Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ

rainzax's page

996 posts. No reviews. No lists. 1 wishlist.


RSS

1 to 50 of 996 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

a player of mine asked me after our sunday game if he could rebuild his urban ranger into a brave fighter (after seeing it).

i said "Yes!"

that means there is one Brave Fighter, one Cunning Rogue, and one Mystic Monk within the player group now...


greatly simplified!

the whole 'tiers of fame' as separate from 'prestige points' was an unnecessary distinction.

now players just get fame points (FP) for leveling and completing objectives, and can spend them on privileges.

Fame Points

I am going to give them the Leadership feat for free but at half leadership score - if they take the feat they get the full score. But, they must leverage their fame each time they want to recruit followers or cohorts per the rules above - they don't simply materialize out of thin plot.

your input appreciated!


1 person marked this as a favorite.

awesome concept, slightly more complicated than i like.

i think if you standardized the number of boons you'd keep the idea and shed half of the complexity. like:

Base DC 10, supports 6 people and/or horses, choose one boon per +5 you exceed the DC, each boon selectable up to twice

Bigger Camp: +2 campers supported (may be selected more than twice)
Protected Camp: +2 bonus to camper environmental Fortitude saves
Safety Zone: +2 bonus to camper Perception against enemy approach
Tactical Camp: +2 bonus to camper Initiative within camp parameter
Feeding Resources: campers do not expend food/water resources for 1 day
Camouflaged Camp: +2 bonus to camper Stealth checks, who may take 10
Improvised Infirmary: +2 bonus to camper Healing checks, who may take 10


mechanically not conceptually

hunger rounds?

a benefit from the idea is that in terms of uses per day it's situated between strictly limited and unlimited

also, as it centers the duration on you, the 'reaving' could be an ongoing effect that takes a standard/attack action to activate per foe and a free (concentration) action to maintain. which opens the door wider to having steady ongoing effects (like auras, HP drain, cumulative penalties, etc) as well as heavy blast effects.


adds his bravery bonus to leadership score


talking to people IRL can be pretty scary...


(necro)

Each Settlement has a score from -10 to +10 max in each category
Half of this number is used to modify skill checks
Each attribute affects one type of skill check

Settlement Modifiers (alternate)

Spoiler:

Corruption
modify social checks to Bribe city officials
Bluff, Diplomacy, Intimidate
not a fan of Stealth checks

Crime
modify DC to Pick Pockets and Avoid Detection
Sleight of Hand
high crime should make it harder not easier given supply/demand dynamics

Economy
modify Job checks to make money
Craft, Profession, Perform, Sleight of Hand
Sleight of Hand is a job skill after all

Law
modify checks to Call Guards (base DC 5, 1d6 minutes)
Diplomacy, Local
Knowledge Local can sub in here, put the Intimidate bit under Society

Lore
modify Research checks
Appraise, Heal, Knowledge, Linguistics, Spellcraft
all of the above are researchable 'knowledge' skills

Society
modify checks to Influence attitude of citizens
Bluff, Diplomacy, Intimidate
discarded the Disguise part


...

shorthand:

Corruption - Bribe
Crime - DC to Steal
Economy - Jobs
Law - Call Guards
Lore - Research
Society - Influence

cheers!


5) model rage. 4+CHA rounds per day + 2/lv. during which time reaver may make a number of reave attacks as allowable by BAB. damage 1d6 per odd + crit proc menu option (may select shaken, sicken, or fatigue) duration of reave-rage.


Ok. considering this for math simplicity among other things.

Weapon Training works as above. except take away the +1 att/dam option. must pick feats! want numbers/uninspired? choose WF and WS, GWF and GWS.

In it's place, we say any weapons that are currently weapon training weapons suffer no iterative attack penalties. so:

Spoiler:

Weapon Training BAB

+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6/+6
+7/+7
+8/+8
+9/+9
+10/+10
+11/+11/+11
+12/+12/+12
+13/+13/+13
+14/+14/+14
+15/+15/+15
+16/+16/+16/+16
+17/+17/+17/+17
+18/+18/+18/+18
+19/+19/+19/+19
+20/+20/+20/+20

my question is: does this have undesired consequences?
TWF?
high AC?
stuff like that.


Amanuensis wrote:
Since the feats require the use of a specific weapon, they are mutually exclusive (though, admittedly, for some feats it would be hard to justify that they only work with a specific weapon).

no small suggestion here. but. what if these feats worked for all weapons in the same weapon group (see Fighter) as the focus weapon, but worked even better for the focus weapon?

for example, the skill synergy concept could only be granted while using the focus weapon.


maybe a 1-pt Privilege could be to attempt a social check (Diplomacy, Bluff, Intimidate) to influence a (smaller) organization's attitude with respect to you (Hostile, Unfriendly, Indifferent, Friendly, Helpful) - after which, if you want to stay on good terms (Friendly or Helpful) you must spend 1 or 2 days a week on average fulfilling your end of the obligation, else you must make another check each week at cumulative +1 DC lest your relationship status slide one step towards Indifferent.

