Agathion, Cetaceal

not2fear's page

Organized Play Member. 29 posts (75 including aliases). No reviews. No lists. No wishlists. 43 Organized Play characters. 1 alias.


Lantern Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Table #26 is passing their aid token to table #2. Have fun, GmLithrac!

Lantern Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

How do I participate via PBF?

Lantern Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.

Please reconsider making ITS a mandatory requirement. I would like to think that most PFS players keep track of their inventory in some fashion already. Imposing an additional obligation to maintain an additional ITS (or multiple ITSs) for each PC is an added obligation on each player.

I can appreciate that some players do not keep track of their inventory in a fashion which is clearly and easily audited, and the new ITS requirement is aimed at these folks. But why impose an additional requirement on all the other folks who already maintain healthy records?

Would a requirement in the Guide to have "all players maintain clear and organised inventory records in a manner which is easily audited" suffice?

Some have commented that it doesn't take very much time to fill out an ITS "X minutes for a level Y PC" etc. But this is an ongoing mandatory requirement per PC, per scenario/module. All that additional time adds up to hours, and to save, what? 4 minutes during an audit that may not happen all?

Please ask yourself these questions before making the ITS requirement "live"

How does this additional ITS requirement make the game more fun?

And why does the solution for what should be a little problem lead to increasing the workload on ALL the players?

Is PFS about having fun or filling out forms forms and more forms? If not, why add one more now?