intense as normal).

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

So in order to get back in shape (and for other medical reasons), I have radically altered my diet and started exercising regularly. So far about 35 pounds down (and I have boosted my calorie intake to maintain this weight for a bit so as to not have a ton of loose skin to deal with).

The weight loss is all well and good, but with the weight drop, I have found that there are a couple of seated positions that I had previously found to be comfortable that now cause my legs to fall asleep (one or the other, depending on the position, not both).

The pins and needles are driving me freaking nuts!!

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

You can always make the reservation (there is no deposit required) and cancel it if the Con rate is better.

I just reserved a double queen room in the tower for $98/night using the AAA discount ... If memory serves the Convention Rate for 2015 was arounf $114/night.

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

KC, who exactly are your lawyers?

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Got another couple of months before I can grab my airline ticket ... flying from the east coast isn't cheap. But once secured I will also grab up my room. :)

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I enjoy PF. There are a good number of issues with the system, as there are with any system, but overall I have a good time playing the game.

That said, the ever increasing rule set is getting rather cumbersome. While this is not an issue for home games (where most folks I play with look at the rules as a set of guidelines ... with the occasional quick rules debate), it is certainly becoming an issue for PFS, at least from my point of view. The errata which result in requiring character rebuilds, the ever growing list of PC classes and archetypes, and the ever expanding FAQs are making it more burdensome to run PFS for folks who GM.

Does this mean I will stop playing? Nope. When I play or GM I enjoy myself, primarily due to the folks I play with. Occasionally I will end up at a table with a lackluster GM or a jerk who has his or her PC act like a jerk "because it's what my character would do", but those instances are thankfully few and far between. Couple that with the fact that the folks I play the home games with are also willing to pick up a game of Shadowrun, Star Wars, WoD, etc etc etc and if there is an increase in a burnout level it can be countered easily.

At least that is where it stands now. Ask again in a year or two and we'll see how the weigh of the rules looks at that point.

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

You know, I had been a strong nay sayer re: HeroLab for ages. There were issues with bad data in the past and folks would use it without double checking the settings they were using. BUT, over the last two years I have come to appreciate it greatly. I don't use it to run my PCs off of (save for one), but I do use it to stat out NPCs and encounters for home games. Saves me a LOT of time on that front. Is it expensive? Yeah, it can be. But you also have to look at how valuable your time is. Would you prefer to hash out all your NPCs by hand or have extra time to do additional adventure design for your players? At this point, I figure it has saved me enough time to have covered it's cost.

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

It may not be a lost cause, but unless you intend for the campaign you are running to continue on for at least three years, don;t count on anything to appear that fits that bill. It takes time to develop products and I believe Paizo maps out their product schedule for the larger books about three years out (though I could be mistaken).

Even then, the chances of it being on the radar of any publisher is not overly high, so Brother Fen's suggestion of DIY with Hero Lab is not something you should dismiss out of hand.

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

you probably won't get feedback from any legal staff from Paizo. Their job, after all, is to protect Paizo's legal interests, not everyone else's.

That said, I advise you check out the OGL (which you can find in any published Paizo product). Also check out the Community Use Policy on this site.

Also, aspects such as are you writing this for profit or for free distribution will have an impact on what you can and cannot do.

And, of course, when in doubt, contact your lawyer. They are paid to look out for your legal interests.

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

In no particular order:

Seoni
Merisiel
Amiri
Seelah
Jirelle
Adowyn
Lini
Imrijka
Feiya
Lirianne
Alahazra

All that said, the main problem with dating any of the Iconics is the paper cuts ...

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Y'all are looking at Marshall's all wrong. They are not selling styles that are two years out of style. They are selling the retro look 15 years ahead of when that retro look will be fashionable again. ;)

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Keep on the Borderlands. Seriously. How did that make any sense? Why did the ogre not eat everything else in those silly caverns?

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Maybe it's my Nordic heritage that has me keeping my hair long ... Hell, I even braided and beaded my beard for a while several years ago. Now I just need a longship and a long axe and I'll be good to go. ;)

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

At this point I'm not sure how much of an impact attacking the PCs wealth would be. It will have an effect long term, but it would not have any impact in the immediate. And any long term effect would be based on how reliant they are on consumables compared to the extra abilities they have at their disposal.