Naturally, if you are on certain terms with one organization, a rival organization may consider you on similar terms with them as default.

Also, you gain a faction bonus on social rolls.


i think this proposal single-handedly solves the fighter's feat versatility problems. whether or not you put in even minimal work consolidating feat trees in your game.

Weapon Training (version 2):

Spoiler:

Fighters train continuously. Once per day after a full nights rest, the fighter may subject himself to a 1 hour training regimen, wherein he trains additional weapon-dependent combat feats at the completion of his exercises. At 1st level he may choose one weapon group and one combat feat. Until he trains again, so long as he is using a weapon from that group, he is treated as having that feat, and if the feat usually only grants it’s benefits to a single weapon, it now grants it’s benefits to all weapons in the same group. Feats selected using this ability must have their prerequisites met using BAB from fighter levels only.

In lieu of making a feat selection, the fighter may simply choose to add +1 to hit and damage with weapons in his trained group. This bonus stacks with itself.

At 5th level, the fighter may similarly train a second weapon group, and may select two combat feats for his first group. At 9th level, he may choose a third group, two feats for his second group, and three feats for his first group. And so on every four fighter levels, until at 17th level the fighter may choose five groups each with one, two, three, four, or five associated feats. This is an extraordinary ability.


...

cheers


the basic idea is here

and though I am pretty unsatisfied with the implementation, i think the raw idea is really cool.
In my campaign, we level with the story (everybody levels at the same time at certain points in the story) - and so this restores a sort of 'xp' reward which i like!

what I want to keep:

-Starting Fame equal to character level + CHA
-Fame increases by +1 when you gain a new level
-Fame increases by +1 when your Charisma modifier increases from level-based ability increases
-Fame increases when you accomplish important deeds - doubled or trebled if done so in style!
-Prestige points are awarded each time your Fame increases - these may be 'spent' on Privileges
-Many of the Privileges in the book are spot on
-Higher Fame grants you access to cooler Privileges with which you may spend your Prestige

what I want to change:

-Fame tiers 10/20/30/40/50 let you spend Prestige on 1/2/3/4/5-pt Privileges respectively
-Privilege 'costs' standardized to fit within this schema
-Prestige points are not hero points, they are not feats. They are political 'get out of jail free' cards. No bonuses to skills checks, no learning spells (wtf!), no picking up class skills or features. Prestige points allow you to obtain Privileges.

ideas?/help?
cheers


'medium' is my floor.

I'm currently giving my players a character progression of +1 to all saves at even levels.
good saves get an additional +2 'class save bonus' based on class selection.
this leaves good save unchanged, brings up poor saves, and cuts (most) multiclass shenanigans.

also i changed the 'improved save' feats to give them a single menu option among three:

1) you may key a different stat if higher (ST=Fort, INT=Ref, CHA=Will)
2) take a +2 feat bonus to the save
3) re-roll a confirmed-failed save 1/day as immediate action per 4 character levels

the greater version of these feats grants all three


Vigor pool should come online at 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or 4th level (at latest), replacing nothing - just tack it on. this way, you could make it work with archetypes, and all material printed for the fighter thus far. then you don't have to remake the wheel - just add tires to it.

to me, as a DM, the 'point' is to make fighter an attractive option again amidst the 30 some odd pathfinder classes to choose from. do what you need to do.


fighter


WithoutHisFoot wrote:
I like your suggestion about inverting the point pool, but I had already chosen not to allow characters to store points because I was worried about someone saving up a dozen points and just doing the whole list. That kind of behavior should be discouraged, both for balance and for plausibility.

cap the pool. using an ability score (like Grit), 1/2 BAB, 1/2 ranks, or some other metric (expertise bonus, etc)

or cap spending (per round), similarly.

also, you could write the pre-rolling into the system using the immediate action. maybe.


a way to leave bonus feats as-is and still give the fighter some daily feat retraining!
also, bumped to 1st level, plus created the "paired" weapon group.

Weapon Training (alternate):

Spoiler:

Once per day after a full nights rest and 10 minutes of practice, a 1st level fighter may choose one weapon group (see below) and one combat feat he currently meets all prerequisites for. The fighter may use that feat while wielding a weapon from his selected group. This is a permanent change until the fighter chooses another weapon group and feat to train.

Upon reaching 5th level, the fighter may similarly train a second weapon group, and may choose up to two feats for his first weapon group. At 9th level, he may choose a third group, two feats for his second group, and three feats for his first group. And so on, until at 17th level the fighter may choose five groups each with one, two, three, four, or five associated feats. This is an extraordinary ability.

