|Paizo Pathfinder® Paizo Games|
|About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ|
Philippe Lam wrote:
On the other hand, why should developers handle it instead of fans is for me very simple : fans are biased when a throurought neutral check should be needed. Those who made the rules are those who are better placed to change it because they have the two sides of the problem, not only one.
Lets be realistic here. The devs play too. Thus, they are fans. How "neutral" can they be?
Some GMs allow things that modify the same class feature, but not the same part of the same class feature to be ok. Hence the yellow.
The bottom part is just data. I can move it around to where it needs to go.
You are working on Investigator, right? I'll make one up as soon as I can. Everything up to alignment should be the same for all classes anyway.
I've not figured out how to color the whole line yet. I've got the individual conflicts highlighted though. Take a look see.
Near as I can tell, if I am going to color the entire line, I'll have to have a conditional formatting entry for each column from G to AV. That will likely slow the sheet to unusable once done.
Edit: It indeed gets very slow. I tested the alchemist tab until from column H to N doing full row with just one of the two colors, and it was scary slow.
Heather 540 wrote:
This seems like it would really be helpful. The chart the link takes you to doesn't have any hybrid classes. Do you think you could do Hunter and Swashbuckler archetypes?
I only did Alchemist because A. I'm working on one, and B. I was gauging interest. I plan on doing all PF, SoP, SoM, Psionics, and PoW. Any others would be included if someone else does them. I'll do the spreadsheet work.
Ancient Dragon Master: I'd love the help and good suggestion about graying out. I'll play with it on the alchemist sheet tonight.
Note that I have 84 classes on my list right now. Wow. At least I'll know all the Archetypes when I'm done.
The top couple are archetypes you're interested in. The bottom block are all the archetypes. Filtering doesn't seem to be preserved between users, unfortunately.
The purpose is so you can list the archetypes you want at the top, then use filters to select ones below that to that are still compatible. An update with some automation for [PF] Archetype Combos: Doing all the work b/c reading charts is bloody annoying
Also with 3PP support.
You will need to make a copy and setup your own filters before filters will work.
I'm working on it. Thoughts before I start working on the other classes?
Yes, I know some of the d20pfsrd links don't work. Please comment on them when you find them so I can see what gives.
Also, comment on any mistakes I've made on the Alchemist.
In Swashbuckler, Knife Tosser could use a link on the left.
Also, how does it qualify for Ricochet Toss?
Swashbuckler Weapon Training (Ex): At 5th level, a swashbuckler gains a +1 bonus on attack and damage rolls with one-handed or light piercing melee weapons. While wielding such a weapon, she gains the benefit of the Improved Critical feat. These attack and damage bonuses increase by 1 for every 4 levels beyond 5th level (to a maximum of +4 at 17th level).
Ricochet Toss@ArchiveofNethys wrote:
Prerequisites: Quick Draw, base attack bonus +6, weapon training class feature with a ranged weapon.
I emphasized the possible problems.
Boomerang Nebula wrote:
They were stunned for a moment, then "That's f-ing awesome!"
Emphasis mine. RD's math checks out.
Which book changed that?
Nutcase Entertainment wrote:
Just don't use the tables with authority. There are mistakes, and missing archetypes.
N. Jolly wrote:
While I'd love to get back to guide writing at some point, I have at least 3 projects on which I'm working now as well as other obligations. I'm at the point where I should be trying to pass these guides off to others who will be able to maintain them better than I am.
Working so much, you don't even know how many projects you're on. Make sure you take some time for you.
Is there anyway we can suggest things to your guides, an if so, how?
I'll be honest, I'm a little turned on right now. heh. (I'm playing a human life oracle of Milani in Kingmaker right now). It would take a huge amount of retraining to get there. I do, however, have an undecided feat next level...
Anyway, those 10 bonus feats, let me see if I can track them down. Craft Wondrous Item is from the Spirit Guide Hex, Tails are easy enough as they replace mystery spells, and Exotic Weapon Proficiency is from Kitsune Favored Class?
