Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Tourist

randomwalker's page

Goblin Squad Member. 789 posts (995 including aliases). No reviews. No lists. No wishlists. 1 alias.


1 to 50 of 152 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | next > last >>
Goblin Squad Member

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Posting and settlements aside, Kadere is a hot beefcake. Those dreamy eyes, that smile that gives butterflies in my stomach - and beyond. The shirt is a little scruffy, so there's another reason to take it off, hmm?

Wait, what do you mean judged by the collective... umm.. gotta go!

Spoiler:
My main takes no reponsibility for what this alt does in her spare time. Also, I already have an invite.

Goblin Squad Member

3 people marked this as a favorite.
KarlBob wrote:
What do robot cows like? Electronic hay?

Haywire!

Goblin Squad Member

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Ryan Dancey wrote:


There's a corner case [....] "Dear customer service, we keep finding people in nearby hexes strip mining and they're all aligned with NPC settlements and we can't get rid of them without taking Rep and Alignment hits, please make them stop."

But... that only works if the company actually listens to the players, and everybody knows tha... oh, right. This is Goblinworks - talking to them is actually very likely to work.

To paraphrase (with great artistic liberty): We don't believe this will be an actual problem. If so happens, we'll deal with it.

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Lam wrote:
I have vague memories (or not given my age), but Nihimon for the actual reference! Or sometimes KC.

I find the problem isn't so much remembering stuff that was stated by devs, as forgetting all that was speculated by forumites and avoiding mixing them up.

so.. why did Buurz marry that fish again?

Goblin Squad Member

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Black Silver of The Veiled, T7V wrote:
ugh... someone in Alpha has already started 'Griefing' activity. Shame on you. Hope you get it out of your system before EE starts if not, I hope the 'Ban Hammer' hits you repeatedly.

From a different angle: GW prioritized these changes to the game in this extremely hectic period because of one single griefer.

Whether the griefing was an "experiment" or not, the response from GW is encouraging.

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Democracy doesn't have to be absolute democracy nor direct democracy. Bascially (according to Popper and myself) it simply means that leadership is accountable to the people and can be controlled/replaced by them without needing to change the system (as opposed to a dictatorship/tyranny, where revolution is needed).

Democracy by representation is good enough for reality, and the government/administration/board/council can be fully accountable without everyone meddling in day-to-day affairs.

One feasible way of organizing a functional 'democracy' is by means of electing representatives for various committes and/or a centralized government. In practice, settlements and guilds will be divided into subgroups anyway which make logical units.

Mechanically, it is not possible to enforce unless GW give mechanisms that allow transfer of power (formal guild/settlement leadership) without the consent of the current holder. This was previously discussed in the context of settlement leaders going AWOL and crippling the settlement, so I'm sure there have been some thinking around the issue. On the other hand, if you need to enforce democracy it isn't a very good democracy in the first place.

My best solution: find a leader you trust, and talk to him/her as needed. (If large organization: make a hierarcy of such leaders).

Goblin Squad Member

2 people marked this as a favorite.

remember: Government is evil, business is evil, military conquest is evil and money is the root of all evil.
= If you are playing to win, Lawful Evil is the way to go!

..and for many of us on the other side, we much prefer the "bad guys" to be in organized, properly labeled evil empires that can be occasionally negotiated with.

You should not be ashamed of the label. It's basically a fair warning to the world saying "We play to win, even if it means you lose".

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Why not just put a hit% penalty for moving/running? Let people choose Miss-and-run tactics if they want.

Cirolle wrote:
Am I the only one that gets a mental picture of the whole UNC popping up in their underwear, with bows, renaming themselves the UDC?

until you mentioned it, yes. But not any longer.

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Being wrote:
Kadere wrote:

Co-operation at an entire community scale is infeasible.

Cooperation at the community scale is what a community IS.

It's not even about the whole community, it's about only 33 settlement leaderships only the handful of settlements who are actually in a position to dominate their neighbours early on.

(politically totally uncorrect comparison: it's like the european great powers in 1600-1700s competing for colonies overseas instead of trying to conquer others homelands).