In lieu of making a feat selection, the fighter may simply choose to add +1 to hit and damage with weapons in his trained group. This bonus stacks with itself. He may also choose to leave one or more weapon group and/or feat slots 'open,' gaining no benefit until he takes 10 minutes to train the empty slot(s) at a later time.

Finally, there is a new weapon group described below:

Paired - the fighter chooses two different non-shield weapons and gains the associated benefits any time he is using both weapons at the same time, but not individually. Two weapon fighting penalties apply normally. (Example: Valeros chooses paired (longsword and shortsword) and picks up a longsword and shortsword. He gains a +1 bonus to attack and damage while fighting with these two weapons. If his opponent disarms his longsword, he gains no benefit from his weapon training ability until he picks it up again.)

>>copy/paste weapon groups here<<

01- Bonus Feats, Weapon Training I
02- Bonus Feat, Bravery +1
03- Armor Training I
04- Bonus Feat
05- Weapon Training II
06- Bonus Feat, Bravery +2
07- Armor Training
08- Bonus Feat
09- Weapon Training III
10- Bonus Feat, Bravery +3

(doesn't this just look right?)


damn these are cool. i like how you delve into the whole feat system before supplementing with your techniques. it's just good design.

can't wait until you create a google-doc so i can tell my players "and you can use any of these >click here<"...

what are the rules for techniques? do they 'activate' as an action or just the moment you pick up the specified weapon? can you use two at a time? you want to be explicit here.

ideas (take or leave):

Whirling Fans - bonus to combat-Performance checks

Saber - +2 subdual damage per feat when using saber 'punch' no -4 penalty

Hooked Axe - possess all feats, when you demoralize you also frighten for 1 round plus normal effect. (not a fan of take 10 for these feats)

Tiger Claw - provided you have sufficient AoO, you make two attacks per opportunity provided the first one hits


Ciaran Barnes wrote:

Charmer (Ex):

I would use "creature" instead of "non-player character". Player characters already can't be affected by Charisma skills.
Combat Trick:
The sentence "She may select this talent up to once every fifth rogue level" doesn't work. How about "She may select this talent once for every five rogue levels she has."

Deadly Range (Ex):
I still don't like the term point blank range, but moving on... I would drop the swift action part. Increasing the distance at which SA works is pretty useful (if you can manage to get off a ranged SA). However, the swift action part seems kind of silly considering how few swift uses for swift actions she has available to her. Its a non-issue to spend a swift action.

What I suggest is:
The rogue's ranged attacks can count as sneak attacks if her target is within 45 feet, instead of only 30 feet. If the rogue possess the Point Blank Shot feat, she similarly gains it's benefits at ranges up to 45 feet.

Then you add an advanced talent that increases the ranges up to 60 feet.

Deft Palm (Ex):
You'll need to spell this out with more detail, because Slight of Hand doesn't include a feint usage. Copy and paste some of the language used in Bluff, and modify it to fit the talent.

Esoteric Scholar (Ex):
This is basically copying a bard class feature, right? IMHO its too much.

Evasion (Ex):
This is already a class feature, and you don't have archetypes. What gives?
Expert Leaper (Ex):
What is the DC of increasing the distance she can safely fall? If the DC doesn't increase, there doesn't seem to be a need to increase her Acrobatics skill.

Fast Getaway (Ex):
After successfully making a sneak attack or Sleight of Hand check, a rogue with this talent can spend a move action to take the withdraw action. She also gains the Run feat.

Fast Tumble (Ex):
When a rogue with this talent uses Acrobatics to move at greater than half her speed through a threatened square without provoking an attack of opportunity, the DC of the check does not increase by 10 unless she is running.

Honeyed Words (Ex):
Use "creature" in place of "non-player character". Player characters are already immune to charisma skills.

Nimble Climber (Ex):
Does the rogue need any talent for climbing before gaining a climb speed?
Peerless Maneuver (Ex):
She can target the opponent with a sneak attack? You'll have to be more clear, such as "she can apply her sneak attack damage to the first successful attack she makes against that enemy or before her next turn."

Snap Shot (Ex):
The ban on using a certain action on her turn feels funny. Perhaps "A rogue with this talent can make a ranged attack as an immediate action during a surprise round, if she is capable of acting during the surprise round." A rogue with a weapon already in hand can make the attack before her turn, while a rogue with quick draw can draw and throw on her surprise round turn.

Stand Up (Ex):
Swift action would be better.

Strong Stroke (Ex):
Does the rogue need any talent for swimming before gaining a swim speed?

Swift Poison (Ex):
There is no need to mention that it is player's choice which action to use. By including words like can or may, you have already given the player that choice.

