gnomewizard's page

Why would they waste money on another brand when their own is doing so well?

Now that you-know-who is preparing for a marketing blitz around 5th edition, I think it's time for Pathfinder 2nd ed. Mostly, I think this would be a good way to capitalize on a larger marketing budget, but I could see some real value coming out of it.

I see Paizo taking a very long look at what's happened to WOTC and saying to themselves.

"Do we really want to fracture our player base the way they did?"

"Are we better off leaving the minority grumbling about a 2nd edition, then spawning our own set of Edition Wars?"

Quite frankly, I don't see a point of a 2nd edition that's mechanically different from the first.

Maybe clarify and repackage the existing ruleset.. But we don't need a 2nd edition... ever.

No

Don't fix what is not broken.

Just no.

No.

Crusader's Flurry feat from Ultimate Combat. Become a cleric first and just use your dip of monk to power flurrying with a scimitar.

Quandary said the same thing, and I was thinking that originally, but it costs four feats to use it effectively. Weapon Finesse, Weapon Focus, Dervish Dancer, Crusader's Flurry. When a monk uses flurry of blows, it’s still like TWF in that you alternate attacks. So I would only be getting one attack with the scimitar when flurrying, and a second when ever I get a second base attack. It would be better to just take the Dervish Dancer feat (I already have weapon finesse) and fore go flurry all together until high enough in monk for it to be worth taken.