Goblin Squad Member

2 people marked this as a favorite.

the gist of Proxima's post is:

-capturing Beta/Gamma/Omega towers is playing the tower war. Your motivation is interpreted as simply seeking legitimate benefit for yourself.
-capturing Alpha towers is/feels personal. Your motivation is interpreted as aiming to inflict harm on that specific group.

Hamstringing a smaller settlement simply because they have fewer EE members online than you is ...ungentlemanly. Doing so when there are Beta towers ripe for plucking is a clear sign that you don't care and respect them enough to make even a small sacrifice. Doing it when you already have enough towers for all your training needs is a neutral-lose scenario which seems motivated by the joy of making others suffer (aka sadism).

Goblin Squad Member

5 people marked this as a favorite.
Brutus Bellator wrote:


Daaang!
I want a War of the Taverns so badly now!

..and that's how threads turn into tavern brawls.

marketing PFO as a Tavern Defense MMO might be better than Tower Defense MMO though.

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Mounts, roads, move buffs: yes!!
Teleport: only is costs/limitations match the benefits (for settlements, not just privates).

The point against is that meeting RL friends in-game becomes cumbersome. But since this isn't a theme park there is no driving force for players to change regions as they level up, so once you get those friends down to Brighth your settlement, there's little reason why they shouldn't use that as home base too. (And if best friends just have to play pala and necro, well, I'm sure you can find a nice workaround if you look.

Pirates of the Burning Sea (disclaimer: last played 5 years ago) had no teleport and crossing the map was maybe a 15 minute affair. Add in (player and npc) pirates, 3-way faction warfare and sieges (ports changing allegiance) and the economy became interesting - and not unlike what i expect PFO to be. I could make money hauling cheap bulk goods across the map (at least when the pvp fleets were elsewhere), or I could make piles of money from outfitting warships just before (or after) a critical port battle. Fast (or even safe) travels would have completely ruined that game, and I think PFO might be similar.
Hearing the Devs input here gives cause for continued optimism.

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Kobold Cleaver wrote:
Caldeathe Baequiannia wrote:
Kobold Cleaver wrote:
This topic is so hot, even the colors can start fires.
Colours.

*Slap*

We are in the New World now, so please, for god's sake, speak! AMERICAN!

I'm with Caldeathe on this one. Just because you can't spell doesn't make it a separate language.

In other european news, how about we just rename the "doubly red" Roseblood to "Red Pact" and use a hammer and sickle to symbolize our extension from mountains to croplands (and maybe toss in a star to make TSV astrologers happy)? That should clear up any colour issue.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Smarnil actually knows what he's talking about. Gas stations wouldn't be crowded when you no longer need them. If you are on a long-distance road trip, you'll want to find a diner or mall with a power outlet, though, until fast-charging infrastructure becomes more common).

In Norway (my country), plug-in cars now are more than 10% of total new car sales, and growing faster than ever. Interestingly, the growth is largest in the 'oil cities', though maybe that is the Tesla being a status symbol (and politically correct too).
The first fully electric ferry is also starting up this year, since charging tech now has reached the point where it can be charged wirelessly (induction) during loading/unloading.

To the original topic: Tesla granting free patent use is a very good thing that suggests Tesla is concerned with competing against fossil cars, not against other electric cars. Getting more total plug-in cars on the road drives infrastructure and attitude changes which ultimately will help Tesla. And hopefully the environment.

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.
cipher_nemo wrote:
...but have absolutely no time to play a sandbox MMO competitively within a company/settlement.

but you don't have to!

Think of it this way: you will want to live somewhere, and there will be a lot of settlements (so far: all of them) that want you to choose them. Many will not require a single thing in return except maintaining a minimum reputation (they still benefit if you work in a building, trade in the market, do stuff that generates influence, etc), most will expect you to help defend your home when you are online, some will demand more.

The clear indication from GW is that filling up your settlement (and army) with basically anyone you can get, will be a good strategy. Much like a tug-of-war with no limit on team size. So expect to stay in demand unless you are known to be a bad egg. Even if your settlement is burned down, there will surely be other settlements welcoming the refugees with open arms (especially characters who have clocked xp since the beggining).