Trapfinding (Ex):
This is already a class feature.

Weapon Training:
This seems like a huge gains. Normally the only way to gain this is by multi classing. What is the talent gave the Weapon Proficiency and Weapon Focus feats? Or if it granted proficiency with all martial weapons in a fighter's weapon group?

Charmer, Deft Palm, Fast Getaway, Fast Tumble, Honeyed Words, Peerless Maneuver, Swift Poison - fixed per your suggestions.

Deadly Range - how about +10 (=40), +10 every fifth? i think overall though the rogue's swift options have expanded in my improvements. i'm tempted to keep it.

Esoteric Scholar - why bard not rogue? tell me. uses a precious talent.

Evasion, Trafinding - this rogue is fully compatible with all archetypes (including ninja...)

Expert Leaper - good point. tied directly to the scaling skill DC now. went with +10 feet per +5 DC. so, slower than Slow Fall in theory.

Fast Getaway - took away Run. added swift +10 speed for 1 minute then fatigued 10 minutes. how can a talent called 'fast getaway' not be used for chase scenes? you think the drawback is fair? like the rogue smokes too much...

Nimble Climber, Strong Stroke - i want to keep these single talents. so now it's take 10 and move half your speed. very similar.

Snap Shot - made it an immediate action, clarified drawing, and protected against a triple sneak attack. different eh?

Stand Up - why swift over free? how about 1/round free as a compromise?

Weapon Training - it is a huge gain. but it keeps the rogue loyal. some rogues will pump ST and run around with a greatsword or a bunch of shuriken. that's cool with me. let's let 'em splash monk or fighter without straying from the class. Anybody can get weapon focus that's not special.

changes implemented here.
cheers!


With nigh 30 base classes available in the pathfinder system, I have observed the slow waning in efficacy of the 3 core non-spellcasting classes, eclipsed by the flexibility and power of the new classes (as well as expansion of spell lists for all casting classes). The changes below are an attempt to keep the original feel of these core classes intact while provisioning additional design space to realize a wider range and stronger delivery of concept.

in a nutshell the 'problems' as i see it:

Fighter
-poor saves
-no special shtick
-skill potential lacking
-few/lackluster class features
-high system mastery required

Rogue
-no special shtick
-skill potential lacking
-few/lackluster class features (especially rogue talents)
-trouble hitting in combat
-high system mastery required

Monk
-no special shtick
-skill potential lacking
-low synergy class features
-trouble hitting in combat
-high system mastery required

my fixes:


...

feel free to steal; i did!
my campaign starts sunday. two of my PCs are using my new classes. will report here periodically.
cheers!


evil class!

don't do shaken. do sickened. stacks later to nauseated.

save shaken for a fear aura effect that is a function of #points.

consider making reave finite (use rage rounds per day?). when he steals someone's essence, he latches on in a battle of wills like a mental grapple. target is sickened while 'grappled' - this helps allies. while target is 'pinned' they suffer a bleed effect, reaver gains fast healing.

later effects increase the danger of being 'grappled' or 'pinned'


compromise.

Indefatigability Pool!

...

agreed on feat flexibility being priority one. maybe he can freely retrain his 4/8/12/16/20 bonus feats upon resting and replenishing his pool. or pay 1 point as a standard action to retrain one in a pinch?

or something.


no i dig it. i'm saying the damage factor could still be thought of as channeling natural energies. Fast Decaying 2 or whatever.


negative channelling could just be fast healing for microbial life - inflicting disease damage on forms of life size fine or larger.


alignment is one big waxball of philosophy. two poles, five colors, no different. the subjective component is huge.

that said, how about this: keep (or change?) your flavors. then assign them to two (or more?) positions.

(example)
position one: how do you handle conflict?
position two: what is your role in a group dynamic?

this way Green-Black is different than Black-Green, etc.

just an idea. someone will likely interject with a monologue about personal freedoms. comes with the territory. cheers!


ok.
so as my move action, i roll tactics and then instantly apply the benefits.
at worst, i settle for a (clearable) +4 AC, maybe i get to force-move my opponent's position, but hopefully i get to take a 15-foot step or target flat AC.

kind of neat.

later, as a swift action, in addition to the options above, at worst i get to take a second 5-step, maybe i get to do a fast or tricky charge, but hopefully i get a free dirty trick.