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I've kept my hair long since high school (oh so many years ago). I just really do not like the way short hair looks on me (it just looks wrong to me).

On other folks, it just depends. Some folks look good with long hair, others not so much. Same could be said for short hair or no hair. And this is regardless of gender.

While I have been involved with women with short to long hair (never had a girlfriend shave her head fully ... Closest was a mohawk in my teenage punk phase), I have had more girlfriends with long hair than short. Not so much a preference rather than the luck of the draw.

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Unless the encounters you are throwing them against are also buffed in the same fashion as the PCs, you are not going to balance the encounters easily. This could mean throwing them against mythic opponents and building NPCs in the same fashion that PCs are built (extra abilities, etc), and similar tactics. Additionally, by allowing folks to take tier 1 mythic abilities, you really are not "walking the thin line" between gestalt and mythic, you are at best staggering along the line and stepping off into mythic.

All that said, since this is a home brew game, you could also bump up the monstrous ability effects. A creature has the grab ability? Have it add a significant bonus the creatures CMB and CMD for grapple checks. The creature has Awesome Blow? Allow it to be used on ALL attacks allowing the creature to knock multiple targets back in a round of combat and increase the distance knocked back by 5' for every 5 points they exceed the target's CMD.

Bottom line is the PCs are obviously not balanced if at level 8 they are blowing through what should be epic encounters. Unless you tweak the creatures they encounter in a fashion similar to what you are allowing for the PCs, you will not achieve balance and will have a very bored group of players once they hit level 12 and are easily defeating out of the book CR 20+ encounters.

EDIT: to be clear, the PCs' abilities could be balanced in regards to one another, but they are clearly not balanced in regards to the world in which they find themselves or the opponents they are fighting. It is a common issue when making custom changes as you described to PCs to neglect doing similar adjustments to the PCs' foes.

Sovereign Court **** RPG Venture-Lieutenant, North Carolina—Asheville , Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7 aka zylphryx

Hey folks! Looking for a convention this upcoming October in the MidAtlantic? Want to be surrounded by the beauty of the Appalachians why you game to your heart's content?

Check out ScareFest 2015!

Scarefest had been the Asheville Pathfinder Lodge's annual PFS mini-con, but last year we filled the FLGS to capacity. This year, the event has grown to include not only PFS, but also D&D5e, Savage Worlds, Shadowrun, Star Wars, World of Darkness, and much more!

And all this for $10 in advance! Where else are you going to find a bargain like that?

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I didn't find the first episode boring. Granted the series is a slow burn; it is not action out of the gate. It is, however, the reveal of the situation as it unfolds, showing the effects of these changes on the lives of the folks involved as they occur. That I find rather intriguing. Definitely a change from the mainstream for video media where the standard tactic for shows of this type is to hook the audience with action or conflict almost immediately.

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

So I am sitting outside the W in ATL and just heard the following statement:

"I've made a lot of money having sex with women"

Followed by a discussion of film production.

Just freaking odd the things folks talk about loudly in public...

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Sitting at the hotel bar in ATL drinking beer, so please forgive typos and whatnot.

Wolfgang obviously has a great freaking bluff skill. One does not kill one's father and keep it hidden from the family for years without a hellishly good bluff skill.

As far as intimidate goes, it's not of the "battle cry" version, but more of the "that's all you got" version, as he can take a hit and makes sure he is theastnone standing.

He also has a hell of a DR score, which he can pass on to the others, as wintnessed by the fight he stepped into on behalf of Lito. Taking a solid hit to the face and no flinching is not something most folks could do.

He certainly has a high disable device skill by cracking a safe manually that his father (who presumably was quite skilled) failed to do.

Anyway, just some inebriated possible insights ... ;)

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

ah, gotcha ... so this would be more of a "please move all derails to this thread" thread, then? More to the point, if that is the case, I apologize for trying to stay on topic. ;)

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

So the premise of this thread is to discuss the "problems" with engaging in civil discourse with those with whom you may not not agree with ... really? To be clear, voicing your viewpoint which may be counter to the OPs position, or the position of others in the thread is the nature of civil discourse.