Bottom line: don't expect to not be able to 'play the game' or not be in demand because you have a life (lots of us do!) The game is still for you.

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Simple forum rules that I occasionally adhere to. (Also possibly applicable in politics).

- A bad idea is a bad idea because of reasons, not because of who presents them. A good idea is a good idea because of reasons, not because of who presents them.

- People want different things. What is a good idea to me may be a bad idea to you, even if we agree on what the consequences will be.
- Sometimes we try to achieve good things by doing the completely wrong things. What seems a good idea to you may seem a bad idea to me, even if we agree on the goal.
- Sometimes (such as saturday nights) ideas are just poorly formulated and easily misunderstood. Sometimes ideas are just complicated (or in a complex context) and easily misunderstood.

- presenting ideas you think are bad does not imply that posters are evil, trying to undermine the community or 'ruining' the game we are all so excited about.

Goblin Squad Member

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Bonny Paz wrote:
I don't know about underwear lol

you're not familiar with the concept of undergarnments? That's ...interesting.

(and has absolutely nothing to do with my avatar using binoculars)

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Roughshod wrote:


How does alignment factor into this?
I've never played D&D so I am only passingly familiar with alignment. I read the blog (https://goblinworks.com/blog/alignment-and-reputation/) and googled Neutral Good as well as a few others. Neutral Good (NG) seems like a pretty good fit for me, so TEO and their settlement Brighthaven...

I suspect in reality, what matters after a year is "Us vs Them", not nominal alignment. Two LG settlement could easily wage war for control of an important PoI, or a CN settlement could ally with a LN one.

However, there is a very interesting element of self-selection: Would you rather be on the side of those saying "screw alignment, it's meaningless, let's just game the system and build the best settlement" or those saying "we want to be labeled as a shining beacon(*) of good, even if we have to jump some extra hoops".
(FYI, the answer to that question is self-evident to many, although they may disagree on what the obvious answer is).

(*) beacon, not bacon. Shining bacon of goodness is something else.

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.
TEO Urman wrote:
We do have a number of German members. Any French or British members?

Scandinavian, but can easily pretend to be a brit if needed.

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Thod wrote:


So if turnout at something as important (or unimportant) as European Parliament is at 13-50% then this gives us a bracket from 10-50% for PF (it seems the offial number across all of Europe is 43%).

I disagree with your assumptions here, and would expect a higher (50-70+)% turnout.

The turnout rate among voters who are actually members of a party are significantly higher, I would guess 90%+. IMO this should suggest that the LR2 voting rate for anyone associated with a guild should be quite high. And there is a clear incentive for guilds to recruit very actively during the LR2 period.

There are also other mechanisms that suggests higher turnout rates than in political elections: small constituency, internet voting, issue that directly affects voters/voting for yourself, and tangible benefit in moving up the ranks whether you are near top or bottom. I also think it increases last-minute turnouts that you can see (roughly) how many votes are needed to make a difference in the next count.

Finally, I predict that there are a lot of KS backers who will turn their attention back to the game once EE date in announced, so that I expect a push in the last few weeks.

EDIT: in other words, pretty much what Snorter said above

EDIT2: the Belgium thingie: well, they have both compulsory voting and the EU HQ.

Goblin Squad Member

2 people marked this as a favorite.

The interesting thing here isn't the loot you can gain from war, it's all the loot that's simply lost.

I'll be in the 4th party, a little further away, selling new consumables to the respawning players.

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Forencith wrote:
we do not have to throw rainbows and daisies at each other

Can we still throw prismatic rays and entagles?

(in a non-abusive and gentlemanly way, of course).

Goblin Squad Member

2 people marked this as a favorite.

I see a niche market here for 'training camp settlements':

Upon reaching the steps to T3, Paladins leave their settlements for a few months and travel to the mountain monastery of Petraathen to be initiated in the secrets of the order. Rogues and bards similarly slip away to the big city, clerics go on pilgrimages and wizards apply for a scholarship at Phaeros University. After a few months they return, smug and full of new secrets.

I'm sure we could see someone trying to run a chaotic mercenary settlement (Tortuga!) renting out training (and membership if needed) for barbarians and bandits.

