Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Runelord Alderpesh

nighttree's page

2,150 posts. Alias of Marian Reinholtz.


RSS

1 to 50 of 2,150 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

So what's the story on the Runegaurd ?
What do they do and why do they do it ?


Not sure we are saying the same thing.....I don't actually see a big disconnect between a LN character and a NG deity....are they the same ?.....no.....but it's not the same level of disconnect at between a LG dity and a CE deity.....


Claxon wrote:

As a GM I definitely enforce that a character needs to be within 1 alignment step of a deity to gain mechanical benefit from them.

However, ultimately this is up to each individual GM. To me it doesn't make sense to worship a deity more than 1 alignment step from you, they would be to unaligned with your own interests.

For instance, a LG deity could have LE worshipers and vice versa. It doesn't make much sense.

Which is what I found strange....and why I asked the question. Granted, I can certainly see a LN character worshiping a NG being without any real conflict.....at the same time....a LG deity and a CE character....seems like a bit of a stretch.


vhok wrote:

in normal pathfinder there is no req to be within 1 step. however with that feat it leads into 3 prestige classes that all req you to be within 1 step.

only clerics are req to be within 1 step of their god. if it doesn't say it's required then it's not.

The specific character concept I'm looking at would be a LN wizard...who worshiped Soralyon (NG).....if we had an obedience for Lissala I would just go that route :P


I'm not seeing any specific requirement for alignment in regards to this feat. Is that correct ? or have I missed something ?


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Andrew Mullen wrote:
nighttree wrote:
nighttree wrote:

Anyone dug into the Runeguard PrC yet ?

Also curious about the "New Thasillonian Magic" feat :P
.....someone ?.....anyone ?......:(
Not particularly my cup of tea, unfortunately!** spoiler omitted **

MANy thanks ;)


nighttree wrote:

Anyone dug into the Runeguard PrC yet ?

Also curious about the "New Thasillonian Magic" feat :P

.....someone ?.....anyone ?......:(


Anyone dug into the Runeguard PrC yet ?
Also curious about the "New Thasillonian Magic" feat :P


Can we get a few more details on the Rune guard, and the New Thassilonian Magic feat ???


Skeld, PDF Prophet wrote:
jedi8187 wrote:

What are the requirements for feysworn

** spoiler omitted **

Dragon78 wrote:
What kind of fey like abilities does the prestige class grant?

** spoiler omitted **

-Skeld

First speech ??? That's new....

The class abilities sound much better than I was expecting as well ;)


Is the Feysworn PrC meant for worshipers of the Eldest ? or is it just a PrC that makes you more fey like ?


Skeld, PDF Prophet wrote:
nighttree wrote:
Oh I'm giggling like a school girl.....Skeld, you probably have not had time to get into the meat of it yet....but if you run across anything that discusses how people become "one of the many" I would LOVE a clue...or two....:P

I can't find a reference to "one of the many" (except a sentence pertaining to staircases). can you give me a better idea what you're looking for?

-Skeld

Shyka is actually multiple beings.....and it's been suggested that mortals are absorbed into Shyka "the many"....


Skeld, PDF Prophet wrote:
nighttree wrote:
Do we in fact get illustrations of the Eldest ???

Oh, yes, we do!

nighttree wrote:
ANd any info on Shykas obediences ?

** spoiler omitted **

-Skeld

Oh I'm giggling like a school girl.....Skeld, you probably have not had time to get into the meat of it yet....but if you run across anything that discusses how people become "one of the many" I would LOVE a clue...or two....:P


Do we in fact get illustrations of the Eldest ???

ANd any info on Shykas obediences ?


I really hope this touches on the Ulfen children traded to the Fey of Frost's End that are mentioned way back 0.O


....Ya....I'm more interested in the Darkfolk and Caligni than anything.....


What I would want is something like "Spellfire"....raw magical energy, and the defensive ability would be spell resistance, that if it's not overcome, gives you an increased effective burn (without the HP hit)..


I rather enjoy archetypes myself....not so much PrC....

I'm still hoping against hope for a Primal magic element for Kineticist :P


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Paladinosaur wrote:
Tectorman wrote:
Mark Moreland wrote:
Until then, let us know how you want them to look, I guess.
Bestiary 3 version. For non-Eade examples, I think the rebooted Thundercats version should serve as a set of decent examples of a variety of male and female catfolk.
Well if you're gonna go with the more human look, I like the Worens from the Breath of Fire games

WAY to anima for my tastes.....honestly I have yet to see a version I actually like. "Dark Natasha" style would be more my thing.....


So not really specifically interested in any of the races this book is focused on....how many of the mechanics options (Feats, spells, etc...) are actually usable by other races ???


Are the Shapechange feats usable by non-Kitsune who have the chapechanger subtype ? Or just specifically Kitsune ?