I cannot see this as being a good idea in any way and quite counter to engaging in any kind of civil discussion.

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Ironbriar can act as a means to transition a captured Nualia into the ranks of the overarching machinations of big K's minions, showing up along side the BBEG at the end of Hook Mountain or during the assault on Sandpoint at the start of book 4. If she is slightly bumped up, or given some underlings, she will not prove a major hindrance or obstacle, but the surprise of the players when she shows up again instead of having been executed or imprisoned should be priceless if pulled off properly.

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Honestly, starting with a base DC of 5 to move the person 5' towards you would seem a good initial DC. Add in environmental factors (pulling up a cliff/out of quicksand/rapid water/etc adds 5, 50% of max load add 5, max load add 10, etc). For every 5 points that a PC exceeds the DC increase distance by 5'. Strength based PCs should succeed without much trouble (except in extreme situations) and requires longer time based off of difficulty, which should play a role. Failure by less than 5 has no movement, every 5 points that one fails by causes a drop of 5' if applicable.

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Another reason to not have Ameiko executed would be the awkward start to Jade Regent if you eventually run that AP ...

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

No no, it's an 8 eight ball that is in the process of reproduction via budding ...

Sovereign Court **** RPG Venture-Lieutenant, North Carolina—Asheville , Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7 aka zylphryx

Honestly, for a "hostage photo" to have any weight to it, it would need at least the following three elements:

1. The book
2. An widely accessible newspaper (we're talking NYT, WSJ, WP ... NOT Smallville Gazette)
3. The name of the owner (preferably written ON the book)

Additionally, the photos would need to be recent (updated weekly). And a physical copy of the photo should be required (to avoid possible liability issues if someone's phone/tablet/laptop gets dropped). If the image is more than a week old, the GM should be free to deny the source for the PC.

If those criteria were met, then yeah, perhaps it could be a viable solution. Long term though it is also a more expensive solution that just buying the PDFs ... But that would be the individual's call then as to the preferred route they want to take.

Sovereign Court **** RPG Venture-Lieutenant, North Carolina—Asheville , Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7 aka zylphryx

thing is, by this suggested "solution", they would not even have to do that. All they would need to do is write up a list of resources and throw on a bunch of signatures in order to "prove" they are all good on the ownership front.

No solution is going to be foolproof, but which is better, a solution that is overly simple to exploit or one that would require those who would bother to violate the rules to expend more effort? Which one would result in less exploitation?

and while I will accept you may think having an "ownership" list would make auditing easier (I do not agree), the suggested "solution" still falls short of the other criteria and is in fact worse for potential exploitation than the current system.

Sovereign Court **** RPG Venture-Lieutenant, North Carolina—Asheville , Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7 aka zylphryx

Mekkis wrote:
PDF printouts are now considered 'existing alternatives to having tablets'?

Printouts of relevant pages from a water-marked PDF is also considered an alternative to having a book. Just sayin'. ;)

As to the photocopy and owned resource list concept, up thread you (Gary) stated that this idea was not worse than the existing process (a point on which I disagree). The point though, is not to implement a change that is "not worse", but that is actually better. In order for that to be the case, as far as I am concerned, it would need to meet the following criteria:

  • reduce, or at least not increase, the work load of the GMs and/or VOs
  • have enough deterrent or lack of loopholes to minimize exploitation
  • have a ready means of verification of ownership of materials
  • have the relevant content for the materials readily available for review if a rules question comes up

What you have suggested covers the last item. And that is it.

Having an additional sheet that would need to be signed off on by 5 star GMs or VOs adds additional work on those folks. Additionally, for those individuals who do not live near a VO or 5 (or even 4)star GM, they would be SOL. So it does not meet item one (and has additional complications I don't think you considered).

I personally do not know the names of every VO (I know, bad VL), 5 star and/or 4 star GMs. If someone shows me a sheet with a bunch of signatures, I have no way to know if they are valid or if the guy just signed off on his own sheet in the parking lot before the game. This would seem to be a pretty big portion of the suggestion you are putting forward that could be exploited. Provide a physical copy or pages from a PDF or don't use the PC or specific ability/item/etc does not have that same level of potential exploitation. As such, your suggestion does not meet criteria number two.