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Nihimon wrote:
...I wanted to try to make the correction as public as possible.

woot?! You don't get enough attention by being right all the time, now you also want attention for being wrong?!

(or did i Random-fail and misunderstand the concept here?)

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Lee Hammock wrote:

And to give people some further information, here's what the hexes produce. Note Bulk materials are used in making settlement structures, not crafting items, and represent large quantities of goods. They will be difficult to transport long distances due to encumbrance, so you want them made nearby or guarded heavily(...)

So... Is my understanding correct that

1) every (active and growing) settlement will need a steady supply of bulk goods from all terrains
2) most settlements will have good access to goods from 1-2 terrains only
3) getting the rest from across the map will be cumbersome/slow/risky
4) elevation generally follow terrain, forcing much of the bulk transport trough the choke points

trade and logistics seems to be important. That's good news for traders. And bandits. And guards. And...

The only remaining question is whether a single water hex in the mountains can supply a quarter of the map with seafood (ie if a single hex of each type is enough to run a kingdom).

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Sadurian wrote:
Lifedragn wrote:
Bluddwolf wrote:
I'm just glad that when I kill a bear in the woods, it won't drop a +1 battle ax!
This bear wants to know why he can't keep his axe.
Because there are laws restricting people running about the place with a bear chopper.

You don't have the right to arm bears?

EDIT: we are talking bearded axes here, no?

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.

A high-pitched scream comes from somewhere on the 2nd floor. It is unclear if it is of terror, pain or pleasure.

Could it be connected to the comatosis epidemic? Is it the handler of goblin cutpurses discovering his loss? Is it a fan of Jordon? A would-be assassin who accidentally poisoned herself? Has the growing number of dark corners collapsed the geometry of space and shifted the tavern to the nine hells? Has Grickin, unnoticed, snuck upstairs to try to charm a lady? Or is it just a random scream for ambience (or foreshadowing)?

In any case, the barkeep doesn't even raise an eyebrow at the sound.

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Sadurian wrote:

The Pathfinder Wiki is a good place to read up on background material for the Golarion setting.

Pathfinder Wiki list of deities.

Just remember that the Online version might be slightly different in approach.

the quick reference there is particularly useful IMO.

For the PFO, at least for early days, we should expect one deity per alignment. This suggests that alignment (and not domains) is the main characteristic for PFO religions. It also suggests that there will be artwork (buildings, clothing) for each religion in non-trivial amounts.
Of course, RP'ers will choose any deity regardless of what's implemented in the game.

The list of "starting deities" hasn't been discussed (?) in a long time, and presumably a sufficient documented interest for a particular deity might influence the list. Iomedae, Gorum and Asmodeus are pretty obvious as the game will be much about territory warfare. Norgober (assassins) is also near certain. Gozreh is likely to push out Nethys (and Pharasma). Irori vs Adabar, Saerenrae vs Shelyn and Desna vs Cayden are less obvious.

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.

From a mechanics/coding point of view, the simplest way to deal with religious doctrine may be to code it as faction standing.

Ie. if you join a religious (or any other) faction, you get a standing. Doing 'good stuff' increases it, while 'bad stuff' decreases it.
Higher tiers of membership may have stricter codes of behaviour.

For example the church of Adabar may reward you for making money and building settlements, but punish you for criminal acts. The church of Gorum may reward you for winning feuds and wars, but your standing may decay with time forcing you to seek battle regularly.
For druids, in the absence of defined 'neutral' actions I could suggest that any action that shifts your alignment rating too fast or too far in the wrong direction may decrease your standing, while simply maintaining a TN active alignment may give a increase over time (ie alternating between great good and great evil won't work, but being a pacifist loner will).

The nice thing about such a system is that each faction can have different rules, factions are easily added and rules/rewards can easily be tuned.

(Though I dread the thought of ads like "crusade month: in all of april, slaying evil escalation bosses will earn double Iomedae influence")

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.
BrotherZael wrote:

@Nightdrifter

You are a boon to the community friend

I love how we can tell which one is the liberal sciences theory crafter type and which is the applied sciences theory tester. (....)

+1

Nightdrifter wrote:
Pretty much all the info I have ultimately comes from Stephen Cheney (a dev) in some way, so only fair he gets credit!