Emphasis mine. (Your username demanded correction. heh)
You are not aware of any traps on the <thing>.
Clockwork Familiar (Ex) wrote:
I'd say no to most archetypes due to my emphasis. Emissary and Sage would be ok.
Victor Ravenport wrote:
Merely speculation, but from what I've heard it's not a proper shapeshifter, though it's pretty close. Go look at the Ultimate Wilderness product discussion.
Don't forget special materials!
That's my plan for my next feat as my Dual Cursed Oracle. Quicken Ill-Omen followed by one of Waves of Ecstasy, Chains of Light (favorite as they can't take actions until they beat the save), Greater Forbid Action, Serenity, Debilitating Portent, Charitable Impulse, or Reach Bestow Curse.
It occurs to me that I need some non-will save attack spells.
bitter lily wrote:
NOOOO, everything in PF rounds down. (Except anything where lower is better.) The hit should become the lower one, IMHO, unless the fraction is truly small. Yes, it penalizes multiclassing, which I suppose reflects a bias of mine. But you're ignoring it!
Why I rounded instead of rounded down is the example of Fighter 19 Monk 1. 1d9.9 would be 1d8. If that's the case, there is no point in trying to make this work. I figured 1d8.9 would round down, 1d9 would round up.
bitter lily wrote:
Sorceror 10, Dragon Disciple 9 would be 10d6+9d12. I'm not sure what you intended to type, but let's go with Sorc 10, DD 10, or 10d6+10d12, which averages to 10d9 as you say. It should NOT round up, no, it should be either a d8 & d10 averaged, or a d8. That's a ferocious HD for a caster!
I was calculating something else here. I just missed a spot editing. I was supposed to be Soc10/DD10.
Also, I was trying to avoid averaging dice in play.
bitter lily wrote:
That does simplify things a tad.
I don't think healing needs to be buffed for martials as it kind of messes with the healing economy a bit. However, it does seem reasonable.
I'm more doing this for the healer to give them more resources when dealing with the barbarian with max con and retrained HPs that just loves to dodge into weapons and spells.
My biggest issue is that I don't understand why you want to cap the CL based on the target's HD.
I did that because I'm removing the cap on spells like CLW. CLW no longer caps out at 1d8+5. In other words, CLW can do 1d8+20.
Yes, I know the Life Oracle has a revelation that does that. I planned on giving them double CL to it instead.
The HD cap is not really needed, I suppose.
bitter lily wrote:
Yeah, that's what I mean. It really only matters for lots of multi-classing. Wizard 6 Cleric 3 MT 1 Evanglist 10 is 6d6+3d8+1d6+10d8. The average die size would be 7.3, which would become d8. Sorceror 10, Dragon Disciple 9 would be 10d6+10d20. The average die size would be 9, so round that to 1d10.
I imagine that most things would stay 1d8 (Channel would go up to d8) except the full on martials. It does mean that mass healing effects need to be rolled individually though.
With spells that heal dice, the dice that are rolled are the average HD of the target, rounded to the nearest die. Cure-like spells on a barb would be xd12+x. Fighter 3 Wizard 3 would be xd8+x. Channel is also affected. Cleric 3 channeling would heal the wizard 2d6 and the barb 2d12. Of course, pre-calculate your "healing die" when you level to speed play.
Spells that have a capped caster level, such as heal, etc, cap at either the HD of the target, or the caster level of the caster, whichever is lower. CLW from cleric 10 healing fighter 7 would heal 1d10+7. CLW from cleric 7 on fighter 10 would do the same. Cleric 18 heal cures fighter 7 70 and fighter 20 200.
I don't know about spells that heal a fixed amount *(infernal healing), but I think they might be fine.
Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, Starfinder, the Starfinder logo, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc. The Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Legends, Pathfinder Online, Starfinder Adventure Path, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.