...

though i like the idea, i share your concern about it being a skill-feat tax, even given your skill boost to fighters and athletic consolidations, because, one can never have enough skills and feats, especially the fighter.

also, i am concerned that adding a new tactics roll every round can slow down play.

to the first concern:
question: what role does Combat Expertise play in your game? have you altered it's base function in some way? (this is a common house rule).
because, the colors match (ie this kind of mechanic makes sense as a form of 'combat expertise'), and CE is already baked into the game in other ways.
this is the general route.
the specific route is to just give this ability outright to the fighter as a class feature. you could also do both.

to the second concern:
consider inverting the conventional pool mechanics.
like, say your Tactical Assessment Pool starts with 0 points, you take actions to fill it with points, and those points remain until spent or the battle is over. (if you like more concrete durations set it at 1 minute).
then, instead of rolling every round for points, some rounds you roll, some rounds you just jam. plus, this gives you something to do while the flying creatures or archers or whatever is out of reach.

dunno if that helps.


(i'm going to pretend haste isn't a 2nd level spell...)


White - Good (NG)
Black - Evil (NE)
Green - Neutral (TN)
Blue - Lawful (LN)
Red - Chaotic (CN)

?


i see it as an error in core. to me, if it ain't prepared, it ain't INT. btw i value flexibility in rogue choosing her 'special stuff' stat among all the mental ability scores.

taking feedbacks into consideration, how about:

Magic Rogue Talents (version 2):

Spoiler:

Minor Magic (Sp)
The rogue chooses one spell from the list of any casting class (rogue's choice) of up to 1st level which she may cast as a spell-like ability a number of times per day equal to her Charisma modifier (minimum 0). If she chooses a cantrip (or orison), she may cast it at will instead. The rogue must have a minimum Charisma of 10 to take this talent.

Major Magic (Sp)
The rogue chooses another spell from the same list, this time of up to 2nd level, to add to her repertoire. If she chooses a 2nd level spell, it consumes two of her uses per day in casting. The rogue must have the minor magic talent before selecting major magic.

...

better?


the originals, as written, create for me three junctures of disappointment.

1) "man i gotta waste two talents just to get one 1st level spell!"
2) "man the cantrip isn't even at-will!"
3) "man even if i do invest in this i can't ever get a 2nd level spell!"

so, as i've proposed greater access, i had to take something back. hence the trade-offs 'from the same pool' and 'half caster level'.

i think CHA is way more appropriate than INT for a spell-like ability, casting more like a sorcerer than a wizard. the fact that the DCs build off the stat mentioned is implied. maybe i assume too much? i could see an Alchemy/Extracts version as INT though...


Elghinn Lightbringer,
aside from the rewriting all feat trees part, i like your 1/4/8/12/16/20 prepared and 2/6/10/14/18 spontaneous idea. have you seen this bloke's techniques?

Aelryinth,
to clarify, i am open to the fighter obeying prerequisites for combat feats if and only if they are used in conjunction with some kind of prepared/spontaneous feat retraining ability. in fact, i think that either without the other is 'wrong' (an admittedly subjective term).


on feat prerequisites and retraining:

i like the two ideas together. prerequisites are a restriction, retraining is a relaxation - using them together enables structured wriggle-room. a fighter's 'build' would be dictated by his ability scores - and by 'build' i mean 'access' to any feat in any book that has ability score prerequisites. if it's used in the "1/day after a full night's rest and 1 hour preparation" fashion it closely resembles the Cleric's ability to prepare spells.

also, at every 4th level the fighter can already permanently retrain a feat. the decision between whether a feat ought to be permanent or retrainable is a matter of frequency of usage. some feats might be useful every fight - these are your permanents. others have a highly situational use - these are your retrainables.

what we are working against here is the user-friendliness of the fighter. they are supposed to be the easiest class to play. i think a fair trade-off between applicability and flexibility is to introduce daily retraining later in the fighter's career. that way, they are pretty straight-forward to play right out of the gates for a few levels, allowing the player to get a feel for the character, then we introduce options and complexity later.

my 2 cp.


i propose rogue because it'd otherwise be the only spell-less technique-less class under your system

what if instead 5-foot-steppin' was a move action? then, the archer at best could get a single shot, and the wizard would have to choose between safety and metamagic/full-round spells?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

also, as the general parry+riposte/redirect mechanic may be a recurring theme for your styles/techniques (this is a popular theme indeed), i would consider looking at all of them first, and use the knowledge of what's out there to inform your creation process. for example, if you add a new parry+riposte/redirect, in addition to basing it on a new skill (a cosmetic change), i would allow the mechanic to trigger under differentiated circumstances - for example, the positioning of the martial artist relative to the opponent(s)/terrain/ally(s) involved.

flag: beware your combats being mostly people acting on other people's turns. ha ha.

finally, i would make a hard choice between style and technique. either keep both the name and basic mechanics of 'style,' or, forge ahead with a new name and new mechanics. if you do the latter, consider making a master of many techniques rogue and/or fighter archetype!


so, if i'm a level 2 fighter with two techniques, do i get 2 feats or 4? ie is it 1/level or 1/level/technique?

regarding the 5-foot step: is 'because it makes casting safer" the only reason you 'removed' them?