Having a physical copy at the time you are deciding to be audited for material ownership only proves you were able to get your hands on a physical copy that one time, be it from your bookshelf, your buddy's backpack, B&N (and then promptly return it once done). Having a physical copy (or water-marked PDF or sections thereof) at any given time that you may be asked for it is a better gauge of actual ownership. Hence the third item is really not met in a better fashion than the current system.

All in all, I do not see how your suggestion is an improvement over the current requirements. Yes, the PDFs cost extra (unless you are a subscriber), and it is not a requirement to have the PDFS if you have the physical books. Not having to carry your physical books would really be a convenience, and honestly, convenience typically carries additional cost ... Such as purchasing the PDFs.

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Varangian guard. They were mercenaries of Scandinavian origin initially, though later Anglo-Saxons also filled the ranks. They were imperial guards, loyal to the Emporer, and trusted moreso than Byzantine soldiers for that position, and we're apparently terrors on the battlefield. When an Emporer died, they would take from the treasury all they could carry.

Pretty solid basis for the Ulfen guard.

Edit: as far as the "look at the names" bit, not really sure what is meant.

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Set wrote:
Timitius wrote:
Also threw up color copies of #11 and additional copies of #12.

Blorch!

Just wipe that off, it's fine.

So our printing process is a bit messy, but you have to admit, they turn out nice. ;)

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

<sniff> that was so sad ... such a tragedy ... you are truly a Shakespeare among zombies <sniff>

unless, of course, Shakespeare is a zombie, in which case, that would just be awkward.

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

OK, my take on this from when the question was posited by Mogmismo on Saturday. Just because it is a surprise round does not mean that time stops. If there are ongoing effects, my first instinct is that yes, they would apply during a surprise round.

While a surprise round is not a regular round, it is still a time for all PCs and NPCs to experience effects (damage from attacks, effects of spells, etc.). As PCs can be required to make saves (and suffer effects) in a surprise round for actions that trigger during the surprise round, I do not see why effects that are in effect prior to the surprise round would be ignored.

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Spoiler:
It could very well be a dormant gene in most sensates that becomes active when certain criteria are met.

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Oh, now the Hao Jin Tapestry would be a cool one. Considering it has bits and pieces from all over Golarion in it folks would be able to do almost anything. And, since it also has parts of Golarion from different time periods as well, iirc, then you could have some interesting divergent timeline concepts as well.

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber
thejeff wrote:

But then we get into much more complicated arguments about which versions and variations of polygamy are legal.

Eh, not so much. If all parties are consenting adults it is then a matter of numbers not of variation/version. Just as there are good and bad monogamous marriages, so to will there be good and bad polygamous marriages. It is the nature of human relationships to run the gamut.

But, all that aside, as to the original topic of this thread, I just gotta say the SCOTUS decision was long overdue. It is a definite step forward along the road of equality. Many congrats to those amongst my friends (and to those who are not) who will be able to finally be able to take part in a ceremony so many others take for granted.

EDIT: posted after the other illithid to confuse matters. ;)

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I would say fey ... And not because I wrote up two pieces with a fey theme for this one and put them aside when I saw your comment on fey deserving their own issue ... Well, not entirely ... Ah hell, who am I kidding? ;)

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Or just have him occasionally role a will save and if he fails tell him the action he is making the next round. You don't need to fully control a PC's actions to scare the hell out of them.

When they ask why they are making will saves, just tell them they are not sure, they just felt an overwhelming compulsion to do it, or their "little voice" told them to do it and it ended up seeming like a good idea. If they item is unveiled as the controller, then have it take possession of the PC, pull the Player aside and tell them to motivation of the item and have them run their PC for that resulting encounter.

Sovereign Court Dedicated Voter Season 6, Star Voter Season 7

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Modules, Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Yeah but they were longer than three paragraphs too.

Keep up the good work Aberzombie.

Ooo ooo, tell us the one about the sleeping princess who wasn't really sleeping.

1 to 50 of 4,873 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2015 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.