xevious573 wrote:There is kinda 1452 (and counting) posts... Certainly most other Campaign Setting books haven't gotten this type attention. In addition telling Lone Wolf/my friends to go check page 28 or 29 of this thread for the various errata seems kinda... well not right to me I guess. Don't know how else to describe it. I think you guys should consider that FAQ page for this product, it makes the corrections more official and less word of mouthy even if it is coming from the toothy tyrannic-sauric jaws of the Creative Director. I'm sure we can be plenty patient for that page but I think it would do this book some good in avoiding confusion.
I do agree, and the increased attention and the heavy rules content of this book does mean it'd be good to get the errata gathered. I'll see what I can do.
And having been the one who wrote the bulk of these rules and playtested them for over a decade, I'm pretty confident I can provide pretty official corrections for the book anyway... ;-P
Oh, I know you're the go-to guy to get information on how things work in this book. But some people could be kinda weird and get uppity about being linked to a forum thread as opposed to a FAQ/Errata/Correction & Clarifications page. Dunno why, I seem to remember atleast seeing one post by someone more or less saying they don't listen to developers forum posts, if they are going to get official answers they best be in the form of an errata file or FAQ page.
I dunno man, people are weird. Anyway glad to hear we will eventually get a FAQ page.
And Andrew, that is good to hear. We don't want one-shot rockets in our Hero Lab.