also, if you don't want to create an entire new list of techniques, you could just let the aforementioned rogue talents each 'dip' a single technique from any list.


in my game, most of my changes facilitate easier optimization. i see it like this: YOIO = you optimize, I optimize! bear in mind that my players only get one character, where I get as many as the story needs. if one of my players shows up with min/maxed stats and traits/archetypes/feats/spells/etc from a bunch of different books, i see it as a challenge. that said, if that player (or any player) turns out to be a ball-hog, he gets the boot. fun is #1 - and it's my job to maximize whole-group fun by any means necessary.

one tip: be a part of the character creation process if possible, maybe suggest powerful combinations based off their concept if they are open to that. then you get an advance look at what's comin' at you and can turn around and use that knowledge to challenge them in return.

but enough meta-chat. in particular i'm looking forward to trying out this new house rule:

Casting Defensively DC 10 + highest BAB of among threatening foes + 2 per additional foe + twice spell level


Healing is trained-only, except for First Aid

functions include:
Autopsy (cause of death) - DC 20 +1 per day decomposed, 1 minute check
Knowledge (Anatomy)

are you using Injury/Strain rules?
These are my rules to stop infection (Filth Fever)
if the Injury damage is less than half total HP, you can use Treat Wounds (DC 15, 10 minutes)
if the Injury damage is more than that, you must Treat Deadly Wounds (DC 20, 1 hour)
magic healing automatically deals with this.
absent these, I roll onset times (1d3 days) and take it from there.

...

(ninja steal Cyriad's idea)

combining Treat Wounds or Treat Deadly Wounds with magical healing (spell, potion, wand) allows the Healer to substitute their ranks for caster level, and taking 20 on this check lets them maximize the dice

what do you think?


fair enough

my goal here is not really to model the realism of aiming (despite the title) except inasfar as it facilitates a 'free' but also 'investable' mechanic that helps a ranged rogue get more use out of sneak attack


if you ever got a look at me you would immediately realize that i do not look smart. that is, if you don't turn to stone first!

i am parked somewhere in between a quick-n-dirty fix and something of the magnitude preluded to here.

my only argument against using the Resolve mechanic is that what happens then if your players choose both a Resolved Fighter and a Samurai. it's better for compatibility if the fighter's new abilities are all original and still interact well with the other classes.

a similar argument could be made for Solo Tactics, for example. or Martial Maneuvers. or Combat Style. from a certain point of view these all 'belong' on the core fighter, not the inquisitor/brawler/ranger what-have-you.

that said, i definitely think Endurance at 3rd for the fighter is spot on...


my bad

i want to leave CMB out (even BAB+WIS)

also want to avoid touch attacks

RedDogMT, why a move action and not a standard? seems kind of unfair. do you cap it at 30 feet and have it provoke?

thinking about throwing concentration in there - probably too complicated to port over from spellcasting though...

the main reason is to facilitate sneak attack and utilize the "dodge this" meme to take away from the dominance of the Dexterity ability score in general.


Gulian,
that is the quick-n-dirty fix for the fighter, in addition to good will saves and 4 skill points per level and sharing in samurai's class skills.

Aelryinth is searching for a more comprehensive fix.


at first glance yes.

the ability is limited to once per foe per day per exploitation (got that?) - the strategic decision is between choosing to 'blow' the ability to augment an already confirmed sneak attack or to create a new sneak attack, and so is a choice between 'wasting' the attempt on burst damage (statistically an additional +2.5 damage per SA die immediately) and utilizing the extra SA to exercise additional battlefield control (via strike talents) and/or squeeze even more damage out of the ability overall (statistically +1 damage per SA dice by comparison) by holding off one or more rounds. essentially, if you don't actually drop the foe choosing the maximize option, it is strategically inferior to creating a second sneak attack opportunity. i consider this tactical crossroad an intentional feature. what more, for those who omit doing the math, both options are pretty darn good.

both have their uses. and besides, to even be at that decision crossroad, the stars have to align. (ie meeting both standard SA and exploitation SA qualifications simultaneously).


modeled after Feint - a short range counterpart

Aim (new):

Spoiler:

Aiming is a standard action. To Aim, make a Perception skill check against a target within your point blank range (usually 30 feet). The DC of this check is equal to your opponent's CMD. If your opponent is trained in Acrobatics, the DC is instead equal to 10 + your opponent's Acrobatics bonus, if higher. If successful, the next ranged attack you make against the target does not allow him to use his Dexterity bonus to AC (if any). This attack must be made on or before your next turn. If you move before you make this next attack, you lose these benefits.

When aiming for a creature of a different size category than you, you take a +4 bonus to your Perception check for each size category he is larger than you, or a -4 for each size category he is smaller than you. If your target has cover, you take his cover bonus as a penalty to your Perception check. You cannot aim for a creature that benefits from concealment. Aiming in combat provokes an attack of opportunity.