That's a very well formulated disclaimer!

Nightdrifter's conclusions are obviously only as good as his information (ie assumptions and hard data), and are strictly limited to the cases he models. However the underlying methods appear very sound (robust, even) and can easily accommodate new assumptions and data.
In short: Nightdrifter knows what he's doing and has given us a very good vantage point for discussing certain game aspects.

However (over)interpreting his data should be done with a bit of caution as there are plenty of explicit and implicit assumptions that affect the answers, the corner cases are often far apart, and it is not always clear if we are discussing potential outcomes, likely outcomes, the validity of model or assumptions, etc. etc.

The "10 v 1" discussion is a prime example here. If you ask Nightdrifter "in a duel, would you rather have higher tier equipment or a friend to help you?", you may get a different picture than with the current default question which is "will normally a T3 fighter beat two T2 fighters if they stand still and autoattack each other?"


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Alternate scenario:
A Neutral Good bard is suspected of theft. A paladin and 10 guards confront him, but before he kills them all with a surprise meteor strike scroll "because they threathened me". Evil act or not?

The OP main argument seems to be "because i'm stupid and violent, you should expect me to behave bad and therefore it's not evil".
Alternatively "if the murderer is a barbarian, then murder is not evil".

sorry, but no.

He was maybe brought up in a CE society and never learned right from wrong, but that doesn't make him 'neutral'. It does however mean that he doesn't care what the last letter of his alignment is. The only problem I see here is that the player for some reason doesn't want the character to be characterized as evil, and launches this discussion to absolve himself and blame the DM.

For the record, killing evil soldiers from an evil empire attacking innocents is evil. Arguably less evil than allowing them to continue, and the morally right to do. Saving the innocents is good, killing the attackers is evil, and the good act outweighs the evil one in this example - but it is still evil.

Goblin Squad Member

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Stephen Cheney wrote:
...And we love square roots over here, so they're pretty sharply curved.

The nice thing about square roots is that once you start thinking of them as exponents, it becomes easy to fine-tune them.

ie. if [x^(0.5)] is just a little bit too steep, try [x^(0.45)]

The general mechanics sound fair: in TT the crit confirmation chance = hit chance, but you only crit on the very highest attack rolls, so linking it to margin of success is good.

QUESTION: Will there be rogue talents allowing inflicting 'injury damage' on sneak attacks? What about assassins?

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Lifedragn wrote:
...The idea that our immortality could come with a karmic learning block...

simply: Karma?

Basically you are sacrificing to the creators of the world in order to improve your fate. Proper sacrifice will let you live long and prosper, but vile transgressions will earn smiting by the banhammer.

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Bluddwolf wrote:

On the issue of bringing our real world moal conventions / beliefs to an MMO, that I completely disagree with. I intentionally separate my character's actions from what I would do in real life. I separate your character from the person on the other side of the computer monitor.

If someone can not separate themselves from their characters, I'd venture the suggestion that they mat not be emotionally secure enough to play an MMORPG. I'm in no way directing this at any specific person, just making a general suggestion.

The only disagreement we have is where the boundary between game and player lies.

I prefer to err on the 'silk glove' side as I regard all interaction between characters simultaneously as a meta-interaction between players. (In tabletop gaming this is very clear and the meta-game is always more important than the game, in MMO I still tend to regard it as the same - the objective is for the players to have fun, character achievements is just a tool to achieve that).

I suppose, though, that in reality I will treat newbs and strangers with silk gloves but assume that members of certain settlement are 'emotionally secure' enough to enjoy being sabotaged.

DeciusBrutus wrote:
Bluffing in poker is not lying at all. It is making the statement "I wager this amount."

Bluffing in poker is done with the express intent to deceive and mislead others to your benefit. How is that conceptually different from lying? If your reply is to defining 'lie' as meaning strictly counter-factual statements, then you should possibly consider a career in politics or law.

EDIT: or marketing...

