Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search
Links
Shop
Recent Reviews

Pathfinder Society Scenario #3-12: Wonders in the Weave—Part I: The Dog Pharaoh's Tomb (PFRPG) PDF
**( )( )( ) by Azothath

Way of the Samurai (PFRPG) PDF
***** by Endzeitgeist

Scions of Evil (PFRPG) PDF
***** by Endzeitgeist

Book of Friends and Foes: Assassins in the River Nations (PFRPG) PDF
***( )( ) by Endzeitgeist

Power Word Spells: Lore of the First Language (PFRPG) PDF
***** by Endzeitgeist

   RSS Posts    RSS Reviews    RSS Wishlists
Barl Breakbones

gig-gilf's page

21 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.



I thought Pathfinder was going to be a role-players dream – it turns out, I was wrong.

OK, it’s now very clear/obvious that the P-RPG will be catering to Powergamers, Minmaxers, Rules Lawyers, and WoW fanatics.

hell, I play WoW too- (So my problem is not with WoW - I love the game!)

But WoW is not D&D – it’s a video game.

D&D is a role-playing game.

Stop trying to mix the two –

If I want to play WoW, I can turn on my computer, and have a blast powering-up and destroying everything in my field of view.

If I want to play D&D, I’ll invite some friends over to hang out, have fun, laugh, and *role-play* (not see who can build the most powerful character, min-max everything, or argue over rules).

I’m all for over-powering through *supplemental* books, but when you make the *core* book overpowered you give the DM no choice but to run a power focused game.
Any player (whether a powergamer or not) in his right mind is not going to like all those pretty little power-ups, just house ruled away from him.

When the power ups are in *supplemental* form, you can just not allow that book --- “core book only” – The DM will get *much* less flack.


Are we going to see more Male character iconics?
To me the ratio is still WAY-WAY off.

I know the whole general magazine marketing drill - women on the cover of magazines sell more than men on the cover of magazines, yatta,yatta,yatta.
Putting hot chicks on the cover of magazines to sell more magazines is a marketing strategy and I don’t really (in general) have a problem with that.
If that’s why the skewed representation (4 women/3 men) - just let me know and I can deal with that.

If not;
I would just like a “realistic” representation of an adventuring party and a proper representation of pre-generated characters (the icons are used as pre-gen characters for all GameMastery modules).

D&D groups (D&D players in whole) are at best - 80% male and 20% female.
I would imagine if “D&D adventuring” were real; the ratio of adventures would also be at best 80% male and 20% female.

Please… I am just asking the folks at Paizo (or the powers-that-be, who decided on the 4 women/3 men distribution of iconics) on this one.
I’m really not interested in other posters using this post to flame/troll/debate how adventuring parties should/could/would exist with 90% women ----- This one is just common sense

BTW Paizo - the way the current women iconics are portrayed in the artwork so far is great!! (real adventuring clothes & gear- no chainmail bikinis).

I’d just like a proper representation/ratio.

Thanks for listening,

GG



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online,PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.