New Aim Feats

Spoiler:

Improved Aim (combat feat)
You are skilled at hitting your opponent in point blank range
Prerequisites: Dex 13, Point Blank Shot
Benefit: You can make a Perception check to aim in combat as a move action.
Normal: Aiming in combat is a standard action.

Greater Aim (combat feat)
You are skilled at holding your aim even while you move
Prerequisites: Dex 13, Point Blank Shot, Improved Aim, base attack bonus +6
Benefit: Whenever you use aim to cause an opponent to lose his Dexterity bonus, you may move before you make your next attack without ruining your aim.
Normal: Moving after aiming but before making the attack spoils the attempt.


...

this should go in the "Little love for Rogues" thread...

unless anyone has strong reservations, i'm going to loose this on my players.


i have seen several renditions of these talents. here are mine.

Magic Rogue Talents (revised):

Spoiler:

Minor Magic (Sp)
The rogue chooses one 1st-level spell from the sorcerer/wizard list which she may cast as a spell-like ability a number of times per day equal to her Charisma modifier (minimum 0) using half her rogue level as her caster level.

Major Magic (Sp)
The rogue chooses another spell from the sorcerer/wizard list of up to 2nd level. If she chooses a cantrip, it may be cast at will. Otherwise it draws from the same uses per day, with a 2nd level spell consuming twice as many per casting. The rogue must have the minor magic talent before selecting major magic.


...

wanted to keep it at two.
and thus, simple but effective.
half caster level keeps attack spells in check.
thoughts?


thought of something.

Repeat Offender (new feat):

Spoiler:

Prerequisites: Exploitation, Sneak Attack +3d6
Benefit: Choose one of your exploitations. You develop a special knack for that exploitation, and may use it once per round against the same foe, instead of once per day.
Special: This feat may be selected multiple times, each time applying to a different exploitation.

plus i trimmed more words, as the whole action/creature type thing seemed too forced.
she's lookin' pretty mean now.

Exploitation (version 5.5):

Spoiler:

Rogues brutally exploit vulnerability. A 5th level rogue chooses one Exploitation (below), and another every four rogue levels thereafter (at 9th, 13, and 17th). The rogue has only to hit a creature that is suffering from a listed condition or status effect to exploit him. As a swift action, the rogue applies her sneak attack dice to the damage roll - if the attack is already a sneak attack, she maximizes the dice instead. Each exploitation is usable against the same victim only once per 24 hours.

Charmed Exploitation (charm or compulsion effect)
Confusion Exploitation (confused or fascinated)
Curse Exploitation (curse effect)
Fatigue Exploitation (exhausted or fatigued)
Fear Exploitation (frightened, panicked, or shaken)
Nausea Exploitation (nauseated or sickened)
Pain Exploitation (bleed or pain effect)
Prone Exploitation (prone)
Restraint Exploitation (entangled, grappled, or pinned)
Sensory Exploitation (blinded, dazzled, or deafened)
Shock Exploitation (dazed, staggered, or stunned)
Slow Exploitation (reduced speed or slowed)


...

still lookin' fer other ideas.
cheers.


awkward targeting mechanics removed
interactivity with 'regular' sneak attack expanded
classification broadened in include SA-immune types
the synergy to make a 'build' out of these is encouraged

Exploitation (version 5):

Spoiler:

Rogues brutally exploit vulnerability. A 5th level rogue chooses one Exploitation (below), and another every four rogue levels thereafter (at 9th, 13, and 17th). Each one details the vulnerability the rogue is exploiting, and each is usable against a vulnerable foe once per 24 hours. Exploiting her foe is as simple as succeeding on an attack roll. As a swift action, the rogue simply applies her sneak attack dice to a damage roll - if the attack is already a sneak attack, she maximizes the dice instead. Most exploitations are usable against a foe who is suffering from a condition or status effect. Others are usable against a creature type that is ordinarily immune to precision damage, or against a foe performing a specific action in combat. The latter case requires the rogue to ready an attack action against her victim to catch him in the act. These are extraordinary abilities.

