GinoA wrote:kinevon wrote:General content developers simply don't fall in the group I highlighted. BTW, the URL you highlighted is *only* the PFS board, not, say Rules.FLite wrote:
Actually, the GtOP says that you are supposed to respect forum posts from developers.
So yes, you are required to respect semi-stealth errata if you are aware of them.
Can you cite that? All I can find in v7 is:
The Pathfinder Society Community
You may not simply ignore rules clarifications made by the campaign leadership, including the campaign coordinator and campaign developer, at http://paizo.com/paizo/messageboards/paizoPublishing/pathfinder/pathfinderS ociety. GMs are not required to read every post on the messageboards, but GMs familiar with rules clarifications made by the campaign leadership (which have not been superseded by the Guide to Pathfinder Society Organized Play or FAQ) must abide by these clarifications or rulings. If it is a significant clarification, it will be updated in the FAQ, and later in the Guide to Pathfinder Society Organized Play if necessary.
Please excuse me but... I do not understand the last post in this group.
I have no horse in this race - doesn't matter one way or another to me really, but I don't understand what you are trying to say here.
@GinoA: You missed the point of my post, yes?I was asking FLite for the citation for the general, any developer, version.
I was posting the quote from v7 of the Guide verbatim.
That included using bold to match the highlighted portion of the text in the PDF, which includes the link to this section of the Paizo boards.
@nosig: GinoA seems to have missed both what I was asking, which was a citation for general developers, and that I was posting a quote form the Guide verbatim.