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Tyncale wrote:


(description of regional trait pack)
Quote:
You can choose a homeland somewhere in Golarion for your character. A Region Trait Pack provides one character with an achievement stating the country they hail from, a title, and a small bonus or special effect based on the country of origin selected when the pack is used. Select one region: Absalom, Andoran, Cheliax, Five King’s Mountain, Galt, Katapesh, Kyonin, Lands of the Linnorm Kings, Mwangi Expanse, Osirion, Qadira, Rahadoum, The Shackles, Taldor, Ustalav, and

now, I understand why Geb, Nex, Alkenstar, Numeria, Mammoth Lords, Medioganti etc. etc. are not on that list.

but.. Brevoy or Nirmathas please?

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Boojumbunn wrote:
What would people think if, when you hit the door to go into a shop, if your mount was put at a hitching post until you emerged?

Two simple mechanisms that could solve the issues:

1) prevent (tall) mounts to go through doors (or tight cave entrances, into deep water, up ladders, etc)

2) have stables give the mounts some sort of 'rested' buff (scaling with time stabled and quality of stables).

Goblin Squad Member

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Steelwing wrote:

I am sure it is merely coincidence but I cannot help noticing that there is a strong correlation between those "sheepdogs" arguing that low rep people should be consequence free pvp targets and those arguing that low rep people should be made to suck skills and gear wise by the mechanics. If I was a cynical man, which of course I am not, I might infer a thing or two from such a coincidence.

Indeed, you are not cynical but sarctastic.

'Coincidence' is strictly speaking a correct mathematical term, but this is not 'merely' coincidence but correlation. There are a lot of players who simply think low-rep behaviour should be a losing tactic in the long term. And we are willing to have asymmetric rules to make that happen.

Similarly, the people who think low-rep behaviour should be a viable/competitive playstyle have a similarly strong correlation in their arguments.

Goblin Squad Member

3 people marked this as a favorite.

The simplest form of black market is simply evading settlement tax by trading privately just outside the trading hall.

Smuggling will de facto be in the game, but trying to avoid bandits rather than customs officials.

The idea of goods to sabotage settlements is nice, and should be considered when they get around to implementing espionage/sabotage.

Goblin Squad Member

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Drakhan Valane wrote:


Actually, he said, "Also any crime committed to an exiled player in your territory does not generate corruption / unrest." I interpret that as being crimes AGAINST the trespasser, not crimes BY the trespasser.

The wording seems inaccurate. I believe his intention is that you can legally take actions against trespassers that would be crimes if done against anyone else. Murder would still raise unrest, but killing trespassers would not be murder.

@Steelwing

Quote:
The very first one I pointed out that NRDS is perfectly viable without these mechanics.

This is what I still don't see. You point out that other groups intend to go NRDS and jump to the conclusion that it therefore must be viable. Arguing that you can play NRDS regardless of mechanics is trivial, you may as well claim that pacifism is a viable choice.

Andius' implicit argumentation is that NBSI (in an isolated perspective) has intrinsic security benefit and every (rational) settlement would go NBSI unless NRDS offers rewards to balance the risks.

Another unspoken assumption is that NBSI/NRDS should be balanced because it would make the game more interesting for a wider range of players than an all-NBSI world. If meaningful interaction is the goal, making it rational to kill strangers by default seems like the poor game design.

Your argument comes across to me as wanting minimal rewards for NRDS because you already made your choice to play NBSI.

Goblin Squad Member

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Nihimon wrote:
AvenaOats wrote:
So, a Wizard, Rogue, Cleric, and Fighter walk into a bar...

Almost :)

LFG! (Looking for Group!) - A Fighter, a Wizard, a Rogue and a Cleric Walk into a Bar...

Yeah, what party would put the squishies first in the marching order and the tank last?

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Wow. Our vision of hideouts certainly differ.
Intially I understood hideouts as an object that you could use to disappear from the map (ie perceptive characters will find the hideout, but not you) and that gave you the ability to disrupt fast travel. Effectively like a sniper post.
The hideout should be cheap to build, easy to destroy but hard to find. My assumption was that hideouts would be anonymous and that anti-bandit patrols would almost always destroy hideouts immediately.

Then there were discussion whether hideouts should have inventory, which opened the possibility of hidden equipment caches. I still assumed these would be hidden and anonymous, so that anyone stumbling over a hidden cache could simply loot it. (The owner should have some right to defend it, but that's a different discussion).