Ya...I wish they would have the pawns ready as the AP started....


Norn....just sayin.....


.....Paladine is a no brainer......wonder what the other one is ???


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Marco Massoudi wrote:
Moved to december, like i said.

Ah....bugger


My moneys on an official "Phantom" type......


Marco Massoudi wrote:


I also like the original art better.

The new one looks like a Horned Devil a lot.

I somehow seem to have missed the original art :(

Where is it to be found ?


Dragon78 wrote:

We will just have to wait and see how their version of the Wild Hunt will be like.

I agree, there are few categories of fey, well other then gremlins I can't think of any. I have always felt that pixies, nixies, grigs, atomies, brownies, etc. should have been classified as types of sprites.

Traditionally....there is not a "hard" distinction between the good folk, Spirits of the dead, Land spirits...... etc


Dragon78 wrote:
Currently, no real info about the Wild Hunt.

The Wild Hunt is more a seasonal "event" than a creature....but given it's placement in a bestiary....it's safe to assume they are doing something very different......


I have enough interest for at least ten people :P


Thomas Seitz wrote:

I'm all for Boneyard/Purgatory Dragon.

Nighttree,

I think we've run out of Tane...

I thought only two had been done so far ???


1 person marked this as a favorite.

....what about Tane ?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

And more stuff for Caligni !


Kalindlara wrote:
nighttree wrote:

......so.....that's a no on Groetus stuff ?

The only mention of Groetus is the Truth apocrypha subdomain. ^_^

So what's the Domain like ?....PLEASE....


James Jacobs wrote:
Insane KillMaster wrote:
Can't we just wishlist which Iconic we want to see get eaten on the cover?

We don't put iconics on the covers of Bestiaries. And in any event, the cover was ordered months ago so it's already well in progress.

The sketch is DELIGHTFUL.

Wayne ?....please tell me it's Wayne doing the cover ???


......so.....that's a no on Groetus stuff ?


Dragon78 wrote:
I can't wait to see the finalized cover.

I hope Wayne did the cover :P


Anything fun in here for followers of Groetus ?


Woodenman wrote:

When I saw this thread had 40 new posts for me to read, I rejoiced. I figured that there must be in depth discussion on the new planes of power kineticist archetype.

But no....

.....Ditto......


CBDunkerson wrote:
Cwethan wrote:
Anyone have any tidbits on what an Elemental Purist gives up?
Answered here... and here.

So still trying to wrap my head around this....so at 7th you can take infusions and forms not usually associated with your element ( 1 for every four levels) ?

But you need to enter a specific state to use them ?
What are the constraints on entering that state ?


In folklore Hag's are numbered among them ;)


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Dragon78 wrote:
Well technically it is how some of them look in Pathfinder and in modern society in general;)

I prefer it when they look to older folklore, which Pathfinder has actually been pretty good about ;)


Thomas Seitz wrote:
I imagine there will be wings involved...

God's I hope not....that "image" is the thing that bug's me the most...making fey all "winged and glittery"....that's not how the good folk look.....:P


Feats ?


I'm doing a Psychic with the Abomination discipline....


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Thomas Seitz wrote:
I had issues with Firbolg myself, but otherwise yes they are solid books. :)

As a Gaelic Polytheist.....I tend to have some issue with all the fey creatures, as well as the Druid and Bard class....but when all is said and done....this is not about "authentic representation" of different ethnic mythos....it's a role playing game. So you have to give some "wiggle room" to pop culture representations :P


1 person marked this as a favorite.

This version of Pact Wizard works perfect for a concept I have been wanting to do for some time ;)


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Thomas Seitz wrote:
I'm hoping for some updated devils from back in Council of Thieves. I mean we already got Nemesis Devil. Where's Cabal Devil or Chort? How about Firebreather devil?

I'm a BIG fan of the Cabal devils....wish they were not so under represented. Would also like to see them tweaked a bit given all the mechanics that have been released since.....some hex's would be interesting....also the art for them could be better :P


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Benchak the Nightstalker wrote:
nighttree wrote:
Dragon78 wrote:
I hope the Yaddithian will be an aberration, it would be nice to have at least one aberration 0HD race.

Agreed.....just not impressed with the existing visual. I hope they are far more "human" looking.....

I go the other way on this one. I think the game has more than enough "human-but-not-quite" races, I'd much rather see a full on inhuman weirdo. I really dug that picture (with its weird toothy snout and funny legs!)

The more I think on it, it's just that I think that character looks like something from a muppets show. I don't mind them looking alien...I just don't like them looking goofy :P


Dragon78 wrote:
I hope the Yaddithian will be an aberration, it would be nice to have at least one aberration 0HD race.

Agreed.....just not impressed with the existing visual. I hope they are far more "human" looking.....

1 to 50 of 2,150 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2016 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.