Charmed Exploitation (charm or compulsion effect)
Confusion Exploitation (confused or fascinated)
Fatigue Exploitation (exhausted or fatigued)
Fear Exploitation (frightened, panicked, or shaken)
Nausea Exploitation (nauseated or sickened)
Pain Exploitation (bleed or pain effect)
Prone Exploitation (prone)
Restraint Exploitation (entangled, grappled, or pinned)
Sensory Exploitation (blinded, dazzled, or deafened)
Shock Exploitation (dazed, staggered, or stunned)
Elemental Exploitation
Ooze Exploitation
Spellcasting Exploitation
Withdrawing Exploitation


...

other ideas? comments


i love your design philosophy, and it's results.

especially tying each to a skill, then giving +X to that skill, X=number of feats in chain. nice touch.

i agree that you should call these 'techniques' and not 'style' - monks already have 'style' as Seranov said.

i feel Sabre Technique needs another prereq (Combat Reflexes?) and a 5th feat (BAB 9) - it feels incomplete as is. maybe an ability that builds off the parry? like, if you succeed at a parry, you may burn another AoO to make an Acro check redirect the attack to another foe who is currently flanking you too (or would be if you have IUD), resolving that attack against flat AC - call it Friendly Fire or something.

keep it up. and you should consider a google doc, so i can direct my players there too.

cheers


bookrat,
at 15th level, light amor will be 3/-, medium 4/-, heavy 5/-.

and yes i think i will make Armor Mastery simply be 'armor training V' (so, DR 4/-, 5/-, and 6/- respectively), and add a clause that using a buckler/shield/tower increases this by +1/2/3 respectively, and possibly a second clause that if used in conjunction with Combat Expertise, a fighter may add his expertise bonus to his DR in lieu of a dodge bonus.

what do you think of the two clauses?

as for Armor Master archetype, as he replaces Weapon Training and Armor Mastery, we can just let the DR stack, starting him with DR 1/3/5 at 5th level (as opposed to 0/1/2), growing to DR 4/6/8 by 15th level (as opposed to 3/4/5), and culminating in DR 4/8/12 per the archetype at 19th, plus we'll let him add DR +1/2/3 for buckler/shield/tower as a bonus at 19th too. eh?

i shy away from a raw dodge/enhancement/armor bonus increase because i am okay with the fact that the ability gives out some things for free (DR, ACP reduction) and others as a return on investment (Max Dex). to me, the added DR tips the ability in the right direction, and pouring on free bonuses crosses my threshold. besides, the Elusive feature of the Free Hand Fighter does this.

...

and so:

Armor Training (version 2):

Spoiler:

Starting at 3rd level, a fighter learns to be more maneuverable while wearing armor. Whenever he is wearing armor, he reduces the armor check penalty by 1 (to a minimum of 0), increases the maximum Dexterity bonus allowed by 1, and boasts 1 point of typeless damage reduction (DR 1/-). Every four levels thereafter, these bonuses increase by one step, until 19th level the fighter enjoys a 5-point reduction in ACP, a +5 increase to Max Dex, and DR 5/-. In all cases, damage reduction provided by this ability is lowered by 1 (minimum of 0) for light armor, and raised by 1 (maximum 6) for heavy armor. Damage reduction from special armor materials (such as adamantine) stacks with that granted by this ability.
Finally, a 3rd level fighter can move at his normal speed while wearing medium armor, and at 7th level can move at his normal speed while wearing heavy armor.

Armor Mastery (Ex):
At 19th level, the fighter’s armor training ability advances another step (to +5), and he gains additional typless damage reduction when using a shield. This comes to DR 1/- for using a buckler, DR 2/- for using a regular shield, or DR 3/- for using a tower shield. This DR stacks with armor training.
Finally, a fighter using Combat Expertise may forfeit the AC bonus to instead apply his expertise bonus as additional typeless damage reduction. This DR also stacks with armor training.


ever wonder why the barbarian gets damage reduction, naked, where the fighter, fully armored, doesn't?

this patch fixes that, as moderately as possible, as linearly as possible, while still retaining a qualitative difference between light/medium/heavy armors, so a fighter doesn't have to keep a high DX to benefit from this feature.

Armor Training (modified):

Spoiler:

Starting at 3rd level, a fighter learns to be more maneuverable while wearing armor. Whenever he is wearing armor, he reduces the armor check penalty by 1 (to a minimum of 0), increases the maximum Dexterity bonus allowed by his armor by 1, and boasts 1 point of typeless damage reduction (DR 1/-). The damage reduction is decreased by 1 for light armor (minimum 0), and increased by 1 for heavy armor. Every four levels thereafter (7th, 11th, and 15th), these bonuses increase by +1 each time, to a maximum –4 reduction of the armor check penalty, +4 increase of the maximum Dexterity bonus, and DR 5/-.
In addition, a fighter can also move at his normal speed while wearing medium armor. At 7th level, a fighter can move at his normal speed while wearing heavy armor.

...

Armor Mastery
At 19th level, a fighter’s damage reduction while wearing armor or using a shield increases; to DR 5/- for wearing light armor and/or while using a buckler, to DR 10/- for wearing medium armor and/or while using a regular shield, or to DR 15/- for wearing heavy armor and/or using a tower shield. DR gained from this ability overrides DR gained from armor training.

...
cheers

1 to 50 of 996 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2014 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.