Now people seem to be discussing upgradable secret underground complexes. Did I miss some dev information on this, or is it just speculation?

I just don't think hideouts should be the new player housing!

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Magically influenced weather obviously allows for all kinds of extreme conditions.
I'd love to see 'winter escalations' with yetis and white dragons where the entire hex gets a modifier (reduced movement, fire spells weaker, cold damage dot, etc), and where the arctic conditions spread to adjacent hexes unless stopped.

(I would not love to see santa as the final boss of the winter escalation cycle, though).


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Female Human Rogue 4

She amuses herself by making a little poem that she quitely mutters to herself

"There once was a wizard named Alk,
I thought he was just books and talk,
But give him a shovel
in dark spider-hovel:
at hard work he sure doesn't balk!
"

Goblin Squad Member

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Aeioun Plainsweed wrote:

Your delirious posts have made me see a different view. Thanks :)

Agree with this statement. While I tend not to agree with those views (at least not initially), it certainly does me good to try to understand them.

Short story: You've severely increased my expectation of being ganked, but somehow decreased my worry of being ganked.

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.

this post by Ryan Dancey is the best info I can recall on the topic.

Goblin Squad Member

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Andius wrote:


My only question is why would a settlement go CE over NE or CN. I'm sure there will be an answer for that though.

The obvious first answer is that they want to have both CN and NE member.

On a separate note, I chuckled at the idea of stealth-necromancers sneaking into NG territory and raising dead to cause unrest. (There should have been a pun here about un-restless dead, but it fizzled).


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Rogues do it in groups
Wizards do it by the book
Rangers do it outside
Shadowdancers do it in plain sight
Barbarians do it if they are in the mood

Necromancers do it... whoa, there's that line again.

Goblin Squad Member

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Lifedragn wrote:
...And while I believe chair sitting would be more favorable to my gameplay than darkland adventures or kenku characters (though less important than adding the additional core races)...

That makes two of us. Though sitting around a bonfire would rank much higher than in a chair for me.

Ryan etc:
The thing about sitting is versimillitude and being reminded of limitations. Chairs in the inns will constantly remind me of something obvious I cannot do. On the annoyance scale it is almost up with gentle slopes being impassable because the steepness hit the magic number.
The sandbox promise "you can do anything!" then becomes "...except a bunch of obvious things, infact you can only do the things the devs want you to".
A possible workaround might actually be not to put chairs in inns at all, but let us hang in bars instead of sitting in chairs. Having all those chairs for not sitting in is the annoying bit.

The thing about writing is all about putting your persistent mark on the world. Not everyone expects to build a settlement or be infamous on the server, but many want to contribute to the story of PFO and put their persistent mark on -something-. Doing that on blogs and forums isn't quite the same.

Social/custom clothing, biographies and furnished homes is about feeling unique. Slightly different motivation, and I feel more in line with Ryan's comment about themepark starving us of everything else.

The thing about pointless waste of time is that the whole game could be seen as such (certainly by my mother) - unless there is meaningful interaction. For social players, having a good talk with someone is a lot more memorable and meaningful than killing or being killed. In every MMO i've played, the mechanics and setting is what gets me in, but the people are what holds me. Although this is not the adrenaline-pumping interaction GW strives for, mechanics that promote social interactions must surely be a good thing for community building?

Also, guard and sentry duty -will- often be boring and tools to help pass the time would be great. (And stealthers would use the emote density as an indication of how distracted the guards are)


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Gedichtewicht wrote:
NineMoons wrote:
I'm so hungry, I could eat a Pegasus.
You really do look hungry, let me get you a full plate.

and thus the dinner party turned into an all-knighter.

Goblin Squad Member

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Tork Shaw wrote:

Just to chime in a little : the distinction between wizard/rogue/fighter/etc abilities is something we are being extremely careful with. (....)

Very reassuring.

The reminder/re-clarification on cantrips was also appreciated. You've persuaded me fighter won't feel like re-skinned wizard and that fighter/wizard will feel different from both of them.

1 to 50 of 152 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | next > last >>

©2002–2014 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.